Resynchronisation as an element of improving cattle reproduction efficiency

1. Arshad U., Qayyum A., Hassan M., Husnain A., Sattar A., Ahmad N.: Effect of resynchronization with GnRH or progesterone (P4) intravaginal device (CIDR) on day 23 after timed artificial insemination on cumulative pregnancy and embryonic losses in CIDR-GnRH synchronized Nili-Ravi buffaloes. Theriogenology. 2017, 103, 104–109.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.07.054Search in Google Scholar

2. Barletta R.V., Carvalho P.D., Santos V.G., Melo L.F., Consentini C.E., Netto A.S., Fricke P.M.: Effect of dose and timing of prostaglandin F2α treatments during a Resynch protocol on luteal regression and fertility to timed artificial insemination in lactating Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 2018, 101, 1730–1736.10.3168/jds.2017-13628Search in Google Scholar

3. Bartolome J.A., van Leeuwen J.J., Thieme M., Sa Filho O.G., Melendez P., Archbald L.F., Thatcher W.W.: Synchronization and resynchronization of inseminations in lactating dairy cows with the CIDR insert and the Ovsynch protocol. Theriogenology 2009, 72, 869–878.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.06.008Search in Google Scholar

4. Bilby T.R., Bruno R.G., Lager K.J., Chebel R.C., Moraes J.G., Fricke P.M., Lopes G. Jr., Giordano J.O., Santos J.E., Lima F.S., Stevenson J.S., Pulley S.L.: Supplemental progesterone and timing of resynchronization on pregnancy outcomes in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2013, 96, 7032–7042.10.3168/jds.2013-6960Search in Google Scholar

5. Carvalho P.D., Consentini C.C., Weaver S.R., Barleta R.V., Hernandez L.L., Fricke P.M.: Temporarily decreasing progesterone after timed artificial insemination decreased expression of interferon-tau stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) in blood leukocytes, serum pregnancy-specific protein B concentrations, and embryo size in lactating Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 2017, 100, 3233–3242.10.3168/jds.2016-11996Search in Google Scholar

6. Cavestany D., Cibils J., Freire A., Sastre A., Stevenson J.S.: Evaluation of two different oestrus-synchronisation methods with timed artificial insemination and resynchronisation of returns to oestrus in lactating Holstein cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2003, 77, 141–155.10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00032-0Search in Google Scholar

7. Chebel R.C., Santos J.E.P., Cerri L.R.A., Galvão K.N., Juchem S.A., Thather W.W.: Effect of resynchronization with GnRH on day 21 after artificial insemination on pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology, 2003, 60, 1389–1399.10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00117-1Search in Google Scholar

8. Dewey S.T., Mendonça L.G., Lopes G. Jr., Rivera F.A., Guagnini F., Chebel R.C., Bilby T.R.: Resynchronization strategies to improve fertility in lactating dairy cows utilizing a presynchronization injection of GnRH or supplemental progesterone. I. Pregnancy rates and ovarian responses. J Dairy Sci 2010, 93, 4086–4095. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3233.10.3168/jds.2010-3233Search in Google Scholar

9. El-Tarabany M.S.: The efficiency of new CIDR and once-used CIDR to synchronize ovulation in primiparous and multiparous Holstein cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2016, 173, 29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.08.006.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.08.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Fosgate G.T., Motimele B., Ganswindt A., Irons P.C.: A Bayesian latent class model to estimate the accuracy of pregnancy diagnosis by transrectal ultrasonography and laboratory detection of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins in dairy cows. Prev Vet Med 2017, 15, 100–109.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.004Search in Google Scholar

11. Fricke P.M., Caraviello D.Z., Weigel K.A., Welle M.L.: Fertility of dairy cows after resynchronization of ovulation at three intervals following first timed insemination. J Dairy Sci 2003, 86, 3941–3950.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74003-XSearch in Google Scholar

12. Fricke P.M., Ricci A., Carvalho P.D., Mason C., Amundson M.C.: milk vs. blood – which is best for PAG pregnancy prediction? Western Dairy Management Conference, Reno 2015.Search in Google Scholar

13. Gajewski Z., Melo de Sousa N., Konopka A.: Determination of PAG in the milk and blood in cow’s in comparison to other examination methods for pregnancy diagnosis. Procedings XXV WBC, Budapest 2008, pp. 92–97.Search in Google Scholar

14. Galvão K.N., Santos J.E.: Factors affecting synchronization and conception rate after the Ovsynch protocol in lactating Holstein cows. Reprod Domest Anim 2010, 45, 439–446.10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01220.x19144008Search in Google Scholar

15. Giordano J.O., Fricke P.M., Cabrera V.E.: Economics of resynchronization strategies including chemical tests to identify non-pregnant cows. J. Dairy Sci 2013, 96, 949–961.10.3168/jds.2012-570423261387Search in Google Scholar

16. Giordano J.O., Stangaferro M.L., Wijma R., Chandler W.C., Watters R.D.: Reproductive performance of dairy cows managed with a program aimed at increasing insemination of cows in estrus based on increased physical activity and fertility of timed artificial inseminations. J Dairy Sci 2015, 98, 2488–2501.10.3168/jds.2014-896125660744Search in Google Scholar

17. Giordano J.O., Thomas M.J., Catucuamba G., Curler M.D., Masello M., Stangaferro M.L., Wijma R.: Reproductive management strategies to improve the fertility of cows with a suboptimal response to resynchronization of ovulation. J Dairy Sci 2016, 99, 2967–2978.10.3168/jds.2015-1022326830745Search in Google Scholar

18. Giordano J.O., Wiltbank M.C., Guenther N.J., Pawlish R., Bas S., Cunha A.P., Fricke P.M.: Increased fertility in lactating dairy cows resynchronized with Double-Ovsynch compared with Ovsynch initiated 32 d after timed artificial insemination. Resynchronization with double-ovsynch. J. Dairy Sci 2012, 95, 639–653.10.3168/jds.2011-441822281329Search in Google Scholar

19. Green J.C., Okamura C.S., Mathew D.J., Newsom E.M., Lucy M.C.: Hot topic: successful fixed-time insemination within 21 d after first insemination by combining chemical pregnancy diagnosis on d 18 with a rapid resynchronization program. J Dairy Sci 2010, 93, 5668–5672.10.3168/jds.2010-339521094738Search in Google Scholar

20. Górna K., Zaborowicz M., Jaśkowski B.M., Jaśkowski J.M., Boniecki P., Okoń P., Kozłowski R.J., Przybył J.: Neural analysis of bovine ovaries ultrasound images in the identification process of the corpus luteum – preliminary study. Ninth International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP 2017), Hong Kong, China, 2017, 104204h-6.10.1117/12.2281723Search in Google Scholar

21. Herudzińska M., Nalaskowska M., Jaśkowski B.M., Gehrke M., Kulus J., Jaśkowski J.M.: Conception rate after different models of treatment in non-pregnant cows, 30^th World Buiatric Congress, Sapporo, 2018 (in press).Search in Google Scholar

22. Herudzińska M., Nalaskowska M., Jaśkowski B.M., Niewitecki W., Kulus J., Jaśkowski J.M.: Progesterone devices and Ovsynch – efficacy in anestrus and non-pregnant dairy cows – retrospective study. 30^th World Buiatric Congress, Sapporo, 2018 (in press).Search in Google Scholar

23. Jaśkowski J.M., Herudzińska M., Kmiecik J., Jaśkowski B.M., Kierbić A., Kulus J.: Wstępne uwagi dotyczące wykorzystania testu terenowego do wykrywania wczesnej ciąży u krów. Lecznica Dużych Zwierząt 2017, 11, 55–59.Search in Google Scholar

24. Jaśkowski J.M., Herudzińska M., Kmiecik J., Kierbić A., Jaśkowski B.M., Gehrke M.: New possibilities for pregnancy diagnosis in ruminants: limitations, advantages, use. Med Weter 2018, 74, 349–355.10.21521/mw.6016Search in Google Scholar

25. Jaśkowski J.M., Kaczmarowski M., Kulus J., Jaśkowski B.M., Herudzińska M., Gehrke M.: Palpation per rectum on pregnancy in cows - a past or an alternative to modern diagnostic methods. Med Weter 2018 (in press).10.21521/mw.6156Search in Google Scholar

26. Jaśkowski J.M., Kmiecik J., Kierbić A., Herudzińska M., Woźna-Wysocka M.: Automatic cow heat detection systems as a tool to improve herd management. Med Weter 2018, 74, 434–440.10.21521/mw.5989Search in Google Scholar

27. Kelley D.E., Ibarbia L., Daetz R., Bittar J.H., Risco C.A., Santos J.E., Ribeiro E.S., Galvão K.N.: Combined use of progesterone inserts, ultrasonography, and GnRH to identify and resynchronize non-pregnant cows and heifers 21 days after timed artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2016, 85, 230–237.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.09.052Search in Google Scholar

28. Lamb G.C., Dahlen C.R., Larson J.E., Marquezini G., Stevenson J.S.: Control of the estrous cycle to improve fertility for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle: a review. J Anim Sci 2010, 88, 181–192. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009–2349.10.2527/jas.20092349Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29. Macmillan K.L.: Recent advances in the synchronization of estrus and ovulation in dairy cows. J Reprod Dev 2010, 56, 42–47.10.1262/jrd.1056S42Search in Google Scholar

30. McArt J.A., Caixeta L.S., Machado V.S., Guard C.L., Galvao K.N., Sá Filho O.G., Bicalho R.C.: Ovsynch versus Ultrasynch: reproductive efficacy of a dairy cattle synchronization protocol incorporating corpus luteum function. J Dairy Sci 2010, 93, 2525–2532.10.3168/jds.2009-2930Search in Google Scholar

31. Michaelis I., Burfeind O., Heuwieser W.: Evaluation of oestrous detection in dairy cattle comparing an automated activity monitoring system to visual observation. Reprod Domest Anim 2014, 49, 621–628.10.1111/rda.12337Search in Google Scholar

32. Motavalli T., Dirandeh E., Deldar H., Colazo M.G.: Evaluation of shortened timed-AI protocols for resynchronization of ovulation in multiparous Holstein dairy cows. Theriogenology 2017, 95, 187–192.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.03.003Search in Google Scholar

33. Osawa T., Honju S., Nitta H., Uchiza M., Tameoka N., Moro Y., Izaike Y.: Effect of synchronization of ovulation on ovarian profile and days open in holstein cows diagnosed as non-pregnant 26 days after timed artificial insemination. J Reprod Dev 2009, 55, 163–169.10.1262/jrd.20109Search in Google Scholar

34. Pereira R.V., Caixeta L.S., Giordano J.O., Guard C.L., Bicalho R.C.: Reproductive performance of dairy cows resynchronized after pregnancy diagnosis at 31 (±3) days after artificial insemination (AI) compared with resynchronization at 31 (±3) days after AI with pregnancy diagnosis at 38 (±3) days after AI. J Dairy Sci 2013, 96, 7630–7639.10.3168/jds.2013-6723Search in Google Scholar

35. Rabiee A.R., Lean I.J., Stevenson M.A.: Efficacy of Ovsynch program on reproductive performance in dairy cattle: a meta-analysis. J Dairy Sci 2005, 88, 2754–2770.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72955-6Search in Google Scholar

36. Racewicz P., Sickinger M., Włodarek J., Jaśkowski J.M.: Ultrasonographic diagnosis of early pregnancy in cattle using different ultrasound systems. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere 2016, 44, 151–156.10.15653/TPG-15081627090352Search in Google Scholar

37. Reese S.T., Pereira M.H.C., Edwards J.L., Vasconcelos J.L.M., Pohler K.G.: Pregnancy diagnosis in cattle using pregnancy associated glycoprotein concentration in circulation at day 24 of gestation. Theriogenology 2018, 106, 178–185. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.10.020.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.10.02029073542Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

38. Ribeiro E.S., Cerri R.L., Bisinotto R.S., Lima F.S., Silvestre F.T., Greco L.F., Thatcher W.W., Santos J.E.: Reproductive performance of grazing dairy cows following presynchronization and resynchronization protocols. J Dairy Sci 2011, 94, 4984–4996.10.3168/jds.2011-422521943749Search in Google Scholar

39. Ricci A., Carvalho P.D., Amundson M.C., Fricke P.M.: Characterization of luteal dynamics in lactating Holstein cows for 32 days after synchronization of ovulation and timed artificial insemination. J Dairy Sci 2017, 100, 9851–9860.10.3168/jds.2017-1329328987588Search in Google Scholar

40. Ricci A., Carvalho P.D., Amundson M.C., Fourdraine R.H., Vincenti L., Fricke P.M.: Factors associated with pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) levels in plasma and milk of Holstein cows during early pregnancy and their effect on the accuracy of pregnancy diagnosis. J Dairy Sci 2015, 98, 2502–2514.10.3168/jds.2014-897425660740Search in Google Scholar

41. Romano J.E., Pinedo P., Bryan K., Ramos R.S., Solano K.G., Merchan D., Velez J.: Comparison between allantochorion membrane and amniotic sac detection by per rectal palpation for pregnancy diagnosis on pregnancy loss, calving rates, and abnormalities in newborn calves. Theriogenology 2017, 90, 219–227.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.11.004712583228166972Search in Google Scholar

42. Rudolph J., Bruckmaier R.M., Kasimanickam R., Steiner A., Kirchhofer M., Hüsler J., Hirsbrunner G.: Comparison of the effect of a CIDR-Select Synch versus a long-term CIDR based AI protocol on reproductive performance in multiparous dairy cows in Swiss dairy farms. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2011, 9, 151. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-151.10.1186/1477-7827-9-151325720622117599Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

43. Sá Filho M.F., Marques M.O., Girotto R., Santos F.A., Sala R.V., Barbuio J.P., Baruselli P.S.: Resynchronization with unknown pregnancy status using progestin-based timed artificial insemination protocol in beef cattle. Theriogenology 2014, 81, 284–290.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.02724139935Search in Google Scholar

44. Sani R.N., Farzaneh N., Moezifar M., Seifi H.A., Tabatabei A.A.: Evaluation of five resynchronization methods using different combinations of PGF2α, GnRH, estradiol, and an intravaginal progesterone device for insemination in Holstein cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2011, 124, 1–6.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.02.01321396790Search in Google Scholar

45. Scully S., Butler S.T., Kelly A.K., Evans A.C., Lonergan P., Crowe M.A.: Early pregnancy diagnosis on days 18 to 21 post insemination using high-resolution imaging in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2014, 97, 3542–3557.10.3168/jds.2013-751824657084Search in Google Scholar

46. Silva E., Sterry R.A., Kolb D., Mathialagan N., McGrath M.F., Ballam J.M., Fricke P.M.: Effect of interval to resynchronization of ovulation on fertility of lactating Holstein cows when using transrectal ultrasonography or a pregnancy-associated glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to diagnose pregnancy status. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92, 3643–3650. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1704.10.3168/jds.2008-170419620645Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

47. Sinedino L.D., Lima F.S., Bisinotto R.S., Cerri R.L., Santos J.E.: Effect of early or late resynchronization based on different methods of pregnancy diagnosis on reproductive performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2014, 97, 4932–4941. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7887.10.3168/jds.2013-7887Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

48. Stevenson J.F., Cartmill J.A., Hensley B.A., El-Zarkouny S.Z., Metrics P.X.: Conception rates of dairy cows following early not-pregnant diagnosis by ultrasonography and subsequent treatments with shortened Ovsynch protocol Theriogenology 2003, 60, 475–483.10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00042-6Search in Google Scholar

49. Szenci O., Beckers J.F., Humblot P., Sulon J., Sasser G., Taverne M.A.M., Varga J., Baltusen R., Schekk G.: Comparison of ultrasonography, bovine pregnancy-specific protein B, and bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein 1 tests for pregnancy detection in dairy cows. Theriogenology 1998, 50, 77–88.10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00115-0Search in Google Scholar

50. Wijma R., Pérez M.M., Masello M., Stangaferro M.L., Giordano J.O.: A resynchronization of ovulation program based on ovarian structures present at nonpregnancy diagnosis reduced time to pregnancy in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2018, 101, 1697–1707.10.3168/jds.2017-1348929224858Search in Google Scholar

51. Wijma R., Stangaferro M.L., Masello M., Granados G.E., Giordano J.O.: Resynchronization of ovulation protocols for dairy cows including or not including gonadotropin-releasing hormone to induce a new follicular wave: effects on reinsemination pattern, ovarian responses, and pregnancy outcomes. J Dairy Sci 2017, 100, 7613–7625. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12550.10.3168/jds.2017-1255028668533Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

52. Yamada K.: JSAR Innovative Technology Award. Development of ovulation synchronization and fixed time artificial insemination in dairy cows. J Reprod Dev 2005, 51, 177–186.10.1262/jrd.1610315883484Search in Google Scholar