À propos de cet article

Citez

Introduction

With a camel population of about 280,000, China has an abundance of the Camelus bactrianus species and ranks second in the world for head of these ungulates. The Tianshan Mountains pastoral area in Xinjiang, China is a major distribution region of camels, owing to its vast grasslands particularly suitable for extensive animal breeding, and accounts for about 20% of the total camels in the country. As the “ship of the desert”, the camel is an important transportation tool in the Tianshan Mountains pastoral area, and besides this it also has high nutritional value. Furthermore, camel milk has health protection effects (2, 11, 22, 25), and camel hair can be used as an important textile material. Accordingly, the camel breeding industry has become a cornerstone of the local economy for herders.

Gastrointestinal parasites are one of the most common pathogens, and can not only lead to nutritional and immune inadequacy as well as stunted growth and delayed development (4, 5, 6, 7, 823), but also have adverse effects on the quality of camel meat and milk (18, 21).

These consequences of parasitical infection are potential threats to food safety and the health of the majority of herders (1, 9, 12, 13, 27, 28). In recent years, with the rapid development of the Chinese camel breeding industry in the Tianshan Mountains pastoral area, the number of animals has reached more than 40,000. Nevertheless, due to the fact that this region’s camels are mainly fed by grassland grazing and due to the weak veterinary epidemic prevention and control measures, they are often infected by a variety of gastrointestinal tract parasites, which causes serious financial losses. However, the species and infection intensity of gastrointestinal tract parasites in camels in this region are still unknown.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the species and infection intensity as well as to identify the dominant parasites infecting the gastrointestinal tract of camels in the studied area, which will provide useful epidemiological data for preventing and controlling the parasitic diseases of camels.

Material and Methods

With a camel population of about 280,000, China has an abundance of the Camelus bactrianus species and ranks second in the world for head of these ungulates. The Tianshan Mountains pastoral area in Xinjiang, China is a major distribution region of camels, owing to its vast grasslands particularly suitable for extensive animal breeding, and accounts for about 20% of the total camels in the country. As the “ship of the desert”, the camel is an important transportation tool in the Tianshan Mountains pastoral area, and besides this it also has high nutritional value. Furthermore, camel milk has health protection effects (2, 11, 22, 25), and camel hair can be used as an important textile material. Accordingly, the camel breeding industry has become a cornerstone of the local economy for herders.

Gastrointestinal parasites are one of the most common pathogens, and can not only lead to nutritional and immune inadequacy as well as stunted growth and delayed development (4, 5, 6, 7, 823), but also have adverse effects on the quality of camel meat and milk (18, 21). These consequences of parasitical infection are potential threats to food safety and the health of the majority of herders (1, 9, 12, 13, 27, 28). In recent years, with the rapid development of the Chinese camel breeding industry in the Tianshan Mountains pastoral area, the number of animals has reached more than 40,000. Nevertheless, due to the fact that this region’s camels are mainly fed by grassland grazing and due to the weak veterinary epidemic prevention and control measures, they are often infected by a variety of gastrointestinal tract parasites, which causes serious financial losses. However, the species and infection intensity of gastrointestinal tract parasites in camels in this region are still unknown.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the species and infection intensity as well as to identify the dominant parasites infecting the gastrointestinal tract of camels in the studied area, which will provide useful epidemiological data for preventing and controlling the parasitic diseases of camels.

Results

Overview of the surveyed area’s climate and vegetation. The Tianshan Mountains pastoral area in Xinjiang has a temperate continental arid and semi-arid climate. The average annual temperature in northern Xinjiang is 4–9°C. Its annual precipitation is above 150–200 mm and its annual frost-free period is 140–185 days. Considering the southern region, the average annual temperature is 7–14°C. Its annual precipitation is 25–100 mm, and its annual frost-free period is 180–220 days. The Tianshan grassland has abundant water sources and a wide variety of pastures; different regions: the high mountain areas are mainly covered with Artemisia and Cyperaceae and partly with miscellaneous grasses, the forest grass lands are mainly covered with leguminous plants and weedy grasses and the low mountainous areas are mainly covered with Bromus pauciflorus, Achnatherum sibiricum, Artemisia, Astragalus, and other grasses.

Collection of camel faeces. During the period of 2016–2018, a total of 362 fresh faecal samples were collected from camels (Camelus bactrianus) in the Tianshan pastoral area of Xinjiang, China. Among them, 106 were from camels younger than two years, 139 were collected from camels aged between two and six years, and 117 were collected from older camels. These fresh faecal samples were collected from the rectum and sealed in 50 mL plastic bottles, stored at 4°C, and sent to the Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Prevention and Control. During the collection period, information on clinical manifestations in the camels and deworming records were also collected from local veterinarians or those tending the grazing animals.

Morphological examination and identification of parasite eggs in camel faeces. Eggs were first examined using the saturated saline floating method. In brief, 10 g of fresh faecal samples were crushed with a glass rod and washed 10 times with saturated saline solution. Then, the mixture was filtered with a 50-mesh copper sieve and collected in a 100 mL conical beaker. After clarification for 20 min, a wire ring with a diameter of 10 mm was used to collect the film from the surface of the liquid by parallel contact with the liquid surface and release of the ring’s contents onto a glass slide. Simultaneously, parasite eggs in faeces were also collected by the natural sedimentation method. The shape and colour of the parasite eggs were observed and examined under the microscope, and the short and long diameters of the eggs were measured and photographed. The morphological characteristics of each egg were used to identify the parasites according to Georgis’ Parasitology for Veterinarians (3), Veterinary Clinical Parasitology (26), and Veterinary Parasitology (23).

Molecular detection and identification of parasite eggs in faeces. Nematode eggs with similar morphological structure were identified molecularly. Briefly, the eggs collected from the faeces were processed with a grinder and DNA was extracted using the MiniBEST Universal Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, Japan). Using the extracted DNA as a template, PCR amplification was performed with specific primers (Table 1) targeting a nematode ribosomal DNA sequence which harbours 18S ribosomal RNA, internal transcribed spacer 1 and 5.8S ribosomal RNA. The reaction conditions were as follows: pre-denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, denaturation at 94°C for 50 s, annealing at 50°C for 45 s, and extension at 72°C for 30–70 s in 35 cycles. The PCR products were analysed by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel. Then they were recovered with the MiniBEST Agarose Gel DNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, Japan) and sent to Shanghai Bioengineering Technology Co. Ltd. (Sangon, China) for sequencing. Each sample was sequenced three times. Sequence homology was evaluated in GenBank with Blast N software, and the species of the eggs were identified according to the homology found.

Primers used in the study

PrimerNucleotide sequence (5′ to 3′)Target geneSize of amplified product (bp)
FP1AGGTATCTGTAGGTGAACCTGCRibosomal ITS1 of Haemonchus contortus810
RP1ATACAAATGATAAAAGAACATC
FP2GAGAGGACTGCGGACTGCTGTARibosomal ITS1 of Trichostrongylus spp.240
RP2CTCACACACAGAGCTCTAACGG
FR3CTGCGGAAGGATCATTGTCGAARibosomal ITS1 of Chabertia ovina475
RP3ACTCTAAGCGTCTGCAATTCGT
FR4TGTACACACCGCCCGTCGCTGTRibosomal ITS1 of Ostertagia spp.475
RP4TGACAACCAGGTACCGTACACA
FR5GGACTGCGGACTGCTGTATCGARibosomal ITS1 of Bunostomum spp.475
RP5TGTTAAACGTAAAAAATTGGTT

Determination of parasitic infection intensity in faeces. Infection intensity was determined using Stoll’s dilution method. Briefly, a small conical beaker was marked at the capacity of 56 mL and 60 mL, and 4% NaOH solution were added to the 56 mL mark. Then, about 4 g of chopped faeces were added slowly until the liquid level reached the 60 mL mark. Next, more than 10 glass beads were added and the solution was shaken to make a fine and uniform faecal suspension. A 200 μL volume of solution was collected on a glass slide, and covered with a rectangle of glass of not less than 22 mm × 40 mm. Finally, the total egg numbers were counted under a microscope. The number multiplied by 100 is the number of eggs per gram of faeces (EPG).

Statistical analysis of data. All data were analysed using SPSS 18 software (IBM SPSS, USA). The continuous variables were compared using an F-test. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). A P value less than 0.05 was considered significantly different, while a P value less than 0.01 was considered extremely significantly different.

All of the 362 camels were infected with different species of parasite, as detected in their faeces. Based on the morphological (Fig.1) and molecular examinations (Fig. 2), a total of 15 species of parasites eggs were detected and identified in the gastrointestinal tracts of the camels (Table 2), including those of nine species of nematode, three species of trematode, two species of tapeworm, and one species of coccidia.

Fig. 1

Morphological characteristics of eggs of different parasitic worms in the faeces of camels in the Tianshan Mountains pastoral area

A – Nematodirus spp.; B – Marshallagia spp.; C – Fasciola hepatica; D – Chabertia ovina; E – Bunostomum spp.; F – Moniezia expansa; G – Haemonchus contortus; H – Trichostrongylus spp.; I – Ostertagia spp.; J – Trichuris spp.; K – Strongyloides papillosus; L – Dicrocoelium spp.; M – Eimeria spp.; N – Thysaniezia ovilla; O – Hasstilesia ovis

Fig. 2

Molecular detection of nematode eggs with similar morphological structure in camel faeces

M – DNA maker DL1000 (1000, 700, 500, 400, 300, 200, 100 bp); Lanes 1, 4, 5, 6, and 10 – negative results; Lane 2 – Haemonchus contortus; Lane 3 – Trichostrongylus spp.; Lane 7 – Chabertia ovina; Lane 8 – Ostertagia spp.; Lane 9 – Bunostomum spp.

Summary statistics of gastrointestinal parasites in camels in the Tianshan Mountains pastoral area

Parasite speciesInfection rate (%)Mean EPGLength of egg (μm)Width of egg (μm)
Ostertagia spp.100 (362/362)298 ± 57.171.25 ± 9.1236.44 ± 4.57
Trichostrongylus spp.98.1 (355/362)105 ± 36.282.24 ± 10.8339.63 ± 3.53
Haemonchus contortus88.1 (319/362)176 ± 62.575.65 ± 5.7846.35 ± 7.88
Nematodirus spp.87.3 (316/362)138 ± 41.8241.36 ± 23.14111.93 ± 18.51
Marshallagia spp.80.4 (291/362)129 ± 38.7182.89 ± 11.9081.56 ± 7.42
Trichuris spp.77.3 (281/362)93 ± 22.975.42 ± 6.5735.27 ± 3.46
Chabertia ovina18.2 (66/362)71 ± 10.489.24 ± 8.3352.26 ± 5.72
Bunostomum spp.9.9 (36/362)45 ± 14.888.67 ± 7.9148.22 ± 2.35
Strongyloides papillosus33.1 (120/362)113 ± 8.751.78 ± 8.7530.58 ± 5.67
Thysaniezia ovilla60.8 (220/362)126 ± 29.425.18 ± 3.1522.34 ± 2.78
Moniezia expansa42.3 (153/362)103 ± 41.163.13 ± 4.3246.86 ± 5.31
Dicrocoelium spp.62.4 (226/362)82 ± 6.839.19 ± 4.7431.25 ± 3.16
Fasciola hepatica24.6 (89/362)20 ± 13.5140.55 ± 7.6884.54 ± 8.12
Hasstilesia ovis91.7(332/362)56 ± 17.530.12 ± 3.8118.32 ± 1.72
Eimeria spp.73.5 (266/362)94 ± 16.234.18 ± 2.3222.17 ± 1.72

Among the 15 species of parasite, the particularly highly infective ones were Ostertagia spp. (100%, 362/362), Trichostrongylus spp. (98.1%, 355/362), Haemonchus contortus (88.1%, 319/362), and Nematodirus spp. (87.3%, 316/362), their prevalences qualifying Ostertagia spp. and Trichostrongylus spp. as dominant species of infecting parasites (Table 2).

All the investigated camels were co-infected with 5–14 different species of parasites (Fig. 3). The number of cases of simultaneous infection with nine species of parasites was the highest, accounting for 23.8% (86/362), followed in turn by cases of infection with 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, and 13 different species of parasites, accounting for 6.1% (22/362), 5.0% (18/362), 9.9% (36/362), 9.9% (36/362), 20.7% (75/362), 9.7% (35/362), 6.9% (25/362), and 5.8% (21/362), respectively, while the number of 14-species infections was the lowest, accounting for 2.2% (8/362) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Mixed infection with different species of gastrointestinal parasite in camels in the Tianshan Mountains pastoral area

The average number of infectious parasite species in young camels was significantly lower than that in adult ones, but the mean intensity of parasitic infection in this age group shown as EPG of faeces was significantly higher (P < 0.05). The infection intensity in juvenile camels was between that in young and adult animals (Table 3), indicating that parasitic infection has a certain correlation with host age. However, there was no significant difference in the average number of infecting parasite species and infection intensity between male and female camels (P > 0.05), indicating no correlation between parasitic infection and gender.

Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in camels in the Tianshan Mountains pastoral area

Potential propensity factorNumber of examined camelsMean number of parasite species in co-infectionMean EPG
Young camels (>2 years)1066 ± 1.6a1046 ± 87.2a
AgeSub-adult camels (2–6 years)1397 ± 1.8a779 ± 39.6a
Adult camels (>6 years)11711 ± 1.5b462 ± 40.7b
SexMale Female206 1569 ± 1.2a 10 ± 1.9a901 ± 85.5a 1027 ± 101.2a

Different letters in same column mean significant difference (P < 0.05)

Discussion

Parasitic disease is a disease that seriously endangers the development of the camel industry (18, 20, 22, 24) and that not only impedes the growth and development of camels (14, 17, 19), but is also one of the important reasons for the peak in camel deaths in the spring, resulting in great economic losses (15, 16, 21). What is more, many zoonotic parasites (1, 9, 10, 12, 13, 28) could contaminate camel milk (18) and meat, posing potential threats to food safety and the health of the majority of herders (9, 21, 22). The documents on camel parasitic diseases in Iran showed that 48 helminth species were detected in the digestive system (21). Therefore, the investigation of the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in camels in the Tianshan pastoral area is of great significance for improving the economic output of the camel industry and preventing the spread of parasitic zoonosis.

Many studies reported that the helminth is particularly rich in the digestive tract of camelids, which is more than 40 species (17, 21). Among them, Trichostrongylus spp. and Haemonchus contortus are the most common species (21). In our study, we systematically investigated the infection status of camel gastrointestinal parasites in the Tianshan Mountains pastoral area. A total of 15 species of camel gastrointestinal parasite were identified, including 9 species of nematodes, 3 species of tapeworm, 2 species of trematode, and 1 species of coccidian. All camels suffered from mixed infections of 5–14 parasite species. Among them, Ostertagia spp. and Trichostrongylus spp. were the dominant species. The average number of infected parasites in young camels was significantly lower than in adult camels, but the young camel EPG was significantly higher than that of adult camels, which may be related to the weak immune system and incomplete establishment of parasite immunity in juvenile camels. Our epidemiological surveys also suggested that irregular deworming and being grazed and housed together with cattle and sheep were partially responsible for high prevalence of parasites in camels.

In addition, this survey also showed that mixed parasitic infections were very common in camels, which was consistent with the clinical manifestations (diarrhoea, hair loss, reproductive rate decline, and high mortality) of the camel population under investigation. We found that the pathogenicity of a parasite was related to the level of infection, while characteristics of individual species seemed to play a lesser role in pathogenicity. This survey also found a large number of eggs of nematodes in the Ostertagia, Trichostrongylidae, Haemonchus, and Bunostomum genera. These eggs were difficult to distinguish and identify at the level of species, and so they were further subjected to molecular identification.

To our knowledge, this was the first systematic survey on the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in C. bactrianus in the Tianshan Mountains pastoral area in China, and it offers useful epidemiological data for the prevention and control of gastrointestinal parasite infection in camels. In conclusion, gastrointestinal parasite infection in camels was very common in the Tianshan pasture. Therefore, it is necessary to take effective measures such as deworming and rotational grazing to prevent and control the parasite infection in camels.

eISSN:
2450-8608
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Life Sciences, Molecular Biology, Microbiology and Virology, other, Medicine, Veterinary Medicine