Wild animals are affected by the environment, and thus, can be excellent bioindicators for assessing its richness in nutrients and the possibility of its contamination. These animals are in a much closer relationship with environmental geochemical systems than those kept in containment. They are also more exposed to adverse factors, including low doses of heavy metals in the environment which they inhabit. Therefore, in animals living in natural ecosystems, the level of some heavy metals is often higher than in farmed animals (22, 30, 32, 37). In game animals, secondary lead contamination may also occur through bullets and the accidental consumption of lead shot in the environment (9, 13, 29). The accumulation of heavy metals, including toxic ones, and the deficiency of some bioelements may have a significant impact on animal health including game animals and the quality of the obtained carcasses. The content of heavy metals in food also significantly affects the reproductive processes of some animals in the trophic chain. These types of threats mainly affect mammals, birds of prey, and the scavengers that feed on carrion when animals injured during hunting die and are not found by hunters (5, 7, 9, 33).
In recent years, there has been an increase in interest in food of natural origin, thus increasing consumer attention is directed to game. Game products are more nutritious and recommendable for dietary reasons, one of which is their content of mineral elements. Previous studies on the content of micro- and macroelements in the tissues of wild animals have focused mainly on game as large as deer and wild boar (22, 30, 32). Although consumption of meat from wild game birds does not match the scale of the consumption of venison, consumer interest is expressed increasingly towards the meat of pheasants, among other varieties. Research on the chemical composition of the meat of partridges and pheasants principally, but also that of other small animals inhabiting mainly agrarian and segetal environments, has been and is still being conducted (12, 17, 18, 31). The meat of these birds is characterised by its high nutritional value, resulting from a significant protein content and low fat content (36, 40). The majority of previous studies concerned captive-bred animals (4, 17, 18, 24, 27, 38). Research by some authors indicates significant differences in the slaughter performance of wild and farmed birds. These differences also apply to the amino acid composition and fatty acid profile of individual muscle groups (31, 36).
Despite its high nutritional and dietary value, pheasant meat remains a niche product (2, 3, 18). This status is mainly influenced by the difficulty of obtaining it, and in the case of wild pheasants, the fairly high price of the carcasses and the seasonality of access to them resulting from hunting season restrictions (11, 28, 34). Nevertheless, due to the fact that full containment farms raise this species both for release into hunting grounds and for the table, the availability of carcasses is definitely higher than that of other species of wild birds (14). Therefore, it is interesting to compare the nutritional value, and especially the mineral composition of pheasant carcasses obtained from natural habitats and from farm bred where the composition of feed and living conditions are subject to specific control.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the nutritional composition and the content of selected macro- and trace elements in the usable pieces of pheasant breast and thigh muscles from farm bred and wild birds, with particular reference to heavy metals.
Ingredients (g kg−1) and nutritive value of reared pheasant diet
Components | Reared (0–4 weeks) | Reared (5–8 weeks) | Fattening (9–38 weeks) |
---|---|---|---|
Corn | 232.1 | 272.3 | 291.6 |
Wheat | 100.0 | 100.0 | 160.0 |
Soybean meal | 280.0 | 280.0 | 250.0 |
Garden pea | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
Fish meal | 80.0 | 20.0 | - |
Linseed | 40.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 |
Sunflower meal | 80.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 |
Soya oil | 50.0 | 50.0 | - |
Sorghum | 10.0 | 30.0 | 50.0 |
Dicalcium phosphate | 16.0 | 16.0 | 17.0 |
Calcium carbonate | 55.0 | 55.0 | 55.0 |
Salt | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Mineral-vitamin premix | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
DL-methionine | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
L-lysine chloride | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
Analysed value: | |||
Dry matter | 896.9 | 895.4 | 894.8 |
Crude protein | 278.7 | 230.7 | 189.2 |
Crude ash | 70.,1 | 69.,2 | 69.,3 |
Calcium | 26.1 | 26.3 | 26.4 |
Total phosphorus | 7.9 | 7.8 | 7.7 |
Iron, mg kg−1 | 179.2 | 176.3 | 174.5 |
Zinc, mg kg−1 | 132.4 | 129.5 | 125.4 |
Copper, mg kg−1 | 22.9 | 22.8 | 22.7 |
AMEn, MJ kg−1 * | 12.05 | 12.06 | 10.57 |
Mineral-vitamin premix in farm-bred group contained in 1 kg diet: Mn – 60 mg; I – 1 mg; Fe – 54 mg; Zn –100 mg; Cu – 11 mg; Se – 0.2 mg; vit. A – 10,000 IU; vit. D3– 2,500 IU; vit. E – 50 mg; vit. K3 – 2 mg; vit. B1– 1.5 mg; vit. B2– 4.5 mg; vit. B6– 3 mg; vit. B12– 0.015 mg; biotin – 0.1 mg; folic acid – 0.8 mg; nicotinic acid – 20 mg; pantothenic acid – 12 mg; choline – 300 mg
*AMEn – apparent metabolisable energy at zero nitrogen balance was calculated with Fisher and McNab’s (8) equations
The composition of the wild birds’ diet was not strictly defined, as it is mainly dependent on the conditions in the habitat in which the birds live, and thus its specifics vary through particular periods of the growing season.
The limits of detection (LOD) for the individual elements were 0.306 μg L-1 for Cd, 0.030 mg L-1 for Pb, 0.013 mg L-1 for Ni, 0.015 mg L-1 for Cr, and 0.031mg L-1 for Mn. The total P content in the feed was determined colorimetrically according to the Fiske and Subbarow method (10) with a Helios Alpha UV-VIS apparatus (Spectronic Unicam, Cambridge, UK). The analytical procedures used are checked on an ongoing basis in intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory tests, using control samples spiked with different metal concentrations and certified reference materials (CRM). At the same time, blank samples were analysed to calibrate for the measuring glass and auxiliary materials used.
Wild birds were characterised by a lower thigh muscle mass than the farmed pheasants (Table 2). There were no such differences for the breast muscle for breeding and wild animals. In the males, a higher mass of both muscles was found than in the females. The breast muscles of the wild birds had more water than the farmed ones. The differences in water content between the breast and thigh muscles and between male and female birds were not statistically confirmed. The breast muscles of the male and female farm birds were measured to have more crude protein than the wild birds. There was no such difference for the thigh muscles, while these muscles contained less protein than the breast muscles. The birds from the farms yielded a higher fat content from both muscle types than the wild birds, with much more fat in the thigh than in the breast muscles. Both breast and thigh muscles showed a slightly larger crude ash constituent in the farm birds.
Weight and chemical composition of pheasant muscles
Item | Bird origin | Breast muscle | Thigh muscle | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
♂ | ♀ | Average | ♂ | ♀ | Average | ||
Weight of muscle, kg | Wild | 0.264a ± 0.12 | 0.203a ± 0.15 | 0.234x ± 0.14 | 0.221a ± 0.17 | 0.171a ± 0.15 | 0.195x ± 0.12 |
Farm | 0.278b ± 0.19 | 0.209a ± 0.18 | 0.244x ± 0.18 | 0.239b ± 0.21 | 0.185b ± 0.1 | 0.212y ± 0.14 | |
Average | 0.271c ± 0.16 | 0.206d ± 0.16 | 0.239w ± 0.15 | 0.230c ± 0.19 | 0.178d ± 0.13 | 0.204z ± 0.13 | |
Water, % | Wild | 74.13a ± 4.15 | 74.64a ± 4.17 | 74.38x ± 4.16 | 74.67a ± 3.82 | 74.76a ± 4.26 | 74.71x ± 3.94 |
Farm | 73.15b ± 4.28 | 73.49b ± 4.32 | 73.32y ± 4.19 | 74.31a ± 3.54 | 74.84a ± 3.72 | 74.58x ± 3.63 | |
Average | 73.64c ± 4.19 | 74.06c ± 4.23 | 73.85z ± 4.17 | 74.49c ± 3.73 | 74.8c ± 3.96 | 74.62z ± 3.85 | |
Total protein, % | Wild | 24.21a ± 1.28 | 23.85a ± 1.33 | 24.03x ± 1.32 | 23.43a ± 1.09 | 23.36a ± 0.98 | 23.39x ± 0.92 |
Farm | 25.04b ± 0.87 | 24.82b ± 1.04 | 24.93y ± 0.98 | 23.85a ± 0.92 | 23.34a ± 1.02 | 23.59x ± 0.96 | |
Average | 24.63c ± 0.98 | 24.34c ± 1.18 | 24.48w ± 1.15 | 23.64c ± 1.02 | 23.35c ± 0.97 | 23.49z ± 0.92 | |
Crude fat, % | Wild | 0.27a ± 0.04 | 0.29a ± 0.03 | 0.28x ± 0.03 | 0.44a ± 0.04 | 0.46a ± 0.04 | 0.45x ± 0.03 |
Farm | 0.39b ± 0.05 | 0.41b ± 0.04 | 0.4y ± 0.05 | 0.55b ± 0.05 | 0.57b ± 0.05 | 0.56y ± 0.05 | |
Average | 0.33c ± 0.04 | 0.35c ± 0.04 | 0.34w ± 0.04 | 0.49c ± 0.04 | 0.52c ± 0.04 | 0.51z ± 0.04 | |
Crude ash, % | Wild | 1.07a ± 0.06 | 1.02a ± 0.05 | 1.05x ± 0.05 | 1.09a ± 0.07 | 1.08a ± 0.06 | 1.08x ± 0.06 |
Farm | 1.12a ± 0.07 | 1.11a ± 0.06 | 1.11x ± 0.06 | 1.11a ± 0.08 | 1.07a ± 0.09 | 1.09x ± 0.08 | |
Average | 1.09c ± 0.06 | 1.07c ± 0.05 | 1.08z ± 0.05 | 1.10c ± 0.07 | 1.08c ± 0.07 | 1.09z ± 0.06 |
a, b – different letters in the columns for the individual muscle groups of the females and males between the wild and farm birds mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05
c, d – different letters in the rows mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 between the mean values for the males and females in particular muscle types
x, y – different letters in the columns between the average values for the individual muscle groups between the wild and farm birds mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05
w, z – different letters in the rows mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 between the average values for the individual muscle types
The content of macronutrients in the breast and thigh muscles of wild and farm birds varied considerably (Table 3). In all cases, the farm birds presented higher calcium content, but a statistically significant difference was found only in the male breast muscle. In relation to the wild animals, the farm birds’ breast thigh muscles had more magnesium, with a slight variation of this feature between wild and farm birds within the sexes. In both the breast and thigh muscles, higher potassium content was found in the farm birds. In the breast muscles, these differences were statistically significant in males and females. Also in the breast muscle and in both sexes, higher sodium content was found. Higher and statistically significant differences were also found between the farm and wild birds in terms of phosphorus content in both muscle types.
The content of selected macroelements (g kg−1 dry matter) in the muscles of pheasants
Item | Bird origin | Breast muscle | Thigh muscle | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
♂ | ♀ | Average | ♂ | ♀ | Average | ||
Phosphorus | Wild | 9.42a ± 0.74 | 9.15a ± 0.86 | 9.29x ± 0.79 | 9.18a ± 0.81 | 9.04a ± 0.79 | 9.11x ± 0.79 |
Farm | 10.12b ± 0.79 | 10.16b ± 0.94 | 10.14y ± 0.83 | 9.95b ± 0.81 | 9.93b ± 0.83 | 9.94y ± 0.82 | |
Average | 9.77c ± 0.76 | 9.66c ± 0.9 | 9.72z ± 0.81 | 9.57c ± 0.81 | 9.49c ± 0.81 | 9.53z ± 0.81 | |
Calcium | Wild | 0.24a ± 0.02 | 0.29a ± 0.05 | 0.27x ± 0.04 | 0.47a ± 0.04 | 0.53a ± 0.04 | 0.5x ± 0.04 |
Farm | 0.34b ± 0.03 | 0.37a ± 0.06 | 0.35x ± 0.05 | 0.53a ± 0.05 | 0.6a ± 0.05 | 0.56x ± 0.05 | |
Average | 0.29c ± 0.02 | 0.33c ± 0.05 | 0.31w ± 0.04 | 0.50c ± 0.04 | 0.57c ± 0.05 | 0.53z ± 0.04 | |
Magnesium | Wild | 0.93a ± 0.06 | 0.93a ± 0.07 | 0.93x ± 0.06 | 0.75a ± 0.02 | 0.86a ± 0.03 | 0.8x ± 0.03 |
Farm | 1.04b ± 0.08 | 0.99a ± 0.08 | 1.02x ± 0.08 | 0.94b ± 0.02 | 0.98b ± 0.02 | 0.96y ± 0.02 | |
Average | 0.99c ± 0.07 | 0.96c ± 0.07 | 0.98z ± 0.07 | 0.85c ± 0.02 | 0.92c ± 0.02 | 0.88z ± 0.02 | |
Potassium | Wild | 14.23a ± 0.84 | 13.55a ± 1.03 | 13.91a ± 0.95 | 11.82a ± 0.92 | 12.34a ± 1.02 | 12.1x ± 0.97 |
Farm | 15.41b ± 0.87 | 14.62b ± 1.04 | 15.0b ± 0.97 | 12.35a ± 0.91 | 12.96a ± 0.94 | 12.72x ± 0.92 | |
Average | 14.82c ± 0.85 | 14.08c ± 1.03 | 14.46w ± 0.96 | 12.09c ± 0.92 | 12.65c ± 0.99 | 12.4z ± 0.94 | |
Sodium | Wild | 1.05a ± 0.05 | 1.12a ± 0.05 | 1.08x ± 0.05 | 1.63a ± 0.09 | 1.99a ± 0.11 | 1.8x ± 0.09 |
Farm | 1.27b ± 0.17 | 1.34b ± 0.16 | 1.3y ± 0.16 | 1.71a ± 0.08 | 2.03a ± 0.12 | 1.89x ± 0.1 | |
Average | 1.16c ± 0.15 | 1.23c ± 0.15 | 1.19w ± 0.15 | 1.66c ± 0.07 | 2.01d ± 0.11 | 1.85z ± 0.09 |
a, b – different letters in the columns for the individual muscle groups in the females and males between the wild and farm birds mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05
c, d – different letters in the rows mean statistically significant differences at p≤0.05 between the mean values for the males and females in particular muscle types
x, y – different letters in the columns between the average values for the individual muscle groups between the wild and farm birds mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05
w, z – different letters in the rows mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 between the average values for the individual muscle types
Regardless of type, the muscles of the farm pheasants were characterised by significantly higher iron content than the wild ones, while the females were typified by a higher content of iron than the males (Table 4). A larger amount of zinc was assessed to be in both types of the farm birds’ muscles than in the wild birds’, with much more zinc found in the thigh muscles. Both the breast and thigh muscles were analysed to have higher copper accumulation in wild birds, with the exception of the thigh muscles in the males where the difference was statistically insignificant. The wild birds had also accumulated more manganese in the muscles of the breasts and thighs alike.
The content of selected microelements (mg kg−1 dry matter) in pheasant muscles
Item | Bird origin | Breast muscle | Thigh muscle | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
♂ | ♀ | Average | ♂ | ♀ | Average | ||
Iron | Wild | 57.05a ± 5.02 | 79.09a ± 6.03 | 68.07x ± 5.53 | 82.08a ± 7.05 | 108.11a ± 9.04 | 95.09x ± 8.03 |
Farm | 98.11b ± 7.51 | 99.07b±8.02 | 98.59y ± 7.72 | 124.13b ± 9.05 | 126.09b ± 9.03 | 125.11y ± 9.04 | |
Average | 77.6c ± 6.29 | 89.1d ± 7.03 | 83.34w ± 6.64 | 103.11c ± 8.06 | 117.31d ± 9.04 | 110.12z ± 8.55 | |
Zinc | Wild | 15.33a ± 1.33 | 16.01a ± 1.56 | 15.7x ± 1.47 | 21.74a ± 2.33 | 22.15a ± 2.01 | 21.9x ± 2.25 |
Farm | 18.67b ± 1.24 | 18.87b ± 1.88 | 18.76y ± 1.56 | 24.35b ± 1.98 | 24.88b ± 1.45 | 24.56y ± 1.87 | |
Average | 17.0c ± 1.29 | 17.44c ± 1.73 | 17.22w ± 1.52 | 23.05c ± 2.16 | 23.52c ± 1.72 | 23.22z ± 2.06 | |
Cooper | Wild | 3.11a ± 0.34 | 3.68a ± 0.45 | 3.42x ± 0.38 | 2.15a ± 0.18 | 3.36a ± 0.24 | 2.76x ± 0.21 |
Farm | 1.61b ± 0.1 | 1.65b ± 0.18 | 1.63y ± 0.12 | 2.01a ± 0.11 | 2.11b ± 0.14 | 2.05y ± 0.12 | |
Average | 2.36c ± 0.23 | 2.67c ± 0.34 | 2.54z ± 0.26 | 2.08c ± 0.15 | 2.74d ± 0.2 | 2.42z ± 0.17 | |
Manganese | Wild | 1.59a ± 0.27 | 1.05a ± 0.18 | 1.33x ± 0.22 | 2.57a ± 0.22 | 2.26a ± 0.28 | 2.43x ± 0.25 |
Farm | 0.83b ± 0.12 | 0.7b ± 0.09 | 0.77y ± 0.1 | 1.02b ± 0.16 | 0.99b ± 0.11 | 1.01y ± 0.12 | |
Average | 1.22c ± 0.2 | 0.88d ± 0.11 | 1.05w ± 0.15 | 1.8c ± 0.19 | 1.63c ± 0.2 | 1.72z ± 0.18 |
a, b – different letters in the columns for the individual muscle groups in the females and males between the wild and farm birds mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05
c, d – different letters in the rows mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 between the mean values for the males and females in particular muscle types
x, y – different letters in the columns between the average values for the individual muscle groups between the wild and farm birds mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05
w, z – different letters in the rows mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 between the average values for individual muscle types
The wild birds were characterised by a higher lead content in both types of muscle (Table 5), and the differences between wild and farm birds were statistically significant. The cadmium in the breast muscles in the wild birds was greater, and this difference was statistically significant irrespective of sex. The differences in the contents of this element in the thigh muscles have not been statistically confirmed. The farm birds had a slightly higher level of chromium found in both the breast and thigh muscles, the latter also containing significantly more nickel than the breast muscles. Also higher in nickel, albeit slightly, was the result from the farm birds, regardless of the type of muscle and sex.
The content of heavy metals (mg kg−1 dry matter) in the muscles of pheasants
Item | Bird origin | Breast muscle | Thigh muscle | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
♂ | ♀ | Average | ♂ | ♀ | Average | ||
Lead | Wild | 0.81a ± 0.12 | 0.72a ± 0.12 | 0.76x ± 0.12 | 1.15a ± 0.15 | 1.13a ± 0.13 | 1.14x ± 0.13 |
Farm | 0.35b ± 0.12 | 0.35b ± 0.11 | 0.35y ± 0.11 | 0.58b ± 0.14 | 0.65b ± 0.12 | 0.61y ± 0.13 | |
Average | 0.57c ± 0.12 | 0.54c ± 0.12 | 0.55w ± 0.12 | 0.86c ± 0.13 | 0.88c ± 0.12 | 0.87z ± 0.12 | |
Cadmium | Wild | 0.041a ± 0.01 | 0.061a ± 0.01 | 0.051x ± 0.02 | 0.011a ± 0.01 | 0.013a ± 0.002 | 0.012x ± 0.06 |
Farm | 0.002b ± 0.001 | 0.006b ± 0.002 | 0.004y ± 0.001 | 0.014a ± 0.02 | 0.018a ± 0.001 | 0.016x ± 0.05 | |
Average | 0.022c ± 0.006 | 0.034d ± 0.006 | 0.028w ± 0.011 | 0.013c ± 0.01 | 0.016c ± 0.001 | 0.014z ± 0.05 | |
Chromium | Wild | 14.14a ± 2.04 | 14.88a ± 2.15 | 14.51x ± 2.09 | 16.66a ± 2.46 | 16.12a ± 2.32 | 16.38x ± 2.41 |
Farm | 18.29a ± 3.14 | 19.25a ± 3.26 | 18.78x ± 3.22 | 18.81a ± 3.12 | 17.84a ± 3.04 | 18.3x ± 3.1 | |
Average | 16.23c ± 2.61 | 17.07c ± 2.72 | 16.66z ± 2.67 | 17.75c ± 2.8 | 17.0c ± 2.71 | 17.35z ± 2.77 | |
Nickel | Wild | 4.18a ± 1.45 | 4.22a ± 1.12 | 4.2x ± 1.31 | 7.12a ± 4.35 | 7.44a ± 3.12 | 7.28x ± 2.84 |
Farm | 4.58a ± 2.04 | 4.78a ± 1.95 | 4.74x ± 1.99 | 7.84a ± 2.18 | 7.43a ± 2.88 | 7.64x ± 2.91 | |
Average | 4.43c ± 1.76 | 4.5c ± 1.54 | 4.47w ± 1.68 | 7.48c ± 3.42 | 7.43c ± 3.1 | 7.46z ± 2.89 |
a, b – different letters in the columns for the individual muscle groups in the females and males between the wild and farm birds mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05
c, d – different letters in the rows mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 between the mean values for the males and females in particular muscle types
x, y – different letters in the columns between the average values for individual muscle groups between the wild and farm birds mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05
w, z – different letters in the rows mean statistically significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 between the average values for individual muscle types
The content of nutrients and minerals, including heavy metals, in the muscles of pheasants allows the birds’ nutrition, their condition, and the degree of environmental contamination to be assessed. In the presented studies, significant differences were found between the weight and mineral composition of the wild pheasants’ breast and thigh muscles and those of the pheasants raised under farm conditions. These differences are predicated on the different feeding regimes of birds kept on farms and those in their natural habitat, as well as on age and sex, which has been shown in the studies of other authors (18, 23, 27). The males were characterised by a higher mass of breast and thigh muscles in relation to the females, which was also seen in studies by Kotowicz
The assessment of the quality of meat of particular animal species, including wild-caught ones, concerns mainly the protein and fat content, amino acid and fatty acid profile, and mineral accumulation, including heavy and toxic metals (3, 4, 20, 25). The content of macroelements found in our studies was at a level similar to that reported by other authors (35, 36); however, for some elements, significant differences were found depending on the sex and maintenance system. More significant differences in the content of macroelements between farm and wild birds were found for the breast muscles than the thighs, mainly for the males. The level of phosphorus was distinctly higher in farm birds than in wild birds regardless of sex and muscle type. This indicates a much better supply of this element to farm animals than to wild ones. The sex of the birds and the type of the muscles did not significantly affect the level of this element, which was confirmed by the results of studies by Strakova
The content of micronutrients in the muscles of pheasants was interesting, and not always unambiguously interpreted. Iron and zinc were higher in farm animals, while copper and manganese were higher in wild birds. Compared to breast muscles, the thigh muscles showed a similar copper level but significantly higher levels of iron, zinc, and manganese. These results are similar to those reported by certain authors but are also significantly different to those of others (11, 27, 35, 36). This may be due to the supply of these elements in the feed for farmed birds, and its availability in the natural environment, as well as the sex and age of the slaughtered pheasants. Female pheasants showed higher iron content in both breast muscles (89.10 mg/kg
Wild animals are exposed to continuous pressure from environmental factors, so they can be used as a natural bioindicator of environmental contamination (19, 22, 26, 30, 37). The most attention is paid to the accumulation of lead and cadmium, legislation for which is included in Commission Regulation (WE) No. 1881/2006 (6), where for poultry, the permissible lead content is 0.10 mg/kg of fresh weight, and for cadmium - 0.05 mg/kg of fresh weight. The lead content of farm pheasants in both evaluated muscles was slightly higher than the acceptable recommendations in this respect, with the higher reference value being exceeded for the thigh muscles. Clearly more lead was found in wild pheasant carcasses because it was introduced by the shot penetration of the birds, and the differences regardless of sex and muscle were statistically confirmed. The lead content in pheasants shot and killed in eastern Slovakia was detected as significantly greater only in the breast muscles (20). The results of research conducted in England, Scotland, and Wales on the content of lead in the tissues of various species of wild animals showed that on average there were 3.3 shots weighing 0.42 g in the muscles of one shot pheasant. The same studies showed that in 54% of pheasants, the lead content was higher than 0.1 mg/kg of fresh weight, and in another 10%, this level was higher than 1 mg/kg of fresh muscle mass (29). Cadmium had accumulated to a significantly larger extent in the breast muscles (0.028 mg/kg DM) than in the thighs (0.014 mg/kg DM), but it was within the values given in the Commission Regulation. In addition, the breast muscles of wild birds contained significantly more cadmium than farmed ones, with similar amounts in the thigh muscles. Similar trends regarding the amount of cadmium in thigh muscles were reported in studies by Koréneková
The presented results confirm the high quality and usefulness of the meat of pheasants as a dietary element, both wild and farm-bred. This meat has a recommendable content of macro- and trace elements as well as the permissible content of elements of heavy metals, with the exception of lead in wild birds. The level of heavy metals, especially lead in wild birds, can be a natural bioindicator of the occurrence of these metals in of the environment, as well as remnants from shot. The results of our research confirm the quality and suitability of pheasant meat as a component of the human diet (3, 4, 18, 20, 23, 25, 27). An increased content of lead slightly above the reference values, especially in wild birds after shooting, should not have a negative impact on the health of consumers. This is confirmed by the results of Haldimann
The obtained results allow the following conclusions to be formulated: farm pheasants were characterised by a larger weight of breast and thigh muscle, which was conditioned by the specifics of their feed and their lesser locomotor activity. Captive bred pheasants yielded a slightly higher protein content, and a significantly higher fat content, from both types of muscle. The breast muscles had stronger positive dietary attributes than thighs because they contained much less fat (3.4 g