A Novel Method for Fast Generation of 3D Objects from Multiple Depth Sensors

[1] R. Ramm, M. Heinze, P. Kühmstedt, A. Christoph, S. Heist, G. Notni, Portable solution for high-resolution 3D and colour texture on-site digitization of cultural heritage objects, Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 53, pp. 165–175, Elsevier (2022). DOI 10.1016/j.culher.2021.11.006 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[2] J. Perez-Cerrolaza, J. Abella, L. Kosmidis, A.J. Calderon, F.J. Cazorla, J.L. Flores, GPU Devices for Safety-Critical Systems: A Survey, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), pp. 1–35, New York, NY, USA (2022). DOI 10.1145/3549526 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] N. Li, C.P. Ho, J. Xue, L.W. Lim, G. Chen, Y.H. Fu, L.Y.T. Lee, A Progress Review on Solid-State LiDAR and Nanophotonics-Based LiDAR Sensors, Laser & Photonics Reviews, vol. 16, 2100511, pp. 1–24, Wiley-VCH GmbH, Weinheim (2022). DOI 10.1002/lpor.202100511 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] B. Wang, J. Lan, J. Gao, LiDAR Filtering in 3D Object Detection Based on Improved RANSAC, Remote Sensing, Computational Intelligence in Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 9, 2110, pp. 1–18 (2022). DOI 10.3390/rs14092110 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Y. Li, Z. Ge, G. Yu, J. Yang, Z. Wang, Y. Shi, J. Sun, Z. Li, BEVDepth: Acquisition of reliable depth for multi-view 3d object detection, pp. 1–12 (2022). arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10092 Search in Google Scholar

[6] M. Pandey, M. Fernandez, F. Gentile, O. Isayev, A. Tropsha, A.C. Stern, A. Cherkasov, The transformational role of GPU computing and deep learning in drug discovery, Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 211–221 (2022). DOI 10.1038/s42256-022-00463-x Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] L. You, H. Jiang, J. Hu, C.H. Chang, L. Chen, X. Cui, M. Zhao, GPU-accelerated Faster Mean Shift with euclidean distance metrics, In: IEEE 46th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), pp. 211–216 (2022). DOI 10.1109/COMPSAC54236.2022.00037 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] V. Tadic, A. Toth, Z. Vizvari, M. Klincsik, Z. Sari, P. Sarcevic, J. Sarosi, I. Biro, Perspectives of RealSense and ZED Depth Sensors for Robotic Vision Applications, Machines, vol. 10, no. 3, 183, pp. 1–16 (2022). DOI 10.3390/machines10030183 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[9] S. Cerfoglio, C. Ferraris, L. Vismara, G. Amprimo, L. Priano, G. Pettiti, M. Galli, A. Mauro, V. Cimolin, Kinect-Based Assessment of Lower Limbs during Gait in Post-Stroke Hemiplegic Patients: A Narrative Review, Sensors, vol. 22, no. 13, 4910, pp. 1–15 (2022). DOI 10.3390/s22134910926978135808426 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10] Z. Qiu, J. Martínez-Sánchez, V.M. Brea, P. López, P. Arias, Low-cost mobile mapping system solution for traffic sign segmentation using Azure Kinect, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 112, 102895, pp. 1–11 (2022). DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102895 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[11] X. Xu, L. Zhang, J. Yang, C. Cao, W. Wang, Y. Ran, Z. Tan, M. Luo, A Review of Multi-Sensor Fusion SLAM Systems Based on 3D LiDAR, Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 12, 2835, pp. 1–27 (2022). DOI 10.3390/rs14122835 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[12] S. Zahia, B. Garcia-Zapirain, J. Anakabe, J. Ander, O. Jossa Bastidas, A. Loizate Totoricagüena, A Comparative Study between Scanning Devices for 3D Printing of Personalized Ostomy Patches, Sensors, vol. 22, no. 2, 560, pp. 1–20 (2022). DOI 10.3390/s22020560878018235062521 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] S. Tavani, A. Billi, A. Corradetti, M. Mercuri, A. Bosman, M. Cuffaro, T. Seers, E. Carminati, Smartphone assisted fieldwork: Towards the digital transition of geoscience fieldwork using LiDAR-equipped iPhones, Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 227, 103969, pp. 1–15 (2022). DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103969 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] P. Chemweno, R.J. Torn, Innovative safety zoning for collaborative robots utilizing Kinect and LiDAR sensory approaches, Procedia CIRP, vol. 106, pp. 209–214 (2022). DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2022.02.180 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[15] H.S. Tham, R. Hussin, R.C. Ismail, A Real-Time Distance Prediction via Deep Learning and Microsoft Kinect, In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1064, pp. 1–6 (2022). DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/1064/1/012048 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] M. Vogt, A. Rips, C. Emmelmann, Comparison of iPad Pro®’s LiDAR and TrueDepth Capabilities with an Industrial 3D Scanning Solution, Technologies, vol. 9, no. 2, 25, pp. 1–13 (2021). DOI 10.3390/technologies9020025 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17] B. Chen, S. Shi, J. Sun, W. Gong, J. Yang, L. Du, K. Guo, B. Wang, B. Chen, Hyperspectral Li-DAR point cloud segmentation based on geometric and spectral information, OPTICS EXPRESS, vol. 27, no. 17, pp. 24043–24059 (2019) Search in Google Scholar

[18] T. Staffas, M. Brunzell, S. Gyger, L. Schweickert, S. Steinhauer, V. Zwiller, 3D scanning quantum LiDAR, In: 2022 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO), pp. 1–2 (2022). DOI 10.1364/CLEO_AT.2022.AM2K.1 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] F. Di Stefano, S. Chiappini, A. Gorreja, M. Balestra, R. Pierdicca, Mobile 3D scan Li-DAR: a literature review, Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 2387–2429, Taylor & Francis (2021). DOI 10.1080/19475705.2021.1964617 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[20] A. Notchenko, V. Ishimtsev, A. Artemov, V. Selyutin, E. Bogomolov, E. Burnaev, Scan2Part: Fine-grained and Hierarchical Part-level Understanding of Real-World 3D Scans, In: Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications, vol 5, pp. 711–722 (2022). DOI 10.5220/0010848200003124 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21] Y. Li, T. Harada, Non-rigid Point Cloud Registration with Neural Deformation Pyramid, pp. 1–19 (2022). arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.12796 Search in Google Scholar

[22] P. Besl, H.D. McKay, A method for registration of 3-D shapes, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence vol. 14, pp. 239–256 (1992). DOI 10.1109/34.121791 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] S. Gold, A. Rangarajan, C. Lu, S. Pappu, E. Mjolsness, New algorithms for 2D and 3D point matching: pose estimation and correspondence, Pattern Recognition, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1019–1031 (1998). DOI 10.1016/S0031-3203(98)80010-1. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[24] Intel Corporation. Intel RealSense Product Overview. Retrieved October 30, 2022, from https://www.intelrealsense.com/ Search in Google Scholar

[25] Intel Corporation. Learn About the Intel® RealSense^TM SDK 2.0. Retrieved October 30, 2022, from https://www.intelrealsense.com/intel-realsense-sdk-2-0/ Search in Google Scholar

[26] Intel Corporation. Intel® RealSense^TM LiDAR Camera L515. Retrieved October 30, 2022, from https://www.intelrealsense.com/LiDAR-camera-l515/ Search in Google Scholar

[27] Intel Corporation. Multi-Camera configurations with the Intel® RealSense^TM LiDAR Camera L515. Retrieved October 30, 2022, from https://dev.intelrealsense.com/docs/LiDAR-camera-l515-multi-camera-setup Search in Google Scholar

[28] H. Sarmadi, R. Muñoz-Salinas, M.A. Berbís, A. Luna, R. Medina-Carnicer, Joint scene and object tracking for cost-effective augmented reality assisted patient positioning in radiation therapy, pp. 1–16 (2020). arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.01895. Search in Google Scholar

[29] The Gnomon Workshop. 3D scan and retopology for production. Retrieved October 30, 2022, from https://www.thegnomonworkshop.com/tutorials/3d-scan-and-retopology-for-production Search in Google Scholar

[30] ScanLab photogrammetry. 3D scanning service. Retrieved October 30, 2022, from https://scanlab.ca/services/3d-scanning/ Search in Google Scholar

[31] Scan Engine. Studio. Retrieved October 30, 2022, from https://www.scan-engine.fr/ Search in Google Scholar

[32] Shining 3D. 3D Digitizing Solutions. Product models. Retrieved October 30, 2022, from https://www.shining3d.com/3d-digitizing-solutions/ Search in Google Scholar

[33] Artec 3D. Artec Leo 3D scanner. Retrieved October 30, 2022, from https://www.artec3d.com/portable-3d-scanners/artec-leo Search in Google Scholar

[34] Peel 3D. Peel 3 3D scanner. Retrieved October 30, 2022, from https://peel-3d.com/products/peel-3/ Search in Google Scholar

[35] Calibry. Skaner 3D Calibry. Retrieved October 30, 2022, from https://calibry.pl/ Search in Google Scholar

[36] A. Kulikajevas, Reconstruction algorithm of invisible sides of a 3D object for depth scanning systems, Doctoral dissertation (2022), Kauno technologijos Universitetas, KTU, Lithuania Search in Google Scholar

[37] L. Downs, A. Francis, N. Koenig, B. Kinman, R. Hickman, K. Reymann, T.B. McHugh, V. Vanhoucke, Google Scanned Objects: A High-Quality Dataset of 3D Scanned Household Items, pp. 1–8 (2022). arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.11918 Search in Google Scholar

[38] Google Research. Scanned Objects by Google Research: A Dataset of 3D-Scanned Common Household Items. Retrieved October 31, 2022, from https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/06/scanned-objects-by-google-research.html Search in Google Scholar

[39] Amazon. Amazon Berkeley Objects (ABO) Dataset. Retrieved October 31, 2022, from https://amazon-berkeley-objects.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html#home Search in Google Scholar

[40] J. Collins, S. Goel, K. Deng, A. Luthra, L. Xu, E. Gundogdu, T.F.Y. Vicente, T. Dideriksen, H. Arora, M. Guillaumin, J. Malik, ABO: Dataset and benchmarks for real-world 3d object understanding, In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 21126-21136 (2021). DOI 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.02045 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[41] Meta. Common Objects in 3D: Large-Scale Learning and Evaluation of Real-life 3D Category Reconstruction. Retrieved October 31, 2022, from https://ai.facebook.com/datasets/CO3D-dataset/ Search in Google Scholar

[42] J. Reizenstein, R. Shapovalov, P. Henzler, L. Sbordone, P. Labatut, D. Novotny, Common objects in 3d: Large-scale learning and evaluation of real-life 3d category reconstruction, In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 10901–10911 (2021). DOI 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01072 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[43] Alibaba. Our Businesses. Retrieved October 31, 2022, from https://www.alibabagroup.com/en-US/about-alibaba-businesses Search in Google Scholar

[44] H. Fu, R. Jia, L. Gao, M. Gong, B. Zhao, S. Maybank, D. Tao, 3d-future: 3D furniture shape with texture, International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 129, no. 12, pp. 3313–3337 (2021). DOI 10.1007/s11263-021-01534-z Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[45] XRPro LLC (Structure). Structure Sensor Pro. Retrieved October 31, 2022, from https://structure.io/ Search in Google Scholar

[46] Kaggle Inc. Datasets. Retrieved October 31, 2022, from https://www.kaggle.com/datasets Search in Google Scholar

[47] F.J. Romero-Ramirez, R. Muñoz-Salinas, R. Medina-Carnicer, Speeded up detection of squared fiducial markers, Image and Vision Computing, 76, pp. 38—47 (2018). DOI 10.1016/j.imavis.2018.05.004 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[48] Multi-Camera configurations with the Intel® RealSense^TM LiDAR Camera L515. Retrieved October 31, 2022 from https://dev.intelrealsense.com/docs/LiDAR-camera-l515-multi-camera-setup Search in Google Scholar

[49] V. Kraevoy, A. Sheffer, Template-Based Mesh Completion, Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing (2005). DOI 10.2312/SGP/SGP05/013-022 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[50] J. Huang, T. Birdal, Z. Gojcic, L. Guibas, S. Hu, Multiway Non-rigid Point Cloud Registration via Learned Functional Map Synchronization, In: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, pp. 1–18 (2022). DOI 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.316465335380953 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[51] Y. Li, T. Harada, Lepard: Learning partial point cloud matching in rigid and deformable scenes, pp. 1–17 (2021). DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2111.12591 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[52] F. Poux, R. Billen, Voxel-based 3D point cloud semantic segmentation: unsupervised geometric and relationship featuring vs. deep learning methods, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 8, no. 5, 213, pp. 1–34 (2019). DOI 10.3390/ijgi8050213 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar