This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Allen, Liz, Scott, Jo, Brand, Amy, Hlava, Marjorie, & Altman, Micah. (2014). Publishing: Credit where credit is due. Nature, 508(7496), 312–313.AllenLizScottJoBrandAmyHlavaMarjorieAltmanMicah. (2014). Publishing: Credit where credit is due. 508(7496), 312–313.Search in Google Scholar
Bao, P., & Zhai, C. X. (2017). Dynamic credit allocation in scientific literature. Scientometrics, 112(1), 595–606. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2335-9BaoP.ZhaiC. X. (2017). Dynamic credit allocation in scientific literature. 112(1), 595–606. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2335-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Barabási, Albert-László. (2009). Scale-free networks: a decade and beyond. Science, 325(5939), 412–413.BarabásiAlbert-László. (2009). Scale-free networks: a decade and beyond. 325(5939), 412–413.Search in Google Scholar
Barabási, Albert-László, & Bonabeau, Eric. (2003). Scale-free networks. Scientific american, 288(5), 60–69.BarabásiAlbert-LászlóBonabeauEric. (2003). Scale-free networks. 288(5), 60–69.Search in Google Scholar
Barabási, Albert-László, Ravasz, Erzsébet, & Vicsek, Tamas. (2001). Deterministic scale-free networks. Physica A: Statistical mechanics and its applications, 299(3-4), 559–564.BarabásiAlbert-LászlóRavaszErzsébetVicsekTamas. (2001). Deterministic scale-free networks. 299(3-4), 559–564.Search in Google Scholar
Beveridge, Christine, & Morris, Suzanne. (2007). Order of merit. Nature, 448(7152), 508–508.BeveridgeChristineMorrisSuzanne. (2007). Order of merit. 448(7152), 508–508.Search in Google Scholar
Burrell, Q., & Rousseau, R. (1995). Fractional Counts for Authorship Attribution - a Numerical Study. Journal of the American society for information science, 46(2), 97–102. doi:Doi 10.1002/(Sici)1097-4571(199503)46:2<97::Aid-Asi3>3.0.Co;2-LBurrellQ.RousseauR. (1995). Fractional Counts for Authorship Attribution - a Numerical Study. 46(2), 97–102. doi:Doi 10.1002/(Sici)1097-4571(199503)46:2<97::Aid-Asi3>3.0.Co;2-LOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Das, N., & Das, S. (2020). ‘Author Contribution Details’ and not ‘Authorship Sequence’ as a merit to determine credit: A need to relook at the current Indian practice. National Medical Journal of India, 33(1), 24–30. doi:Pmid 33565483 10.4103/0970-258x.308238DasN.DasS. (2020). ‘Author Contribution Details’ and not ‘Authorship Sequence’ as a merit to determine credit: A need to relook at the current Indian practice. 33(1), 24–30. doi:Pmid 3356548310.4103/0970-258x.308238Search in Google Scholar
Dong, Y. X., Ma, H., Shen, Z. H., & Wang, K. S. (2017). A century of science: Globalization of scientific collaborations, citations, and innovations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. https://keg.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn/yuxiao/papers/KDD17-dong-ma-shen-wang-A-Century-Science.pdf.DongY. X.MaH.ShenZ. H.WangK. S. (2017). A century of science: Globalization of scientific collaborations, citations, and innovations. . https://keg.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn/yuxiao/papers/KDD17-dong-ma-shen-wang-A-Century-Science.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Drenth, Joost PH. (1998). Multiple authorship: the contribution of senior authors. Jama, 280(3), 219–221.DrenthJoost PH. (1998). Multiple authorship: the contribution of senior authors. 280(3), 219–221.Search in Google Scholar
Egghe, Leo, Rousseau, Ronald, & Van Hooydonk, Guido. (2000). Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. Journal of the American society for information science, 51(2), 145–157.EggheLeoRousseauRonaldVan HooydonkGuido. (2000). Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. 51(2), 145–157.Search in Google Scholar
Endersby, J. W. (1996). Collaborative research in the social sciences: Multiple authorship and publication credit. Social Science Quarterly, 77(2), 375–392.EndersbyJ. W. (1996). Collaborative research in the social sciences: Multiple authorship and publication credit. 77(2), 375–392.Search in Google Scholar
Eysenbach, Gunther. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS biology, 4(5), e157.EysenbachGunther. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. 4(5), e157.Search in Google Scholar
Frandsen, Tove Faber, & Nicolaisen, Jeppe. (2010). What is in a name? Credit assignment practices in different disciplines. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 608–617.FrandsenTove FaberNicolaisenJeppe. (2010). What is in a name? Credit assignment practices in different disciplines. 4(4), 608–617.Search in Google Scholar
Hagen, N. T. (2008). Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis. PLoS One, 3(12), e4021. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004021HagenN. T. (2008). Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis. 3(12), e4021. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hagen, N. T. (2010). Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably - not equally, geometrically or arithmetically. Scientometrics, 84(3), 785–793. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0129-4HagenN. T. (2010). Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably - not equally, geometrically or arithmetically. 84(3), 785–793. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0129-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S. L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists’ perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 952–965. doi:10.1002/asi.10291HaraN.SolomonP.KimS. L.SonnenwaldD. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists’ perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. 54(10), 952–965. doi:10.1002/asi.10291Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hodge, S. E., & Greenberg, D. A. (1981). Publication Credit. Science, 213(4511), 950–950.HodgeS. E.GreenbergD. A. (1981). Publication Credit. 213(4511), 950–950.Search in Google Scholar
Hu, H. T., Wang, D. B., & Deng, S. H. (2020). Global collaboration in artificial intelligence: Bibliometrics and network analysis from 1985 to 2019. Journal of Data and Information Science, 5(4), 86–115.HuH. T.WangD. B.DengS. H. (2020). Global collaboration in artificial intelligence: Bibliometrics and network analysis from 1985 to 2019. 5(4), 86–115.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, H., Zhu, D. H., & Wang, X. F. (2022). Evaluating scientific impact of publications: combining citation polarity and purpose. Scientometrics, 127(9), 5257–5281. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04183-8HuangH.ZhuD. H.WangX. F. (2022). Evaluating scientific impact of publications: combining citation polarity and purpose. 127(9), 5257–5281. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04183-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Huang, S. Z., Huang, Y., Bu, Y., Luo, Z. R., & Lu, W. (2023). Disclosing the interactive mechanism behind scientists’ topic selection behavior from the perspective of the productivity and the impact. Journal of Informetrics, 17(2), 101409.HuangS. Z.HuangY.BuY.LuoZ. R.LuW. (2023). Disclosing the interactive mechanism behind scientists’ topic selection behavior from the perspective of the productivity and the impact. 17(2), 101409.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, S. Z., Lu, W., Bu, Y., & Huang, Y. (2022). Revisiting the exploration-exploitation behavior of scholars’ research topic selection: Evidence from a large-scale bibliographic database. Information Processing & Management, 59(6), 103110.HuangS. Z.LuW.BuY.HuangY. (2022). Revisiting the exploration-exploitation behavior of scholars’ research topic selection: Evidence from a large-scale bibliographic database. 59(6), 103110.Search in Google Scholar
Hundley, Vanora, Teijlingen, Evan, & Simkhada, Padam. (2013). Academic authorship: who, why and in what order? Health Renaissance, 11(2), 99–101.HundleyVanoraTeijlingenEvanSimkhadaPadam. (2013). Academic authorship: who, why and in what order?11(2), 99–101.Search in Google Scholar
Jia, T., Wang, D. S., & Szymanski, Boleslaw K. (2017). Quantifying patterns of research-interest evolution. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(4), 0078.JiaT.WangD. S.SzymanskiBoleslaw K. (2017). Quantifying patterns of research-interest evolution. 1(4), 0078.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Benjamin F (2011). As science evolves, how can science policy? Innovation policy & the economy, 11(1), 103–131.JonesBenjamin F (2011). As science evolves, how can science policy?11(1), 103–131.Search in Google Scholar
Kennedy, Donald. (2003). Multiple authors, multiple problems. Science, 301(5634), 733–733.KennedyDonald. (2003). Multiple authors, multiple problems. 301(5634), 733–733.Search in Google Scholar
Lo, CY. (2013). On the Nobel Prize in Physics, Controversies and Influences. GJSFR 13-A, 3(10), 59–73.LoCY. (2013). On the Nobel Prize in Physics, Controversies and Influences. 3(10), 59–73.Search in Google Scholar
Lu, C., Zhang, C. W., Xiao, C. R., & Ding, Y. (2022). Contributorship in scientific collaborations: The perspective of contribution-based byline orders. Information Processing & Management, 59(3), 102944.LuC.ZhangC. W.XiaoC. R.DingY. (2022). Contributorship in scientific collaborations: The perspective of contribution-based byline orders. 59(3), 102944.Search in Google Scholar
Milojević, Staša. (2014). Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(11), 3984–3989.MilojevićStaša. (2014). Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution. 111(11), 3984–3989.Search in Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1), 5200–5205. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307545100NewmanM. E. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. 101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1), 5200–5205. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307545100Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Oppenheim, C. (1998). Fractional counting of multiauthored publications. Journal of the American society for information science, 49(5), 482–482. doi: Doi 10.1002/(Sici)1097-4571(19980415)49: 5<482::Aid-Asi11>3.3.Co;2-8OppenheimC. (1998). Fractional counting of multiauthored publications. 49(5), 482–482. doi: Doi10.1002/(Sici)1097-4571(19980415)49:5<482::Aid-Asi11>3.3.Co;2-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pravdić, Nevenka, & Oluić-Vuković, Vesna. (1986). Dual approach to multiple authorship in the study of collaboration/scientific output relationship. Scientometrics, 10, 259–280.PravdićNevenkaOluić-VukovićVesna. (1986). Dual approach to multiple authorship in the study of collaboration/scientific output relationship. 10259–280.Search in Google Scholar
Price, D. D. (1981). Multiple Authorship. Science, 212(4498), 986–986. doi:DOI 10.1126/science.212.4498.986-aPriceD. D. (1981). Multiple Authorship. 212(4498), 986–986. doi:DOI 10.1126/science.212.4498.986-aOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Radicchi, Filippo, Fortunato, Santo, & Castellano, Claudio. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(45), 17268–17272.RadicchiFilippoFortunatoSantoCastellanoClaudio. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. 105(45), 17268–17272.Search in Google Scholar
Regalado, A. (1995). Multiauthor papers on the rise. Science, 268(5207), 25. doi:10.1126/science.7701334RegaladoA. (1995). Multiauthor papers on the rise. 268(5207), 25. doi:10.1126/science.7701334Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rennie, D., & Flanagin, A. (1994). Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. Jama, 271(6), 469–471. doi:10.1001/jama.271.6.469RennieD.FlanaginA. (1994). Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. 271(6), 469–471. doi:10.1001/jama.271.6.469Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Riesenberg, Don, & Lundberg, George D. (1990). The order of authorship: who’s on first? Jama, 264(14), 1857–1857.RiesenbergDonLundbergGeorge D. (1990). The order of authorship: who’s on first?264(14), 1857–1857.Search in Google Scholar
Sekara, Vedran, Deville, Pierre, Ahnert, Sebastian E, Barabási, Albert-László, Sinatra, Roberta, & Lehmann, Sune. (2018). The chaperone effect in scientific publishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(50), 12603–12607.SekaraVedranDevillePierreAhnertSebastian EBarabásiAlbert-LászlóSinatraRobertaLehmannSune. (2018). The chaperone effect in scientific publishing. 115(50), 12603–12607.Search in Google Scholar
Shen, H. W., & Barabási, A. L. (2014). Collective credit allocation in science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 111(34), 12325–12330. doi:10.1073/pnas.1401992111ShenH. W.BarabásiA. L. (2014). Collective credit allocation in science. 111(34), 12325–12330. doi:10.1073/pnas.1401992111Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sinatra, R., Wang, D. S., Deville, P., Song, C. M., & Barabási, A. L. (2016). Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science, 354(6312), aaf5239.SinatraR.WangD. S.DevilleP.SongC. M.BarabásiA. L. (2016). Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. 354(6312), aaf5239.Search in Google Scholar
Smolinsky, Lawrence, & Lercher, Aaron J. (2020). Co-author weighting in bibliometric methodology and subfields of a scientific discipline. Journal of Data and Information Science, 5(3), 84–96.SmolinskyLawrenceLercherAaron J. (2020). Co-author weighting in bibliometric methodology and subfields of a scientific discipline. 5(3), 84–96.Search in Google Scholar
Trueba, F. J., & Guerrero, H. (2004). A robust formula to credit authors for their publications. Scientometrics, 60(2), 181–204. doi: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027792.09362.3fTruebaF. J.GuerreroH. (2004). A robust formula to credit authors for their publications. 60(2), 181–204. doi: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027792.09362.3fOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biol, 5(1), e18. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018TscharntkeT.HochbergM. E.RandT. A.ReshV. H.KraussJ. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. 5(1), e18. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Van Hooydonk, Guido (1997). Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. Journal of the American society for information science, 48(10), 944–945.Van HooydonkGuido (1997). Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. 48(10), 944–945.Search in Google Scholar
Verhagen, Justus V, Wallace, Karin J, Collins, Stephan C, & Scott, Thomas R. (2003). QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors. Nature, 426(6967), 602–602.VerhagenJustus VWallaceKarin JCollinsStephan CScottThomas R. (2003). QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors. 426(6967), 602–602.Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L. (2012). An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 700–711. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.008WaltmanL. (2012). An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. 6(4), 700–711. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365–391.WaltmanL. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. 10(2), 365–391.Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Wouters, P. (2013). Counting publications and citations: Is more always better? Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 635–641.WaltmanL.Van EckN. J.WoutersP. (2013). Counting publications and citations: Is more always better?7(3), 635–641.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, F. H., Fan, Y., Zeng, A., & Di, Z. R. (2019). A nonlinear collective credit allocation in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 119(3), 1655–1668. doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03107-xWangF. H.FanY.ZengA.DiZ. R. (2019). A nonlinear collective credit allocation in scientific publications. 119(3), 1655–1668. doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03107-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang, J. P., Guo, Q., Zhou, L., & Liu, J. G. (2019). Dynamic credit allocation for researchers. Physica a-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 520, 208–216. doi:10.1016/j. physa.2019.01.011WangJ. P.GuoQ.ZhouL.LiuJ. G. (2019). Dynamic credit allocation for researchers. 520208–216. doi:10.1016/j. physa.2019.01.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wu, L., Wang, D., & Evans, J. A. (2019). Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature, 566(7744), 378–382. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9WuL.WangD.EvansJ. A. (2019). Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. 566(7744), 378–382. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Xing, Y. M., Wang, F. H., Zeng, A., & Ying, F. (2021). Solving the cold-start problem in scientific credit allocation. Journal of Informetrics, 15(3), 101157. doi:ARTN 101157 10.1016/j. joi.2021.101157XingY. M.WangF. H.ZengA.YingF. (2021). Solving the cold-start problem in scientific credit allocation. 15(3), 101157. doi:ARTN 101157 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101157Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Xu, J., Ding, Y., Song, M., & Chambers, T. (2016). Author Credit-Assignment Schemas: A Comparison and Analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 1973–1989. doi:10.1002/asi.23495XuJ.DingY.SongM.ChambersT. (2016). Author Credit-Assignment Schemas: A Comparison and Analysis. 67(8), 1973–1989. doi:10.1002/asi.23495Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Xu, Lucy L, Qi, Miao, & Fred, Y Ye. (2021). Identifying Scientific and Technical “Unicorns”. Journal of Data and Information Science, 6(2), 96–115.XuLucy LQiMiaoFredY Ye. (2021). Identifying Scientific and Technical “Unicorns”. 6(2), 96–115.Search in Google Scholar
Yu, S., Alqahtani, F., Tolba, A., Lee, I., Jia, T., & Xia, F. (2022). Collaborative Team Recognition: A Core Plus Extension Structure. Journal of Informetrics, 16(4), 101346.YuS.AlqahtaniF.TolbaA.LeeI.JiaT.XiaF. (2022). Collaborative Team Recognition: A Core Plus Extension Structure. 16(4), 101346.Search in Google Scholar
Yu, X. Y., Szymanski, B. K., & Jia, T. (2021). Become a better you: Correlation between the change of research direction and the change of scientific performance. Journal of Informetrics, 15(3), 101193.YuX. Y.SzymanskiB. K.JiaT. (2021). Become a better you: Correlation between the change of research direction and the change of scientific performance. 15(3), 101193.Search in Google Scholar
Zeng, A., Shen, Z. S., Zhou, J. L., Wu, J. S., Fan, Y., Wang, Y. G., & Stanley, H. E. (2017). The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems. Physics Reports-Review Section of Physics Letters, 714, 1–73. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.001ZengA.ShenZ. S.ZhouJ. L.WuJ. S.FanY.WangY. G.StanleyH. E. (2017). The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems. 7141–73. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Harriet A. (1968). Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity. American Journal of Sociology, 74(3), 276–291.ZuckermanHarriet A. (1968). Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity. 74(3), 276–291.Search in Google Scholar