1. bookVolume 38 (2022): Edition 4 (December 2022)
    Special Edition on Respondent Burden
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
2001-7367
Première parution
01 Oct 2013
Périodicité
4 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
Accès libre

Exploring Burden Perceptions of Household Survey Respondents in the American Community Survey

Publié en ligne: 03 Dec 2022
Volume & Edition: Volume 38 (2022) - Edition 4 (December 2022) - Special Edition on Respondent Burden
Pages: 1177 - 1203
Reçu: 01 Mar 2021
Accepté: 01 Dec 2021
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
2001-7367
Première parution
01 Oct 2013
Périodicité
4 fois par an
Langues
Anglais

Bavdaž, M. 2010. “The multidimensional integral business survey response model.” Survey Methodology 36(1): 81–93. Search in Google Scholar

Bogen, K. 1996. “The Effect of Questionnaire Length on Response Rates––A Review of the Literature.” In Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, May 16–19, American Statistical Association, 1020-5. Alexandria, VA, USA. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/papers/1996_177.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Bradburn, N. 1978. “Respondent burden.” In Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section: American Statistical Association: 35–40. Alexandria, VA, USA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/papers/1978_007.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Crawford, S.D., M. Couper, and M.J. Lamias. 2001. “Web Surveys: Perceptions of Burden.” Social Science Computer Review 19(2): 146–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900202. Search in Google Scholar

Dahlhamer, J., A. Maitland, B. Zablotsky, and A. Galinsky. 2019. “Does Reducing the Length Matter? An Assessment of Respondent Burden with the Redesigned U.S. National Health Interview Survey.” Presentation at the DC-AAPOR Respondent Burden Workshop, October 21, Washington D.C., USA. Available at: http://files.dcaapor.org/slides/burden2019/Galinsky.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Dale, T., J. Erikson, J. Fosen, G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and O. Kleven. 2007. Handbook for Monitoring and Evaluating Business Survey Response Burdens. Technical Report, European Commission, Eurostat. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/64157/4374310/12-HANDBOOK-FOR-MONITORING-AND-EVALUATING-BUSINESS-SURVEY-RESONSE-BURDEN.pdf/600e3c6d-8e8d-44f7-a8f5-0931c71d9920 (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Earp, M.S., B. Kopp, and J. Dixon. 2019. “Exploring the Relationship between Burden Factors and Survey Response.” Presentation at the DC-AAPOR Respondent Burden Workshop, October 21, Washington, DC, USA. Available at: http://files.dc-aapor.org/slides/burden2019/Earp.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Fox, M., K. Johns, A. Kline, D. Raglin, and R.C. Sawyer. 2018. Analysis of Complaints Received. Technical Report, U.S. Census Bureau 2018 American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series #ACS18-RER-08. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2018/acs/2018_Fox_01.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Fricker, S. 2016. “Defining, Measuring, and Mitigating Respondent Burden.” Presentation at the Workshop on Respondent Burden in the American Community Survey, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, March 8, Washington, DC, USA. Available at: https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_173169.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Fricker, S., J. Gonzalez, and L. Tan. 2011. “Are you burdened? Let’s find out.” Presentation at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, May 14, Phoenix, AZ, USA. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/AnnualMeetingProceedings/2011/05-14-11_3B_Fricker.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Fricker, S., C. Kreisler, and L. Tan. 2012. “An exploration of the application of PLS path modeling approach to creating a summary index of respondent burden.” In Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association: 4141–4155, July 30, Alexandria, VA, USA. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2012f.html (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Fricker, S., T. Yan, and S. Tsai. 2014. “Response Burden: What Predicts It and Who is Burdened Out?” In Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association: 4568–4577, May 16, Alexandria, VA, USA. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2014f.html (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Galesic, M. 2006. “Dropouts on the Web: Effects of Interest and Burden Experiences During an Online Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 22 (2): 313–328. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/dropouts-onthe-web-effects-of-interest-and-burden-experienced-during-an-online-survey.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Giesen, D., M. Bavdaž, and G. Haraldsen. 2011. “Response Burden Measurement: Current Diversity and Proposal for Moving toward Standardization.” In Proceedings of the BLUE-ETS Conference on Burden and Motivation in Official Business Surveys, March 22-23, Heerlen, Netherlands: 125–134. Available at: https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/imported/documents/2011/25/2011-06-20-giesen-bavdaz-haraldsen-2011-response-burden-measurement.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Surveys. New York: Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9781118490082 Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M., E. Singer, and A. Bowers. 1999. “A Laboratory Approach to Measuring the Effects on Survey Participation of Interview Length, Incentives, Differential Incentives, and Refusal Conversion.” Journal of Official Statistics 15(2): 251–268. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/a-laboratory-approach-to-measuring-the-effects-on-survey-participation-of-interview-length-incentives-differential-incentives-and-refusal-conversion.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Haraldsen, G. 2004. “Identifying and Reducing Response Burdens in Internet Business Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 20 (2): 393–410. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/identifying-and-reducing-response-burdens-in-internet-business-surveys.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Hedlin, D., T. Dale, G. Haraldsen, and J. Jones. 2005. Developing Methods for Assessing Perceived Response Burden. Technical Report, European Commission, Eurostat. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/64157/4374310/10-DEVELOPING-METHODS-FOR-ASSESSING-PERCEIVED-RESPONSE-BURDEN.pdf/1900efc8-1a07-4482-b3c9-be88ee71df3b (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Hedlin, D., H. Lindkvist, H. Backstrom, and J. Erikson. 2008. “An Experiment on Perceived Survey Response Burden among Businesses.” Journal of Official Statistics 24 (2): 301–318. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7-be7fb3/an-experiment-on-perceived-survey-response-burden-among-businesses.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Holzberg, J., J. Katz, and M. Davis. 2021. Measuring Respondents’ Perceptions of Burden in the American Community Survey (ACS). Technical Report, U.S. Census Bureau Research Report Series Survey Methodology: 2021(4). Available at: https://www2.census.gov/adrm/CBSM/rsm2021-04.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Hotchkiss, M. and J. Phelan. 2017. Uses of Census Bureau Data in Federal Funds Distribution: A New Design for the 21St Century. Technical Report, U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial/2020/program-management/working-papers/Uses-of-Census-Bureau-Data-in-Federal-Funds-Distribution.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Hughes, T., E. Slud, R. Ashmead, and R. Walsh. 2016. Results of a Field Pilot to Reduce Respondent Contact Burden in the American Community Survey’s Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing Operation. Technical Report, U.S. Census Bureau 2016 American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series #ACS16-RER-07. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/-working-papers/2016/acs/2016_Hughes_01.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Jones, C., P. Sheatsley, and A. Stinchcombe. 1979. Dakota Farmers and Ranchers Evaluate Crop and Livestock Surveys. Technical Report, National Opinion Research Center Report No. 128. Chicago. Available at: https://www.norc.org/PDFs/publications/NORCRpt_128.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Jones, J. 2012. “Response Burden: Introductory Overview Lecture.” Presentation at the Fourth Annual International Conference on Establishment Surveys, June 12, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Available at: https://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2012/papers/302289.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Joshipura, M. 2008. 2005 American Community Survey Respondent Characteristics Evaluation. Technical Report, U.S. Census Bureau DSSD American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Memorandum Series, Chapter #ACS-RE-2. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2008/acs/2008_Joshipura_01.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. and J. Holzberg. 2019. “What Does it Mean to be Burdened? Exploring Subjective Perceptions of Burden.” Presentation at the DC-AAPOR Respondent Burden Workshop, October 21, Washington D.C., USA. Available at: http://files.dc-aapor.org/slides/burden2019/Kaplan.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. and S. Fricker. 2017. Objective and Subjective Burden Measures: Which Survey Features and Respondent Characteristics Contribute to Both? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, May 20, New Orleans, LA, USA. Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Y., J. Dykema, J. Stevenson, P. Black, and D.P. Moberg. 2019. “Straightlining: Overview of Measurement, Comparison of Indicators, and Effects in Mail-Web Mixed-Mode Surveys.” Social Science Computer Review 37: 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317752406. Search in Google Scholar

Krosnick, J.A. 1991. “Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 5: 213–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305. Search in Google Scholar

Kunz, T. and T. Gummer. 2019. “Perceived and Actual Respondent Burden and the Effects on Data Quality in Web Surveys.” Presentation at the European Survey Research Conference, July 17, Zagreb, Croatia. Available at: https://www.europeansurveyresearch.org/conferences/programme?sess=203#573. Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Y.A. and C. Knappenberger. 2019. “Exploring monetary incentives and respondent burden in the Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey.” Presentation at the DC-AAPOR Respondent Burden Workshop, October 21, Washington D.C., USA. Available online at: http://files.dc-aapor.org/slides/burden2019/Lee.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Leeper, T.J. 2019. “Where Have the Respondents Gone? Perhaps We Ate Them All.” Public Opinion Quarterly 83: 280–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz010. Search in Google Scholar

Malhotra, N. 2008. “Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72: 914–934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn050. Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J.S., D.G. Beckler, and S.M. Qualey. 2006. “An Analysis of the Relationship Between Survey Burden and Nonresponse: If We Bother Them More, Are They Less Cooperative?” Journal of Official Statistics 22 (1): 97 – 112. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/an-analysis-ofthe-relationship-between-survey-burden-and-nonresponse-if-we-bother-them-more-are-they-less-cooperative.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J.S. and D.G. Beckler. 2000. “Survey Burden and its Impact on Attitudes toward the Survey Sponsor.” Paper presented at the Second Annual International Conference on Establishment Surveys, June 17-21, Buffalo, NY, USA. Available at: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Education_and_Outreach/Reports,_Presentations_and_Conferences/allreports/Survey_Burden_and_Its_Impact.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, D.L. 1998. The Focus Group Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781483328164 Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, E., R. Horwitz, and J.G. Tancreto. 2015. An Examination of Self-Response for Hard-to-Interview Groups When Offered an Internet Reporting Option for the American Community Survey. Technical Report, U.S. Census Bureau 2015 American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series Chapter #ACS15-RER-10. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/-working-papers/2015/acs/2015_Nichols_01.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Olson, C.A. 2014. “Survey Burden, Response Rates, and the Tragedy of the Commons.” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 34: 93–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.21238.24939350 Search in Google Scholar

Peytchev, A. 2009. “Survey Breakoff.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73(1): 74–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp014. Search in Google Scholar

Phipps, P. 2014. “Defining and Measuring Respondent Burden in Establishment Surveys.” Presentation at the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology (FCSM) Statistical Policy Seminar, December 16, Washington D.C., USA. Search in Google Scholar

Presser, S. and S. McCulloch. 2011. “The growth of survey research in the United States: Government-sponsored surveys, 1984-2004.” Social Science Research 40: 1019–1024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.04.004. Search in Google Scholar

Read, B. 2019. “Respondent burden in a mobile app: Evidence from a shopping receipt scanning study.” Survey Research Methods 13: 45–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2019.v1i1.7379. Search in Google Scholar

Ritchie, J., L. Spencer, and W. O’Connor. 2003. “Carrying out Qualitative Analysis.” In Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, edited by J. Ritchie and J. Lewis: 219–262. London: Sage Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Sharp, L.M. and J. Frankel. 1983. “Respondent Burden: A Test of Some Common Assumptions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 47: 36–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/268765. Search in Google Scholar

Tortora, R.D. 2017. “Respondent Burden, Reduction Of.” In Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, edited by S. Kotz, C.B. Read, N. Balakrishnan, B. Vidakovic, and N.L. Johnson. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Search in Google Scholar

Tourangeau, R. and T.J. Plewes. 2013. Nonresponse in Social Science Surveys: A Research Agenda. Panel on a Research Agenda for the Future of Social Science Data Collection, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/18293. Search in Google Scholar

Tourangeau, R. and T. Yan. 2007. “Sensitive Questions in Surveys.” Psychological Bulletin 133: 859–883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859.17723033 Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2012. Consumer Expenditure Surveys Quarterly Interview CAPI Survey 2011–2012. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cex/capi/2011/cecapihome.htm Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2013. Consumer Expenditure Surveys Quarterly Interview CAPI Survey 2013. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cex/capi/2013/cecapihome.htm Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2017. Consumer Expenditure Survey Interview Questionnaire (CEQ) – 2017. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cex/capi/2017/2017-CEQ-CAPI-instrument-specifications.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Census Bureau. 2014. American Community Survey Design and Methodology (January 2014). Technical Report. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/methodology/design_and_methodology/acs_design_methodology_report_2014.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Census Bureau. 2017. ACS Notification: Change in Methodology for Nonresponse Follow Up Data Collection. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/news/updates.2017.html (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). 2011. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Guide Version 2.0. Available at: https://www.opm.gov/about-us/open-government/digital-government-strategy/fitara/paperwork-reduction-act-guide.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Wenemark, M., G.H. Frisman, T. Svensson, and M. Kristenson. 2010. “Respondent Satisfaction and Burden among Differently Motivated Participants in a Health-Related Survey.” Field Methods 22: 378–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10376704. Search in Google Scholar

Willis, G.B. 2015. Analysis of the Cognitive Interview in Questionnaire Design. New York: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Yan, T., S. Fricker, and S. Tsai. 2020. “Response Burden: What Is It and What Predicts It?” In Advances in Questionnaire Design, Development, Evaluation, and Testing edited by P.C. Beatty, D. Collins, L. Kaye, J. Padilla, G.B. Willis, and A. Wilmot: 193–212. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9781119263685.ch8 Search in Google Scholar

Yang, D.K. 2015. “Compiling Respondent Burden Items: A Composite Index Approach.” Presentation at the Consumer Expenditure Survey Methods Symposium, July 14, Washington D.C., USA. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cex/respondent-burden-index.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Yu, E.C., S. Fricker, and B. Kopp. 2015. “Can Survey Instructions Relieve Respondent Burden?” Presentation at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, May 15: Hollywood, FL, USA. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2015/pdf/st150260.pdf (accessed November 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Articles recommandés par Trend MD

Planifiez votre conférence à distance avec Sciendo