This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., & Reale, E. (2019). Peer review versus bibliometrics: Which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications? Scientometrics 121(1), 537–554. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03184-yAbramoG.D’AngeloC.A.RealeE. (2019). Peer review versus bibliometrics: Which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications?Scientometrics121(1), 537–554. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03184-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Antelman, K. (2004). Do Open-Access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries 65(5), 372–382. doi: 10.5860/crl.65.5.372AntelmanK. (2004). Do Open-Access articles have a greater research impact?College & Research Libraries65(5), 372–382. doi: 10.5860/crl.65.5.372Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Asai, S. (2023). Revisiting methodology for identifying Open Access advantages. Publishing Research Quarterly 39(2), 107–119. doi: 10.1007/s12109-023-09946-0AsaiS. (2023). Revisiting methodology for identifying Open Access advantages. Publishing Research Quarterly39(2), 107–119. doi: 10.1007/s12109-023-09946-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Basson, I., Blanckenberg, J.P., & Prozesky, H. (2021). Do Open Access journal articles experience a citation advantage? Results and methodological reflections of an application of multiple measures to an analysis by WoS subject areas. Scientometrics 126(1), 459–484. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03734-9BassonI.BlanckenbergJ.P.ProzeskyH. (2021). Do Open Access journal articles experience a citation advantage? Results and methodological reflections of an application of multiple measures to an analysis by WoS subject areas. Scientometrics126(1), 459–484. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03734-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bautista-Puig, N., Lopez-Illescas, C., de Moya-Anegon, F., Guerrero-Bote, V., & Moed, H.F. (2020). Do journals flipping to gold open access show an OA citation or publication advantage? Scientometrics 124(3), 2551–2575. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03546-xBautista-PuigN.Lopez-IllescasC.de Moya-AnegonF.Guerrero-BoteV.MoedH.F. (2020). Do journals flipping to gold open access show an OA citation or publication advantage?Scientometrics124(3), 2551–2575. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03546-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Beall, J. (2021). Beall’s list of potential predatory publishers and journals. https://beallslist.net/BeallJ. (2021). Beall’s list of potential predatory publishers and journals. https://beallslist.net/Search in Google Scholar
Björk, B.C., & Solomon, D. (2012). Open Access versus subscription journals: A comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine 10, article 73. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-73BjörkB.C.SolomonD. (2012). Open Access versus subscription journals: A comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine10, article 73. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-73Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L. (2020). How can citation impact in bibliometrics be normalized? A new approach combining citing-side normalization and citation percentiles. Quantitative Science Studies 1(4), 1553–1569. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00089BornmannL. (2020). How can citation impact in bibliometrics be normalized? A new approach combining citing-side normalization and citation percentiles. Quantitative Science Studies1(4), 1553–1569. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00089Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Borrego, A. (2023). Article processing charges for Open Access journal publishing: A review. Learned Publishing 36(3), 359–378. doi: 10.1002/leap.1558BorregoA. (2023). Article processing charges for Open Access journal publishing: A review. Learned Publishing36(3), 359–378. doi: 10.1002/leap.1558Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bradshaw, C.J.A., & Brook, B.W. (2016). How to rank journals. PLoS ONE 11(3), article e0149852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149852BradshawC.J.A.BrookB.W. (2016). How to rank journals. PLoS ONE11(3), article e0149852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149852Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Carvalho Neto, S., Willinsky, J., & Alperin, J.P. (2016). Measuring, rating, supporting, and strengthening Open Access scholarly publishing in Brazil. Education Policy Analysis Archives 24, article 54. doi: 10.14507/epaa.24.2391Carvalho NetoS.WillinskyJ.AlperinJ.P. (2016). Measuring, rating, supporting, and strengthening Open Access scholarly publishing in Brazil. Education Policy Analysis Archives24, article 54. doi: 10.14507/epaa.24.2391Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chartered Association of Business Schools. (2021). Academic journal guide 2021. https://charteredabs.org/academic-journal-guide-2021/Chartered Association of Business Schools. (2021). Academic journal guide 2021. https://charteredabs.org/academic-journal-guide-2021/Search in Google Scholar
Clarivate. (2023). Journal citation reports. https://clarivate.com/products/scientific-and-academic-research/research-analytics-evaluation-and-management-solutions/journal-citation-reports/Clarivate. (2023). Journal citation reports. https://clarivate.com/products/scientific-and-academic-research/research-analytics-evaluation-and-management-solutions/journal-citation-reports/Search in Google Scholar
Clarivate. (2024). Web of Science core collection: Editorial selection process. https://clarivate.com/products/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-workflow-solutions/webofscience-platform/web-of-science-core-collection/editorial-selection-process/Clarivate. (2024). Web of Science core collection: Editorial selection process. https://clarivate.com/products/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-workflow-solutions/webofscience-platform/web-of-science-core-collection/editorial-selection-process/Search in Google Scholar
Copiello, S. (2019). The open access citation premium may depend on the openness and inclusiveness of the indexing database, but the relationship is controversial because it is ambiguous where the open access boundary lies. Scientometrics 121(2), 995–1018. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03221-wCopielloS. (2019). The open access citation premium may depend on the openness and inclusiveness of the indexing database, but the relationship is controversial because it is ambiguous where the open access boundary lies. Scientometrics121(2), 995–1018. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03221-wOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dalton, E.D., Tenopir, C., & Björk, B.-C. (2020). Attitudes of North American academics toward Open Access scholarly journals. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 20(1), 73–100. doi: 10.1353/pla.2020.0005DaltonE.D.TenopirC.BjörkB.-C. (2020). Attitudes of North American academics toward Open Access scholarly journals. Portal: Libraries and the Academy20(1), 73–100. doi: 10.1353/pla.2020.0005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Davis P.M., Lewenstein, B.V., Simon, D.H., Booth, J.G., & Connolly, M.J.L. (2008). Open Access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 337(7665), article 568. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a568DavisP.M.LewensteinB.V.SimonD.H.BoothJ.G.ConnollyM.J.L. (2008). Open Access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ337(7665), article 568. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a568Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Davis, P.M. (2011). Open Access, readership, citations: A randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. FASEB Journal 25(7), 2129–2134. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-183988DavisP.M. (2011). Open Access, readership, citations: A randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. FASEB Journal25(7), 2129–2134. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-183988Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Derrick, G.E., Haynes, A., Chapman, S., & Hall, W.D. (2011). The association between four citation metrics and peer rankings of research influence of Australian researchers in six fields of public health. PLoS ONE 6(4), article 18521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018521DerrickG.E.HaynesA.ChapmanS.HallW.D. (2011). The association between four citation metrics and peer rankings of research influence of Australian researchers in six fields of public health. PLoS ONE6(4), article 18521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018521Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dorta-González, P., & Dorta-González, M.I. (2022). Contribution of the Open Access modality to the impact of hybrid journals controlling by field and time effects. Journal of Data and Information Science 7(2), 57–83. doi: 10.2478/jdis-2022-0007Dorta-GonzálezP.Dorta-GonzálezM.I. (2022). Contribution of the Open Access modality to the impact of hybrid journals controlling by field and time effects. Journal of Data and Information Science7(2), 57–83. doi: 10.2478/jdis-2022-0007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dorta-González, P., & Dorta-González, M.I. (2023a). Citation differences across research funding and access modalities. Journal of Academic Librarianship 49(4), article 102734. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102734Dorta-GonzálezP.Dorta-GonzálezM.I. (2023a). Citation differences across research funding and access modalities. Journal of Academic Librarianship49(4), article 102734. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102734Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dorta-González, P., & Dorta-González, M.I. (2023b). The funding effect on citation and social attention: The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a case study. Online Information Review 47(7), 1358–1376. doi: 10.1108/OIR-05-2022-0300Dorta-GonzálezP.Dorta-GonzálezM.I. (2023b). The funding effect on citation and social attention: The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a case study. Online Information Review47(7), 1358–1376. doi: 10.1108/OIR-05-2022-0300Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Elsevier. (2023). Scopus: Sources. https://www.scopus.com/sources.uriElsevier. (2023). Scopus: Sources. https://www.scopus.com/sources.uriSearch in Google Scholar
Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology 4(5), article 157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157EysenbachG. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology4(5), article 157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Feenstra, R.A., & López-Cózar, E.D. (2022). Philosophers’ perceptions of pay to publish and open access in Spain: Books versus journals, more than a financial dilemma. Learned Publishing 35(2), 118–129. doi: 10.1002/leap.1426FeenstraR.A.López-CózarE.D. (2022). Philosophers’ perceptions of pay to publish and open access in Spain: Books versus journals, more than a financial dilemma. Learned Publishing35(2), 118–129. doi: 10.1002/leap.1426Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., & Harnad, S. (2010). Selfselected or mandated, Open Access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PloS ONE 5(10), article 13636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013636GargouriY.HajjemC.LarivièreV.GingrasY.CarrL.BrodyT.HarnadS. (2010). Selfselected or mandated, Open Access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PloS ONE5(10), article 13636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013636Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gaule, P., & Maystre, N. (2011). Getting cited: Does Open Access help? Research Policy 40(10), 1332–1338. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.025GauleP.MaystreN. (2011). Getting cited: Does Open Access help?Research Policy40(10), 1332–1338. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V.P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics 4(3), 379–391. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002González-PereiraB.Guerrero-BoteV.P.Moya-AnegónF. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics4(3), 379–391. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Guba, K., & Tsivinskaya, A. (2023). Expert judgments versus publication-based metrics: Do the two methods produce identical results in measuring academic reputation? Journal of Documentation 79(1), 127–143. doi: 10.1108/JD-02-2022-0039GubaK.TsivinskayaA. (2023). Expert judgments versus publication-based metrics: Do the two methods produce identical results in measuring academic reputation?Journal of Documentation79(1), 127–143. doi: 10.1108/JD-02-2022-0039Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Guerrero-Bote, V.P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics 6(4), 674–688. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.001Guerrero-BoteV.P.Moya-AnegónF. (2012). A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics6(4), 674–688. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hadad, S., Aharony, N., & Raban, D.R. (2024). Policy shaping the impact of Open-Access publications: A longitudinal assessment. Scientometrics 129(1), 237–260. doi: 10.1007/s11192-023-04875-3HadadS.AharonyN.RabanD.R. (2024). Policy shaping the impact of Open-Access publications: A longitudinal assessment. Scientometrics129(1), 237–260. doi: 10.1007/s11192-023-04875-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hadad, S., & Aharony, N. (2023). Open Access advantages as a function of the discipline: Mixed-methods study. Journal of Academic Librarianship 49(4), article 102746. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102746HadadS.AharonyN. (2023). Open Access advantages as a function of the discipline: Mixed-methods study. Journal of Academic Librarianship49(4), article 102746. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102746Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Haddawy, P., Hassan, S.U., Asghar, A., & Amin, S. (2016). A comprehensive examination of the relation of three citation-based journal metrics to expert judgment of journal quality. Journal of Informetrics 10(1), 162–173. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.005HaddawyP.HassanS.U.AsgharA.AminS. (2016). A comprehensive examination of the relation of three citation-based journal metrics to expert judgment of journal quality. Journal of Informetrics10(1), 162–173. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Halevi, G., & Walsh, S. (2021). Faculty attitudes towards article processing charges for Open Access articles. Publishing Research Quarterly 37(3), 384–398. doi: 10.1007/s12109-021-09820-xHaleviG.WalshS. (2021). Faculty attitudes towards article processing charges for Open Access articles. Publishing Research Quarterly37(3), 384–398. doi: 10.1007/s12109-021-09820-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hall, C.M. (2011). Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism. Tourism Management 32(1), 16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.07.001HallC.M. (2011). Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism. Tourism Management32(1), 16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.07.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hayman, R. (2016). Some LIS faculty indicate reservations about Open Access. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 11(3), 96–98. doi: 10.18438/B8890BHaymanR. (2016). Some LIS faculty indicate reservations about Open Access. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice11(3), 96–98. doi: 10.18438/B8890BOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hodge, D.R., Yu, M., & Kim, A. (2021). Ranking disciplinary social work journals: Comparing faculty perceptions with two citation-based approaches. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research 12(1), 109–129. doi: 10.1086/713306HodgeD.R.YuM.KimA. (2021). Ranking disciplinary social work journals: Comparing faculty perceptions with two citation-based approaches. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research12(1), 109–129. doi: 10.1086/713306Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hubbard, D.E. (2017). Open Access citation advantage? A local study at a large research university. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 54(1), 712–713. doi: 10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401126HubbardD.E. (2017). Open Access citation advantage? A local study at a large research university. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology54(1), 712–713. doi: 10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401126Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Khan, D., Ashar, M., & Yuvaraj, M. (2023). Do Open Access journals have a greater citation impact? A study of journals in library and information science. Collection and Curation 42(1), 13–24. doi: 10.1108/CC-03-2022-0010KhanD.AsharM.YuvarajM. (2023). Do Open Access journals have a greater citation impact? A study of journals in library and information science. Collection and Curation42(1), 13–24. doi: 10.1108/CC-03-2022-0010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Koler-Povh, T., Južnič, P., & Turk, G. (2014). Impact of Open Access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering. Scientometrics 98(2), 1033–1045. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1101-xKoler-PovhT.JužničP.TurkG. (2014). Impact of Open Access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering. Scientometrics98(2), 1033–1045. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1101-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kulczycki, E., & Rozkosz, E.A. (2017). Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland. Scientometrics 111(1), 417–442. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2261-xKulczyckiE.RozkoszE.A. (2017). Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland. Scientometrics111(1), 417–442. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2261-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature 411(6837), 521. doi: 10.1038/35079151LawrenceS. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature411(6837), 521. doi: 10.1038/35079151Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maddi, A., & Sapinho, D. (2022). Article processing charges, altmetrics and citation impact: Is there an economic rationale? Scientometrics 127(12), 7351–7368. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04284-yMaddiA.SapinhoD. (2022). Article processing charges, altmetrics and citation impact: Is there an economic rationale?Scientometrics127(12), 7351–7368. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04284-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mahmood, K. (2017). Correlation between perception-based journal rankings and the journal impact factor (JIF): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Serials Review 43(2), 120–129. doi: 10.1080/00987913.2017.1290483MahmoodK. (2017). Correlation between perception-based journal rankings and the journal impact factor (JIF): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Serials Review43(2), 120–129. doi: 10.1080/00987913.2017.1290483Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Meester, W. (2021). The guardians of Scopus. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/the-guardians-of-scopusMeesterW. (2021). The guardians of Scopus. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/the-guardians-of-scopusSearch in Google Scholar
Ming, W., & Zhao, Z. (2022). Rethinking the open access citation advantage: Evidence from the “reverse‐flipping” journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 73(11), 1608–1620. doi: 10.1002/asi.24699MingW.ZhaoZ. (2022). Rethinking the open access citation advantage: Evidence from the “reverse‐flipping” journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology73(11), 1608–1620. doi: 10.1002/asi.24699Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Momeni, F., Mayr, P., Fraser, N., & Peters, I. (2021). What happens when a journal converts to open access? A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 126(12), 9811–9827. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03972-5MomeniF.MayrP.FraserN.PetersI. (2021). What happens when a journal converts to open access? A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics126(12), 9811–9827. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03972-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J.P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ 6, article e4375. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4375PiwowarH.PriemJ.LarivièreV.AlperinJ.P.MatthiasL.NorlanderB.FarleyA.WestJ.HausteinS. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ6, article e4375. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4375Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Robitzsch A., & Lüdtke, O. (2023). Why full, partial, or approximate measurement invariance are not a prerequisite for meaningful and valid group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling 30(6), 859–870. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2023.2191292RobitzschA.LüdtkeO. (2023). Why full, partial, or approximate measurement invariance are not a prerequisite for meaningful and valid group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling30(6), 859–870. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2023.2191292Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Robitzsch, A. (2020). Why ordinal variables can (almost) always be treated as continuous variables: Clarifying assumptions of robust continuous and ordinal factor analysis estimation methods. Frontiers in Education 5, article 589965. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.589965RobitzschA. (2020). Why ordinal variables can (almost) always be treated as continuous variables: Clarifying assumptions of robust continuous and ordinal factor analysis estimation methods. Frontiers in Education5, article 589965. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.589965Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Robitzsch, A. (2022). On the bias in confirmatory factor analysis when treating discrete variables as ordinal instead of continuous. Axioms 11(4), article 162. doi: 10.3390/axioms11040162RobitzschA. (2022). On the bias in confirmatory factor analysis when treating discrete variables as ordinal instead of continuous. Axioms11(4), article 162. doi: 10.3390/axioms11040162Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Saarela, M., & Kärkkäinen, T. (2020). Can we automate expert-based journal rankings? Analysis of the Finnish publication indicator. Journal of Informetrics 14(2), article 101008. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101008SaarelaM.KärkkäinenT. (2020). Can we automate expert-based journal rankings? Analysis of the Finnish publication indicator. Journal of Informetrics14(2), article 101008. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schroter, S., & Tite, L. (2006). Open Access publishing and author-pays business models: A survey of authors’ knowledge and perceptions. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 99(3), 141–148. doi:10.1177/014107680609900316SchroterS.TiteL. (2006). Open Access publishing and author-pays business models: A survey of authors’ knowledge and perceptions. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine99(3), 141–148. doi:10.1177/014107680609900316Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
SCImago Research Group. (2007). Description of SCImago journal rank indicator. https://www.scimagojr.com/SCImagoJournalRank.pdfSCImago Research Group. (2007). Description of SCImago journal rank indicator. https://www.scimagojr.com/SCImagoJournalRank.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Segado-Boj, F., Prieto-Gutiérrez, J.-J., & Martín-Quevedo, J. (2022). Attitudes, willingness, and resources to cover article publishing charges: The influence of age, position, income level country, discipline and open access habits. Learned Publishing 35(4): 489–498. doi: 10.1002/leap.1455Segado-BojF.Prieto-GutiérrezJ.-J.Martín-QuevedoJ. (2022). Attitudes, willingness, and resources to cover article publishing charges: The influence of age, position, income level country, discipline and open access habits. Learned Publishing35(4): 489–498. doi: 10.1002/leap.1455Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sotudeh, H. (2020). Does Open Access citation advantage depend on paper topics? Journal of Information Science 46(5), 696–709. doi: 10.1177/0165551519865489SotudehH. (2020). Does Open Access citation advantage depend on paper topics?Journal of Information Science46(5), 696–709. doi: 10.1177/0165551519865489Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Szluka, P., Csajbók, E., & Győrffy, B. (2023). Relationship between bibliometric indicators and university ranking positions. Scientific Reports 13, article 14193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35306-1SzlukaP.CsajbókE.GyőrffyB. (2023). Relationship between bibliometric indicators and university ranking positions. Scientific Reports13, article 14193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35306-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thelwall, M. (2022). Can the quality of published academic journal articles be assessed with machine learning? Quantitative Science Studies 3(1), 208–226. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00185ThelwallM. (2022). Can the quality of published academic journal articles be assessed with machine learning?Quantitative Science Studies3(1), 208–226. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00185Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., Makita, M., Abdoli, M., Stuart, E., Wilson, P., & Levitt, J. (2023). In which fields do higher impact journals publish higher quality articles? Scientometrics 128(7), 3915–3933. doi: 10.1007/s11192-023-04735-0ThelwallM.KoushaK.MakitaM.AbdoliM.StuartE.WilsonP.LevittJ. (2023). In which fields do higher impact journals publish higher quality articles?Scientometrics128(7), 3915–3933. doi: 10.1007/s11192-023-04735-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Togia, A., & Korobili, S. (2014). Attitudes towards Open Access: A meta-synthesis of the empirical literature. Information Services & Use 34(3–4), 221–231. doi: 10.3233/ISU-140742TogiaA.KorobiliS. (2014). Attitudes towards Open Access: A meta-synthesis of the empirical literature. Information Services & Use34(3–4), 221–231. doi: 10.3233/ISU-140742Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Walters, W.H. (2017a). Citation-based journal rankings: Key questions, metrics, and data sources. IEEE Access 5, 22036–22053. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2761400WaltersW.H. (2017a). Citation-based journal rankings: Key questions, metrics, and data sources. IEEE Access5, 22036–22053. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2761400Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Walters, W.H. (2017b). Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact? Journal of Informetrics 11(3), 730–744. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.001WaltersW.H. (2017b). Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact?Journal of Informetrics11(3), 730–744. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Walters, W.H. (2022). The citation impact of the Open Access accounting journals that appear on Beall’s List of potentially predatory publishers and journals. Journal of Academic Librarianship 48(1), article 102484. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102484WaltersW.H. (2022). The citation impact of the Open Access accounting journals that appear on Beall’s List of potentially predatory publishers and journals. Journal of Academic Librarianship48(1), article 102484. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102484Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Walters, W.H. (2024). Relationships between expert ratings of business/economics journals and key citation metrics: The impact of size-independence, citing-journal weighting, and subjectarea normalization. Journal of Academic Librarianship 50(4), article 102882. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102882WaltersW.H. (2024). Relationships between expert ratings of business/economics journals and key citation metrics: The impact of size-independence, citing-journal weighting, and subjectarea normalization. Journal of Academic Librarianship50(4), article 102882. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102882Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Walters, W.H., & Markgren, S. (2019). Do faculty journal selections correspond to objective indicators of citation impact? Results for 20 academic departments at Manhattan College. Scientometrics 118(1), 321–337. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2972-7WaltersW.H.MarkgrenS. (2019). Do faculty journal selections correspond to objective indicators of citation impact? Results for 20 academic departments at Manhattan College. Scientometrics118(1), 321–337. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2972-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang, H.Y., Wei, S.X., Cao, C., Wang, X., & Ye, F.Y. (2021). Scientific value weights more than being open or toll access: An analysis of the OA advantage in Nature and Science. Journal of Data and Information Science 6(4), 62–75. doi: 10.2478/jdis-2021-0033WangH.Y.WeiS.X.CaoC.WangX.YeF.Y. (2021). Scientific value weights more than being open or toll access: An analysis of the OA advantage in Nature and Science. Journal of Data and Information Science6(4), 62–75. doi: 10.2478/jdis-2021-0033Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang, M., Zhang, J., Chen, G., & Chai, K.-H. (2019). Examining the influence of Open Access on journals’ citation obsolescence by modeling the actual citation process. Scientometrics 119(3), 1621–1641. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03085-0WangM.ZhangJ.ChenG.ChaiK.-H. (2019). Examining the influence of Open Access on journals’ citation obsolescence by modeling the actual citation process. Scientometrics119(3), 1621–1641. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03085-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Weitzner, A.S., Davis, M., Han, A.H., Liu, O.O., Patel, A.B., Sites, B.D., & Cohen, S.P. (2024). How predictive is peer review for gauging impact? The association between reviewer rating scores, publication status, and article impact measured by citations in a pain subspecialty journal. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, advance online publication. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105490WeitznerA.S.DavisM.HanA.H.LiuO.O.PatelA.B.SitesB.D.CohenS.P. (2024). How predictive is peer review for gauging impact? The association between reviewer rating scores, publication status, and article impact measured by citations in a pain subspecialty journal. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, advance online publication. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105490Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wenaas, L. (2022). Choices of immediate Open Access and the relationship to journal ranking and publish-and-read deals. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 7, article 943932. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.943932WenaasL. (2022). Choices of immediate Open Access and the relationship to journal ranking and publish-and-read deals. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics7, article 943932. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.943932Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
West, J.D., Bergstrom, T.C., & Bergstrom, C.T. (2010). The Eigenfactor metrics: A network approach to assessing scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries 71(3), 236–244. doi: 10.5860/0710236WestJ.D.BergstromT.C.BergstromC.T. (2010). The Eigenfactor metrics: A network approach to assessing scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries71(3), 236–244. doi: 10.5860/0710236Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
West, J.D., Jensen, M.C., Dandrea, R.J., Gordon, G.J., & Bergstrom, C.T. (2013). Author-level Eigenfactor metrics: Evaluating the influence of authors, institutions, and countries within the social science research network community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(4), 787–801. doi: 10.1002/asi.22790WestJ.D.JensenM.C.DandreaR.J.GordonG.J.BergstromC.T. (2013). Author-level Eigenfactor metrics: Evaluating the influence of authors, institutions, and countries within the social science research network community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology64(4), 787–801. doi: 10.1002/asi.22790Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wray, K. (2016). No new evidence for a citation benefit for author-pay Open Access publications in the social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics 106(3), 1031–1035. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1833-5WrayK. (2016). No new evidence for a citation benefit for author-pay Open Access publications in the social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics106(3), 1031–1035. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1833-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar