This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019BaasJ.SchottenM.PlumeA.CôtéG.KarimiR., (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019Search in Google Scholar
Batagelj, V. (2008). SN5 – Network data for Viazards session at INSNA Sunbelt 2008. http://vlado. fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/data/WoS/SN5.zipBatageljV., (2008). SN5 – Network data for Viazards session at INSNA Sunbelt 2008. http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/data/WoS/SN5.zipSearch in Google Scholar
Batagelj, V. (2014). Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0309023BatageljV., (2014). Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0309023Search in Google Scholar
Batagelj, V. (2017). WoS2Pajek. Networks from Web of Science. Version 1.5 (2017). http://vladowiki.fmf.uni-lj.si/doku.php?id=pajek:wos2pajekBatageljV., (2017). WoS2Pajek. Networks from Web of Science. Version 1.5 (2017). http://vladowiki.fmf.uni-lj.si/doku.php?id=pajek:wos2pajekSearch in Google Scholar
Batagelj, V. (2020a). On fractional approach to analysis of linked networks. Scientometrics, 123(2), 621-633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03383-yBatageljV., (2020a). On fractional approach to analysis of linked networks. Scientometrics, 123(2), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03383-ySearch in Google Scholar
Batagelj, V. (2020b). Nets: Python package for network analysis. https://github.com/bavla/NetsBatageljV., (2020b). Nets: Python package for network analysis. https://github.com/bavla/NetsSearch in Google Scholar
Batagelj, V., & Cerinšek, M. (2013). On bibliographic networks. Scientometrics, 96(3), 845-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0940-1BatageljV.CerinšekM., (2013). On bibliographic networks. Scientometrics, 96(3), 845–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0940-1Search in Google Scholar
Batagelj, V., Doreian, P., Ferligoj, A., & Kejžar, N. (2014). Understanding large temporal networks and spatial networks: Exploration, pattern searching, visualization and network evolution. Wiley.BatageljV.DoreianP.FerligojA.KejžarN., (2014). Understanding large temporal networks and spatial networks: Exploration, pattern searching, visualization and network evolution. Wiley.Search in Google Scholar
Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A., & Doreian, P. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of the network clustering literature. In P. Doreian, V. Batagelj, & A. Ferligoj (Eds.), Advances in network clustering and blockmodeling. Wiley.BatageljV.FerligojA.DoreianP., (2020). Bibliometric analysis of the network clustering literature. In DoreianP.BatageljV.FerligojA. (Eds.), Advances in network clustering and blockmodeling. Wiley.Search in Google Scholar
Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A., & Squazzoni, F. (2017). The emergence of a field: A network analysis of research on peer review. Scientometrics, 113, 503-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8BatageljV.FerligojA.SquazzoniF., (2017). The emergence of a field: A network analysis of research on peer review. Scientometrics, 113, 503–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8Search in Google Scholar
Batagelj, V., & Maltseva, D. (2020). Temporal bibliographic networks. Journal of Informetrics, 14(1), 101006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101006BatageljV.MaltsevaD., (2020). Temporal bibliographic networks. Journal of Informetrics, 14(1), 101006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101006Search in Google Scholar
Batagelj, V., & Praprotnik, S. (2016). An algebraic approach to temporal network analysis based on temporal quantities. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 6(1), 1-22. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13278-016-03304BatageljV.PraprotnikS., (2016). An algebraic approach to temporal network analysis based on temporal quantities. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 6(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-016-03304Search in Google Scholar
Bonacich, P. (2004). The invasion of the physicists. Social Networks, 26, 285-288.BonacichP., (2004). The invasion of the physicists. Social Networks, 26, 285–288.Search in Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013.BorgattiS. P.FosterP. C., (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013.Search in Google Scholar
Boyack, K., Borner, K., & Klavans, R. (2009). Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research. Scientometrics, 79(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0403-5BoyackK.BornerK.KlavansR., (2009). Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research. Scientometrics, 79(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0403-5Search in Google Scholar
Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404.BoyackK. W.KlavansR., (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389–2404.Search in Google Scholar
Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & Van Raan, A. F. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for InformationScience, 42(4), 233-251.BraamR. R.MoedH. F.Van RaanA. F., (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 233–251.Search in Google Scholar
Brandes, U., & Pich, C. (2011). Explorative visualization of citation patterns in social network research. Journal of Social Structure, 12(8), 1-19.BrandesU.PichC., (2011). Explorative visualization of citation patterns in social network research. Journal of Social Structure, 12(8), 1–19.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, C. (2005). Measuring the movement of a research paradigm. In Visualization and data analysis 2005 (Vol. 5669, pp. 63-76). SPIE.ChenC., (2005). Measuring the movement of a research paradigm. In Visualization and data analysis 2005 (Vol. 5669, pp. 63–76). SPIE.Search in Google Scholar
DBLP. (2024). FAQ – How does DBLP handle homonyms and synonyms? dblp.org.DBLP. (2024). FAQ – How does DBLP handle homonyms and synonyms?dblp.org.Search in Google Scholar
De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2018). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek: Revised and expanded edition for updated software (Vol. 46). Cambridge University Press.De NooyW.MrvarA.BatageljV., (2018). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek: Revised and expanded edition for updated software (Vol. 46). Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Borner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., … & Barabási, A. L. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), eaao0185.FortunatoS.BergstromC. T.BornerK.EvansJ. A.HelbingD.MilojevićS.BarabásiA. L., (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), eaao0185.Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science (1st ed.). Empirical Press.FreemanL. C., (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science (1st ed.). Empirical Press.Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (2011). The development of social network analysis – With an emphasis on recent events. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 26-39). SAGE Publications.FreemanL. C., (2011). The development of social network analysis – With an emphasis on recent events. In ScottJ.CarringtonP. J. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 26–39). SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. Science, 122(3159), 108-111.GarfieldE., (1955). Citation indexes for science. Science, 122(3159), 108–111.Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1971). Citation indexing, historio-bibliography and the sociology of science. Current Contents, 14(15), M25.GarfieldE., (1971). Citation indexing, historio-bibliography and the sociology of science. Current Contents, 14(15), M25.Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 178(4060), 471-479.GarfieldE., (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 178(4060), 471–479.Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E., & Merton, R. K. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (Vol. 8). Wiley.GarfieldE.MertonR. K., (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (Vol. 8). Wiley.Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (2004). Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature. Journal of Information Science, 30(2), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504042802
GarfieldE., (2004). Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature. Journal of Information Science, 30(2), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504042802
Gauffriau, M., Larsen, P., Maye, I., Roulin-Perriard, A., & von Ins, M. (2007). Publication, cooperation and productivity measures in scientific research. Scientometrics, 73(2), 175-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1800-2GauffriauM.LarsenP.MayeI.Roulin-PerriardA.von InsM., (2007). Publication, cooperation and productivity measures in scientific research. Scientometrics, 73(2), 175–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1800-2Search in Google Scholar
Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2016). The relationship between authors’ bibliographic coupling and citation exchange: Analyzing disciplinary differences. Scientometrics, 107, 609-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1856-yGazniA.DidegahF., (2016). The relationship between authors’ bibliographic coupling and citation exchange: Analyzing disciplinary differences. Scientometrics, 107, 609–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1856-ySearch in Google Scholar
Gipp, B., & Beel, J. (2009). Citation proximity analysis (CPA): A new approach for identifying related work based on co-citation analysis. In ISSI’09: 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 571-575).GippB.BeelJ., (2009). Citation proximity analysis (CPA): A new approach for identifying related work based on co-citation analysis. In ISSI’09: 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 571–575).Search in Google Scholar
Harzing, A. W. (2015). Health warning: Might contain multiple personalities—the problem of homonyms in Thomson Reuters Essential Science Indicators. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2259-2270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1699-yHarzingA. W., (2015). Health warning: Might contain multiple personalities—the problem of homonyms in Thomson Reuters Essential Science Indicators. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2259–2270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1699-ySearch in Google Scholar
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature News, 520(7548), 429.HicksD.WoutersP.WaltmanL.De RijckeS.RafolsI., (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature News, 520(7548), 429.Search in Google Scholar
Hidalgo, C. A. (2016). Disconnected, fragmented, or united? A trans-disciplinary review of network science. Applied Network Science, 1(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-016-0010-3HidalgoC. A., (2016). Disconnected, fragmented, or united? A trans-disciplinary review of network science. Applied Network Science, 1(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-016-0010-3Search in Google Scholar
Hummon, N. P., & Carley, K. (1993). Social networks as normal science. Social Networks, 15(1), 71-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(93)90022-DHummonN. P.CarleyK., (1993). Social networks as normal science. Social Networks, 15(1), 71–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(93)90022-DSearch in Google Scholar
Ioannidis, J. P., Baas, J., Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2019). A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field. PLoS Biology, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384IoannidisJ. P.BaasJ.KlavansR.BoyackK. W., (2019). A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field. PLoS Biology, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384Search in Google Scholar
Kacem, A., Flatt, J. W., & Mayr, P. (2020). Tracking self-citations in academic publishing. Scientometrics, 123(2), 1157-1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03413-9KacemA.FlattJ. W.MayrP., (2020). Tracking self-citations in academic publishing. Scientometrics, 123(2), 1157–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03413-9Search in Google Scholar
Kejžar, N., Černe, S. K., & Batagelj, V. (2010). Network analysis of works on clustering and classification from Web of Science. In Classification as a Tool for Research: Proceedings of the 11th IFCS Biennial Conference and 33rd Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation eV, Dresden, (pp. 525-536). Berlin, Heidelberg.KejžarN.ČerneS. K.BatageljV., (2010). Network analysis of works on clustering and classification from Web of Science. In Classification as a Tool for Research: Proceedings of the 11th IFCS Biennial Conference and 33rd Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation eV, Dresden, (pp. 525–536). Berlin, Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.KesslerM. M., (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25.Search in Google Scholar
Lazer, D., Mergel, I., & Friedman, A. (2009). Co-citation of prominent social network articles in sociology journals: The evolving canon. Connections, 29(1), 43-64.LazerD.MergelI.FriedmanA., (2009). Co-citation of prominent social network articles in sociology journals: The evolving canon. Connections, 29(1), 43–64.Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 5-25.LeydesdorffL., (1998). Theories of citation?Scientometrics, 43(1), 5–25.Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Schank, T., Scharnhorst, A., & De Nooy, W. (2008). Animating the development of social networks over time using a dynamic extension of multidimensional scaling. El Profesional de Información, 17(6).LeydesdorffL.SchankT.ScharnhorstA.De NooyW., (2008). Animating the development of social networks over time using a dynamic extension of multidimensional scaling. El Profesional de Información, 17(6).Search in Google Scholar
Lietz, H. (2009). Diagnosing emerging science: The cases of the ‘new science of networks’ and scientometrics. In PRIME-ENID Summer School on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators and Knowledge Dynamics Visualization.LietzH., (2009). Diagnosing emerging science: The cases of the ‘new science of networks’ and scientometrics. In PRIME-ENID Summer School on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators and Knowledge Dynamics Visualization.Search in Google Scholar
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: Acritical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 342-349.MacRobertsM. H.MacRobertsB. R., (1989). Problems of citation analysis: Acritical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 342–349.Search in Google Scholar
Maltseva, D., & Batagelj, V. (2019). Social network analysis as a field of invasions: Bibliographic approach to study SNA development. Scientometrics, 121(2), 1085-1128. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-019-03193-xMaltsevaD.BatageljV., (2019). Social network analysis as a field of invasions: Bibliographic approach to study SNA development. Scientometrics, 121(2), 1085–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03193-xSearch in Google Scholar
Maltseva, D., & Batagelj, V. (2020). Towards a systematic description of the field using keywords analysis: Main topics in social networks. Scientometrics, 123(1), 357-382. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-020-03365-0MaltsevaD.BatageljV., (2020). Towards a systematic description of the field using keywords analysis: Main topics in social networks. Scientometrics, 123(1), 357–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03365-0Search in Google Scholar
Maltseva, D., & Batagelj, V. (2021). Journals publishing social network analysis. Scientometrics, 126(4), 3593-3620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03889-zMaltsevaD.BatageljV., (2021). Journals publishing social network analysis. Scientometrics, 126(4), 3593–3620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03889-zSearch in Google Scholar
Maltseva, D., & Batagelj, V. (2022). Collaboration between authors in the field of social network analysis. Scientometrics, 127, 3437–3470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04364-zMaltsevaD.BatageljV., (2022). Collaboration between authors in the field of social network analysis. Scientometrics, 127, 3437–3470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04364-zSearch in Google Scholar
Marshakova, I. V. (1973). System of document connections based on references. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2: Informatsionnye Protsessy i Sistemy (6), 3-8.MarshakovaI. V., (1973). System of document connections based on references. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2: Informatsionnye Protsessy i Sistemy (6), 3–8.Search in Google Scholar
Marshakova, I. V. (1981). Citation networks in information science. Scientometrics, 3(1), 13-25.MarshakovaI. V., (1981). Citation networks in information science. Scientometrics, 3(1), 13–25.Search in Google Scholar
Marshakova-Shaikevich, I. (2013). Bibliomertrics – what and how we can evaluate in science. Upravlenie Bol’shimi Sistemami, 44, 210–247.Marshakova-ShaikevichI., (2013). Bibliomertrics – what and how we can evaluate in science. Upravlenie Bol’shimi Sistemami, 44, 210–247.Search in Google Scholar
McCain, K. W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 290–296.McCainK. W., (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 290–296.Search in Google Scholar
Meuschke, N., Gipp, B., & Lipinsk, M. (2015). CITREC: An evaluation framework for citation-based similarity measures based on TREC Genomics and PubMed 2015 Proceedings.MeuschkeN.GippB.LipinskM., (2015). CITREC: An evaluation framework for citation-based similarity measures based on TREC Genomics and PubMed 2015 Proceedings.Search in Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016132. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.039906NewmanM. E., (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016132. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.039906Search in Google Scholar
OpenAlex. (2024). OpenAlex technical documentation. docs.openalex.org. https://docs.openalex.orgOpenAlex. (2024). OpenAlex technical documentation. docs.openalex.org. https://docs.openalex.orgSearch in Google Scholar
Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601OtteE.RousseauR., (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601Search in Google Scholar
Ouvrard, X., Le Goff, J. M., & Marchand-Maillet, S. (2017). Networks of collaborations: Hypergraph modeling and visualisation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.00115.OuvrardX.Le GoffJ. M.Marchand-MailletS., (2017). Networks of collaborations: Hypergraph modeling and visualisation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.00115.Search in Google Scholar
Price, D. J. de Solla. (1963). Little science, big science (Vol. 5). Columbia University Press.PriceD. J. de Solla. (1963). Little science, big science (Vol. 5). Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Price, D. J. de Solla. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 510–515.PriceD. J. de Solla, (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 510–515.Search in Google Scholar
Rice, R. E., Borgman, C. L., Bednarski, D., & Hart, P. J. (1989). Journal-to-journal citation data: Issues of validity and reliability. Scientometrics, 15(3–4), 257–282.RiceR. E.BorgmanC. L.BednarskiD.HartP. J., (1989). Journal-to-journal citation data: Issues of validity and reliability. Scientometrics, 15(3–4), 257–282.Search in Google Scholar
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2007). Topological analysis of citation networks to discover the future core articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 872–882. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20529ShibataN.KajikawaY.MatsushimaK., (2007). Topological analysis of citation networks to discover the future core articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 872–882. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20529Search in Google Scholar
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications. Technovation, 28(11), 758–775.ShibataN.KajikawaY.TakedaY.MatsushimaK., (2008). Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications. Technovation, 28(11), 758–775.Search in Google Scholar
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2009). Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 571–580.ShibataN.KajikawaY.TakedaY.MatsushimaK., (2009). Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 571–580.Search in Google Scholar
Silva, F. N., Tandon, A., Amancio, D. R., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., Milojevic, S., & Fortunato, S. (2020). Recency predicts bursts in the evolution of author citations. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1298–1308.SilvaF. N.TandonA.AmancioD. R.FlamminiA.MenczerF.MilojevicS.FortunatoS., (2020). Recency predicts bursts in the evolution of author citations. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1298–1308.Search in Google Scholar
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.SmallH., (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.Search in Google Scholar
Small, H. G. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8(3), 327–340.SmallH. G., (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8(3), 327–340.Search in Google Scholar
Small, H. G., & Koenig, M. E. (1977). Journal clustering using a bibliographic coupling method. Information Processing and Management, 13(5), 277–288.SmallH. G.KoenigM. E., (1977). Journal clustering using a bibliographic coupling method. Information Processing and Management, 13(5), 277–288.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83–106.SmithL. C., (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83–106.Search in Google Scholar
Szomszor, M., Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2020). How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. Scientometrics, 123(2), 1119–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03417-5SzomszorM.PendleburyD. A.AdamsJ., (2020). How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. Scientometrics, 123(2), 1119–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03417-5Search in Google Scholar
TePaske-King, B., & Richert, N. (2001). The identification of authors in the Mathematical Reviews Database. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (31). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1861TePaske-KingB.RichertN., (2001). The identification of authors in the Mathematical Reviews Database. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (31). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1861Search in Google Scholar
Web of Science. (2023). Web of Science Core Collection field tags. https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hs_wos_fieldtags.htmlWeb of Science.. (2023). Web of Science Core Collection field tags. https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hs_wos_fieldtags.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171.WhiteH. D.GriffithB. C., (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171.Search in Google Scholar
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author cocitation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327–355.WhiteH. D.McCainK. W., (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author cocitation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327–355.Search in Google Scholar
Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012a). A framework of studying scholarly networks. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 917–926). Science-Metrix and OST.YanE.DingY., (2012a). A framework of studying scholarly networks. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 917–926). Science-Metrix and OST.Search in Google Scholar
Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012b). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1313–1326.YanE.DingY., (2012b). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1313–1326.Search in Google Scholar
Yanhui, S., Lijuan, W., & Junping, Q. (2021). A comparative study of first and all-author bibliographic coupling analysis based on Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 126, 1125–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03798-7YanhuiS.LijuanW.JunpingQ., (2021). A comparative study of first and all-author bibliographic coupling analysis based on Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 126, 1125–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03798-7Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, R., & Yuan, J. (2022). Enhanced author bibliographic coupling analysis using semantic and syntactic citation information. Scientometrics, 127(12), 7681–7706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04333-6ZhangR.YuanJ., (2022). Enhanced author bibliographic coupling analysis using semantic and syntactic citation information. Scientometrics, 127(12), 7681–7706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04333-6Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070–2086.ZhaoD.StrotmannA., (2008). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070–2086.Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015). Analysis and visualization of citation networks. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.ZhaoD.StrotmannA., (2015). Analysis and visualization of citation networks. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Search in Google Scholar