Effect of R, µ and T on the Fragility Curves for Two Spans Reinforced Concrete Highway Bridges

Alwin, D.F., and Hauser, R.M., 1975. The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American sociological review, pp. 37-47.10.2307/2094445Search in Google Scholar

Baker, J. W., and Allin Cornell, C., 2005. A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34(10), pp. 1193-1217.10.1002/eqe.474Search in Google Scholar

Bentler, P. M. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological bulletin, 107(2), 238.10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238Search in Google Scholar

Berry, M., Parrish, M., and Eberhard, M., 2004. PEER Structural Performance Database, User’s Manual (Version 1.0). University of California, Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Browne, M. W., and Cudeck, R. 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus editions, 154, pp. 136-136.Search in Google Scholar

Celik, OC., and Ellingwood, BR., 2010. Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames–Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Structural Safety, 32, pp. 1-1210.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.003Search in Google Scholar

Choi, E., DesRoches, R., and Nielson, B., 2004. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Engineering Structures, 26, pp. 187-199.10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006Search in Google Scholar

Cornell, CA. and Krawinkler, H., 2000. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER center news, 3, pp. 1-3.Search in Google Scholar

DesRoches, R., Padgett, J., Ramanathan, K. and Dukes, J. 2012. Feasibility studies for improving Caltrans bridge fragility relationships No. CA12-1775.Search in Google Scholar

Jeong, S-H., and Elnashai, AS., 2007. Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities. Engineering Structures, 29, pp. 1238-1251.10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.026Search in Google Scholar

Kennedy, R. P., and Ravindra, M. K., 1984. Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 79(1), pp. 47-68.10.1016/0029-5493(84)90188-2Search in Google Scholar

Kircher, C. A., Whitman, R. V. and Holmes, W. T., 2006. HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods. Natural Hazards Review, 7(2), pp. 45-59.10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(45)Search in Google Scholar

Land, K. C. 1969. Principles of path analysis. Sociological methodology, 1: 3-37.10.2307/270879Search in Google Scholar

Luco N., and Cornell, CA., 2007. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra, 23, pp. 357-392.10.1193/1.2723158Search in Google Scholar

Mackie, K., and Stojadinovic, B., 2004. Improving probabilistic seismic demand models through refined intensity measures. In: Proc. 13th World Conf. Earthquake Eng. Int. Assoc. for Earthquake Eng. Japan, August 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Mackie, KR., and Stojadinovic, B., 2005. Fragility basis for California highway overpass bridge seismic decision making. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Kadysiewski, S. and Mosalam, K.M., 2009. Modeling of unreinforced masonry infill walls considering in-plane and outof-plane interaction (Vol. 70). Berkeley, California, USA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.Search in Google Scholar

McKay, MD., Beckman, RJ. and Conover, WJ., 2000. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 42, pp. 55-61.10.1080/00401706.2000.10485979Search in Google Scholar

Megally, S., Veletzos, MJ., Burnell, K., Restrepo, JI. and Seible, F., 2009. Seismic performance of precast concrete segmental bridges: Summary of experimental research on segment-to-segment joints. PCI journal, 54(2).10.15554/pcij.03012009.116.142Search in Google Scholar

Nielson, B. G., 2005. Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones. PhD Thesis., Georgia Institute of Technology,Search in Google Scholar

Padgett, JE., Nielson, BG. and DesRoches, R. 2008. Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 37, pp. 711-725.10.1002/eqe.782Search in Google Scholar

Pedhazur, E. J., and Pedhazur Schmelkin, L. 1991. Exploratory factor analysis. Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach, pp. 590-630.Search in Google Scholar

Priestley, MN, Seible, F., and Calvi, GM., 1996. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470172858Search in Google Scholar

Ramanathan, K., DesRoches, R., and Padgett, J., 2010. Analytical fragility curves for multispan continuous steel girder bridges in moderate seismic zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, pp. 173-182.10.3141/2202-21Search in Google Scholar

Ramanathan, K., Padgett, JE., and DesRoches, R., 2015. Temporal evolution of seismic fragility curves for concrete box-girder bridges in California. Engineering Structures, 97, pp. 29-46.10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.069Search in Google Scholar

Scharge, L., 1981. Anchoring of bearings by friction, joint sealing and bearing systems for concrete structures. In: World congress on joints and bearings (Vol. 1).Search in Google Scholar

Shamsabadi, A., Yan, L. 2008. Closed-form force-displacement backbone curves for bridge abutment-backfill systems. In: Geotechnical Earthquake. Engineering and Soil Dynamics, IV: pp. 1-10.10.1061/40975(318)159Search in Google Scholar

Shome, N., 1999. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. Stanford University.Search in Google Scholar

Singhal, A., and Kiremidjian, A. S., 1996. Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage. Journal of Structural Engineering, 122(12), pp. 1459-1467.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:12(1459)Search in Google Scholar

Straub, D., and Der Kiureghian, A., 2008. Improved seismic fragility modeling from empirical data. Structural safety, 30(4): pp. 320-336.10.1016/j.strusafe.2007.05.004Search in Google Scholar

Wright, S., 1921. Correlation and causation. Journal of agricultural research, 20(7), pp. 557-585.Search in Google Scholar