This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Aguilera, R.V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization science, 19(3), 475–492. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0322AguileraR.V.FilatotchevI.GospelH.JacksonG.2008An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementaritiesOrganization science19347549210.1287/orsc.1070.0322Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2009). The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Reports, 10(1), 2–6. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.233BornmannL.DanielH.-D.2009The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?EMBO Reports1012610.1038/embor.2008.233261321419079129Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2018). Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”! Scientometrics, 115(2), 1119–1123.BornmannL.LeydesdorffL.2018Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”!Scientometrics11521119112310.1007/s11192-018-2682-1588084729628536Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 59(5), 830–837.BornmannL.MutzR.DanielH.-D.2008Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicineJournal of the American society for information science and technology59583083710.1002/asi.20806Search in Google Scholar
Bouyssou, D., & Marchant, T. (2011). Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1761–1769.BouyssouD.MarchantT.2011Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent mannerJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6291761176910.1002/asi.21544Search in Google Scholar
Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 193–203.CostasR.BordonsM.2007The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro levelJournal of Informetrics119320310.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001Search in Google Scholar
Durisin, B., & Puzone, F. (2009). Maturation of corporate governance research, 1993–2007: An assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 266–291.DurisinB.PuzoneF.2009Maturation of corporate governance research, 1993–2007: An assessmentCorporate Governance: An International Review17326629110.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00739.xSearch in Google Scholar
Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.EggheL.2006Theory and practice of the g-indexScientometrics69113115210.1007/s11192-006-0144-7Search in Google Scholar
Fassin, Y. (2018). A new qualitative rating system for scientific publications and a fame Index for academics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(11), 1396–1399.FassinY.2018A new qualitative rating system for scientific publications and a fame Index for academicsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology69111396139910.1002/asi.24059Search in Google Scholar
Fassin, Y. (2019). The compound F2-index as extension of the f2-index in a dynamic perspective: An application in corporate governance research. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, Rome.FassinY.2019The compound F2-index as extension of the f2-index in a dynamic perspective: An application in corporate governance researchInProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics & InformetricsRomeSearch in Google Scholar
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431.HicksD.WoutersP.WaltmanL.De RijckeS.RafolsI.2015Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metricsNature520754842943110.1038/520429a25903611Search in Google Scholar
Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16569–16572.HirschJ.E.2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research outputInProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102165691657210.1073/pnas.0507655102128383216275915Search in Google Scholar
Kosmulski, M. (2006). A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(3), 4–6.KosmulskiM.2006A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-indexISSI Newsletter2346Search in Google Scholar
OECD (1999). “Principles of corporate governance”, http://www.encycogov.com/OECD1999“Principles of corporate governance”http://www.encycogov.com/Search in Google Scholar
Rousseau, R. (2016). Citation data as proxy for quality or scientific influence are at best PAC (Probably Approximately Correct). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 3092–3094.RousseauR.2016Citation data as proxy for quality or scientific influence are at best PAC (Probably Approximately Correct)Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67123092309410.1002/asi.23525Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N.J. (2012). The inconsistency of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 406–415.WaltmanL.Van EckN.J.2012The inconsistency of the h-indexJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63240641510.1002/asi.21678Search in Google Scholar
