[
Almarri, K. and Gardiner, P. 2014. Application of resource-based view to project management research: supporters and opponents. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 119: 437–445.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal 14 (1): 33–46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–423.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aralica, Z., Svilokos, T., and Bacic, K. 2018. institutions’ and firms’ performance in transition countries: the case of selected Cesee countries. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 13 (1): 68–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arik, M., Clark, L. A., and Raffo, D. M. 2016. Strategic responses of non-profit organizations to the economic crisis- Examining through the lenses of resource dependency and resourced-based view theories. Academy of Strategic Management Journal 15 (1): 48–70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arthur, M. B., DeFillippi, R. J., and Jones, C. 2001. Project-based learning as the interplay of career and company non-financial capital. Management Learning 32 (1): 99–117.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arya, B. and Lin, Z. 2007. Understanding collaboration outcomes from an extended resource-based view perspective: The roles of organizational characteristics, partner attributes, and network structures. Journal of Management 33 (5): 697–723.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., and Phillips, L. W. 1991. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (3): 421–458.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barnett, W. P., Greve, H. R., and Park, D. Y. 1994. An evolutionary model of organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal 15 (S1): 11–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barney, J. B. 1986. Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Source: The Academy of Management Review 11 (3): 656–665.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barney, J. B. 2001. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. The Academy of Management Review 26 (1): 41–56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barreto, I. 2010. Dynamic Capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management 36 (1): 256–280.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bettabai, W., Ben Mrad Douagi, F., and Ali Brahim Omri, M. 2016. Construction of the measurement scale of the audit committee diligence: the perception of Tunisian internal auditors. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research 28 (1): 1–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BiH Ministry of Justice. (n.d.). Zbirni e-registar udruženja i fondacija u BiH. http://zbirniregistri.gov.ba/Home (accessed August 18, 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bjørnholt, B. and Larsen, F. 2014. The politics of performance measurement: Evaluation use as mediator for politics. Evaluation 20 (4): 400–411.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blalock, A. B. 1999. Evaluation research and the performance management movement: from estrangement to useful integration?. Evaluation 5 (2): 117–149.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, T. A. 2015. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Second Edition. New York: The Guilford Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulleting 56 (2): 81–105.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cerchione, R. and Esposito, E. 2017. Using knowledge management systems: A taxonomy of SME strategies. International Journal of Information Management 37 (1): 1551–1562.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Choudry, A. 2013. Activist research practice: exploring research and knowledge production for social action. Socialist Studies / Études Socialistes 9 (1): 128–151.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128–152.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crawford, P. and Bryce, P. 2003. Project monitoring and evaluation: A method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation. International Journal of Project Management 21 (5): 363–373.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–340.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Bem Machado, A., Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., and Lanzalonga, F. 2022. Knowledge management and digital transformation for Industry 4.0: A structured literature review. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 20 (2): 320–338.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Desouza, K. C. and Evaristo, J. R. 2006. Project management offices: A case of knowledge-based archetypes. International Journal of Information Management 26 (5): 414–423.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17: 109–122.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Green, S. B. and Yang, Y. 2009. Reliability of summed item scores using structural equation modeling: An alternative to coefficient alpha. Psychometrika 74 (1): 155–167.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. 2019. Multivariate Data Analysis (Eight edition). Hampshire: Cengage Learning EMEA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heinrich, C. J. 2002. Outcomes-based performance management in the public sector: implications for government accountability and effectiveness. Public Administration Review 62 (6): 712–725.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Helfat, C. E. and Peteraf, M. A. 2003. The dynamic resourcebased view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal 24 (10): 997–1010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A. P., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., and Winter, S. G. 2007. Dynamic Capabilities - Understanding Strategic Change in Organization. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, J. C. and Newell, S. 2003. Knowledge integration processes and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects. International Journal of Project Management 21: 167–176.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Itami, H. and Roehl, T. W. 1987. Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jimenez-Jimenez, D. and Sanz-Valle, R. 2013. Studying the effect of HRM practices on the knowledge management process. Personnel Review 42 (1): 28–49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khang Ba, D. and Mo Lin, T. 2008. Success criteria and factors for international development projects: A life-cycle-based framework. Project Management Journal 39 (1): 72–84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kogen, L. 2018. What have we learned here? Questioning accountability in aid policy and practice. Evaluation 24 (1): 98–112.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koskinen, K. U. 2004. Knowledge management to improve project communication and implementation. Project Management Journal 35 (1): 13–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, H. and Choi, B. 2003. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (1): 179–228.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, K. C., Lee, S., and Kang, I. W. 2005. KMPI: Measuring knowledge management performance. Information and Management 42 (3): 469–482.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liao, S. H. and Chi-chuan, W. 2009. The relationship among knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational performance. International Journal of Business and Management 4 (4): 64–76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin, Y. and Wu, L. Y. 2014. Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework. Journal of Business Research 67 (3): 407–413.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lockett, A., Thompson, S., and Morgenstern, U. 2009. The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal. International Journal of Management Reviews 11 (1): 9–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markić, M., Požega, Ž., and Crnković, B. 2022. The impact of knowledge management on the economic indicators of the companies. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 17 (2): 34–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. (2008). The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the Accra Agenda for Action. Paris: OECD.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. (2023). Development Co-operation Report 2023. Paris: OECD
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oswald, K. and Taylor, P. 2010. A learning approach to monitoring and evaluation. IDS Bulletin 41 (6): 114–120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pérez-López, S. and Alegre, J. 2012. Information technology competency, knowledge processes and firm performance. Industrial Management and Data Systems 112 (4): 644–662.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peteraf, M. A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14 (3): 179–191.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Power, M. 1997. The Audit Society Rituals of Verification (First edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Preskill, H. and Torres, R. T. 1999. Evaluative Inquiry for Learning in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Project Management Institute. 2021. The standard for project management and a guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raymond, L. and Bergeron, F. 2008. Project management information systems: an empirical study of their impact on project manager and project success. International Journal of Project Management 26 (2): 213–229.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rocco, S. 2021. The (positive) design environment as a prerequisite of design orientation. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 16 (2): 17–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seleim, A. and Khalil, O. 2007. Knowledge management and organizational performance in the Egyptian software firms. International Journal of Knowledge Management 3 (4): 37–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, K. A., Vasudevan, S. P., and Tanniru, M. R. 1996. Organizational learning and resource-based theory: an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Change Management 9 (6): 41–53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18: 509–533.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Todorović, M. L., Petrović, D. T., Mihić, M. M., Obradović, V. L., and Bushuyev, S. D. 2015. Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management. International Journal of Project Management 33 (4): 772–783.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torres, R. T. and Preskill, H. 2002. Evaluation and organizational learning: past, present, and future. The American Journal of Evaluation 22 (3): 387–395.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turulja, L. and Bajgoric, N. 2018. Information technology, knowledge management and human resource management: Investigating mutual interactions towards better organizational performance. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems 48 (2): 255–276.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG). 2016. Norms and Standards for Evaluation. New York: UNEG.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vähämäki, J., Schmidt, M., and Molander, J. 2011. Review: Results-Based Management in Development Cooperation. Paris: OECD.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Valaei, N., Nikhashemi, S. R., and Javan, N. 2017. Organizational factors and process capabilities in a KM strategy: toward a unified theory. Journal of Management Development 36 (4): 560–580.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walsh, J. N. and Lannon, J. 2020. Dynamic knowledge management strategy development in international nongovernmental organisations. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 21 (2): 229–240.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, C. L. and Ahmed, P. K. 2007. Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 9 (1): 31–51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zollo, M. and Winter, S. G. 2002. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science 13 (3): 339–351.
]Search in Google Scholar
| 29 juin 2024