Connexion
S'inscrire
Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Publier & Distribuer
Solutions d'édition
Solutions de distribution
Thèmes
Architecture et design
Arts
Business et économie
Chimie
Chimie industrielle
Droit
Géosciences
Histoire
Informatique
Ingénierie
Intérêt général
Linguistique et sémiotique
Littérature
Mathématiques
Musique
Médecine
Pharmacie
Philosophie
Physique
Sciences bibliothécaires et de l'information, études du livre
Sciences des matériaux
Sciences du vivant
Sciences sociales
Sport et loisirs
Théologie et religion
Études classiques et du Proche-Orient ancient
Études culturelles
Études juives
Publications
Journaux
Livres
Comptes-rendus
Éditeurs
Blog
Contact
Chercher
EUR
USD
GBP
Français
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Panier
Home
Journaux
Journal of Horticultural Research
Édition 28 (2020): Edition 1 (June 2020)
Accès libre
Hydraulic Relations and Water Use of Mediterranean Ornamental Shrubs in Containers
Paolo Zuccarini
Paolo Zuccarini
,
Alejandro Galindo
Alejandro Galindo
,
Arturo Torrecillas
Arturo Torrecillas
,
Alberto Pardossi
Alberto Pardossi
et
Brent Clothier
Brent Clothier
| 30 juin 2020
Journal of Horticultural Research
Édition 28 (2020): Edition 1 (June 2020)
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Résumé
Article
Figures et tableaux
Références
Auteurs
Articles dans cette édition
Aperçu
PDF
Citez
Partagez
Publié en ligne:
30 juin 2020
Pages:
49 - 56
Reçu:
01 févr. 2020
Accepté:
01 mai 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2020-0009
Mots clés
gas exchange
,
hydric behavior
,
Mediterranean shrubs
,
water stress
,
water use
© 2020 Paolo Zuccarini et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1
Trend of climatic data during the days of experiment: Temperature (closed circles), vapor pressure deficit (VPD, open circles), and global radiation (RG) are shown. Error bars for each average value of temperature and VPD come from 3 measurements, taken at the hours of the day with highest radiation (11:30, 12:30, and 13:30). RG values refer to the interval 11:30–13:30
Fig. 2
Leaf area by species. Values marked with the same letter are not statistically different at p < 0.05, according to Duncan's multiple range test. Error bars were calculated from six measurements (replicates) for each average value
Fig. 3
ET/RG ratio versus substrate water tensionNote: See Fig. 2
Fig. 4
Relative stomatal conductance (gsrel) versus substrate water tensionNote: See Fig. 2
Fig. 5
Linear correlation between measured and calculated stomatal conductance; for each species, a single regression line, with slope and R2, is presented in the graph; the central dotted line represents the ideal 1 : 1 relationship between measured and calculated gs
Fig. 6
ΔT versus substrate water tension. Note: See Fig. 2
Substrate water tension (SWT) versus percentage of container capacity for the three investigated species
N. oleander
L. japonicum
P. tobira
SWT
% C.C.
SWT
% C.C.
SWT
% C.C.
8
100
18
100
23
100
26
89.5
35
90.7
41
90.7
46
78.8
41
85.6
65
85.6
78
69.6
65
76.1
90
76.1
117
59.8
101
65.3
135
65.3