This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Baccini, A., & Barabesi, L. (2010). Interlocking editorship. A network analysis of the links between economic journals. Scientometrics, 82(2), 365–389.BacciniA.BarabesiL. (2010). Interlocking editorship. A network analysis of the links between economic journals. Scientometrics, 82(2), 365–389. Search in Google Scholar
Baccini, A., & Barabesi, L. (2011). Seats at the table: The network of the editorial boards in information and library science. Journal of Informetrics, 5(2), 382–391.BacciniA.BarabesiL. (2011). Seats at the table: The network of the editorial boards in information and library science. Journal of Informetrics, 5(2), 382–391. Search in Google Scholar
Baccini, A., Barabesi, L., Khelfaoui, M., & Gingras, Y. (2020). Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: An exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 277–289.BacciniA.BarabesiL.KhelfaouiM.GingrasY. (2020). Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: An exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 277–289. Search in Google Scholar
Baker, S. (2023). China overtakes United States on contribution to research in Nature Index. Nature Index (May 19, 2023), available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-01705-7BakerS. (2023). China overtakes United States on contribution to research in Nature Index. Nature Index (May19, 2023), available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-01705-7Search in Google Scholar
Bakker, P., & Rigter, H. (1985). Editors of medical journals: Who and from where. Scientometrics, 7(1-2), 11–22.BakkerP.RigterH. (1985). Editors of medical journals: Who and from where. Scientometrics, 7(1-2), 11–22. Search in Google Scholar
Bedeian, A.G., Van Fleet, D. D., & Hyman III, H. H. (2009). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 211–238.BedeianA.G.Van FleetD. D.HymanH. H.III (2009). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 211–238. Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, J.C. (2004). The Anglosphere Challenge: Why the English-Speaking Nations Will Lead the Way in the Twenty-First Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.BennettJ.C. (2004). The Anglosphere Challenge: Why the English-Speaking Nations Will Lead the Way in the Twenty-First Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Search in Google Scholar
Besancenot, D., Huynh, K.V., & Faria, J. R. (2012). Search and research: The influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality. Theory and Decision, 73(4), 687–702.BesancenotD.HuynhK.V.FariaJ. R. (2012). Search and research: The influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality. Theory and Decision, 73(4), 687–702. Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., Daniel, H. D. (2007). Gatekeepers of science-Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 83–91.BornmannL.DanielH. D. (2007). Gatekeepers of science-Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 83–91. Search in Google Scholar
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1989). Some data on the distribution of journal publication types in the science citation index database. Scientometrics, 15(5-6), 325–330.BraunT.GlänzelW.SchubertA. (1989). Some data on the distribution of journal publication types in the science citation index database. Scientometrics, 15(5-6), 325–330. Search in Google Scholar
Braun, T., & Dióspatonyi, I. (2005a). Gatekeeping indicators exemplified by the main players in the international gatekeeping orchestration of analytical chemistry journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(8), 854–860.BraunT.DióspatonyiI. (2005a). Gatekeeping indicators exemplified by the main players in the international gatekeeping orchestration of analytical chemistry journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(8), 854–860. Search in Google Scholar
Braun, T., & Dióspatonyi, I. (2005b). World flash on basic research: The counting of core journal gatekeepers as science indicators really counts. The scientific scope of action and strength of nations. Scientometrics, 62(3), 297–319.BraunT.DióspatonyiI. (2005b). World flash on basic research: The counting of core journal gatekeepers as science indicators really counts. The scientific scope of action and strength of nations. Scientometrics, 62(3), 297–319. Search in Google Scholar
Braun, T., Zsindely, S., Dióspatonyi, I., & Zádor, E. (2007). Gatekeeping patterns in nano-titled journals. Scientometrics, 70(3), 651–667.BraunT.ZsindelyS.DióspatonyiI.ZádorE. (2007). Gatekeeping patterns in nano-titled journals. Scientometrics, 70(3), 651–667. Search in Google Scholar
Brinn, T., & Jones, M. J. (2007). Editorial boards in accounting: The power and the glory. Accounting Forum, 31(1), 1–25.BrinnT.JonesM. J. (2007). Editorial boards in accounting: The power and the glory. Accounting Forum, 31(1), 1–25. Search in Google Scholar
Campanario, J.M. (1998). Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 1. Science Communication, 19(3), 181–211.CampanarioJ.M. (1998). Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 1. Science Communication, 19(3), 181–211. Search in Google Scholar
Chenette, E. (2021). A new Editor-in-Chief for PLOS ONE. PLOS (March 11, 2021), available at: https://everyone.plos.org/2021/03/11/a-new-editor-in-chief-for-plos-one/ChenetteE. (2021). A new Editor-in-Chief for PLOS ONE. PLOS (March11, 2021), available at: https://everyone.plos.org/2021/03/11/a-new-editor-in-chief-for-plos-one/Search in Google Scholar
Crane D. (1967). The gatekeepers in science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. The American Sociologist, 2(4), 195–201.CraneD. (1967). The gatekeepers in science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. The American Sociologist, 2(4), 195–201. Search in Google Scholar
Csomós, G., & Lengyel, B. (2022). Geographies of the global co-editor network in oncology. PLOS ONE, 17(3), e0265652CsomósG.LengyelB. (2022). Geographies of the global co-editor network in oncology. PLOS ONE, 17(3), e0265652Search in Google Scholar
Csomós, G., & Farkas, J. Z. (2023). Understanding the increasing market share of the academic publisher “Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute” in the publication output of Central and Eastern European countries: a case study of Hungary. Scientometrics, 128(1), 803–824.CsomósG.FarkasJ. Z. (2023). Understanding the increasing market share of the academic publisher “Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute” in the publication output of Central and Eastern European countries: a case study of Hungary. Scientometrics, 128(1), 803–824. Search in Google Scholar
Dhanani, A., & Jones, M. J. (2017). Editorial boards of accounting journals: gender diversity and internationalization. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(5), 1008–1040.DhananiA.JonesM. J. (2017). Editorial boards of accounting journals: gender diversity and internationalization. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(5), 1008–1040. Search in Google Scholar
Dow, R. F. (2000). Editorial gatekeepers confronted by the electronic journal. College and Research Libraries, 61(2), 146–154.DowR. F. (2000). Editorial gatekeepers confronted by the electronic journal. College and Research Libraries, 61(2), 146–154. Search in Google Scholar
García, J. A., Rodriguez-Sánchez, R., & Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2015). The author–editor game. Scientometrics, 104(1), 361–380.GarcíaJ. A.Rodriguez-SánchezR.Fdez-ValdiviaJ. (2015). The author–editor game. Scientometrics, 104(1), 361–380. Search in Google Scholar
Gomez, C.J., Herman, A.C., & Parigi, P. (2022). Leading countries in global science increasingly receive more citations than other countries doing similar research. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(7), 919–929.GomezC.J.HermanA.C.ParigiP. (2022). Leading countries in global science increasingly receive more citations than other countries doing similar research. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(7), 919–929. Search in Google Scholar
Goyanes, M. (2020). Editorial boards in communication sciences journals: Plurality or standardization?. International Communication Gazette, 82(4), 342–364.GoyanesM. (2020). Editorial boards in communication sciences journals: Plurality or standardization?. International Communication Gazette, 82(4), 342–364. Search in Google Scholar
Goyanes, M., & Demeter, M. (2020). How the Geographic Diversity of Editorial Boards Affects What is Published in JCR-Ranked Communication Journals. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(4), 1123–1148.GoyanesM.DemeterM. (2020). How the Geographic Diversity of Editorial Boards Affects What is Published in JCR-Ranked Communication Journals. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(4), 1123–1148. Search in Google Scholar
Goyanes, M., & de-Marcos, L. (2020). Academic influence and invisible colleges through editorial board interlocking in communication sciences: a social network analysis of leading journals. Scientometrics, 123(2), 791–811.GoyanesM.de-MarcosL. (2020). Academic influence and invisible colleges through editorial board interlocking in communication sciences: a social network analysis of leading journals. Scientometrics, 123(2), 791–811. Search in Google Scholar
Hagve, M. (2020). The money behind academic publishing. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening, 140(11), 1–5.HagveM. (2020). The money behind academic publishing. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening, 140(11), 1–5. Search in Google Scholar
Harzing, A. W., & Metz, I. (2013). Practicing what We Preach: The Geographic Diversity of Editorial Boards. Management International Review, 53(2), 169–187.HarzingA. W.MetzI. (2013). Practicing what We Preach: The Geographic Diversity of Editorial Boards. Management International Review, 53(2), 169–187. Search in Google Scholar
Heinze, T., Jappe, A., & Pithan, D. (2019). From North American hegemony to global competition for scientific leadership? Insights from the Nobel population. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0213916HeinzeT.JappeA.PithanD. (2019). From North American hegemony to global competition for scientific leadership? Insights from the Nobel population. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0213916Search in Google Scholar
Hodgson, G.M., & Rothman, H. (1999). The editors and authors of economics journals: A case of institutional oligopoly?. Economic Journal, 109(453), 165–186.HodgsonG.M.RothmanH. (1999). The editors and authors of economics journals: A case of institutional oligopoly?. Economic Journal, 109(453), 165–186. Search in Google Scholar
Hojat, M., Gonnella, J. S., & Caelleigh, A. S. (2003). Impartial judgment by the gatekeepers of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 75–96.HojatM.GonnellaJ. S.CaelleighA. S. (2003). Impartial judgment by the gatekeepers of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 75–96. Search in Google Scholar
Larivière, V, Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502LarivièreVHausteinS.MongeonP. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502Search in Google Scholar
Marginson, S. (2020). All things are in flux’: China in global science. Higher Education, 83(4), 881–910.MarginsonS. (2020). All things are in flux’: China in global science. Higher Education, 83(4), 881–910. Search in Google Scholar
Marginson, S., & Xu, X. (2023). Hegemony and Inequality in Global Science: Problems of the Center-Periphery Model. Comparative Education Review, 67(1), 31–52.MarginsonS.XuX. (2023). Hegemony and Inequality in Global Science: Problems of the Center-Periphery Model. Comparative Education Review, 67(1), 31–52. Search in Google Scholar
Mervis, J. (2022). U.S. science no longer leads the world. Here’s how top advisers say the nation should respond. Science. ScienceInsider (January 21, 2022). available at: https://www. science.org/content/article/u-s-science-no-longer-leads-world-here-s-how-top-advisers-say-nation-should-respondMervisJ. (2022). U.S. science no longer leads the world. Here’s how top advisers say the nation should respond. Science. ScienceInsider (January21, 2022). available at: https://www. science.org/content/article/u-s-science-no-longer-leads-world-here-s-how-top-advisers-say-nation-should-respondSearch in Google Scholar
Metz, I., & Harzing, A. W. (2012). An update of gender diversity in editorial boards: A longitudinal study of management journals. Personnel Review, 41(3), 283–300.MetzI.HarzingA. W. (2012). An update of gender diversity in editorial boards: A longitudinal study of management journals. Personnel Review, 41(3), 283–300. Search in Google Scholar
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228.MongeonP.Paul-HusA. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. Search in Google Scholar
Nishikawa-Pacher, A. (2020). Who are the 100 largest scientific publishers by journal count? A webscraping approach. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 450–463.Nishikawa-PacherA. (2020). Who are the 100 largest scientific publishers by journal count? A webscraping approach. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 450–463. Search in Google Scholar
Paasi, A. (2005). Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces. Environment and Planning A, 37(5), 769–789.PaasiA. (2005). Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces. Environment and Planning A, 37(5), 769–789. Search in Google Scholar
Petersen, J., Hattke, F., & Vogel, R. (2017). Editorial governance and journal impact: a study of management and business journals. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1593–1614.PetersenJ.HattkeF.VogelR. (2017). Editorial governance and journal impact: a study of management and business journals. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1593–1614. Search in Google Scholar
Schubert, A. (2017). Power positions in cardiology publications. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1721–1743.SchubertA. (2017). Power positions in cardiology publications. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1721–1743. Search in Google Scholar
Siler, K., Lee, K., & Bero, L. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(2), 360–365.SilerK.LeeK.BeroL. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(2), 360–365. Search in Google Scholar
Teixeira, E.K., & Oliveira, M. (2018). Editorial board interlocking in knowledge management and intellectual capital research field. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1853–1869.TeixeiraE.K.OliveiraM. (2018). Editorial board interlocking in knowledge management and intellectual capital research field. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1853–1869. Search in Google Scholar
Tutarel, O. (2004). Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-3TutarelO. (2004). Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-3Search in Google Scholar