<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>As omission of a person is a certain manifestation of his/her internal will from outside. Exactly through inactivity, the internal will of a person materializes due to which a person becomes a participant of public relations. At the same time in the absence of external expression of will inactivity of a person can not cause the occurrence of legal consequences, in particular, to be examined as a reason of origin of tort liabilities. If a person enacted because of negligence or poor awareness, it should be defined: whether a person knew or had to know about the necessity to perform a certain action. Accordingly, if a person possessed such knowledge this form of behavior will be treated as guilty omission, if not – this is an example of innocent omission. Responsibility for illegal omission can arise only when appropriate persons are included in the system of civil and legal relationships, thus are the subjects of civil relations. Damage caused by “reflexive movements” testifies the carelessness of a person to his/her behavior, which reflects his/her will. Therefore, such behavior of a person is considered to be wrongful.</p></abstract>

As omission of a person is a certain manifestation of his/her internal will from outside. Exactly through inactivity, the internal will of a person materializes due to which a person becomes a participant of public relations. At the same time in the absence of external expression of will inactivity of a person can not cause the occurrence of legal consequences, in particular, to be examined as a reason of origin of tort liabilities. If a person enacted because of negligence or poor awareness, it should be defined: whether a person knew or had to know about the necessity to perform a certain action. Accordingly, if a person possessed such knowledge this form of behavior will be treated as guilty omission, if not – this is an example of innocent omission. Responsibility for illegal omission can arise only when appropriate persons are included in the system of civil and legal relationships, thus are the subjects of civil relations. Damage caused by “reflexive movements” testifies the carelessness of a person to his/her behavior, which reflects his/her will. Therefore, such behavior of a person is considered to be wrongful.

Wrongful Omission as a Condition for Tort Liabilities

Leonid Yuzkov Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law

Leonid Yuzkov Khmelnytsky University of Management and Law

Journal of Legal Studies

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

{"article-title":"Wrongful Omission as a Condition for Tort Liabilities"}

As omission of a person is a certain manifestation of his/her internal will from outside. Exactly through inactivity, the internal will of a person...

Wrongful Omission as a Condition for Tort Liabilities

Publié en ligne: 17 juil. 2020

Pages: 128 - 143

Reçu: 01 avr. 2020

Accepté: 01 juin 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2020-0007

Mots clés
torts, wrongful omission, causal omission, causal inactivity, civil relations, damage

© 2020 Sibilla Buletsa et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Wrongful Omission as a Condition for Tort Liabilities

Publié en ligne: 17 juil. 2020

Pages: 128 - 143

Reçu: 01 avr. 2020

Accepté: 01 juin 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2020-0007

Mots cléstorts, wrongful omission, causal omission, causal inactivity, civil relations, damage

© 2020 Sibilla Buletsa et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Mots clés
torts, wrongful omission, causal omission, causal inactivity, civil relations, damage