[Abraham, K.G., A. Maitland, and S.M. Bianchi. 2006. “Nonresponse in the American Time Use Survey: Who Is Missing from the Data and How Much Does It Matter?” Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5): 676–703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl037.10.1093/poq/nfl037]Search in Google Scholar
[Bethlehem, J. 2009. “The Rise of Survey Sampling.” Statistics Netherlands. Discussion Paper (09015). Available at: https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/imported/documents/2009/07/2009-15-x10-pub.pdf?la=nl-nl&hash=B75A64DF0877B7FD089E796FCFE81145 (accessed August 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Boström, G., J. Hallqvist, B.J.A. Haglund, A. Romelsjö, L. Svanström, and F. Diderichsen. 1993. “Socioeconomic Differences in Smoking in an Urban Swedish Population. The Bias Introduced by Non-Participation in a Mailed Questionnaire.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 21(2): 77–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/140349489302100204.10.1177/140349489302100204]Search in Google Scholar
[Connelly, N.A., T.L. Brown, and D.J. Decker. 2003. “Factors Affecting Response Rates to Natural Resource – Focused Mail Surveys: Empirical Evidence of Declining Rates Over Time.” Society & Natural Resources 16(6): 541–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309152.10.1080/08941920309152]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, M.P., A. Kapteyn, M. Schonlau, and J. Winter. 2007. “Noncoverage and Nonresponse in an Internet Survey.” Social Science Research 36(1): 131–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.10.002.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Cull, W.L., K.G.O. Connor, S. Sharp, and S.S. Tang. 2005. “Methods Response Rates and Response Bias for 50 Surveys of Pediatricians.” HSR: Health Services Research 40(1): 213–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00350.x.10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00350.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Curtin, R., S. Presser, and E. Singer. 2000. “The Effects of Response Rate Changes on the Index of Consumer Sentiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64(4): 413–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/318638.10.1086/318638]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D.A., G. Phelps, R. Tortora, K. Swift, J. Kohrell, J. Berck, and B.L. Messer. 2009. “Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet.” Social Science Research, 38(1), 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.007.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Etter, J.-F., and T.V. Perneger. 1997. “Analysis of Non-Response Bias in a Mailed Health Survey.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 50(10): 1123–1128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00166-2.10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00166-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Goyder, J. 1986. “Surveys on Surveys: Limitations and Potentialities.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50(1): 27–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/268957.10.1086/268957]Search in Google Scholar
[Goyder, J., K. Warriner, and S. Miller. 2002. “Evaluating Socio-Economic Status (SES) Bias in Survey Nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 18(1): 1–11. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/evaluating-socio-economic-status-ses-bias-in-survey-nonresponse.pdf (accessed September 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M., and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York (NY): John Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1999.101.3.699.10.1525/aa.1999.101.3.699]Search in Google Scholar
[Hill, A., J. Roberts, P. Ewings, and D. Gunnell. 1997. “Non-Response Bias in a Lifestyle Survey.” Journal of Public Health 19(2): 203–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024610.10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a0246109243437]Search in Google Scholar
[Hochschild, A., and A. Machung. 2003. The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home. New York (NY): Penguin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, T.P., and J.S. Wislar. 2012. “Response Rates and Nonresponse Errors in Surveys.” JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 307(17): 1805–1806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.3532.10.1001/jama.2012.353222550194]Search in Google Scholar
[Knulst, W., and A. van den Broek. 1998. “Do Time-Use Surveys Succeed in Measuring ‘Busyness’? Some Observations of the Dutch Case.” Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure 21(2): 563–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.1998.10753671.10.1080/07053436.1998.10753671]Search in Google Scholar
[Kwak, N., and B. Radler. 2002. “A Comparison Between Mail and Web Surveys: Response Pattern, Respondent Profile, and Data Quality.” Journal of Official Statistics 18(2): 257–273. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/a-comparison-between-mail-and-web-surveys-response-pattern-respondent-profile-and-data-quality.pdf (accessed September 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Marcus, B., M. Bosnjak, S. Lindner, S. Pilischenko, and A. Schutz. 2007. “Compensating for Low Topic Interest and Long Surveys: A Field Experiment on Nonresponse in Web Surveys.” Social Science Computer Review 25(3): 372–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307297606.10.1177/0894439307297606]Search in Google Scholar
[Minnen, J., I. Glorieux, T.P. van Tienoven, D. Weenas, J. Deyaert, S. van den Bogaert, and S. Rymenants. 2014. “Modular Online Time Use Survey (MOTUS) – Translating an existing method in the 21st century.” Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 11(1), 73–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13085/eIJTUR.11.1.73-93.10.13085/eIJTUR.11.1.73-93]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore, D.L., and J. Tarnai. 2001. “Evaluating Nonresponse Error in Mail Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 197–212. New York (NY): Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pääkkönen, H. 1998. “Are Busy People Under- or over-Represented in National Time Budget Surveys?” Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure 21(2): 573–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.1998.10753672.10.1080/07053436.1998.10753672]Search in Google Scholar
[Porter, S.R., and M.E. Whitcomb. 2005. “Non-Response in Student Surveys: The Role of Demographics, Engagement and Personality.” Research in Higher Education 46(2): 127–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1597-2.10.1007/s11162-004-1597-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Savage, M., and R. Burrows. 2009. “Some Further Reflections on the Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology.” Sociology 43(4): 762–772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509105420.10.1177/0038038509105420]Search in Google Scholar
[Sax, L.J., S.K. Gilmartin, and A.N. Bryant. 2003. “Assessing Response Rate and Nonreponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys.” Research in Higher Education 44(4): 409–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024232915870.10.1023/A:1024232915870]Search in Google Scholar
[Singer, E., R.M. Groves, and A.D. Corning. 1999. “Differential Incentives: Beliefs About Practices, Perceptions of Equity, and Effects on Survey Participation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63(2): 251–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/297714.10.1086/297714]Search in Google Scholar
[Singer, E., J. van Hoewyk, and M.P. Maher. 2000. “Experiments with Incentives in Telephone Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64(2): 171–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/317761.10.1086/31776110984332]Search in Google Scholar
[Singer, J.D., and J.B. Willett. 2003. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis. Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, C., and D. Nutbeam. 1990. “Assessing Non-Response Bias: A Case Study from the 1985 Welsh Heart Health Survey.” Health Education Research 5(3): 381–386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/her/5.3.381.10.1093/her/5.3.381]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, W.G. 2008. “Does Gender Influence Online Survey Participation? A Record-Linkage Analysis of University Faculty Online Survey Response Behavior.” Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501717.pdf (accessed August 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Szalai, A. 1966. “Trends in Comparative Time-Budget Research.” American Behavioral Scientist 9(9): 3–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426600900901.10.1177/000276426600900901]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Ingen, E., I. Stoop, and K. Breedveld. 2008. “Nonresponse in the Dutch Time Use Survey: Strategies for Response Enhancement and Bias Reduction.” Field Methods 21(1): 69–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08323099.10.1177/1525822X08323099]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Kenhove, P., K. Wijnen, and K. de Wulf. 2000. “The Influence of Topic Involvement on Mail-Survey Response Behavior.” Psychology & Marketing 19(3): 293–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1053.10.1002/mar.1053]Search in Google Scholar
[Wallace, D. 1954. “A Case For- and Against- Mail Questionnaires.” Public Opinion Quarterly 18(1): 40–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/266484.10.1086/266484]Search in Google Scholar
[Zuzanek, J. 1998. “Non-Response in Time-Use Surveys: Do the Two Ends Meet?” Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure 21(2): 547–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.1998.10753668.10.1080/07053436.1998.10753668]Search in Google Scholar