[Asefa, T., Kemblowski, M., McKee, M., Khalil, A., 2006. Multi-time scale stream flow predictions: the support vector machines approach. Journal of Hydrology, 318, 1–4, 7–16.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Basak, D., Pal, S., Patranabis, D.C., 2007. Support vector regression. Neural Information Processing-Letters and Reviews, 11, 10, 203–224.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baudron, P., Alonso-Sarría, F., García-Aróstegui, J.L., Canovas-Garcia, F., Martinez-Vicente, D., Moreno-Brotons, J., 2013. Identifying the origin of groundwater samples in a multi-layer aquifer system with Random Forest classification. Journal of Hydrology, 499, 303–315.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.07.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Ben-Hur, A., Weston, J., 2010. A user’s guide to support vector machines. In: Carugo, O., Eisenhaber, F. (Eds.): Data Mining Techniques for the Life Sciences. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols), Vol 609. Humana Press, 2010, pp. 223–239.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biswal, B., Kumar, D.N., 2014. What mainly controls recession flows in river basins? Advances in water resources, 65, 25–33.10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.01.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Blöschl, G., Blaschke, A.P., Broer, M., Bucher, C., Carr, G., Chen, X., Eder, A., Exner-Kittridge, M., Farnleitner, A., Flores-Orozco, A., Haas, P., Hogan, P., Kazemi Amiri, A., Oismüller, M., Parajka, J., Silasari, R., Stadler, P., Strauss, P., Vreugdenhil, M., Wagner, W., Zessner, M., 2016. The Hydrological Open Air laboratory (HOAL) in Petzenkirchen: a hypothesis-driven observatory. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20, 1, 227.10.5194/hess-20-227-2016]Search in Google Scholar
[Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Wagener, T., Viglione, A., Savenije, H., 2013. Runoff Prediction in Ungauged Basins: Synthesis across Processes, Places and Scales. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139235761]Search in Google Scholar
[Blume, T., Zehe, E., Bronstert, A., 2007. Rainfall–runoff response, event-based runoff coefficients and hydrograph separation. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52, 5, 843–862.10.1623/hysj.52.5.843]Search in Google Scholar
[Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 1, 5–32.10.1023/A:1010933404324]Search in Google Scholar
[Brutsaert, W., Nieber, J.L., 1977. Regionalized drought flow hydrographs from a mature glaciated plateau. Water Resources Research, 13, 3, 637–643.10.1029/WR013i003p00637]Search in Google Scholar
[Cánovas-García, F., Alonso-Sarría, F., Gomariz-Castillo, F., Onate-Valdivieso, F., 2017. Modification of the random forest algorithm to avoid statistical dependence problems when classifying remote sensing imagery. Computers & Geosciences, 103, 1–11.10.1016/j.cageo.2017.02.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Chapelle, O., Vapnik, V., 2000. Model selection for support vector machines. In: NIPS’99 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Denver, CO, November 29 - December 4, 1999, pp. 230–236.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chapman, T.G., Maxwell, A.I., 1996. Baseflow separationcomparison of numerical methods with tracer experiments. In: Hydrology and Water Resources 23rd Symposium, Hobart, 1996. National Conference Publication – Institution of Engineers Australia NCP, 2(5), pp. 539–546.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, B., Krajewski, W.F., Helmers, M.J., Zhang, Z., 2019. Spatial variability and temporal persistence of event runoff coefficients for cropland hillslopes. Water Resources Research, 55, 2, 1583–1597.10.1029/2018WR023576]Search in Google Scholar
[Cortes, C., Vapnik, V., 1995. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 3, 273–297.10.1007/BF00994018]Search in Google Scholar
[Cortez, P., Embrechts, M.J., 2013. Using sensitivity analysis and visualization techniques to open black box data mining models. Information Sciences, 225, 1–17.10.1016/j.ins.2012.10.039]Search in Google Scholar
[Deka, P.C., 2014. Support vector machine applications in the field of hydrology: a review. Applied Soft Computing, 19, 372–386.10.1016/j.asoc.2014.02.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Dietterich, T.G., 1997. Machine-learning research. AI Magazine, 18, 4, 97–97.]Search in Google Scholar
[Erdal, H.I., Karakurt, O., 2013. Advancing monthly streamflow prediction accuracy of CART models using ensemble learning paradigms. Journal of Hydrology, 477, 119–128.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Exner-Kittridge, M., Strauss, P., Blöschl, G., Eder, A., Saracevic, E., Zessner, M., 2016. The seasonal dynamics of the stream sources and input flow paths of water and nitrogen of an Austrian headwater agricultural catchment. Science of the Total Environment, 542, 935–945.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.151]Search in Google Scholar
[Friedman, J.H., 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 45, 1, 1189–1232.10.1214/aos/1013203451]Search in Google Scholar
[Friedman, J.H., 2002. Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 38, 4, 367–378.10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaál, L., Szolgay, J., Kohnová, S., Parajka, J., Merz, R., Viglione, A., Blöschl, G., 2012. Flood timescales: Understanding the interplay of climate and catchment processes through comparative hydrology. Water Resources Research, 48, W04511.10.1029/2011WR011509]Search in Google Scholar
[Gottschalk, L., Weingartner, R., 1998. Distribution of peak flow derived from a distribution of rainfall volume and runoff coefficient, and a unit hydrograph. Journal of Hydrology, 208, 3–4, 148–162.10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00152-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Hayes, D.C., Young, R.L., 2006. Comparison of peak discharge and runoff characteristic estimates from the rational method to field observations for small basins in Central Virginia. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigation Reports, 2005-5254.10.3133/sir20055254]Search in Google Scholar
[Ho, T.K., 1995. Random decision forests. In: ICDAR ‘95 Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 1, IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA, 14–15 August 1995, pp. 278–282.]Search in Google Scholar
[Horn, R.A., Johnson, C.R., 1985. Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511810817]Search in Google Scholar
[Hsu, C.W., Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J., 2003. A practical guide to support vector classification. Technical Report. Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hwang, S.H., Ham, D.H., Kim, J.H., 2012. Forecasting performance of LS-SVM for nonlinear hydrological time series. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 16, 5, 870–882.10.1007/s12205-012-1519-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Krakauer, N.Y., Temimi, M., 2011. Stream recession curves and storage variability in small watersheds. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 7, 2377–2389.10.5194/hess-15-2377-2011]Search in Google Scholar
[Liaw, A., Wiener, M., 2002. Classification and regression by random Forest. R News, 2, 3, 18–22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Longobardi, A., Villani, P., Grayson, R.B., Western, A., 2003. On the relationship between runoff coefficient and catchment initial conditions. In: Proceedings of MODSIM, pp. 867–872.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maity, R., Bhagwat, P.P., Bhatnagar, A., 2010. Potential of support vector regression for prediction of monthly streamflow using endogenous property. Hydrological Processes, 24, 7, 917–923.10.1002/hyp.7535]Search in Google Scholar
[Merz, R., Blöschl, G., 2009. A regional analysis of event runoff coefficients with respect to climate and catchment characteristics in Austria. Water Resources Research, 45, 1, W01405.10.1029/2008WR007163]Search in Google Scholar
[Merz, R., Blöschl, G., Parajka, J., 2006. Spatio-temporal variability of event runoff coefficients. Journal of Hydrology, 331, 3–4, 591–604.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Naghibi, S.A., Ahmadi, K., Daneshi, A., 2017. Application of support vector machine, random forest, and genetic algorithm optimized random forest models in groundwater potential mapping. Water Resources Management, 31, 9, 2761–2775.10.1007/s11269-017-1660-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Naghibi, S.A., Pourghasemi, H.R., Dixon, B., 2016. GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188, 1, 44.10.1007/s10661-015-5049-626687087]Search in Google Scholar
[Norbiato, D., Borga, M., Merz, R., Blöschl, G., Carton, A., 2009. Controls on event runoff coefficients in the eastern Italian Alps. Journal of Hydrology, 375, 3–4, 312–325.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.044]Search in Google Scholar
[Osuna, E.E., 1998. Support vector machines: Training and applications. Diss. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.]Search in Google Scholar
[Palleiro, L., Rodríguez-Blanco, M.L., Taboada-Castro, M.M., Taboada-Castro, M.T., 2014. Hydrological response of a humid agroforestry catchment at different time scales. Hydrological Processes, 28, 4, 1677–1688.10.1002/hyp.9714]Search in Google Scholar
[Patnaik, S., Biswal, B., Kumar, D.N., Sivakumar, B., 2015. Effect of catchment characteristics on the relationship between past discharge and the power law recession coefficient. Journal of Hydrology, 528, 321–328.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.032]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodríguez-Blanco, M.L., Taboada-Castro, M.M., Taboada-Castro, M.T., 2012. Rainfall–runoff response and eventbased runoff coefficients in a humid area (northwest Spain). Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57, 3, 445–459.10.1080/02626667.2012.666351]Search in Google Scholar
[Sachdeva, S., Bhatia, T., Verma, A.K., 2018. GIS-based evolutionary optimized Gradient Boosted Decision Trees for forest fire susceptibility mapping. Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer. International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 92, 3, 1399–1418.10.1007/s11069-018-3256-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Şen, Z., Altunkaynak, A., 2006. A comparative fuzzy logic approach to runoff coefficient and runoff estimation. Hydrological Processes, 20, 9, 1993–2009.10.1002/hyp.5992]Search in Google Scholar
[Shen, C., 2018. A transdisciplinary review of deep learning research and its relevance for water resources scientists. Water Resources Research, 54, 8558–8593. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR02264310.1029/2018WR022643]Search in Google Scholar
[Sivapalan, M., 2003. Prediction in ungauged basins: a grand challenge for theoretical hydrology. Hydrological Processes, 17, 15, 3163–3170.10.1002/hyp.5155]Search in Google Scholar
[Széles, B., Broer, M., Parajka, J., Hogan, P., Eder, A., Strauss, P., Blöschl, G., 2018. Separation of scales in transpiration effects on low flows: A spatial analysis in the Hydrological Open Air Laboratory. Water Resources Research, 54, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022037.10.1029/2017WR022037]Search in Google Scholar
[Tachecí, P., Žlabek, P., Kvitek, T., Peterkova, J., 2013. Analysis of rainfall-runoff events in four subcatchments of the Kopaninský potok (Czech Republic). Bodenkultur, 64, 3–4, 105–111.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tague, C., Grant, G.E., 2004. A geological framework for interpreting the low-flow regimes of Cascade streams, Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Water Resources Research, 40, 4, W04303.10.1029/2003WR002629]Search in Google Scholar
[Tallaksen, L.M., 1995. A review of baseflow recession analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 165, 1–4, 349–370.10.1016/0022-1694(94)02540-R]Search in Google Scholar
[Tarasova, L., Basso, S., Poncelet, C., Merz, R., 2018a. Exploring controls on rainfall-runoff events: 2. Regional patterns and spatial controls of event characteristics in Germany. Water Resources Research, 54, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR02258810.1029/2018WR022588]Search in Google Scholar
[Tarasova, L., Basso, S., Zink, M., Merz, R. 2018b. Exploring controls on rainfall-runoff events: 1. Time-series-based event separation and temporal dynamics of event runoff response in Germany. Water Resources Research, 54, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR02258710.1029/2018WR022587]Search in Google Scholar
[Tian, F., Li, H., Sivapalan, M., 2012. Model diagnostic analysis of seasonal switching of runoff generation mechanisms in the Blue River basin, Oklahoma. Journal of Hydrology, 418, 136–149.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Vapnik, V., Golowich, S., Smola, A., 1997. Support vector method for function approximation, regression estimation, and signal processing. In: NIPS’96 Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Denver, Colorado, 3–5 December 1996, pp. 281–287.]Search in Google Scholar
[Viglione, A., Merz, R., Blöschl, G., 2009. On the role of the runoff coefficient in the mapping of rainfall to flood return periods. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13, 5, 577–593.10.5194/hess-13-577-2009]Search in Google Scholar
[Wainwright, J., Parsons, A.J., 2002. The effect of temporal variations in rainfall on scale dependency in runoff coefficients. Water Resources Research, 38, 12, 1271.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zimmermann, B., Zimmermann, A., Turner, B.L., Francke, T., Elsenbeer, H., 2014. Connectivity of overland flow by drainage network expansion in a rain forest catchment. Water Resources Research, 50, 2, 1457–1473.10.1002/2012WR012660]Search in Google Scholar