[Arnold, J.E., C.L.H. Kam, and M.K. Tanenhaus. 2007. “If You Say Thee uh You Are Describing Something Hard: The On-Line Attribution of Disfluency During Reference Comprehension.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33(5): 914–930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.914.10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.914]Search in Google Scholar
[Arnold, J.E., M.K. Tanenhaus, R.J. Altmann, and M. Fagnano. 2004. “The Old and Thee, uh, New: Disfluency and Reference Resolution.” Psychological Science 15(9): 578–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00723.x.10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00723.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Barr, D.J. and M. Seyfeddinipur. 2010. “The role of fillers in listener attributions for speaker disfluency.” Language and Cognitive Processes 25(4): 441–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903047122.10.1080/01690960903047122]Search in Google Scholar
[Boomer, D.S. 1965. “Hesitation and Grammatical Encoding.” Language and Speech 8(3): 148–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002383096500800302.10.1177/002383096500800302]Search in Google Scholar
[Bortfeld, H., S.D. Leon, J.E. Bloom, M.F. Schober, and S.E. Brennan. 2001. “Disfluency Rates in Conversation: Effects of Age, Relationship, Topic, Role, and Gender.” Language and Speech 44(2): 123–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00238309010440020101.10.1177/00238309010440020101]Search in Google Scholar
[Brennan, S.E. and M.F. Schober. 2001. “How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech.” Journal of Memory and Language 44: 274–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2753.10.1006/jmla.2000.2753]Search in Google Scholar
[Chamberlain, G. 1980. “Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data.” The Review of Economic Studies 47(1): 225–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297110.10.2307/2297110]Search in Google Scholar
[Christenfeld, N. 1995. “Does it hurt to say um?” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 19(3): 171–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02175503.10.1007/BF02175503]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, H.H. and J.E. Fox Tree. 2002. “Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking.” Cognition 84(1): 73–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3.10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Conrad, F.G., J.S. Broome, J.R. Benkí, F. Kreuter, R.M. Groves, D. Vannette, and C. McClain. 2013. “Interviewer speech and the success of survey invitations.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 176(1): 191–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01064.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01064.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dijkstra, W. and J. Smit. 2002. “Persuading Reluctant Recipients in Telephone Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.A. Little, 121–134. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Draisma, S. and W. Dijkstra. 2004. “Response Latency and (Para)linguistic Expression as Indicators of Response Error.” In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by S. Presser, J.M. Rothgeb, M.P. Couper, J.T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer, 131–148. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1002/0471654728.ch7]Search in Google Scholar
[Draisma, S., Y. Ongena, and W. Dijkstra. 2005. “Qualified Answers and Other Doubt Expressions as Indicators of Cognitive Problems in a Health Survey.” American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, Miami Beach, FL, May 2005. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2005f.html (accessed June 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Fox Tree, J.E. 2002. “Interpreting Pauses and Ums at Turn Exchanges.” Discourse Processes 34(1): 37–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3401_2.10.1207/S15326950DP3401_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Fox Tree, J.E. 2007. “Folk notions of um and uh, you know, and like.” Text & Talk – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies 23(3): 297–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.012.10.1515/TEXT.2007.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Garbarski, D., N.C. Schaeffer, and J. Dykema. 2011. “Are Interactional Behaviors Exhibited When the Self-Reported Health Question Is Asked Associated with Health Status?“ Social Science Research 40(4): 1025–1036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.04.002.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.04.002317377721927518]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper. 1996. “Contact-Level Influences on Cooperation in Face-to-Face Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 12(1): 63–83. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/contact-level-influences-on-cooperation-in-face-to-face-surveys.pdf (accessed June 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and K. McGonagle. 2001. “A Theory-Guided Interviewer Training Protocol Regarding Survey Participation.” Journal of Official Statistics 17(2): 249–266. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/a-theory-guided-interviewer-training-protocol-regardingsurvey-participation.pdf (accessed June 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M., B.C. O’Hare, D. Gould-Smith, J.R. Benkí, and P. Maher. 2008. “Telephone Interviewer Voice Characteristics and the Survey Participation Decision.” In Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology, edited by J.M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, J.M. Brick, E.D. De Leeuw, L. Japec, P.J. Lavrakas, M.W. Link, and R.L. Sangster, 385–400. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470173404.ch18]Search in Google Scholar
[Hauser, R.M. 2005. “Survey Response in the Long Run: The Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.” Field Methods 17(1): 3–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1525822X04272452.10.1177/1525822X04272452]Search in Google Scholar
[Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. and H. van den Bergh. 2002. “Effects of Introductions in Large-Scale Telephone Survey Interviews.” In Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, edited by D.W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaeffer, and J. van der Zouwen, 205–218. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mathiowetz, N.A. 1999. “Respondent Uncertainty as Indicator of Response Quality.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 11(3): 289–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/11.3.289.10.1093/ijpor/11.3.289]Search in Google Scholar
[Maynard, D.W., J. Freese, and N.C. Schaeffer. 2010. “Calling for Participation: Requests, Blocking Moves, and Rational (Inter)action in Survey Introductions.” American Sociological Review 75(5): 791–814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0003122410379582.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maynard, D.W. and N.C. Schaeffer. 1997. “Keeping the Gate: Declinations of the Request to Participate in a Telephone Survey Interview.” Sociological Methods & Research 26(1): 34–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0049124197026001002.10.1177/0049124197026001002]Search in Google Scholar
[Maynard, D.W., H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaffer, and J. van der Zouwen. 2002. Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, edited by D.W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaeffer, and J. van der Zouwen. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morton-Williams, J. 1993. Interviewer Approaches. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oksenberg, L. and C.F. Cannell. 1988. “Effects of Interviewer Vocal Characteristics on Nonresponse.” In Telephone Survey Methodology, edited by R.M. Groves, P.P. Biemer, L.E. Lyberg, J.T. Massey, W.L. Nicholls II, and J. Waksberg, 257–272. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaeffer, N.C. forthcoming. “Interaction before and during the survey interview: Insights from conversation analysis.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaeffer, N.C. and J. Dykema. 2011. “Response 1 to Fowler’s Chapter: Coding the Behavior of Interviewers and Respondents to Evaluate Survey Questions.” In Question Evaluation Methods: Contributing to the Science of Data Quality, edited by J. Madans, K. Miller, A. Maitland, and G. Willis, 23–39. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118037003.ch3]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaeffer, N.C., D. Garbarski, J. Freese, and D.W. Maynard. 2013. “An Interactional Model of the Call for Participation in the Survey Interview: Actions and Reactions in the Survey Recruitment Call.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77(1): 323–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft006.10.1093/poq/nft006407289424976648]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaeffer, N.C. and D.W. Maynard. 2002. “Occasions for Intervention: Interactional Resources for Comprehension in Standardized Survey Interviews.” In Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, edited by D.W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaeffer, and J. van der Zouwen, 261–280. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaeffer, N.C., B.H. Min, T. Purnell, D. Garbarski, and J. Dykema. 2018. “Greeting and Response: Predicting Participation from the Call Opening?” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 1(1): 122–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx014.10.1093/jssam/smx014]Search in Google Scholar
[Schegloff, E. 2010. “Some Other “Uh(m)”s.” Discourse Processes 47(2): 130–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903223380.10.1080/01638530903223380]Search in Google Scholar
[Schober, M.F. and J.E. Bloom. 2004. “Discourse Cues that Respondents Have Misunderstood Survey Questions.” Discourse Processes 38(3): 287–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3803_1.10.1207/s15326950dp3803_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Schober, M.F., F.G. Conrad, W. Dijkstra, and Y.P. Ongena. 2012. “Disfluencies and Gaze Aversion in Unreliable Responses to Survey Questions.” Journal of Official Statistics 28(4): 555–582. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/disfluencies-and-gaze-aversion-in-unreliable-responses-to-survey-questions.pdf (accessed June 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Sharf, D.J. and M.E. Lehman. 1984. “Relationship between the speech characteristics and effectiveness of telephone interviewers.” Journal of Phonetics 12(3): 219–228. Abstract: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1985-22253-001 (accessed June 2019).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30878-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Shriberg, E. 1996. “Disfluencies in Switchboard.” Proceedings, International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP ’96), Vol. Addendum, 11–14. Philadelphia, PA, October 3–6, 1996. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.16.5822&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed June 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, V.L. and H.H. Clark. 1993. “On the Course of Answering Questions.” Journal of Memory and Language 32(1): 25–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1002.10.1006/jmla.1993.1002]Search in Google Scholar
[Sturgis, P. and P. Campanelli. 1998. “The Scope for Reducing Refusals in Household Surveys: An Investigation Based on Transcripts of Tape-Recorded Doorstep Interactions.” Journal of the Market Research Society 40(2): 121–139. Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/214805239/fulltextPDF/7DBB4A59542349A9PQ/1?accountid=465 (accessed June 2019).10.1177/147078539804000207]Search in Google Scholar
[Van der Vaart, W., Y. Ongena, A. Hoogendoorn, and W. Dijkstra. 2006. “Do Interviewers’ Voice Characteristics Influence Cooperation Rates in Telephone Surveys?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18(4): 488–499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh117.10.1093/ijpor/edh117]Search in Google Scholar