Practical operation and theoretical basis of difference-in-difference regression in science of science: The comparative trial on the scientific performance of Nobel laureates versus their coauthors

Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235–267. AbadieA. ImbensG. W. 2006 Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects Econometrica 74 1 235 267 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00655.x Search in Google Scholar

Austin, P. C. (2009). Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biometrical Journal: Journal of Mathematical Methods in Biosciences, 51(1), 171–184. AustinP. C. 2009 Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations Biometrical Journal: Journal of Mathematical Methods in Biosciences 51 1 171 184 10.1002/bimj.20081048819197955 Search in Google Scholar

Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S., & Wang, J. (2010). Superstar extinction. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(2), 549–589. AzoulayP. Graff ZivinJ. S. WangJ. 2010 Superstar extinction The Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 2 549 589 10.3386/w14577 Search in Google Scholar

Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377. BeckerS. O. IchinoA. 2002 Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores The Stata Journal 2 4 358 377 10.1177/1536867X0200200403 Search in Google Scholar

Blackwell, M., Iacus, S., King, G., & Porro, G. (2009). cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(4), 524–546. BlackwellM. IacusS. KingG. PorroG. 2009 cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata The Stata Journal 9 4 524 546 10.1177/1536867X0900900402 Search in Google Scholar

Borjas, G. J., & Doran, K. B. (2015). Prizes and productivity how winning the fields medal affects scientific output. Journal of human resources, 50(3), 728–758. BorjasG. J. DoranK. B. 2015 Prizes and productivity how winning the fields medal affects scientific output Journal of human resources 50 3 728 758 10.3386/w19445 Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Polity. BourdieuP. 2004 Science of science and reflexivity Polity Search in Google Scholar

Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(5), 373–379. BroadusR. N. 1987 Toward a definition of “bibliometrics” Scientometrics 12 5 373 379 10.1007/BF02016680 Search in Google Scholar

Chan, H. F., Frey, B. S., Gallus, J., & Torgler, B. (2014). Academic honors and performance. Labour Economics, 31, 188–204. ChanH. F. FreyB. S. GallusJ. TorglerB. 2014 Academic honors and performance Labour Economics 31 188 204 10.1016/j.labeco.2014.05.005 Search in Google Scholar

Coca-Perraillon, M. (2007). Local and global optimal propensity score matching. SAS Global Forum, https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings/proceedings/forum2007/185-2007.pdf Coca-PerraillonM. 2007 Local and global optimal propensity score matching SAS Global Forum https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings/proceedings/forum2007/185-2007.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Cover, T., & Hart, P. (1967). Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE transactions on information theory, 13(1), 21–27. CoverT. HartP. 1967 Nearest neighbor pattern classification IEEE transactions on information theory 13 1 21 27 10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 Search in Google Scholar

Donald, S. G., & Lang, K. (2007). Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. The review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 221–233. DonaldS. G. LangK. 2007 Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data The review of Economics and Statistics 89 2 221 233 10.1162/rest.89.2.221 Search in Google Scholar

Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., Petersen, A. M., Radicchi, F., Sinatra, R., & Uzzi, B. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), eaao0185. FortunatoS. BergstromC. T. BörnerK. EvansJ. A. HelbingD. MilojevićS. PetersenA. M. RadicchiF. SinatraR. UzziB. 2018 Science of science Science 359 6379 eaao0185 10.1126/science.aao0185594920929496846 Search in Google Scholar

Garrido, M. M., Kelley, A. S., Paris, J., Roza, K., Meier, D. E., Morrison, R. S., & Aldridge, M. D. (2014). Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. Health services research, 49(5), 1701–1720. GarridoM. M. KelleyA. S. ParisJ. RozaK. MeierD. E. MorrisonR. S. AldridgeM. D. 2014 Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores Health services research 49 5 1701 1720 10.1111/1475-6773.12182421305724779867 Search in Google Scholar

Heckman, J. J., LaLonde, R. J., & Smith, J. A. (1999). The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1865–2097). Elsevier. HeckmanJ. J. LaLondeR. J. SmithJ. A. 1999 The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs In Handbook of labor economics 3 1865 2097 Elsevier 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03012-6 Search in Google Scholar

Hill, J., & Reiter, J. P. (2006). Interval estimation for treatment effects using propensity score matching. Statistics in medicine, 25(13), 2230–2256. HillJ. ReiterJ. P. 2006 Interval estimation for treatment effects using propensity score matching Statistics in medicine 25 13 2230 2256 10.1002/sim.227716220488 Search in Google Scholar

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102 HirschJ. E. 2005 An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 46 16569 16572 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102 10.1073/pnas.0507655102128383216275915 Search in Google Scholar

Huang, J. M., Gates, A. J., Sinatra, R., & Barabási, A. L. (2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(9), 4609–4616. HuangJ. M. GatesA. J. SinatraR. BarabásiA. L. 2020 Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 9 4609 4616 10.1073/pnas.1914221117706073032071248 Search in Google Scholar

Huber, M., Lechner, M., & Steinmayr, A. (2015). Radius matching on the propensity score with bias adjustment: tuning parameters and finite sample behaviour. Empirical Economics, 49(1), 1–31. HuberM. LechnerM. SteinmayrA. 2015 Radius matching on the propensity score with bias adjustment: tuning parameters and finite sample behaviour Empirical Economics 49 1 1 31 10.1007/s00181-014-0847-1 Search in Google Scholar

Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political analysis, 20(1), 1–24. IacusS. M. KingG. PorroG. 2012 Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching Political analysis 20 1 1 24 10.1093/pan/mpr013 Search in Google Scholar

Jin, C., Ma, Y. F., & Uzzi, B. (2021). Scientific prizes and the extraordinary growth of scientific topics. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1–11. JinC. MaY. F. UzziB. 2021 Scientific prizes and the extraordinary growth of scientific topics Nature Communications 12 1 1 11 10.1038/s41467-021-25712-2849270134611161 Search in Google Scholar

King, G., & Nielsen, R. (2019). Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Political analysis, 27(4), 435–454. KingG. NielsenR. 2019 Why propensity scores should not be used for matching Political analysis 27 4 435 454 10.1017/pan.2019.11 Search in Google Scholar

King, G., Nielsen, R., Coberley, C., Pope, J. E., & Wells, A. (2011). Comparative effectiveness of matching methods for causal inference. Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. KingG. NielsenR. CoberleyC. PopeJ. E. WellsA. 2011 Comparative effectiveness of matching methods for causal inference Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University Cambridge, MA Search in Google Scholar

Leuven, E., & Sianesi, B. (2003). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. LeuvenE. SianesiB. 2003 PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing Search in Google Scholar

Li, J. C., Yin, Y. A., Fortunato, S., & Wang, D. S. (2019). A dataset of publication records for Nobel laureates. Scientific data, 6(1), 1–10. LiJ. C. YinY. A. FortunatoS. WangD. S. 2019 A dataset of publication records for Nobel laureates Scientific data 6 1 1 10 10.1038/s41597-019-0033-6647242731000709 Search in Google Scholar

Li, W. H., Aste, T., Caccioli, F., & Livan, G. (2019). Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers. Nat Commun, 10(1), 5170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13130-4 LiW. H. AsteT. CaccioliF. LivanG. 2019 Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers Nat Commun 10 1 5170 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13130-4 10.1038/s41467-019-13130-4685836731729362 Search in Google Scholar

Liu, M. J., & Hu, X. (2022). Movers’ advantages: The effect of mobility on scientists’ productivity and collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 16(3), 101311. LiuM. J. HuX. 2022 Movers’ advantages: The effect of mobility on scientists’ productivity and collaboration Journal of Informetrics 16 3 101311 10.1016/j.joi.2022.101311 Search in Google Scholar

Ma, Y. F., Mukherjee, S., & Uzzi, B. (2020). Mentorship and protege success in STEM fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 117(25), 14077–14083. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915516117 MaY. F. MukherjeeS. UzziB. 2020 Mentorship and protege success in STEM fields Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117 25 14077 14083 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915516117 10.1073/pnas.1915516117732206532522881 Search in Google Scholar

Ma, Y. F., & Uzzi, B. (2018). Scientific prize network predicts who pushes the boundaries of science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115(50), 12608–12615. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800485115 MaY. F. UzziB. 2018 Scientific prize network predicts who pushes the boundaries of science Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115 50 12608 12615 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800485115 10.1073/pnas.1800485115629490130530666 Search in Google Scholar

McCaffrey, D. F., & Bell, R. M. (2003). Bias reduction in standard errors for linear regression with multi-stage samples. Quality control and applied statistics, 48(6), 677–682. McCaffreyD. F. BellR. M. 2003 Bias reduction in standard errors for linear regression with multi-stage samples Quality control and applied statistics 48 6 677 682 Search in Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. MertonR. K. 1968 The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered Science 159 3810 56 63 10.1126/science.159.3810.56 Search in Google Scholar

Petersen, A. M. (2018). Multiscale impact of researcher mobility. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 15(146), 20180580. PetersenA. M. 2018 Multiscale impact of researcher mobility Journal of The Royal Society Interface 15 146 20180580 10.1098/rsif.2018.0580617077130257927 Search in Google Scholar

Petersen, A. M., Fortunato, S., Pan, R. K., Kaski, K., Penner, O., Rungi, A., Riccaboni, M., Stanley, H. E., & Pammolli, F. (2014). Reputation and impact in academic careers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 111(43), 15316–15321. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323111111 PetersenA. M. FortunatoS. PanR. K. KaskiK. PennerO. RungiA. RiccaboniM. StanleyH. E. PammolliF. 2014 Reputation and impact in academic careers Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111 43 15316 15321 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323111111 10.1073/pnas.1323111111421743625288774 Search in Google Scholar

Price, D. J. (1986). Little science, big science... and beyond (Vol. 480). Columbia University Press New York. PriceD. J. 1986 Little science, big science... and beyond 480 Columbia University Press New York Search in Google Scholar

Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(45), 17268–17272. RadicchiF. FortunatoS. CastellanoC. 2008 Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 45 17268 17272 10.1073/pnas.0806977105258226318978030 Search in Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. RosenbaumP. R. RubinD. B. 1983 The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects Biometrika 70 1 41 55 10.21236/ADA114514 Search in Google Scholar

Roth, J., Sant’Anna, P. H., Bilinski, A., & Poe, J. (2022). What's Trending in Difference-in-Differences? A Synthesis of the Recent Econometrics Literature. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.01194. RothJ. Sant’AnnaP. H. BilinskiA. PoeJ. 2022 What's Trending in Difference-in-Differences? A Synthesis of the Recent Econometrics Literature arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.01194. Search in Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. (1977). Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of educational Statistics, 2(1), 1–26. RubinD. B. 1977 Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate Journal of educational Statistics 2 1 1 26 10.1017/CBO9780511810725.009 Search in Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. (2005). Causal inference using potential outcomes: Design, modeling, decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(469), 322–331. RubinD. B. 2005 Causal inference using potential outcomes: Design, modeling, decisions Journal of the American Statistical Association 100 469 322 331 10.1198/016214504000001880 Search in Google Scholar

Sinatra, R., Wang, D. S., Deville, P., Song, C. M., & Barabasi, A. L. (2016). Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science, 354(6312). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5239 SinatraR. WangD. S. DevilleP. SongC. M. BarabasiA. L. 2016 Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact Science 354 6312 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5239 10.1126/science.aaf523927811240 Search in Google Scholar

Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical science: a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 25(1), 1. StuartE. A. 2010 Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward Statistical science: a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics 25 1 1 10.1214/09-STS313294367020871802 Search in Google Scholar

Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M., & Jones, B. (2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342(6157), 468–472. UzziB. MukherjeeS. StringerM. JonesB. 2013 Atypical combinations and scientific impact Science 342 6157 468 472 10.1126/science.124047424159044 Search in Google Scholar

Wang, D. S., Song, C. M., & Barabási, A. L. (2013). Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science, 342(6154), 127–132. WangD. S. SongC. M. BarabásiA. L. 2013 Quantifying long-term scientific impact Science 342 6154 127 132 10.1126/science.123782524092745 Search in Google Scholar

Wang, J. X. (2021). To use or not to use propensity score matching? Pharmaceutical Statistics, 20(1), 15–24. WangJ. X. 2021 To use or not to use propensity score matching? Pharmaceutical Statistics 20 1 15 24 10.1002/pst.205132776719 Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Chawla, N. V., & Uzzi, B. (2019). A network's gender composition and communication pattern predict women's leadership success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(6), 2033–2038. YangY. ChawlaN. V. UzziB. 2019 A network's gender composition and communication pattern predict women's leadership success Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 6 2033 2038 10.1073/pnas.1721438116636975330670641 Search in Google Scholar