[1. Ajaz, T. (2019). Nonlinear Reaction functions: Evidence from India. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 1, 111-132.10.2478/jcbtp-2019-0006]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Andrade, A. & Clare, A. (1994). Is the UK Treasury Bill Rate a Good Proxy for Expected Inflation in the United Kingdom? Economics Letters, 45(3), pp. 335-341.10.1016/0165-1765(94)90034-5]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bajo-Rubio, O., Díaz-Roldán, C.Y. & Esteve, V. (2010). Testing the Fisher Effect in the Presence of Structural Change: A Case Study of the UK, 1966-2007. Economic Issues, 15(2), pp. 1-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. BOE (2018). Bank of England. Statistics, https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/statistics, (accessed 02 Februaury 2018)]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Bayat, T., Kayhan, S. and Tasar, I. (2018). Re-Visiting Fisher Effect for Fragile Five Economies. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 7(1), 203-218.10.2478/jcbtp-2018-0019]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Fabris, N. (2018). Challenges for Modern Monetary Policy. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 2, 5-24.10.2478/jcbtp-2018-0010]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Fahmy, Y.A.F. & Kandil, M. (2003). The Fisher Effect: New Evidence and Implications. International Review of Economics and Finance, 12, pp. 451-465.10.1016/S1059-0560(02)00146-6]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Fisher, I. (1930). The Theory of Interest. New York: MacMillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Ghazali, N.A. & Ramlee, S. (2003). A Long Memory Test of the Long-Run Fisher Effect in the G7 Countries. Applied Financial Economics, 13(10), pp.763-769.10.1080/09603100210149149]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Granville, B. & Mallick, S. (2004). Fisher Hypothesis: UK Evidence over a Century. Applied Economics Letters, 11, pp.87-90.10.1080/1350485042000200169]Search in Google Scholar
[11. IMF (2017). Data Planet, www.imf.org]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Lardic, S. & Mignon, V. (2003). Fractional Cointergration between Nominal Interest Rates and Inflation: A Re-Examination of the Fisher Relationship in the G7 Countries. Economic Bulletin. 3(14), pp.1-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Panopoulou, E. (2005). A Resolution of the Fisher Effect Puzzle: A Comparison of Estimators. Economics, Finance and Accounting Department Working Paper Series, No.1500205.10.2139/ssrn.680401]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Peng, W. (1995). The Fisher Hypothesis and Inflation Persistence: Evidence from Five Major Industrial Countries. IMF Woking Paper, No: 95/118.10.5089/9781451940824.001]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Praščević, A. and Ješić, M. (2019). Modeling Macroeconomic Policymakers’ Interactions under Zero Lower Bound Environment: The New Keynesian Theoretical Approach. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 8(1), 5-38.10.2478/jcbtp-2019-0001]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Shin, Y., Yu, B. & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework. Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric Methods and Applications, eds. by R. Sickels and W. Horrace: Springer, 281-314.10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Toyoshima, Y. & Hamori, S. (2011). Panel Cointegration of the Fisher Effect: Evidence from the US, the UK and Japan. Economics Bulletin, 31(3), pp.2674-2682.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Yuhn, K. (1996). Is the Fisher Effect Robust? Further Evidence. Applied Economics Letters. 3, pp.41–44.10.1080/758525514]Search in Google Scholar