Accès libre

How Standardized is Occupational Coding? A Comparison of Results from Different Coding Agencies in Germany

À propos de cet article

Citez

Belloni, M., A. Brugiavini, E. Meschi, and K. Tijdens. 2016. “Measuring and Detecting Errors in Occupational Coding: An Analysis of SHARE Data.” Journal of Official Statistics 32(4): 917–945. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JOS-2016-0049.10.1515/JOS-2016-0049Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bergmann, M.M. and D. Joye. 2005. “Comparing Social Stratification Schemata: CAMSIS, CSP-CH, Goldthorpe, ISCO-88, Treiman, and Wright.” Cambridge Studies in Social Research 10: 1–35. Available at: https://www.sociology.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/cs10 (accessed January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Billiet, J. and G. Loosveldt. 1988. “Improvement of the Quality of Responses to Factual Survey Question by Interviewer Training.” Public Opinion Quarterly 52: 190–211. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269094.10.1086/269094Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bundesagentur für Arbeit. 2011. Klassifikation der Berufe 2010. Systematischer und alphabetischer Teil mit Erläuterungen. Nürnberg: Bundesagentur für Arbeit.Search in Google Scholar

Bushnell, D. 1998. “An Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Occupation Coding.” In Proceedings of the International Conference New Methods for Survey Research, August 21–22, 1998: 23–26. Chilworth Manor, Southampton, United Kingdom.Search in Google Scholar

Campanelli, P., K. Thomson, N. Moon, and T. Staples. 1997. “The Quality of Occupational Coding in the United Kingdom.” In Survey Measurement and Process Quality, edited by L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. De Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin, 437–453. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Cantor, D. and J.L. Esposito. 1992. “Evaluating Interviewer Style for Collecting Industry and Occupation Information.” Proceedings of the Section on Survey Methods, American Statistical Association: 661–666.Search in Google Scholar

Conrad, F.G., M.P. Couper, and J.W. Sakshaug. 2016. “Classifying Open-Ended Reports: Factors Affecting the Reliability of Occupation Codes.” Journal of Official Statistics 32(1): 75–92. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JOS-2016-0003.10.1515/JOS-2016-0003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Desrosières, Alain. 1996. “Statistical Traditions: An Obstacle to International Comparisons?” In Cross-National Research Methods in the Social Sciences, edited by L. Hantrais and S. Mangen, 17–27. New York: Cassel.Search in Google Scholar

Elias, P. 1997. “Occupational Classification (ISCO-88): Concepts, Methods, Reliability, Validity and Cross-National Comparability.” OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers 20. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/304441717388.10.1787/304441717388Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Freelon, D.G. 2010. “Recal: Intercoder Reliability Calculation as a Web Service.” International Journal of Internet Science 5(1): 20–33. Available at: http://www.ijis.net/ijis5_1/ijis5_1_freelon.pdf (accessed January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Ganzeboom, H.B.G. and D.J. Treiman. 1996. “Internationally Comparable Measures of Occupational Status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations.” Social Science Research 25: 201–239. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1996.0010.10.1006/ssre.1996.0010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ganzeboom, H.B.G. and D.J. Treiman. 2003. “Three Internationally Standardised Measures for Comparative Research on Occupational Status.” In Advances in Cross-National Comparison. A European Working Book for Demographic and Socio-Economic Variables, edited by J.H.P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik and C. Wolf, 159–193. New York: Kluwer Acadamic/Plenum Publishers.10.1007/978-1-4419-9186-7_9Search in Google Scholar

Ganzeboom, H.B.G. and D.J. Treiman. 2012. “International Stratification and Mobility File: Conversion Tools.” Amsterdam: Department of Social Research Methodology. Available at: http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/ismf/index.htm. Retrieved 2017/02/27.Search in Google Scholar

Geis, A. and J.H.P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik. 2000. “Stand der Berufsvercodung.” ZUMANachrichten 47: 103–128. Available at: https://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/upload/forschung/publikationen/zeitschriften/zuma_nachrichten/zn_47.pdf (accessed January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Gweon, H., M. Schonlau, L. Kaczmirek, M. Blohm, and S. Steiner. 2017. “Three Methods for Occupation Coding Based on Statistical Learning.” Journal of Official Statistics 33(1): 101–122. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0006.10.1515/jos-2017-0006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hak, T. and T. Bernts. 1996. “Coder Training: Theoretical Training or Practical Socialization?” Qualitative Sociology 19(2): 235–257. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02393420.10.1007/BF02393420Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, E., P. Elias, B. Embury, and R. Thomas. 1995. What Kind of Work Do You Do? Data Collection and Processing Strategies When Measuring “Occupation” for Statistical Surveys and Administrative Records. Geneva: ILO.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J.H.P., D. Hess, and A. Geis. 2004. “Computerunterstützte Vercodung der International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-88).” ZUMANachrichten 55: 29–52. Available at: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/20762/ssoar-zuma-2004-55-hoffmeyer-zlotnik_et_al-computerunterstutzte_vercodung_der_international_standard.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed January 2016).Search in Google Scholar

International Labour Office (ILO). 2012. International Standard Classification of Occupations 2008 (ISCO-08): Structure, Group Definitions and Correspondence Tables. Geneva: ILO.Search in Google Scholar

Maaz, K., U. Trautwein, C. Gresch, O. Lüdtke, and R. Watermann. 2009. “Intercoder-Reliabilität bei der Berufscodierung nach der ISCO-88 und Validität des sozioökonomischen Status.” ZfE 12: 281–301. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11618-009-0068-0.10.1007/s11618-009-0068-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Schierholz, M., M. Gensicke, N. Tschersich, and F. Kreuter. 2017. “Occupation Coding During the Interview.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 181: 379–407. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12297.10.1111/rssa.12297Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

‘t Mannetje, A. and H. Kromhout. 2003. “The Use of Occupation and Industry Classifications in General Population Studies.” International Journal of Epidemiology 32: 419–428. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyg080.10.1093/ije/dyg08012777430Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tijdens, K. 2014. “Dropout Rates and Response Times of an Occupation Search Tree in a Web Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 30(1): 23–43. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0002.10.2478/jos-2014-0002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tijdens, K. 2015. “Self-Identification of Occupation in Web Surveys: Requirements for Search Trees and Look-up Tables.” Survey Insights: Methods from the Field. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2015-00008.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2001-7367
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Mathematics, Probability and Statistics