À propos de cet article

Citez

[1] ALTMAN, D.G., AND BLAND, J.M. 1983. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. The Statistician. 32, 307-317. Search in Google Scholar

[2] ANDREW, G., CARLIN, J.B., STERN, H.S., et al. 2004. Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC. Search in Google Scholar

[3] ARAVIND, K.R., AND NAWARATHNA, L.S. 2017. A statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of heteroscedastic clinical measurements using the copula method. J Med Stat Inform. 5:3. 10.7243/2053-7662-5-3 Search in Google Scholar

[4] BILIĆ-ZULLE, L. 2011. Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression. Biochemia Medica. 21(1):49-52. 10.11613/BM.2011.010. Search in Google Scholar

[5] BLAND, J.M., AND ALTMAN, D.G. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 307—310. Search in Google Scholar

[6] BLAND, J.M., AND ALTMAN, D.G. 1999. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 8(2): 135–160. 10.1177/096228029900800204. Search in Google Scholar

[7] BOSCARDIN, W.J., AND GELMAN, A. 1994. Bayesian Computation for Parametric Models of Heteroscedasticity in the Linear Model. In Advances in Econometrics. 11, A87-10. Search in Google Scholar

[8] BOSCARDIN, W.J., GELMAN, A. 1996. Bayesian Computation for parametric Models of Heteroscedasticity in the Linear Model. In Advances in Econometrics, Volume 11 (Part A), edited by Hill, R. C. Connecticut: JAI Press Inc. Search in Google Scholar

[9] CARSTENSEN, B. 2010. Comparing methods of measurement: Extending the LoA by regression. Statistics in Medicine. 29: 401-410. doi: 10.1002/sim.3769 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10] CHINCHILLI, V.M., MARTEL, J.K., KUMANYIKA, S., AND LLOYD, T. 1996. A weighted concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measurement designs. Biometrics. 52:341–353. Search in Google Scholar

[11] CHOUDHARY, P.K., AND NAGARAJA, H.N. 2007. Tests for assessment of agreement using probability criteria. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference.137:279–290. Search in Google Scholar

[12] CHOUDHARY, P.K. 2009. Interrater agreement. In Methods and Applications of Statistics in the Life and Health Sciences, BALAKRISHNAN N et. al. (ed.). John Wiley: New York. 461–480. Search in Google Scholar

[13] CHOUDHARY, P.K., AND YIN, K. 2010. Bayesian and Frequentist Methodologies for Analyzing Method Comparison Studies With Multiple Methods. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research. 2:122-132. 10.1198/sbr.2010.08096. Search in Google Scholar

[14] DE WAAL, E.E., WAPPLER, F., AND BUHRE, W.F. 2009. Cardiac output monitoring. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 22: 71–7. Search in Google Scholar

[15] EDILBERTO, C., AND JORGE, A. 2009. Regression Models with Heteroscedasticity using Bayesian Approach. Revista Colombiana de Estadística.32 Search in Google Scholar

[16] GALEA-ROJAS, M., DE CASTILHO, M.V., AND BOLFARINE, H., et al. 2003. Detection of analytical bias. Analyst. 128: 1073–1081. Search in Google Scholar

[17] GARDNER, M.J., AND ALTMAN, D.G. 1986. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 292:746–50. Search in Google Scholar

[18] HANNEMAN, S.K. 2018. Design, analysis, and interpretation of method-comparison studies. AACN advanced critical care. 19(2): 223–234. 10.1097/01.AACN.0000318125.41512.a3. Search in Google Scholar

[19] KASS, R.E., AND WASSERMAN, L. 1996. The Selection of Prior Distributions by Formal Rules. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 91:435, 1343-1370.10.1080/01621459.1996.10477003 Search in Google Scholar

[20] LIN, L., HEDAYAT, A.S., WU, W. 2007. A Unified Approach for Assessing Agreement for Continuous and Categorical Data. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 17:4, 629-652, DOI: 10.1080/10543400701376498 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21] LIN, L. 1989. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 45:255–268. Corrections: 2000,56, 324–325. Search in Google Scholar

[22] LIN, L. 2000. Total deviation index for measuring individual agreement with applications in laboratory performance and bioequivalence. Statistics in Medicine. 19:255–270. Search in Google Scholar

[23] LIN, L.I., HEDAYAT, A.S., SINHA, B., AND YANG, M. 2002. Statistical methods in assessing agreement: models, issues, and tools. Journal of the American Statistical Association.97:257–270. Search in Google Scholar

[24] LINNET, K. 1998. Performance of Deming regression analysis in case of misspecified analytical error ratio in method comparison studies. Clinical Chemistry. 44(5):1024-1031. Search in Google Scholar

[25] MONTENIJ, L.J., BUHRE, W.F., JANSEN, J.R. et al. 2016. methodology of method comparison studies evaluating the validity of cardiac output monitors: a stepwise approach and checklist. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 116 (6): 750–8. Search in Google Scholar

[26] NAWARATHNA, L.S., CHOUDHARY, P.K. 2013. Measuring Agreement in Method Comparison Studies with Heteroscedastic Measurements. Statistics in Medicine. 32(29): 5156-5171. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5955 Search in Google Scholar

[27] NAWARATHNA, L.S., CHOUDHARY, P. 2015. A heteroscedastic measurement error model for method comparison data with replicate measurements. Statistics in Medicine. 34(7), 1242-1258. Search in Google Scholar

[28] O’HAGAN, ANTHONY, FORSTER, et al 2004. Reading in Bayesian Inference. Volume 2b of Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics, second edition. Arnold, London. Search in Google Scholar

[29] PETER, B. 2001. A Brief Introduction to Monte Carlo Simulation. Clinical pharmacokinetics.40: 15-22. 10.2165/00003088-200140010-00002. Search in Google Scholar

[30] PEYTON, P.J., AND CHONG, S.W. 2010. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 113:1220–35. Search in Google Scholar

[31] STUDENMUND, A.H. 1991. Reading using Econometrics: A practical guide.2nd Ed. ISBN 0-673-52125-7. Search in Google Scholar

[32] TIM, P.M., IAN, R.W., AND MICHAEL, J.C. 2019. Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. Statistics in Medicine. 38:2074–2102. doi. 10.1002/sim.8086 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar