[
Agresti, A. 2002. Categorical data analysis, 2 ed. Wiley, Hoboken.10.1002/0471249688
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ahrens, A., Hansen, C., and Schaffer, M. 2020. Lassopack: Model selection and prediction with regularized regression in §tata. The Stata Journal 20, 176–235.10.1177/1536867X20909697
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Akaike, H. 1973. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions of Automatic Control 19, 716–723.10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Breiman, L. 1996. Heuristics of instability and stabilization in model selection. Annals of Statistics 24, 2350–2383.10.1214/aos/1032181158
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cortez, P., Cerdeira, A., Almeida, F., Matos, T., and Reis, J. 2009. Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties. Decision Support Systems 47, 547–553.10.1016/j.dss.2009.05.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dua, D. and Graff, C. 2017. UCI machine learning repository.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fernández, D., Liu, I., Costilla, R., and Gu, P. 2020. Assigning scores for ordered categorical responses. Journal of Applied Statistics 47, 1261–1281.10.1080/02664763.2019.1674790
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Głuszak, M. 2015. Multinomial logit model of housing demand in Poland. Real Estate Management and Valuation 23, 84–89.10.1515/remav-2015-0008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harrell, F. 2015. Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis, 2 ed. Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hasan, A., Wang, Z., and Mahani, A. 2016. Fast estimation of multinomial logit models: R package mnlogit. Journal of Statistical Software 75, 1–24.10.18637/jss.v075.i03
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heinze, G., Wallisch, C., and Dunkler, D. 2018. Variable selection—a review and recommendations for the practicing statistician. Biometrical Journal 60, 431–449.10.1002/bimj.201700067
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horváthová, J. and Mokrišová, M. 2020. Comparison of the results of a data envelopment analysis model and logit model in assessing business financial health. Information 11, 160.10.3390/info11030160
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hosmer, D. 2000. Applied logistic regression, 2 ed. Wiley, Hoboken.10.1002/0471722146
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Inekwe, J., Jin, Y., and Valenzuela, M. 2018. The effects of financial distress: Evidence from US GDP growth. Economic Modelling 72, 8–21.10.1016/j.econmod.2018.01.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Irfan, M., Saha, S., and Singh, S. 2018. A random effects multinomial logit model for the determinants of exit modes. evidence from a panel of us manufacturing firms. Journal of Economic Studies 45, 791–809.10.1108/JES-03-2017-0075
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kalina, J. and Schlenker, A. 2015. A robust supervised variable selection for noisy high-dimensional data. BioMed Research International 2015, 320385.10.1155/2015/320385
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kalina, J., Vašaničová, P., and Litavcová, E. 2019. Regression quantiles under heteroscedasticity and multicollinearity: Analysis of travel and tourism competitiveness. Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics 67, 69–85.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, S. 2017. Ordinal time series model for forecasting air quality index for ozone in southern california. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 22, 175–182.10.1007/s10666-016-9521-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Poplaski, S., Kemnitz, R., and Robb, C. 2019. Investing in education: Impact of student financial stress on self-reported health. Journal of Student Financial Aid 48, 3.10.55504/0884-9153.1611
]Search in Google Scholar
[
R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rao, C. 1973. Linear statistical inference and its applications, 2 ed. Wiley, New York.10.1002/9780470316436
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sarrias, M. and Daziano, R. 2017. Multinomial logit models with continuous and discrete individual heterogeneity in r: The gmnl package. Journal of Statistical Software 19, 1–46.10.18637/jss.v079.i02
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shirk, A., Landguth, E., and Cushman, S. 2018. A comparison of regression methods for model selection in individual-based landscape genetic analysis. Molecular Ecology Resources 18, 55–67.10.1111/1755-0998.12709
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Su, Z., Bao, H., Li, Q., Xu, B., and Cui, X. 2022. The prediction of price gap anomaly in Chinese stock market: Evidence from the dependent functional logit model. Finance Research Letters. In press.10.1016/j.frl.2022.102702
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tutz, G. 2021. Uncertain choices: The heterogeneous multinomial logit model. Sociological Methodology 51, 86–111.10.1177/0081175020979689
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, K., Ye, X., Pendyala, R., and Zou, Y. 2017. On the development of a semi-nonparametric generalized multinomial logit model for travel-related choices. PLoS ONE 12, e0186689.10.1371/journal.pone.0186689
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu, J., Bauldry, S., and Fullerton, A. 2022. Bayesian approaches to assessing the parallel lines assumption in cumulative ordered logit models. Sociological Methods & Research. In press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yan, D. and Yang, Y. 2021. A stochastic user equilibrium formulation for the cumulative prospect theory-based cross-nested logit. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2021, 9929015.10.1155/2021/9929015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yee, T. W. 2010. The VGAM package for categorical data analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 32, 10, 1–34.10.18637/jss.v032.i10
]Search in Google Scholar
