This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Addis, E., & Villa, P. (2003). The editorial boards of Italian Economics journals: women, gender, and socialnetworking. FeministEconomics, 9(1), 75–91.https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570032000057062AddisE.VillaP.(2003). The editorial boards of Italian Economics journals: women, gender, and socialnetworking. , 9(1),75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570032000057062Search in Google Scholar
Arnold, T., Butler, A. W., Crack, T. F., & Altintig, A. (2003). Impact: What influences finance research? Journal of Business, 76(2), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1086/367753ArnoldT.ButlerA. W.CrackT. F.AltintigA.(2003). Impact: What influences finance research?, 76(2),343–361. https://doi.org/10.1086/367753Search in Google Scholar
Asnafi, S., Gunderson, T., McDonald, R. J., & Kallmes, D. F. (2017). Association of h-index of editorial board members and impact factor among radiology journals. Academic Radiology, 24(2), 119–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.005AsnafiS.GundersonT.McDonaldR. J.KallmesD. F.(2017). Association of h-index of editorial board members and impact factor among radiology journals. , 24(2),119–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.005Search in Google Scholar
Baum, C. F. (2008). Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions. Stata Journal, 8(2), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0800800212BaumC. F.(2008). Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions. , 8(2),299–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0800800212Search in Google Scholar
Bedeian, A. G., Van Fleet, D. D., & Hyman III, H. H. (2009). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107309312BedeianA. G.Van FleetD. D.Hyman IIIH. H.(2009). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. , 12(2),211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107309312Search in Google Scholar
Besancenot D., Huynh, K. V., & Faria, J. R. (2012). Search and research: the influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality. Theory and Decision, 73, 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9314-7BesancenotD.HuynhK. V.,FariaJ. R.(2012). Search and research: the influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality. , 73,687–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9314-7Search in Google Scholar
Björk, B. (2015). Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits of growth? PeerJ, 3, e981, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.981BjörkB.(2015). Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits of growth?, 3,e981,https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.981Search in Google Scholar
Björk, B. (2021). Publishing speed and acceptance rates of open access megajournals. Online Information Review, 45(2), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2018-0151BjörkB.(2021). Publishing speed and acceptance rates of open access megajournals. , 45(2),270–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2018-0151Search in Google Scholar
Bosnjak, L., Puljak, L., Vukojevic, K., & Marusic, A. (2011). Analysis of a number and type of publications that editors publish in own journals: case study of scholarly journals in Croatia. Scientometrics, 86, 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0207-7BosnjakL.PuljakL.VukojevicK.MarusicA.(2011). Analysis of a number and type of publications that editors publish in own journals: case study of scholarly journals in Croatia. , 86, 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0207-7Search in Google Scholar
Braun, T., Diospatonyi, I., Zador, E., & Zsindely, Z. (2007). Journal gatekeepers indicator-based top universities of the world, of Europe and of 29 countries-A pilot study. Scientometrics, 71(2), 155-178.BraunT.DiospatonyiI.ZadorE.ZsindelyZ.(2007). Journal gatekeepers indicator-based top universities of the world, of Europe and of 29 countries-A pilot study. , 71(2), 155–178.Search in Google Scholar
Brew, A., Boud, D., Namgung, S. U., et al., (2016). Research productivity and academics’ conceptions of research. Higher Education, 71. 681–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9930-6BrewA.BoudD.NamgungS. U.,(2016). Research productivity and academics’ conceptions of research. , 71.681–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9930-6Search in Google Scholar
Brinn, T., & Jones, M. J. (2007). Editorial boards in accounting: the power and the glory. Accounting Forum, 31(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2006.08.001BrinnT.JonesM. J.(2007). Editorial boards in accounting: the power and the glory. , 31(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2006.08.001Search in Google Scholar
Brinn, T., & Jones, M. J. (2008). The composition of editorial boards in accounting: a UK perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810842304BrinnT.JonesM. J.(2008). The composition of editorial boards in accounting: a UK perspective. , 21(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810842304Search in Google Scholar
Brogaard, J., Engelberg, J., & Parsons, C. A. (2014). Networks and productivity: causal evidence from editor rotations. Journal of Financial Economics, 111,251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jfineco.2013.10.006BrogaardJ.EngelbergJ.ParsonsC. A.(2014). Networks and productivity: causal evidence from editor rotations. , 111,251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jfineco.2013.10.006Search in Google Scholar
Burgess, F. T., & Shaw, N. E. (2010). Editorial board membership of management and business journals: a social network analysis study of the Financial Times 40. British Journal of Management, 21(3), 627–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00701.xBurgessF. T.ShawN. E.(2010). Editorial board membership of management and business journals: a social network analysis study of the Financial Times 40. , 21(3), 627–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00701.xSearch in Google Scholar
Buriak, J. M. (2015). Mega-journals and peer review: Can quality and standards survive? Chemistry of Materials, 27(7), 2243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01142BuriakJ. M.(2015). Mega-journals and peer review: Can quality and standards survive?, 27(7), 2243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01142Search in Google Scholar
Chan, K. C., & Fok R. C. W. (2003). Membership on editorial boards and finance department rankings. The Journal of Financial Research, 26(3), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6803.00066ChanK. C.FokRCW(2003). Membership on editorial boards and finance department rankings. , 26(3), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475–6803.00066Search in Google Scholar
Cherkashin, I., Demodova, S., Imai, S., & Krishna, K. (2009). The inside scoop: acceptance and rejection at the journal of international economics. Journal of International Economics, 77(1), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.10.002CherkashinI.DemodovaS.ImaiS.KrishnaK.(2009). The inside scoop: acceptance and rejection at the journal of international economics. , 77(1), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.10.002Search in Google Scholar
Conley, J. P. (2012). Low acceptance rates, commercial publishing, and the future of scholarly communication. Economics Bulletin, 32(4), 1–37.ConleyJ. P.(2012). Low acceptance rates, commercial publishing, and the future of scholarly communication. , 32(4), 1–37.Search in Google Scholar
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2004). Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands, and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588284CurryM. J.LillisT.(2004). Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands, and rewards. , 38(4), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588284Search in Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. (2013). A decline to nothing? The tenuous existence of the small journal. Learned Publishing, 22(4), 323–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20090410DonovanS. K.(2013). A decline to nothing? The tenuous existence of the small journal. , 22(4), 323–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20090410Search in Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. (2013). Death of a small journal? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 44(3), 289–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jsp.44.3.007DonovanS. K.(2013). Death of a small journal?, 44(3), 289–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jsp.44.3.007Search in Google Scholar
Fogarty, T. J., & Liao, C. (2009). Blessed are the gatekeepers: a longitudinal study of the editorial boards of The Accounting Review. Issues in Accounting Education, 24(3), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2009.24.3.299FogartyT. J.LiaoC.(2009). Blessed are the gatekeepers: a longitudinal study of the editorial boards of The Accounting Review. , 24(3), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2009.24.3.299Search in Google Scholar
Franke, R. H., Edlund, T. W., & Oster, F. (1990). The development of strategic management: Journal quality and article impact. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110306FrankeR. H.EdlundT. W.OsterF.(1990). The development of strategic management: Journal quality and article impact. , 11(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110306Search in Google Scholar
Gasparyan, A. Y. (2013). Selecting your editorial board: maintaining standards. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 28(7), 972–973. https://doi.org/10.3346%2Fjkms.2013.28.7.972GasparyanA. Y.(2013). Selecting your editorial board: maintaining standards. , 28(7), 972–973. https://doi.org/10.3346%2Fjkms.2013.28.7.972Search in Google Scholar
Grancay, M., Vveinhardt, J., & Sumilo, E. (2017). Publish or perish: How Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000-2015. Scientometrics, 111, 1813–1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2332-zGrancayM.VveinhardtJ.SumiloE.(2017). Publish or perish: How Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000-2015. , 111, 1813–1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2332-zSearch in Google Scholar
Haensly, P. J., Hodges, P. E., & Davenport, S. S. (2008). Acceptance rates and journal quality: an analysis of journals in economics and finance. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 14(1), 2–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08963560802176330HaenslyP. J.HodgesP. E.DavenportS. S.(2008). Acceptance rates and journal quality: an analysis of journals in economics and finance. , 14(1), 2–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08963560802176330Search in Google Scholar
Hames, I. (2001). Editorial boards: realizing their potential. Learned Publishing, 14, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315101753141347HamesI.(2001). Editorial boards: realizing their potential. , 14, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315101753141347Search in Google Scholar
Hardin III, W. G., Liano, K., Chan, K. C., & Fok, R. C. W. (2008). Finance editorial board membership and research productivity. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 31, 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-007-0067-2Hardin IIIW. G.LianoK.ChanK. C.FokR. C. W.(2008). Finance editorial board membership and research productivity. , 31, 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-007-0067-2Search in Google Scholar
Harvey, C. (2013). Reflections on editing the Journal of Finance, 2006-2012. Working Paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2191787HarveyC.(2013). . https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2191787Search in Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. & Moktan, S. (2020). The tyranny of the top five. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(2), 419–470. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191574HeckmanJ. J.MoktanS.(2020). The tyranny of the top five. , 58(2), 419–470. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191574Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007HicksD.(2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. , 41(2), 251–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007Search in Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M., & Rothman, H. (1999). The editors and authors of economics journals: A case of institutional oligopoly? The Economic Journal, 109(453), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00407HodgsonG. M.RothmanH.(1999). The editors and authors of economics journals: A case of institutional oligopoly?, 109(453), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00407Search in Google Scholar
Kay, J., Memon, M., et al. (2017). The h-index of editorial board members correlates positively with the impact factor of sports medicine journals. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 5(3), 2325967117694024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.005KayJ.MemonM.(2017). The h-index of editorial board members correlates positively with the impact factor of sports medicine journals. , 5(3), 2325967117694024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.005Search in Google Scholar
Kaufman, G. G. (1984). Rankings of finance departments by faculty representation on editorial boards of professional journals: a note. Journal of Finance, 39(4), 1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03902.xKaufmanG. G.(1984). Rankings of finance departments by faculty representation on editorial boards of professional journals: a note. , 39(4), 1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03902.xSearch in Google Scholar
Koys, D. J. (2008). Judging academic qualifications, professional qualifications, and participation of faculty using AACSB guidelines. Journal of Education for Business, 83(4), 207–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.4.207-213KoysD. J.(2008). Judging academic qualifications, professional qualifications, and participation of faculty using AACSB guidelines. , 83(4), 207–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.4.207-213Search in Google Scholar
Krueger, T., & Shorter, J. (2011). Variation in scholarly journal review processes and acceptance rates across time and disciplines. Southwestern Business Administration Journal, 11(2), 71–112.KruegerT.ShorterJ.(2011). Variation in scholarly journal review processes and acceptance rates across time and disciplines. , 11(2), 71–112.Search in Google Scholar
Kurmis, A. P. (2003). Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 85(12), 2449–2454.KurmisA. P.(2003). Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. , 85(12), 2449–2454.Search in Google Scholar
Laband, D. N. (1990). Is there a value-added from the review process in economics? Preliminary evidence from authors. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(2), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937790LabandD. N.(1990). Is there a value-added from the review process in economics? Preliminary evidence from authors. , 105(2), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937790Search in Google Scholar
Laband, D. N., & Piette, M. J. (1994). Favoritism versus search for good papers: empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors. Journal of Political Economy, 102(1), 194–203. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261927LabandD. N.PietteM. J.(1994). Favoritism versus search for good papers: empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors. , 102(1), 194–203. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261927Search in Google Scholar
Lamb, C. R., & Adams, C. A. (2015). Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012. Equine Veterinary Journal, 47(6), 736–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12376LambC. R.AdamsC. A.(2015). Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012. , 47(6), 736–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12376Search in Google Scholar
Lindsey, D. (1976). Distinction, achievement, and editorial board membership. American Psychologist, 31(11), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.31.11.799LindseyD.(1976). Distinction, achievement, and editorial board membership. , 31(11), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.31.11.799Search in Google Scholar
Liwei, Z., & Chunlin, J. (2015). Social network analysis and academic performance of the editorial board members for journals of Library and Information Science. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 9(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/097377 66.2015.1069947LiweiZ.ChunlinJ.(2015). Social network analysis and academic performance of the editorial board members for journals of Library and Information Science. , 9(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/097377 66.2015.1069947Search in Google Scholar
Lowe, D. J., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2009). Scholarly achievement and accounting editorial board membership. Journal of Accounting Education, 27(4), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jaccedu.2010.07.004LoweD. J.Van FleetD. D.(2009). Scholarly achievement and accounting editorial board membership. , 27(4), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jaccedu.2010.07.004Search in Google Scholar
Luty, J., Arokiadass, S. M. R., Easow, J. M., Anapreddy, J. R. (2009). Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(3), 200-202. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.026740LutyJ.ArokiadassS. M. R.EasowJ. M.AnapreddyJ. R.(2009). Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals. , 35(3), 200–202.https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.026740Search in Google Scholar
Ma, L., & Ladisch, M. (2019). Evaluation complacency or evaluation inertia? A study of evaluative metrics and research practices in Irish universities. Research Evaluation, 28(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz008MaL.LadischM.(2019). Evaluation complacency or evaluation inertia? A study of evaluative metrics and research practices in Irish universities. , 28(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz008Search in Google Scholar
Mani, J., Makarevic, J., Juengel, E., Ackermann, H., Nelson, K. & et al. (2013). I publish in I edit? Do editorial board members preferentially publish their own scientific work? PLOS One, 8(12), e83709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083709ManiJ.MakarevicJ.JuengelE.AckermannH.NelsonK.(2013). I publish in I edit? Do editorial board members preferentially publish their own scientific work?, 8(12), e83709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083709Search in Google Scholar
Marusic, A., & Marusic, M. (1999). Small scientific journals from small countries: Breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy. Croatian Medical Journal, 40(4), 508-514.MarusicA.MarusicM.(1999). Small scientific journals from small countries: Breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy. , 40(4), 508–514.Search in Google Scholar
Metz, I., Harzing, A-W., & Zyphur, M. J. (2016). Of journal editors and editorial boards: Who are the trailblazers in increasing editorial board gender equality? British Journal of Management, 27(4), 712–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12133MetzI.HarzingA-W.ZyphurM. J.(2016). Of journal editors and editorial boards: Who are the trailblazers in increasing editorial board gender equality?, 27(4), 712–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12133Search in Google Scholar
Ougrin, D. (2019). Editorial: The job of an editor. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12320OugrinD.(2019). Editorial: The job of an editor. , 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12320Search in Google Scholar
Pagel, S. S., & Hudetz, J. A. (2011). Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 107(3), 357–361. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer191PagelS. S.HudetzJ. A.(2011). Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members. , 107(3), 357–361. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer191Search in Google Scholar
Pan, Y., & Zhang, J. Q. (2014). The composition of the editorial boards of general marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475313504298PanY.ZhangJ. Q.(2014). The composition of the editorial boards of general marketing journals. , 36(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475313504298Search in Google Scholar
Petersen, J., Hattke, F., & Vogel, R. (2017). Editorial governance and journal impact: a study of management and business journals. Scientometrics, 112, 1593–1614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2434-7PetersenJ.HattkeF.VogelR.(2017). Editorial governance and journal impact: a study of management and business journals. , 112, 1593–1614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2434-7Search in Google Scholar
PLOS Medicine Editors (2006). The impact factor game. PLOS Medicine, 3(6), e291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291PLOS Medicine Editors(2006). The impact factor game. , 3(6), e291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291Search in Google Scholar
Pontika, N., Klebel, T., Correia, A., Metzler, H., Knoth, P., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2022). Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(4) 888–911. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00224PontikaN.KlebelT.CorreiaA.MetzlerH.KnothP.Ross-HellauerT.(2022). Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries. , 3(4) 888–911. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00224Search in Google Scholar
Randall, D. M., & Gibson, A. M. (1990). Methodology in business ethics research: a review and critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382838RandallD. M.GibsonA. M.(1990). Methodology in business ethics research: a review and critical assessment. , 9, 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382838Search in Google Scholar
Rowley, J., Sbaffi, L., Sugden, M., & Gilbert, A. (2022). Factors influencing researchers’ journal selection decisions. Journal of Information Science, 48(3), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520958591RowleyJ.SbaffiL.SugdenM.GilbertA.(2022). Factors influencing researchers’ journal selection decisions. , 48(3), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520958591Search in Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009Salager-MeyerF.(2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. , 7, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009Search in Google Scholar
Santos, J. M., & Horta, H. (2020). The association between researchers’ conceptions of research and their strategic research agendas. Journal of Data and Information Science, 5(4), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2020-0032SantosJ. M.HortaH.(2020). The association between researchers’ conceptions of research and their strategic research agendas. , 5(4), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2020-0032Search in Google Scholar
Sarigöl, E., Garcia, D., Scholtes, I., & Schweitzer, F. (2017). Quantifying the effect of editor-author relations on manuscript handling times. Scientometrics, 113(1), 609–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2309-ySarigölE.GarciaD.ScholtesI.SchweitzerF.(2017). Quantifying the effect of editor-author relations on manuscript handling times. , 113(1), 609–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2309-ySearch in Google Scholar
Seglen, P. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 314, 498–502. https://doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmj.314.7079.497SeglenP.(1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. , 314, 498–502. https://doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmj.314.7079.497Search in Google Scholar
Seglen, P. (1998). Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavia, 69(3), 224–229. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809000920SeglenP(1998). Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. , 69(3), 224–229. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809000920Search in Google Scholar
Sharma, P. (2016). The job of a journal editor. Family Business Review, 29(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516655901SharmaP.(2016). The job of a journal editor. , 29(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516655901Search in Google Scholar
Smith, R. (2006). The trouble with medical journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1258%2Fjrsm.99.3.115SmithR.(2006). The trouble with medical journals. , 99, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1258%2Fjrsm.99.3.115Search in Google Scholar
Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. (2012). Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21660SolomonD. J. & BjörkB.(2012). Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. , 63(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21660Search in Google Scholar
Soreide, K., Ringdal, K. J., Lossius, H. M. (2010). Submission policy, peer review and editorial board members: interesting conflicts and conflicts of interest. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 18, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-18-56SoreideK.RingdalK. J.LossiusH. M.(2010). Submission policy, peer review and editorial board members: interesting conflicts and conflicts of interest. , 18, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-18-56Search in Google Scholar
Spezi, V., Wakeling, S., Pinfield, S., Creaser, C., Fry, J., & Willett, P. (2017). Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review. Journal of Documentation, 73(2), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0082SpeziV.WakelingS.PinfieldS.CreaserC.FryJ.WillettP.(2017). Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review. , 73(2), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0082Search in Google Scholar
Stegmaier, M., Palmer, B., & van Assendelft, L. (2011). Getting on the board: The presence of women in political science journal editorial positions. Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001284StegmaierM.PalmerB.van AssendelftL.(2011). Getting on the board: The presence of women in political science journal editorial positions. , 44(4), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001284Search in Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J., Stigler, S. M., & Friedland, C. (1995). The journals of economics. Journal of Political Economy, 103(2), 331–359. https://doi.org/10.1086/261986StiglerG. J.StiglerS. M.FriedlandC.(1995). The journals of economics. , 103(2), 331–359. https://doi.org/10.1086/261986Search in Google Scholar
Sugimoto, C. R., Lariviere, V., N, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). Journal acceptance rates: A crossdisciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 897–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.007SugimotoC. R.LariviereV.NC.CroninB.(2013). Journal acceptance rates: A crossdisciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures. , 7(4), 897–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.007Search in Google Scholar
Tiokhin, L., Panchanathan, K., Lakens, D., et al. (2021). Honest signaling in academic publishing. PLOS One, 16(2), e0246675. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246675TiokhinL.PanchanathanK.LakensD.(2021). Honest signaling in academic publishing. , 16(2), e0246675. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246675Search in Google Scholar
Tutuncu, L. (2023). All-pervading insider bias alters review time in Turkish university journals. Scientometrics, 128, 3743–3791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04724-3TutuncuL.(2023). All-pervading insider bias alters review time in Turkish university journals. , 128, 3743–3791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04724-3Search in Google Scholar
Tutuncu, L., Yucedogru, R., & Sarisoy, I. (2022). Academic favoritism at work: Insider bias in Turkish national journals. Scientometrics, 127, 2547-2576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04355-0TutuncuL.YucedogruR.SarisoyI.(2022). Academic favoritism at work: Insider bias in Turkish national journals. , 127, 25472576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04355-0Search in Google Scholar
Urbancic, F. R. (2011). The gatekeepers of business education research: an institutional analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 86(5), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2010.5 20757UrbancicF. R.(2011). The gatekeepers of business education research: an institutional analysis. , 86(5), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2010.5 20757Search in Google Scholar
Uzuner, S. (2008). Multilingual scholars’ participation in core/global academic communities: A literature review. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.007UzunerS.(2008). Multilingual scholars’ participation in core/global academic communities: A literature review. , 7(4), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.007Search in Google Scholar
Walters, W. H. (2015). Do editorial board members in library and information science publish disproportionately in the journals for which they serve as board members? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 46(4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.46.4.03WaltersW. H.(2015). Do editorial board members in library and information science publish disproportionately in the journals for which they serve as board members?, 46(4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.46.4.03Search in Google Scholar
Wang, X. (2018). The relationship between SCI editorial board representation and university research output in the field of computer science: a quantile regression approach. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 23(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis. vol23no1.5WangX.(2018). The relationship between SCI editorial board representation and university research output in the field of computer science: a quantile regression approach. , 23(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol23no1.5Search in Google Scholar
Wardle, D. A. (2012). On plummeting manuscript acceptance rates by the main ecological journals and the progress of ecology. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 13–15. https://doi.org/10.4033/iee.2012.5.4.eWardleD. A.(2012). On plummeting manuscript acceptance rates by the main ecological journals and the progress of ecology. , 5, 13–15. https://doi.org/10.4033/iee.2012.5.4.eSearch in Google Scholar
Woolston, C. (2020). University drops impact factor. Nature, 595, 462. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01759-5WoolstonC.(2020). University drops impact factor. , 595, 462. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01759-5Search in Google Scholar
Wu, D. S., Li, J., Lu, X. L., & Li, J. P. (2018). Journal editorship index for assessing the scholarly impact of academic institutions: an empirical analysis in the field of economics. Journal of Informetrics, 12, 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.008WuD. S.LiJ.LuX. L.LiJ. P.(2018). Journal editorship index for assessing the scholarly impact of academic institutions: an empirical analysis in the field of economics. , 12, 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.008Search in Google Scholar
Wu, D. S., Lu, X. L., Li, J. P., & Li, J. (2020). Does the institutional diversity of editorial boards increase journal quality? The case economics field. Scientometrics, 124, 1579–1597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03505-6WuD. S.LuX. L.LiJ. P.LiJ.(2020). Does the institutional diversity of editorial boards increase journal quality? The case economics field. , 124, 1579–1597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03505-6Search in Google Scholar
Xie, Y. D., Wu, Q., & Li, X. C. (2019). Editorial team scholarly index (ETSI): an alternative indicator for evaluating academic journal reputation. Scientometrics, 120, 1333–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03177-xXieY. D.WuQ.LiX. C.(2019). Editorial team scholarly index (ETSI): an alternative indicator for evaluating academic journal reputation. , 120, 1333–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03177-xSearch in Google Scholar
Xu, S., An, M. J., & An, X. (2021). Do scientific publications by editorial board members have shorter publication delays and then higher influence? Scientometrics, 126, 6697–6713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04067-xXuS.AnM. J.AnX.(2021). Do scientific publications by editorial board members have shorter publication delays and then higher influence?, 126, 6697–6713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04067-xSearch in Google Scholar
Yoon, A. H. (2013). Editorial bias in legal academia. Journal of Legal Analysis, 5(2), 309–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/lat005YoonA. H.(2013). Editorial bias in legal academia. , 5(2), 309–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/lat005Search in Google Scholar
Youk, S., & Park, H. S. (2019). Where and what do they publish? Editors’ and editorial board members’ affiliated institutions and the citation counts of their endogenous publications in the field of communication. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1237–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03169-xYoukS.ParkH. S.(2019). Where and what do they publish? Editors’ and editorial board members’ affiliated institutions and the citation counts of their endogenous publications in the field of communication. , 120(3), 1237–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03169-xSearch in Google Scholar
Zdenek, R. (2018). Editorial board self-publishing rates in Czech Economic journals. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9922-2ZdenekR.(2018). Editorial board self-publishing rates in Czech Economic journals. , 24, 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9922-2Search in Google Scholar
Zdenek, T., & Lososova, J. (2018). An analysis of editorial board members’ publication output in agricultural economics and policy journals. Scientometrics, 117, 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2881-9ZdenekT.LososovaJ.(2018). An analysis of editorial board members’ publication output in agricultural economics and policy journals. , 117, 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2881-9Search in Google Scholar