[Akimov, I.A.; Azmanova, N.V. & Asaulova, V.M., Eds. (2006). Ecological Atlas of Kyiv. Kyiv: Agency Intermedia (in Ukrainian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Belik, V.P. (2006). Faunogenetic Structure of the Palearctic Avifauna. Entomol. Rev., 86(1), 15-31. DOI: 10.1134/S0013873806100022.10.1134/S0013873806100022]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergner, A., Avci, M., Eryiğit, H., Jansson, N., Niklasson, M., Westerberg, L. & Milberg, P. (2015). Influences of forest type and habitat structure on bird assemblages of oak (Quercus spp.) and pine (Pinus spp.) stands in southwestern Turkey. Forest Ecology and Management, 336(15), 137-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.025.10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.025]Search in Google Scholar
[Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A., & Mustoe, S.H. (2000). Bird Census Techniques, 2nd ed. London: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biluk, G. (1977). Geobotanical zoning of Ukraine. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.]Search in Google Scholar
[Birds of the National Garden (n.d.). In United States Botanic Garden. Retrieved November 11, 2019, from https://www.usbg.gov/NGbirds.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blinkova, O. & Ivanenko О. (2018). Communities of woody vegetation and wood destroying fungi in natural and semi-natural forests of Kyiv city, Ukraine. Central European Forestry Journal, 64, 55–66. DOI: 10.1515/forj-2017-0030.10.1515/forj-2017-0030]Search in Google Scholar
[Blinkova, O. & Shupova T. (2017). Bird communities and vegetation composition in the urban forest ecosystem: correlations and comparisons of diversity indices. Ekologia (Bratislava), 36(4), 366-87. DOI: 10.1515/eko-2017-0029.10.1515/eko-2017-0029]Search in Google Scholar
[Blinkova, O. & Shupova T. (2018). Bird communities and vegetation composition in natural and semi-natural forests of megalopolis: correlations and comparisons of diversity indices (Kyiv city, Ukraine). Ekologia (Bratislava), 37(3), 259-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2018-0021.10.2478/eko-2018-0021]Search in Google Scholar
[Browder, S.F., Johnson, D.H. & Ball, I.J. (2002). Assemblages of breeding birds as indicators of grassland condition. Ecological Indicators, 2(3), 257-270. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00060-210.1016/S1470-160X(02)00060-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Camprodon, J. & Brotons, L. (2006). Effects of undergrowth clearing on the bird communities of the Northwestern Mediterranean Coppice Holm oak forests. For. Ecol. Manag., 221(1–3), 72-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.044.10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.044]Search in Google Scholar
[Carlson, A., Sandstrom, U. & Olsson, K. (1998). Availability and use of natural tree holes by cavity nesting birds in a Swedish deciduous forest. Ardea, 86(1), 109-119.]Search in Google Scholar
[Catsadorakis, G. (1997). Breeding birds from reed beds to alpine meadows. Hydrobiologia, 351, 143-155. DOI: 10.1023/A:1003080911744.10.1023/A:1003080911744]Search in Google Scholar
[Chaplygina, A., Shupova, T. & Nadtochiy A. (2016). The avifauna of the National Nature Park “HomilshanskiLisy. Biosystems Diversity, 24(1), 124-133. DOI: 10.15421/01161510.15421/011615]Search in Google Scholar
[Conner, R.N. & Dickson, J.D. (1997). Relationships between bird communities and forest age, structure, species composition and fragmentation in the west gulf coastal plain. Tex. J. Sci., 49, 123-138.]Search in Google Scholar
[Domokos, E. & Domokos J. (2016). Bird communities of different woody vegetation types from the Niraj Valley, Romania. Turk. J. Zool., 40, 734-742. DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1510-64.10.3906/zoo-1510-64]Search in Google Scholar
[Everard, M. (2008). Selection of taxa as indicators of river and freshwater wetland quality in the UK. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 18 (6), 1052-1061. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.89610.1002/aqc.896]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, J., Lindenmayer, D.B., Blomberg, S.P., Montague-Drake, R., Felton, A. & Stein, J.A. (2007). Functional Richness and Relative Resilience of Bird Communities in Regions with Different Land Use Intensities. Ecosystems, 10 (6), 964-974. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-007-9071-610.1007/s10021-007-9071-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Fuller, R.J. & Moreton, B.D. (1987). Breeding bird population of Kentish sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) coppice in relation to age and structure of the coppice. J. Appl. Ecol., 24(1), 13-27. DOI: 10.2307/2403784.10.2307/2403784]Search in Google Scholar
[Gabbe, A.P, Robinson, S.K. & Brawn, J.D. (2002). Tree-Species Preferences of Foraging Insectivorous Birds: Implications for Floodplain Forest Restoration. Conservation Biology, 16(2), 462-470. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00460.x.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00460.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Gardner, T.A., Barlow, J., Araujo, I.S., Ávila-Pires, T.C., Bonaldo, A.B., Costa, J.E., Esposito, M.C., Ferreira, L.V., Hawes, J., Hernandez, M.I., Hoogmoed, M.S., Leite, R.N., Lo-Man-Hung, N.F., Malcolm, J.R., Martins, M.B., Mestre, L.A. M., Miranda-Santos, R., Overal, W.L., Parry, L., Peters, S.L., Ribeiro-Junior, M.A., Da Silva, M.N.F., Da Silva Motta, C. & Peres, C.A. (2008). The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests. Ecology Letters, 11 (2), 139-150. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01133.x10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01133.x18031554]Search in Google Scholar
[Grime, J. P. (1977). Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its relenance of ecological and evolutionary theory. The American Naturalist, 111(982), 1169-1194.10.1086/283244]Search in Google Scholar
[Heyman, E. (2010). Clearance of understory in urban woodlands: assessing impact on bird abundance and diversity. For. Ecol. Manag., 260(1), 125-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.011.10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Klausnitzer, B. (1990). Ecology of urban fauna. Moscow: Mir (in Russian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kurosawa, R. (2009).Disturbance-induced bird diversity in early successional habitats in the humid temperate region of northern Japan. Ecological Research, 24 (3), 687-696. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-008-0539-4.10.1007/s11284-008-0539-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Lavrov, V.V. & Blinkova., O.I. (2018). Methodological problems of biotic diagnostics of antropogenic transformation of forest ecosystems at the levels of organization of life. Factors of experimental evolution of organisms, 22, 368-373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7124/FEEO.v22.977 (in Ukrainian).10.7124/FEEO.v22.977]Search in Google Scholar
[MacArthur, R. & MacArthur J. (1961). On bird species diversity. Ecology, 42, 594-598. DOI: 10.2307/1932254.10.2307/1932254]Search in Google Scholar
[Magurran, E. (1998). Ecological diversity and its measurement. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikusinski, G., Gromadzki, M. & Chylarecki, P. (2001). Woodpeckers as indicators of forest bird diversity. Conserv. Biol., 15(1), 208-217. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.99236.x.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.99236.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Milne, R. & Bennett, L. (2013). Understanding landscape patterns of temporal variability in avian populations to improve environmental impact assessments. Ecological Informatics, 14, 75-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.11.006.10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.11.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Mirkin, V., Naumova, L. & Solomesh A. (2002). The modern science of vegetation. Moscow: Logos.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moreno-Rueda, G. & Pizzaro, M. (2009). Relative influence of habitat heterogeneity, climate, human disturbance, and spatial structure on vertebrate species richness in Spain. Ecol. Res., 24(2), 335-344. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-008-0509-x.10.1007/s11284-008-0509-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mosyakin, S. & Fedoronchuk, M. (1999). Vascular plants of Ukraine a nomenclatural checklist. Kyiv: MG Kholodny Institute Botany (in Ukrainian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Novikov, G. (1953). Field studies on the ecology of terrestrial vertebrates. Moscow: Soviet Science (in Russian).]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Connor, R. (1981). Habitat correlates of bird distribution in British census plots. Studies in Avian Biology, 6, 533-537.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pereira, P., Godinho, C., Roque, I., Marques, A., Branco, M. & Rabaça, J. E. (2014). Time to rethink the management intensity in a Mediterranean oak woodland: the response of insectivorous birds and leaf-chewing defoliators as key groups in the forest ecosystem. Annals of Forest Science, 71(1), 25-32. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-012-0227-y.10.1007/s13595-012-0227-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Polyakov, A. (2009). Crimean forest formations and their ecological role. Kharkiv: Nove slovo (in Ukrainian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Robledano, F., Esteve, M.A., Farinós, P., Carreño M.F. & Martinez-Fernandez, J. (2010) Terrestrial birds as indicators of agricultural-induced changes and associated loss in conservation value of Mediterranean wetlands. Ecological Indicators, 10, 274-286. DOI:1 0.1016/j.ecolind.2009.05.00610.1016/j.ecolind.2009.05.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Robles, H., Ciudad, C. & Matthysen, E. (2012). Responses to experimental reduction and increase of cavities by a secondary cavity-nesting bird community in cavity-rich Pyrenean oak forests. For. Ecol. Manag., 277, 46-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.017.10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.017]Search in Google Scholar
[Rysin, L. (2003). Monitoring of recreational forests. Moskow: RAN (in Ukrainian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Šalek, M., Svobodova, J. & Zasadil, P. (2010). Edge effect of low-traffic forest roads on bird communities in secondary production forests in central Europe. Landsc. Ecol., 25(7), 1113-1124. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-010-9487-9.10.1007/s10980-010-9487-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanitary Forest Regulation in Ukraine (2016). Resolution of government of Ukraine. No. 756. Kyiv (in Ukrainian).]Search in Google Scholar
[Sekercioğlu, C. (2002a). Effects of forestry practices on vegetation structure and bird community of Kibale National Park, Uganda. Biol. Conserv., 107(2), 229-240. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00097-6.10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00097-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Sekercioğlu, C. (2002b). Forest Fragmentation Hits Insectivorous Birds Hard. Directions in Science, 1, 62-64. DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2002.190.10.1100/tsw.2002.190]Search in Google Scholar
[Sekercioğlu, C. (2006). Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends Ecol. Evol., 21(8), 464-471. DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.007.10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.00716762448]Search in Google Scholar
[Shirihai, H., Gargallo, G., Helbig, A., Harris, A. & Cottridge, D. (2001). Sylvia Warblers: Identification, Taxonomy and Phylogeny of the Genus Sylvia. London: Helm.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shupova, T.V. (2014). Avifauna in settlement zone of Kiev. J. Karazin Kharkiv National Univ. Ser. Biol., 21(1112), 83-91.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shupova, T.V. (2017). The transformation of the diversity of avifauna under the influence of recreational load. Biosyst. Divers., 25(1), 45-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/011707.10.15421/011707]Search in Google Scholar
[Virkkala, R. (2006). Why study woodpeckers? The significance of woodpeckers in forest ecosystems. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 43(2), 82-85. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from http://www.sekj.org/PDF/anzf43/anzf43-082.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walther, B. (2002). Vertical stratification and use of vegetation and light habitats by Neotropical forest birds. Journal of Ornithology, 143, 64-81. DOI: 10.1007/BF02465460.10.1007/BF02465460]Search in Google Scholar
[White, J.G., Fitzsimons, J.A., Palmer, G.C. & Antos, M.J. (2009). Surviving urbanisation: maintaining bird species diversity in urban Melbourne. Victorian naturalist, 126(3), 73-78.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woodley, S.J., Jonson, G., Freedmanm, B. & Kirk, D.A. (2006). Effects of timber harvesting and plantation development on cavity-nesting birds in New Brunswick. Can. Field-Nat., 120, 298-306. DOI: 10.22621/cfn.v120i3.319.10.22621/cfn.v120i3.319]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhukova, L.A., Eds (2010). Ecological scales and methods for analyzing the ecological diversity of plants. MarSU, Yoshkar-Ola (in Russian).]Search in Google Scholar