[
Ahern, J. (2013). Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: The promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecology, 28, 1203–1212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z.10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnberger, A. (2012). Urban densification and recreational quality of public urban green spaces—a Viennese case study. Sustainability, 4(4), 703–720.10.3390/su4040703
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Armstrong, D. (2000). A survey of community gardens in upstate New York: Implications for health promotion and community development. Health & Place, 6, 319±32710.1016/S1353-8292(00)00013-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bakhtiari, F., Jacobsen, J.B., Strange, N., Helles, F. (2014). Revealing lay people’s perceptions of forest biodiversity value components and their application in valuation method. Global Ecology and Conservation, 1, 27–42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.07.00310.1016/j.gecco.2014.07.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balmford, A., Clegg, L., Coulson, T., Taylor, J. (2002). Why conservationists should heed Pokémon. Science, 295 (5564), 2367. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.295.5564.2367b.10.1126/science.295.5564.2367b11924673
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bornstein, R. F., D’Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and theme reexposure effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol, 63(4), 545–552.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545.10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carrus, G., Scopelliti, M., Lafortezza, R., Colangelo, G., Ferrini, F., Salbitano, F., Agrimi, M., Portoghesi, L., Semenzato, P., Sanesi, G. (2015). Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 221–228, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.02210.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Campbell-Arvai, V. (2018). Engaging urban nature: improving our understanding of public perceptions of the role of biodiversity in cities. Urban Ecosystems, 22, 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0821-310.1007/s11252-018-0821-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chang, C., Hammitt, W., Chen, P., Machnik, L., Su, W. (2008). Psychophysiological responses and restorative values of natural environments in Taiwan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, 79–84, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.01010.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, B., Adimo, O. A., Bao, Z. (2009). Assessment of aesthetic quality and multiple functions of urban green space from the users’ perspective: the case of Hangzhou Flower Garden, China. Landscape Urban Planning, 93, 76–82.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.06.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clergeau, P., Mennechez, G., Sauvage, A., & Lemoine, A. (2001). Human percep-tion and appreciation of birds - A motivation for wildlife conservation in urban environments of France. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, & R. Donnelly (Eds.), Avian ecology in an urbanizing world (pp. 69–86). Massachusetts: Norwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coldwell, D. F, Evans, K. L. (2017) Contrasting effects of visiting urban green-space and the countryside on biodiversity knowledge and conservation support. PLoS ONE, 12(3): e0174376. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.017437610.1371/journal.pone.0174376
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coldwell, D. F, Evans, K. L. (2018). Visits to urban green-space and the countryside associate with different components of mental well-being and are better predictors than perceived or actual local urbanisation intensity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 175, 114–122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.02.00710.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.02.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Convention on biological diversity. (1992). Rio De Janeiro. Retrieved January 8, 2015, from: http://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cornelis, J., & Hermy, M. (2004). Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(4), 385–401.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.038
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dallimer, M., Irvine, K. N., Skinner, A. M. J., Davies, Z. G., Rouquette, J. R., Maltby, L. L. (2012). Biodiversity and the feel-good factor - Understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience, 62, 47–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.910.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dearborn, D. C., Kark, S. (2010). Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv.Biol.24, 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01328.x.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01328.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dye, C. (2008). Health and urban living. Science, 319, 766–769. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150198.10.1126/science.1150198
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, A., Young, J. C. (2007). Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biol. Conserv., 136(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.024.10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of green space increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3, 390–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.014910.1098/rsbl.2007.0149
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gayford, C. (2000). Biodiversity education: a teacher’s perspective. Environ. Educ. Res. 6 (4), 347–361.10.1080/713664696
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Germann-Chiari, C., Seeland, K. (2004). Are urban green spaces optimally distributed to act as places for social integration? Results of a geographical information system (GIS) approach for urban forestry research. For. Policy Econ., 6, 3–13.10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00067-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grinde, B., Patil, G. (2009). Biophilia: Does Visual Contact with Nature Impact on Health and Well-Being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6, 2332-2343; doi:10.3390/ijerph609233210.3390/ijerph6092332276041219826546
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hassan, S., Olsen, S., Thorsen, B. (2019). Urban-rural divides in preferences for wetland conservation in Malaysia. Land Use Policy. 84, 226–237, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.01510.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hernández-Morcillo, M., Plieninger, T., Bieling, C. (2013). An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators. Ecol. Indic. 29, 434–444.10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ho, C. H, Sasidharan, V., Elmendorf, W., Willits, F. K., Graefe, A, Godbey, G. (2005). Gender and ethnic variations in urban park preferences, visitation, and perceived benefits. J. Leis. Res., 37(3), 281–30610.1080/00222216.2005.11950054
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hooykaasa, M., Schilthuizena, M., Aten, C., Hemelaar, E., Albers, C., Smeets, I. (2019). Identification skills in biodiversity professionals and lay people: A gap in species literacy. Biological Conservation, 238, 108202, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.10820210.1016/j.biocon.2019.108202
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoyle, H., Jorgensen, A., Warren, P., Dunnett, N., Evans, K. (2017a). “Not in their front yard” The opportunities and challenges of introducing perennial urban meadows: A local authority stakeholder perspective. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 25, 139–149, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.00910.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoyle, H., Hitchmough, J., Jorgensen, A. (2017b). All about the ‘wow factor’? The relationships between aesthetics, restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting. Landscape and Urban Planning, 164, 109–123, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.011.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoyle, H., Hitchmough, J., Jorgensen, A. (2017c). Attractive, climate-adapted and sustainable? Public perception of non-native planting in the designed urban landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 164, 49–63, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.00910.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoyle, H., Jorgensen, A., Hitchmough, J. (2019). What determines how we see nature? Perceptions of naturalness in designed urban green space. People and Nature, 1, 167–180, doi: 10.1002/pan3.1910.1002/pan3.19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoyle, H. (2015). Human happiness versus urban biodiversity? Public perception of designed urban planting in a warming climate. Doctoral Thesis, The University of Sheffield, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Landscape.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hur, M., Nasar, J., Chun, B. (2010). Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30, 52–59, doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.00510.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Illiassou, A., Oumani, A., Abdou, L., Mahamane, A., Saadou, M. (2016). Urban Biodiversity: Perception, Preference, General Awareness, and Threats in Two Cities (Niamey and Maradi) of Niger. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Urban Studies Research, Volume 2016, Article ID 1469530, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/146953010.1155/2016/1469530
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jalkanen, J., Vierikko, K., Moilanen, A. (2020). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 49, 126586, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.12658610.1016/j.ufug.2020.126586
]Search in Google Scholar
[
James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M. D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J., Elmqvist, T., Frith, M., Gordon, C., Greening, K. L., Handley, J., Haworth, S., Kazmierczak, A. E., Johnston, M., Korpela, K., Moretti, M., Niemelä, J., Pauleit, S., Roe, M. H., Sadler, J. P., Ward, T. C. (2009). Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment. Urban For. Urban Green., 8, 65–75.10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jim, C. Y, Shan, X. Z. (2013). Socioeconomic effect on perception of urban green spaces in Guangzhou, China. Cities, 31, 123–131.10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kazmierczak, A. (2013). The contribution of local parks to neighbourhood social ties. Landscape Urban Planning, 109, 31–44.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kellert, S. R. (1997). Kinship to mastery: Biophilia in human evolution and development, Washington, DC: Island Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Köklükaya, A.N, Demirhan, E., Beşoluk, S. (2014). The Prospective Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Biodiversity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1562 – 156710.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.435
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kothencz, G., Blaschke, T. (2017). Urban parks: Visitors’ perceptions versus spatial indicators. Land Use Policy, 64, 233–244, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.012.10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langemeyer, J., Baró, F., Roebeling, P., Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2015). Contrasting values of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas: the case of park Montjuïc in Barcelona. Ecosyst. Serv., 12, 178–186.10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, A.C.K., Maheswaran, R. (2011). The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. J. Public Health, 33, 212–222.10.1093/pubmed/fdq06820833671
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leslie, E., Sugiyama, T., Ierodiaconou, D., Kremer, P. (2010). Perceived and objectively measured greenness of neighbourhoods: Are they measuring the same thing? Landscape and Urban Planning, 95, 28–33, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.11.00210.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.11.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin, B. B., Fuller, R. A., Bush, R., Gaston, K. J., Shanahan, D. F. (2014). Opportunity or orientation?: who uses parks and why. PLoS One, 9(1), e87422.10.1371/journal.pone.0087422390618524489913
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matthies, L., Bose, E. (2008). How many species are there? Public understanding and awareness of biodiversity in Switzerland. Hum. Ecol., 36 (5), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9194-1.10.1007/s10745-008-9194-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., De Vries, S., Spreeuwenberg, P. (2006). Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J. Epidemiol. Community Health, 60, 587–592.10.1136/jech.2005.043125256623416790830
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marzluff, J. M. (2002). Fringe conservation: a call to action. Conserv. Biol., 16, 1175–1176. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.16501.x.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.16501.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matteson, K. C., Grace, J. B., Minor, E. S. (2013) Direct and indirect effects of land use on floral resources and flower-visiting insects across an urban landscape. Oikos, 122(5), 682–694.10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20229.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayer, F.S., Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515, doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.00110.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGinlay, J., Parsons, D., Morris, J., Hubatova, M., Graves, A. (2017). Do charismatic species groups generate more cultural ecosystem service benefits? Ecosystem Services, 27, 15–24, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.00710.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, J. R., Hobbs, R. J. (2002). Conservation where people live and work. Conserv.Biol.,16, 330–337.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00420.x.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00420.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mitchell, R., & Popham, F. (2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. The Lancet, 372 (9650), 1655–1660.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Montgomery, C. A. (2002). Ranking the benefits of biodiversity:An exploration of relative values. Journal of Environmental Management, 64(3), 313–326.10.1006/jema.2002.055312357662
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., Atman, C. J. (2002). Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muratet, A., Pellegrini, P., Dufour, A., Arrif, T., Chiron, F. (2015). Perception and knowledge of plant diversity among urban park user. Landscape and Urban Planning, 137, 95–106, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.01.00310.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.01.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muratet, A., Porcher, E., Devictor, V., Arnal, G., Moret, J., Wright, S. (2008). Evaluation of floristic diversity in urban areas as a basis for habitat management. Applied Vegetation Science, 11, 451–460. http://dx.doi.org/10.3170/2008-7-1853010.3170/2008-7-18530
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nielsen, A. B., Van den Bosch, M., Maruthaveeran, S., & Van den Bosch, C. K. (2013). Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: a review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosystems, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0316-110.1007/s11252-013-0316-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palliwoda, J., Kowarik, I., Von der Lippe, M. (2017). Human-biodiversity interactions in urban parks: The species level matters. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 394–406, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.00310.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., Kagawa, T., Miyazaki, Y. (2010). The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across. Japan. Environ Health Prev Med, 15, 18–2610.1007/s12199-009-0086-9279334619568835
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parrisa, K., Amati, M., Bekessy, S., Dagenais, D. (2018). The seven lamps of planning for biodiversity in the city. Cities, DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.00710.1016/j.cities.2018.06.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paul, S., Nagendra, H. (2017). Factors Influencing Perceptions and Use of Urban Nature: Surveys of Park Visitors in Delhi. Land, 6, 27. doi:10.3390/land602002710.3390/land6020027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M. L., Childers, D. L., Mcdonnell, M. J., Zhou, W. (2016). Evolution and future of urban ecological science: ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosyst. Heal. Sustain. 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehs2.1229.10.1002/ehs2.1229
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Qiu, L., Lindberg, S., Nielsen, A. (2013). Is biodiversity attractive?- On-site perception of recreational and biodiversity values in urban green space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 119, 136–146, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.007.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Qiu, L. (2014). Linking Biodiversity and Recreational Merits of Urban Green Spaces-Methodological Development, Doctoral Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rupprecht, C. D. D., Byrne, J. A., Garden, J. G., Hero, J. M. (2015). Informal urban green space: A trilingual systematic review of its role for biodiversity and trends in the literature, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.08.00910.1016/j.ufug.2015.08.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sandifer, P. A, Sutton-Grier, A. E., Ward, B. P. (2015). Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosystem Services, 12, 1–15, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.00710.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seto, K. C., Guneralp, B., Hutyra, L. R. (2012). Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.109,16083–16088.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109.10.1073/pnas.1211658109347953722988086
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shanahan, D. F., Lin, B. B., Gaston, K. J., Bush, R., Fulle, R. A. (2015). What is the role of trees and remnant vegetation in attracting people to urban park. Landscape Ecology, 30, 153–165, DOI 10.1007/s10980-014-0113-0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shwartz, A., Turbé, A., Simon, L., & Julliard, R. (2014a). Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers - An experiment. Biological Conservation, 171, 82–90.10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shwartz, A., Turbé, A., Julliard, R., Simon, L., Prévot, A. C. (2014b). Outstanding challenges for urban conservation research and action. Glob. Environ. Chang., 28, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.002.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Southon, G., Jorgensen, A., Dunnett, N., Hoyle, H., Evans, K. (2017). Biodiverse perennial meadows have aesthetic value and increase residents’ perceptions of site quality in urban green-space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 105–118, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.00310.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Southon, G., Jorgensen, A., Dunnett, N., Hoyle, H., Evans, K. (2018). Perceived species-richness in urban green spaces: Cues, accuracy and wellbeing impact. Landscape and Urban Planning, 172, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.00210.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strohbach, M., Haase, D., Kabisch, N. (2009). Birds and the city: urban biodiversity, land use, and socioeconomics. Ecol. Soc. 14(2), 3110.5751/ES-03141-140231
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner-Erfort, G. (1997). Public awareness and perceptions of biodiversity. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science, 90 (3 and 4), 113–121.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tyrväinen, L., Mäkinen, K., Schipperijn, J. (2007). Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79(1), 5-19.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kazmierczak, A., Niemela, J., James, P. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: a literature review. Landscape Urban Planning, 81, 167–178.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United Nations. (2018). Revision of world urbanization prospects. Retrieved December 8, 2018, from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vodouhê, F. G., Coulibaly, O., Adégbidi, A., Sinsin, B. (2010). Community perception of biodiversity conservation within protected areas in Benin. Forest Policy and Economics, 12, 505–512, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.06.00810.1016/j.forpol.2010.06.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Den Berg, A. E., Jorgensen, A., Wilson, E. R. (2014). Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: does setting type make a difference? Landscape and Urban Planning, 127, 173–181. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.01210.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van den Berg, A. E, Joye, Y., Koole, S. (2016). Why viewing nature is more fascinating and restorative than viewing buildings: A closer look at perceived complexity. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 20, 397–401, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.01110.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van, W. D., Wals, A. (2002). Making biodiversity meaningful through environmental education. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 24(11), 1143–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134839.10.1080/09500690210134839
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wals, A. Van, W. D. (1997). Environmental education and the learning of ill-defined concepts: the case of biodiversity. S. Afr. J. Environ. Educ., 17, 4–11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wende, H. E. W., Zarger, R. K., Mihelcic, J. R. (2012). Accessibility and usability: green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(3), 272–282.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
White, M. P., Pahla, S., Wheeler, B. W., Depledge, M. H., & Fleming, L. E. (2017). Natural environments and subjective wellbeing: Different types of exposure are associated with different aspects of wellbeing. Health & Place, 45, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.00810.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.00828319857
]Search in Google Scholar
[
White, M. P., Elliot, L. R., Taylor, T., Wheeler, B. W., Spencer, A., Bone, A., Fleming, L. E. (2016). Recreational physical activity in natural environments and implications for health: A population based cross sectional study in England. Preventive Medicine, 91, 383–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.02310.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.02327658650
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams, K. J. H., Cary, J. (2002). Landscape Preferences, Ecological Quality, and Biodiversity Protection, Environment And Behavior. Vol. 34, No. 2, 257-274. doi10.1177/0013916502034002006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674045231
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wood, E., Harsant, A., Dallimer, M., Cronin de Chavez, A., McEachan, R. R. C., Hassall, C. (2018). Not All Green Space Is Created Equal: Biodiversity Predicts Psychological Restorative Benefits From Urban Green Space. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.0232010.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320627758730538653
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Young, C., Hofmann, M., Frey, D., Moretti, M., Bauer, N. (2020). Psychological restoration in urban gardens related to garden type, biodiversity and garden-related stress. Landscape and Urban Planning, 198, 103777, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.10377710.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103777
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Young, J., Watt, A., Nowicki, P., Alard, D., Clitherow, J., Henle, K., Johnson, R., Laczko, E., McCracken, D., Matouch, S., Niemela, J., Richards, C. (2005). Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(7), 1641–1661.10.1007/s10531-004-0536-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Process mapping software. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol, 9(2, Pt.2),1–27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zanon, D., Doucouliagos, C., Hall, J., Lockstone-Binney, L. (2013). Constraints to Park Visitation: a meta-analysis of North American studies. Leis. Sci. 35(5), 475–493.10.1080/01490400.2013.831294
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zelenski, J. M., Nisbet, E. K. (2014). Happiness and Feeling Connected: The Distinct Role of Nature Relatedness. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 46(1), 3–23, doi: 10.1177/001391651245190110.1177/0013916512451901
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, D. Q., Chu, L. M. (2012). How would size, age, human disturbance, and vegetation structure affect bird communities of urban parks in different seasons? J. Ornithol.,153(4), 1101–1112.10.1007/s10336-012-0839-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Žlender, V., and Thompson, C. (2017). Accessibility and use of peri-urban green space for inner-city dwellers: a comparative study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 165, 193–205. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.01110.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.011
]Search in Google Scholar