[Barron, S., C. Reiser, M. Bentley, J. Hill, and A. Meier. 2012. “2010 Census Deadline Messaging and Compressed Mailing Schedule Experiment.” Paper presented at the 2012 Joint Statistical Meetings, San Diego, CA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barry, T. E. 1987. “The Development of the Hierarchy of Effects: An Historical Perspective.” Current Issues and Research in Advertising 10(1–2): 251–295.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barth, D., M. Zelenak, M. Asiala, E. Castro, and A. Roberts. 2016. 2015 Envelope Mandatory Messaging Test: Final Report. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2016/acs/2016_Barth_01.pdf (accessed April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bavdaž, M. 2010. “The Multidimensional Integral Business Survey Response Model.” Survey Methodology 36(1): 81–93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Britt, R. and F. Featherston. 2007. “Increasing Survey Cooperation: Motivating Chronic Late Responders to an Annual Survey.” Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Establishment Surveys, June 18–21, 2007, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chun, Y.I. and K. Robertson. 1995. “The Effects of Advance Letters and Reminder/Thank You Letters on Reducing Nonresponse in an Establishment Survey: An Experimental Study.” Washington, D.C., USA: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at: https://stats.bls.gov/osmr/pdf/st950020.pdf (accessed April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Cialdini, R. 1984. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. NY: Quill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Claveau, J. and C. Turmelle. 2012. “An Embedded Experiment to Test Non-Response Follow-Up Strategies when Using Electronic Questionnaires.” Paper presented at the Conference of European Statisticians, June 6–8, 2012. Paris, France.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crawford, S., M. Couper, and M. Lamias. 2001. “Web Surveys: Perceptions of Burden.” Social Science Computer Review 19(2001): 146–162. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900202.10.1177/089443930101900202]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Davis, W. and N. Pihama. 2009. “Survey Response as Organizational Behavior: An Analysis of the Annual Enterprise Survey, 2003–2007.” New Zealand Association of Economists Conference, July 1–3, 2009. Wellington, New Zealand.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D., J. Smith, and L. Christian. 2009. Internet, Mail, and Mixed Mode Surveys: the Tailored Design Method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D., E. Singer, J. Clark, and J. Treat. 1996. “Effects of Benefits Appeals, Mandatory Appeals, and Variations in Statements of Confidentiality on Completion Rates for Census Questionnaires.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60(3): 376–389. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/297759.10.1086/297759]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Eggleston, C., J. Childs, and E. Nichols. 2016. “Conjoint Analysis of Survey Invitation Messages: A New Method to Understand What Moves People to Respond.” Presented at the Federal Computer-Assisted Survey Instrument Collection Conference, May 3–4, 2016. Suitland, MD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Erikson, J. and P. Hartwig. 2012. “Trying to Improve Response Rates by Lowering the Perceived Response Burden of a Survey.” Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Establishment Surveys, June 11–14, 2012. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.]Search in Google Scholar
[Franklin, J., J. Simpson, J. Wine, and N. Paoli. 2007. “Developing a Contact Strategy to Maximize Self-Administered Web Participation.” Presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, May 17–20, 2007. Anaheim, CA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fulton, J., G. Morales, and J. Childs. 2016. “Effects of Messaging to Encourage Response to the American Community Survey.” Presented at the American Association of Public Opinion Research Conference, May 12–15, 2016. Austin, TX.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giesen, D. 2012. “Exploring Causes and Effects of Perceived Response Burden.” Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Establishment Surveys, June 11–14, 2012. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R., D. Cantor, M. Couper, K. Levin, K. McGonagle, E. Singer, and J. Van Hoewyk. 1997. “Research Investigations in Gaining Participation from Sample Firms in the Current Employment Statistics Program.” In proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association: 289–294. Anaheim, California, USA, August 10–14, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R., R. Cialdini, and M. Couper. 1992. “Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56(4): 475–495. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269338.10.1086/269338]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Groves, R. and M. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118490082]Search in Google Scholar
[Haraldsen, G. 2013. “Quality Issues in Business Surveys.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by Snijkers, G., Haraldsen, G., Jones, J. and Willimack, D. John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ.10.1002/9781118447895.ch03]Search in Google Scholar
[Hedlin, D., H. Lindkvist, H. Bäckström, and J. Erikson. 2008. “An Experiment on Perceived Survey Response Burden among Businesses.” Journal of Official Statistics 24(2): 301–318.]Search in Google Scholar
[Her Majesty’s Revenue Commission. 2010. Large Business Methodology Review: Stage Two Report. Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs Research Report 98. London, UK: Her Majesty’s Revenue Commission. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-sponsored-research-of-large-businesses (accessed April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernandez, A., C. Fan, and A. Tuttle. 2016. “The Effect of a Pre-Due Date Reminder Letter on Nonresponse in a Business Survey.” Presented at the American Association of Public Opinion Research Conference, May 12–15, 2016. Austin, TX.]Search in Google Scholar
[Herndandez, A. 2016. 2015 ARTS Contact Strategies Experiment Results. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau. Internal report.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hughes, T. and J. Tancreto. 2015. “Refining the Web Response Option in the Multiple Mode Collection of the American Community Survey.” Presented at the European Survey Research Association Conference, July 13–17, 2015. Reykjavik, Iceland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplowitz, M.D., T.D. Hadlock, and R. Levine. 2004. “A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68(1): 94–101. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh006.10.1093/poq/nfh006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Keller, J. 2015. 2017 Economic Census Publicity and Outreach Phase 1: Focus Group Research. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau. Internal presentation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keller, S., R. Hough, T. Falconer, and K. Curcio. 2011. “Characteristics of Large Company Respondents to an Economic Survey.” Presented at the 2011 Joint Statistical Meetings, July 30 – August 4, 2011. Miami Beach, FL.]Search in Google Scholar
[Landreth, A. 2002. Results and Recommendations from Cognitive Interviews with Selected Materials from the American Community Survey. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: http://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/ssm2003-10.pdf (accessed April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Landreth, A. 2003. SIPP Advance Letter Focus Group Results: Issues and Recommendations. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: http://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/ssm2003-07.pdf (accessed April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Landreth, A. 2004. “Survey Letters: A Respondent’s Perspective.” Paper presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research, May 13–16, 2004. Phoenix, Arizona.]Search in Google Scholar
[Langeland, J. and A. Tuttle. 2016. “Improving Data Collection: Results from Two Contact Strategy Experiments in Economic Surveys.” Presented at the Fifth International Conference on Establishment Surveys, June 20–23, 2016. Geneva, Switzerland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leslie, T., D. Griffin, P. McGovern, and D. Raglin. 2004. “Measuring the Impact of Questionnaire and Envelope Messages on Respondent Behavior.” Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, August 8–12, 2004. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lor, M., B. Bowers, and A. Krupp. 2017. “Tailored Explanation: A Strategy to Minimize Nonresponse in Demographic Items Among Low-Income Racial and Ethnic Minorities.” Survey Practice 10(3). Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29115/SP-2017-0015.10.29115/SP-2017-0015584448629527423]Search in Google Scholar
[Lorenc, B., M. Bavdazˇ, D. Diesen, R. Seljak, and V. Torres van Grinsven. 2012. “Businesses as Users of Official Statistics.” Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Establishment Surveys, June 11–14, 2012. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lykes, V. and J. Meyers. 2017. “Got Mail? Drivers of Mail-to-Online Response Rates.” Presented at the American Association of Public Opinion Research Conference, May 18–21, 2017. New Orleans, Louisiana.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marquette, E., M. Kornbau, and J. Toribio. 2015. “Testing Contact Strategies to Improve Response in the 2012 Economic Census.” Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, August 8–13, 2015. Seattle, Washington.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCarthy, J., T. Wilson, and A. Dau. 2015. “Adept Adaptations: Developing Alternative Strategies in Adaptive Survey Designs.” Presented at the Federal Committee on Statistical Methods Conference, December 1–3, 2015. Washington, D.C.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCarthy, J., D. Beckler, and M. Qualey. 2006. “An Analysis of the Relationship Between Survey Burden and Nonresponse: If We Bother Them More, Are They Less Cooperative?” Journal of Official Statistics 22(1): 97–112.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matthews, B. 2012. 2011 American Community Survey Internet Tests: Results from Second Test in November 2011. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau. Internal report.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nichols, E. 2012. The April 2011 American Community Survey Internet Test: Attitudes and Behavior Study Follow up. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2012/acs/2012_Nichols_01.pdf (accessed April 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Perrins, G., P. Phipps, J. Pinkos, T. Shaffer, G. Stamas, S. Suchman, C. Tucker, and S. Watkins. 2009. Results from the Occupational Employment Survey Letter and Brochure Experiment. Washington, D.C: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Internal report.]Search in Google Scholar
[Phipps, P. 2008. “The Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) Program: Cover Letter and Brochure Experiments.” Presented at the Federal Computer-Assisted Survey Instrument Collection Conference, March 11–13, 2008. Washington, D.C.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reiser, C. 2013. “Internet Response for the Decennial Census – 2012 National Census Test.” Presented at the American Association of Public Opinion Research Conference, May 16–19, 2013. Boston, MA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shih, T. and X. Fan. 2008. “Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis.” Field Methods 20(3): 249–271. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08317085.10.1177/1525822X08317085]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G., B. Berkenbosch, and M. Luppes. 2007. “Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey.” Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Establishment Surveys, June 18–21, 2007. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G. and J. Jones. 2013. “Business Survey Communication.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by Snijkers, G., Haraldsen, G., Jones, J. and Willimack, D., 359–430. John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ.10.1002/9781118447895.ch09]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G. and G. Haraldsen. 2013. “Managing the Data Collection.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by Snijkers, G., Haraldsen, G., Jones, J. and Willimack, D., 431–457. John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ.10.1002/9781118447895.ch10]Search in Google Scholar
[Tancreto, J. 2012. 2011 American Community Survey Internet Tests: Results from First Test in April 2011. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau. Internal report.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomaskovic-Devey, D., J. Leiter, and S. Thompson. 1994. “Organizational Survey Nonresponse.” Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 439–457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393298.10.2307/2393298]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Torres van Grinsven, V., I. Bolko, and M. Bavdazˇ. 2012. “Sources of Motivation in Business Surveys.” Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Establishment Surveys, June 11–14, 2012. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tulp, D., C. Hoy, G. Kusch, and S. Cole. 1991. “Nonresponse under Mandatory vs. Voluntary Reporting in the 1989 Survey of Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures (PACE).” In JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section. August 18–22, 1991. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association: 272–277.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tuttle, A. 2009. “Establishment Respondents as Survey Managers: Using Survey Design Features to Empower Respondents to Find and Recruit Knowledgeable Company Personnel for Assistance.” Presented at the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Research Conference, November 2–4, 2009. Washington D.C.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tuttle, A. 2011. Large Company Reporting Practices Program – Company Visits Highlights, Round 1. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau. Internal report.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tuttle, A. 2016. “Developing Electronic Tools to Support the Logistical and Collaborative Needs of Respondents to the Economic Census.” Presented at the Federal Computer-Assisted Survey Instrument Collection Conference, May 3–4, 2016. Suitland, MD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tuttle, A., K. Pick, R. Hough, and J. Mulrow. 2010. “Experimenting with Pre-contact Strategies for Reducing Nonresponse in an Economic Survey.” In JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section. July 31 – August 5, 2010. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association: 5253–5262.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tuttle, A. and D. Willimack. 2005. “Privacy Principles and Data Sharing: Implications of CIPSEA for Economic Survey Respondents.” Presented at the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Research Conference, November 14–16, 2005. Washington D.C.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tuttle, A. and D. Willimack. 2012. “Social Network Analysis as a Tool for Assessing Data Quality and Respondent Burden in Establishment Surveys.” Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Establishment Surveys, June 11–14, 2012. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willimack, D., E. Nichols, and S. Sudman. 2002. “Understanding Unit and Item Nonresponse in Business Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by Groves, R. et al. New York: Wiley, 213–227.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willimack, D. and E. Nichols. 2010. “A Hybrid Response Process Model for Business Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 26(1): 3–24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willimack, D., E. Nichols, and S. Sudman. 1999. “Understanding the Questionnaire in Business Surveys.” In JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section. August 8–12, 1999. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association: 889–94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willimack, D. and G. Snijkers. 2013. “The Business Context and its Implications for the Survey Response Process.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by Snijkers, G., Haraldsen, G., Jones, J. and Willimack, D. page numbers. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ.10.1002/9781118447895.ch02]Search in Google Scholar
[Zotti, A., L. Avenilla, S. Coffey, and G. Walejko. 2016. “The Effects of Sending a Pre-notice Postcard in a CAPI-conducted Survey.” Presented at the American Association of Public Opinion Research Conference, May 12–15, 2016. Austin, TX.]Search in Google Scholar
