This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abbasi, A., Hossain, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 403-412.AbbasiA.HossainL.LeydesdorffL.(2012). Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 403-412.Search in Google Scholar
Bloodgood, J. M., Hornsby, J. S., Rutherford, M., & McFarland, R. G. (2017). The role of network density and betweenness centrality in diffusing new venture legitimacy: An epidemiological approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2), 525-552.BloodgoodJ. M.HornsbyJ. S.RutherfordM.McFarlandR. G. (2017). The role of network density and betweenness centrality in diffusing new venture legitimacy: An epidemiological approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2), 525-552.Search in Google Scholar
Cao, D. P., Li, H., Wang, G. B., Luo, X. C., & Tan, D. (2018). Relationship network structure and organizational competitiveness: Evidence from BIM implementation practices in the construction industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(3), 1-36.CaoD. P.LiH.WangG. B.LuoX. C.TanD. (2018). Relationship network structure and organizational competitiveness: Evidence from BIM implementation practices in the construction industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(3), 1-36.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, H., Xu, X. J., Li, Z. Z., & Zhang, Z. Y. (2022). The synergy of inventor cooperative network dual embeddedness and firm innovation: The mediating role of ambidextrous learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(1), 89-104.ChengH.XuX. J.LiZ. Z.ZhangZ. Y. (2022). The synergy of inventor cooperative network dual embeddedness and firm innovation: The mediating role of ambidextrous learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(1), 89-104.Search in Google Scholar
del-Corte-Lora, V., Vallet-Bellmunt, T. M., & Molina-Morales, F. X. (2017). How network position interacts with the relation between creativity and innovation in clustered firms. European Planning Studies, 25(4), 561-582.del-Corte-LoraV.Vallet-BellmuntT. M.Molina-MoralesF. X. (2017). How network position interacts with the relation between creativity and innovation in clustered firms. European Planning Studies, 25(4), 561-582.Search in Google Scholar
Dong, J. Q., & Yang, C. H. (2016). Being central is a double-edged sword: Knowledge network centrality and new product development in US pharmaceutical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 379-385.DongJ. Q.YangC. H. (2016). Being central is a double-edged sword: Knowledge network centrality and new product development in US pharmaceutical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 379-385.Search in Google Scholar
Feranita, F., Kotlar, J., & De Massis, A. (2017). Collaborative innovation in family firms: Past research, current debates and agenda for future research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(3), 137-156.FeranitaF.KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2017). Collaborative innovation in family firms: Past research, current debates and agenda for future research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(3), 137-156.Search in Google Scholar
Guan, J. C., Zhang, J. J., & Yan, Y. (2015). The impact of multilevel networks on innovation. Research Policy, 44(3), 545-559.GuanJ. C.ZhangJ. J.YanY. (2015). The impact of multilevel networks on innovation. Research Policy, 44(3), 545-559.Search in Google Scholar
Jimenez, D. R., Roig-Tierno, N., Tur, A. M., & Sendra-Pons, P. (2024). Conceptual structure of innovation systems: A systematic approach through qualitative data analysis. ROSA Journal, 1(2), 4-28.JimenezD. R.Roig-TiernoN.TurA. M.Sendra-PonsP. (2024). Conceptual structure of innovation systems: A systematic approach through qualitative data analysis. ROSA Journal, 1(2), 4-28.Search in Google Scholar
Karamanos, A. G. (2016). Effects of a firm’s and their partners’ alliance ego-network structure on its innovation output in an era of ferment. R & D Management, 46(S1), 261-276.KaramanosA. G. (2016). Effects of a firm’s and their partners’ alliance ego-network structure on its innovation output in an era of ferment. R & D Management, 46(S1), 261-276.Search in Google Scholar
Katzy, B., Turgut, E., Holzmann, T., & Sailer, K. (2013). Innovation intermediaries: A process view on open innovation coordination. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(3), 295-309.KatzyB.TurgutE.HolzmannT.SailerK. (2013). Innovation intermediaries: A process view on open innovation coordination. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(3), 295-309.Search in Google Scholar
Kim, D. Y., & Fortado, B. (2022). Supplier centrality, innovation value and supplier acquisition: Evidence from US high-tech manufacturing firms. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(2), 378-398.KimD. Y.FortadoB. (2022). Supplier centrality, innovation value and supplier acquisition: Evidence from US high-tech manufacturing firms. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(2), 378-398.Search in Google Scholar
Lau, A. K. W., Kajikawa, Y., & Sharif, N. (2020). The roles of supply network centralities in firm performance and the moderating effects of reputation and export-orientation. Production Planning & Control, 31(13), 1110-1127.LauA. K. W.KajikawaY.SharifN. (2020). The roles of supply network centralities in firm performance and the moderating effects of reputation and export-orientation. Production Planning & Control, 31(13), 1110-1127.Search in Google Scholar
Li, K. Z., Small, M., Wang, K. H., & Fu, X. C. (2009). Three structural properties reflecting the synchronizability of complex networks. Physical Review E, 79(6), 1-4.LiK. Z.SmallM.WangK. H.FuX. C. (2009). Three structural properties reflecting the synchronizability of complex networks. Physical Review E, 79(6), 1-4.Search in Google Scholar
Lin, J. Y., & Yang, C. H. (2020). Heterogeneity in industry-university R&D collaboration and firm innovative performance. Scientometrics, 124(1), 1-25.LinJ. Y.YangC. H. (2020). Heterogeneity in industry-university R&D collaboration and firm innovative performance. Scientometrics, 124(1), 1-25.Search in Google Scholar
Lin, M., & Wei, J. (2018). The impact of innovation intermediary on knowledge transfer. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 502, 21-28LinM.WeiJ. (2018). The impact of innovation intermediary on knowledge transfer. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 502, 21-28.Search in Google Scholar
Liu, C., Cao, J. M., Wu, G. D., Zhao, X. B., & Zuo, J. (2022). Interenterprise collaboration network in international construction projects: Evidence from Chinese construction enterprises. Journal of Management in Engineering, 38(2), 1-11.LiuC.CaoJ. M.WuG. D.ZhaoX. B.ZuoJ. (2022). Interenterprise collaboration network in international construction projects: Evidence from Chinese construction enterprises. Journal of Management in Engineering, 38(2), 1-11.Search in Google Scholar
Liu, F. C., Zhang, N., & Cao, C. (2017). An evolutionary process of global nanotechnology collaboration: A social network analysis of patents at USPTO. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1449-1465.LiuF. C.ZhangN.CaoC. (2017). An evolutionary process of global nanotechnology collaboration: A social network analysis of patents at USPTO. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1449-1465.Search in Google Scholar
Lozares, C., Lopez-Roldan, P., Bolibar, M., & Muntanyola, D. (2015). The structure of global centrality measures. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(2), 209-226.LozaresC.Lopez-RoldanP.BolibarM.MuntanyolaD. (2015). The structure of global centrality measures. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(2), 209-226.Search in Google Scholar
Lyu, Y. B., He, B. Y., Zhu, Y. Q., & Li, L. (2019). Network embeddedness and inbound open innovation practice: The moderating role of technology cluster. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 12-24.LyuY. B.HeB. Y.ZhuY. Q.LiL. (2019). Network embeddedness and inbound open innovation practice: The moderating role of technology cluster. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 12-24.Search in Google Scholar
Onder, G., & Ulukan, C. (2020). Innovation and the network position of firms: The case of the Eskisehir-Bilecik-Kutahya ceramic cluster in Turkey. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 47(4), 589-612.OnderG.UlukanC. (2020). Innovation and the network position of firms: The case of the Eskisehir-Bilecik-Kutahya ceramic cluster in Turkey. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 47(4), 589-612.Search in Google Scholar
Partanen, J., Chetty, S. K., & Rajala, A. (2014). Innovation types and network relationships. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1027-1055.PartanenJ.ChettyS. K.RajalaA. (2014). Innovation types and network relationships. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1027-1055.Search in Google Scholar
Reck, F., Fliaster, A., & Kolloch, M. (2022). How to build a network that facilitates firm-level innovation: An integration of structural and managerial perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4), 998-1031.ReckF.FliasterA.KollochM. (2022). How to build a network that facilitates firm-level innovation: An integration of structural and managerial perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4), 998-1031.Search in Google Scholar
Ruan, A. J., & Chen, J. (2017). Does formal knowledge search depth benefit Chinese firms’ innovation performance? Effects of network centrality, structural holes, and knowledge tacitness. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 25(1), 79-97.RuanA. J.ChenJ. (2017). Does formal knowledge search depth benefit Chinese firms’ innovation performance? Effects of network centrality, structural holes, and knowledge tacitness. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 25(1), 79-97.Search in Google Scholar
Su, J. F., Yang, Y., & Zhang, X. F. (2019). Knowledge transfer efficiency measurement with application for open innovation networks. International Journal of Technology Management, 81(1-2), 118-142.SuJ. F.YangY.ZhangX. F. (2019). Knowledge transfer efficiency measurement with application for open innovation networks. International Journal of Technology Management, 81(1-2), 118-142.Search in Google Scholar
Tsai, L. C., Zhang, R. H., & Zhao, C. F. (2019). Political connections, network centrality and firm innovation. Finance Research Letters, 28, 180-184.TsaiL. C.ZhangR. H.ZhaoC. F. (2019). Political connections, network centrality and firm innovation. Finance Research Letters, 28, 180-184.Search in Google Scholar
Vedel, M., & Servais, P. (2019). The role of entry nodes in industrial firms’ internationalization: The significance of network structures for value innovation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(6), 1236-1247.VedelM.ServaisP. (2019). The role of entry nodes in industrial firms’ internationalization: The significance of network structures for value innovation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(6), 1236-1247.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, H. F., Zhao, Y. P., Dang, B. L., Han, P. F., & Shi, X. (2019). Network centrality and innovation performance: The role of formal and informal institutions in emerging economies. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(6), 1388-1400.WangH. F.ZhaoY. P.DangB. L.HanP. F.ShiX. (2019). Network centrality and innovation performance: The role of formal and informal institutions in emerging economies. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(6), 1388-1400.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Z. N., & Wang, N. X. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.WangZ. N.WangN. X. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.Search in Google Scholar
Woods, J., Galbraith, B., & Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2022). Network centrality and open innovation: A social network analysis of an SME manufacturing cluster. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(2), 351-364.WoodsJ.GalbraithB.Hewitt-DundasN. (2022). Network centrality and open innovation: A social network analysis of an SME manufacturing cluster. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(2), 351-364.Search in Google Scholar
Xu, L., Yan, J., & Xiong, J. (2019). Network characteristics and organizational innovation capability: A study of the inter-organizational collaboration network of new drug development in Shanghai, China. Strategic Change: Briefings in Entrepreneurial Finance, 28(6), 499-506.XuL.YanJ.XiongJ. (2019). Network characteristics and organizational innovation capability: A study of the inter-organizational collaboration network of new drug development in Shanghai, China. Strategic Change: Briefings in Entrepreneurial Finance, 28(6), 499-506.Search in Google Scholar
Yang, J., Zeng, D. M., Zhang, J., & Dai, H. W. (2022). How tie strength in alliance network affects the emergence of dominant design: The mediating effects of exploration and exploitation innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(1), 112-124.YangJ.ZengD. M.ZhangJ.DaiH. W. (2022). How tie strength in alliance network affects the emergence of dominant design: The mediating effects of exploration and exploitation innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(1), 112-124.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, P., Wang, J. L., Li, X. J., Li, M. H., Di, Z. R., & Fan, Y. (2008). Clustering coefficient and community structure of bipartite networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 387(27), 6869-6875.ZhangP.WangJ. L.LiX. J.LiM. H.DiZ. R.FanY. (2008). Clustering coefficient and community structure of bipartite networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 387(27), 6869-6875.Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, W. H., & Li, H. L. (2024). R&D team network configurations, knowledge diversity and breakthrough innovation: A combined effect framework. European Journal of Innovation Management. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-11-2023-1004ZhouW. H.LiH. L. (2024). R&D team network configurations, knowledge diversity and breakthrough innovation: A combined effect framework. European Journal of Innovation Management. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-11-2023-1004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar