[Anderman, C., A. Cheadle, S. Curry, P. Diehr, L. Shultz, and E. Wagner. 1995. “Selection Bias Related to Parental Consent in School-Based Survey Research.” Evaluation Review 19: 663-674. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9501900604.10.1177/0193841X9501900604]Search in Google Scholar
[Bates, N.A. 2005. “Development and Testing of Informed Consent Questions to Link Survey Data with Administrative Records.” In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, May 12-15, 2005. 3786-3793, Miami Beach, FL. Available at: http:// www.amstat.org/committees/ethics/linksdir/Jsm2005Bates.pdf (accessed May 21, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Calderwood, L. and C. Lessof. 2009. “Enhancing Longitudinal Surveys by Linking to Administrative Data.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 55-72. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470743874.ch4]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, M.P. 2011. “The Future of Modes of Data Collection.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75: 889-908. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr046.10.1093/poq/nfr046]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlhamer, J.M. and C.S. Cox. 2007. “Respondent Consent to Link Survey Data with Administrative Records: Results from a Split-Ballot Field Test with the 2007 National Health Interview Survey.” In Proceedings of the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Research Conference, November 5-7, 2007, Arlington, VA. Available at: http://www.fcsm.gov/07papers/Dahlhamer.IV-B.pdf (accessed May 21, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Eaton, D.K., R. Lowry, N.D. Brener, J.A. Grunbaum, and L. Kann. 2004. “Passive Versus Active Parental Permission in School-Based Survey Research.” Evaluation Review 28: 564-577. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X04265651.10.1177/0193841X0426565115486161]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellikson, P.L. and J.A. Hawes. 1989. “Active vs. Passive Methods for Obtaining Parental Consent.” Evaluation Review 13: 45-55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0193841X8901300104.10.1177/0193841X890130010411659371]Search in Google Scholar
[Fendrich, M. and T.P. Johnson. 2001. “Examining Prevalence Differences in Three National Surveys of Youth: Impact of Consent Procedures, Mode, and Editing Rules.” Journal of Drug Issues 31: 615-642.10.1177/002204260103100303]Search in Google Scholar
[Gray, M. 2010. “A Review of Data Linkage Procedures at NatCen”, Working Paper.]Search in Google Scholar
[London: National Centre for Social Research. Available at: http://www.natcen.ac.uk/media/205504/data-linkage-review.pdf (accessed May 21, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hunt, K.J., N. Schlomo, and J. Addington-Hall. 2013. “Participant Recruitment in Sensitive Surveys: A Comparative Trial of ‘Opt In’ Versus ‘Opt Out’ Approaches.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 13, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-3.10.1186/1471-2288-13-3356691723311340]Search in Google Scholar
[Junghans, C., G. Feder, H. Hemingway, A. Timmis, and M. Jones. 2005. “Recruiting Patients to Medical Research: Double Blind Randomised Trial of ‘Opt-in’ versus ‘Opt-out’ Strategies.” British Medical Journal 331: 940. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38583.625613.AE.10.1136/bmj.38583.625613.AE126119116157604]Search in Google Scholar
[Pascale, J. 2011. “Requesting Consent to Link Survey Data to Administrative Records: Results from a Split-Ballot Experiment in the Survey of Health Insurance and Program Participation (SHIPP).” Study Series in Survey Methodology #2011-03, (U.S. Census Bureau. Washington DC). Available at: http://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/ssm2011-03.pdf (accessed April 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Pascale, J. and T.S. Mayer. 2004. “Exploring Confidentiality Issues Related to Dependent Interviewing: Preliminary Findings.” Journal of Official Statistics 20: 357-377.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sakshaug, J., M.P. Couper, M.B. Ofstedal, and D. Weir. 2012. “Linking Survey and Administrative Records: Mechanisms of Consent.” Sociological Methods and Research 41: 535-569. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124112460381.10.1177/0049124112460381492863527375305]Search in Google Scholar
[Sakshaug, J. and F. Kreuter. 2012. “Assessing the Magnitude of Non-Consent Biases in Linked Survey and Administrative Data.” Survey Research Methods 6: 113-122.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sala, E., J. Burton, and G. Knies. 2012. “Correlates of Obtaining Informed Consent to Data Linkage: Respondents, Interview and Interviewer Characteristics.” Sociological Methods and Research 41: 414-439. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124112457330.10.1177/0049124112457330]Search in Google Scholar
[Sala, E., G. Knies, and J. Burton. 2013. “Propensity to Consent to Data Linkage: Experimental Evidence from the Innovation Panel on the Role of Three Survey Design Features.” Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2013-05. Colchester, England: University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research. Available at: http:// www.iser.essex.ac.uk/publications/working-papers/understanding-society/2013-05 (accessed June 29, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Scherpenzeel, A.C. and M. Das. 2011. “‘True’ Longitudinal and Probability-Based Internet Panels: Evidence from the Netherlands.” In Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet, edited by M. Das, P. Ester, and L. Kaczmirek, 77-104. New York: Taylor and Francis.10.4324/9780203844922-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Singer, E. 1978. “Informed Consent: Consequences for Response Rate and Response Quality in Social Surveys.” American Sociological Review 43: 144-162.10.2307/2094696]Search in Google Scholar
[Singer, E. 2003. “Exploring the Meaning of Consent: Participation in Research and Beliefs about Risks and Benefits.” Journal of Official Statistics 19: 273-285.]Search in Google Scholar
[Singer, E. and M.P. Couper. 2011. “Ethical Considerations in Internet Surveys.” In Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet, edited by M. Das, P. Ester, and L. Kaczmirek, 133-162. New York: Taylor and Francis.10.4324/9780203844922-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Singer, E., H.-J. Hippler, and N. Schwarz. 1992. “Confidentiality Assurances in Surveys: Reassurance or Threat?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 4: 256-268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/4.3.256.10.1093/ijpor/4.3.256]Search in Google Scholar
[Vellinga, A., M. Cormican, B. Hanahoe, K. Bennett, and A. Murphy. 2011. “Opt-Out as an Acceptable Method of Obtaining Consent in Medical Research: A Short Report.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 11: 40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-40. 10.1186/1471-2288-11-40307970221470399]Search in Google Scholar