<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>Arguments have been made both for and against military use of autonomous weapon systems (AWSs) on the basis of how they will help or hinder a state in meeting its international humanitarian law (IHL) obligations. Often, these arguments are made in isolation, or they fail to address all of the potential compliance concerns related to autonomous weapons. This is not ideal. It means the bearers of legal obligations must locate, assess and piece together the disparate arguments into a coherent structure if they are to know whether they can legitimately utilise a particular autonomous capability and, if so, in what circumstances. This article offers a high-level description of a conceptual framework which can be used to organise and assess legal arguments about autonomous weapons. It proposes that the task of integrating autonomous capabilities into an armed force may be viewed as a constrained optimisation problem wherein the task is to find the optimal balance between the fundamental principles of IHL while also satisfying all normative, technological and strategic/operational constraints.</p>
</abstract>

Arguments have been made both for and against military use of autonomous weapon systems (AWSs) on the basis of how they will help or hinder a state in meeting its international humanitarian law (IHL) obligations. Often, these arguments are made in isolation, or they fail to address all of the potential compliance concerns related to autonomous weapons. This is not ideal. It means the bearers of legal obligations must locate, assess and piece together the disparate arguments into a coherent structure if they are to know whether they can legitimately utilise a particular autonomous capability and, if so, in what circumstances. This article offers a high-level description of a conceptual framework which can be used to organise and assess legal arguments about autonomous weapons. It proposes that the task of integrating autonomous capabilities into an armed force may be viewed as a constrained optimisation problem wherein the task is to find the optimal balance between the fundamental principles of IHL while also satisfying all normative, technological and strategic/operational constraints.

Autonomous weapon systems and IHL compliance: A constrained legal optimisation problem

Journal of Military Studies

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Arguments have been made both for and against military use of autonomous weapon systems (AWSs) on the basis of how they will help or hinder a state in meeting...

Autonomous weapon systems and IHL compliance: A constrained legal optimisation problem

Article Category: Original Study

Publié en ligne: 11 mars 2024

Pages: 75 - 84

Reçu: 30 oct. 2022

Accepté: 13 sept. 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jms-2023-0006

Mots clés
autonomous weapons, optimisation, international humanitarian law

© 2023 Tim McFarland, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Autonomous weapon systems and IHL compliance: A constrained legal optimisation problem

Article Category: Original Study

Publié en ligne: 11 mars 2024

Pages: 75 - 84

Reçu: 30 oct. 2022

Accepté: 13 sept. 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jms-2023-0006

Mots clésautonomous weapons, optimisation, international humanitarian law

© 2023 Tim McFarland, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mots clés
autonomous weapons, optimisation, international humanitarian law