This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Afcha, S., Lucena, A. (2021), The effectiveness of R&D subsidies in fostering firm innovation: The role of knowledge-sourcing activities, Business Research Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 302–323.AfchaS.LucenaA.2021The effectiveness of R&D subsidies in fostering firm innovation: The role of knowledge-sourcing activitiesBusiness Research Quarterly24430232310.1177/2340944420933629Search in Google Scholar
Albors-Garrigos, J., Barrera, R.R. (2011), Impact of public funding on a firm's innovation performance. Analysis of internal and external moderating factors. International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 1297–1322.Albors-GarrigosJ.BarreraR.R.2011Impact of public funding on a firm's innovation performance. Analysis of internal and external moderating factorsInternational Journal of Innovation Management1561297132210.1142/S136391961100374XSearch in Google Scholar
Alecke, B., Mitze, T., Reinkowski, J., Untiedt, G. (2012), Does firm size make a difference? Analysing the effectiveness of R&D subsidies in East Germany, German Economic Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 174–195.AleckeB.MitzeT.ReinkowskiJ.UntiedtG.2012Does firm size make a difference? Analysing the effectiveness of R&D subsidies in East GermanyGerman Economic Review13217419510.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00546.xSearch in Google Scholar
Annicchiarico, B., Licandro, O., Mohnen, P., Ortega, E., Veugelers, R. (2020), Moving the frontier of macroeconomic modelling of research and innovation policy, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, doi: 10.2777/34199.AnnicchiaricoB.LicandroO.MohnenP.OrtegaE.VeugelersR.2020Moving the frontier of macroeconomic modelling of research and innovation policyLuxembourgPublications Office of the European Union10.2777/34199Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Atkinson, R.D., Ezell, S.J. (2012), Innovation economics. The race for global advantage. Yale University Press, New Haven, London.AtkinsonR.D.EzellS.J.2012Innovation economics. The race for global advantageYale University PressNew Haven, London10.1007/978-1-4614-4349-0_24Search in Google Scholar
Becker, L. (2015), Effectiveness of public innovation support in Europe. Does public support foster turnover, employment and labour productivity? CAGE Discussion paper No. 236, Centre for European Governance and European Development Research, Georg-August-University Göttingen.BeckerL.2015Effectiveness of public innovation support in Europe. Does public support foster turnover, employment and labour productivity?CAGE Discussion paper No. 236,Centre for European Governance and European Development Research, Georg-August-University Göttingen10.2139/ssrn.2585442Search in Google Scholar
Benedetti Fasil, C., Sanchez-Martinez, M., Ravet, J., Martino, R. (2020), Macroeconomic models for research and innovation policy: the present and the future, directorate-general for research and innovation, European Commission, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, doi: 10.2777/339051.Benedetti FasilC.Sanchez-MartinezM.RavetJ.MartinoR.2020Macroeconomic models for research and innovation policy: the present and the future, directorate-general for research and innovation, European CommissionLuxembourgPublications Office of the European Union10.2777/339051Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bengtsson, L., Edquist, Ch. (2022), Towards a holistic user innovation policy, International Journal of Innovation Studies, Vol. 6, pp. 35–52.BengtssonL.EdquistCh.2022Towards a holistic user innovation policyInternational Journal of Innovation Studies6355210.1016/j.ijis.2022.02.002Search in Google Scholar
Bollen, K.A., Stine, R.A. (1992, November), Bootsrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models, Sociological Methods Research, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 205–229.BollenK.A.StineR.A.1992NovemberBootsrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation modelsSociological Methods Research21220522910.1177/0049124192021002004Search in Google Scholar
Borrás, S., Edquist, Ch. (2019), Holistic innovation policy. Theoretical foundations, policy problems, and instrument choices, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.BorrásS.EdquistCh.2019Holistic innovation policy. Theoretical foundations, policy problems, and instrument choicesOxford University PressOxford, New York10.1093/oso/9780198809807.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bronzini, R., Piselli, P. (2016), The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation, Research Policy, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 442–457.BronziniR.PiselliP.2016The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovationResearch Policy45244245710.1016/j.respol.2015.10.008Search in Google Scholar
Buisseret, T., Cameron, H., Georghiou, L. (1995), What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 10, No. 4/5/6, pp. 587–600.BuisseretT.CameronH.GeorghiouL.1995What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firmsInternational Journal of Technology Management104/5/6587600Search in Google Scholar
Bye, B., Klemetsen, M., Raknerud, A. (2019), The impact of public R&D support on firms’ patenting, Discussion Papers, No. 911, Statistics Norway, Research Department, Oslo.ByeB.KlemetsenM.RaknerudA.2019The impact of public R&D support on firms’ patentingDiscussion Papers, No. 911,Statistics Norway, Research DepartmentOsloSearch in Google Scholar
Chaminade, C., Edquist, C. (2010), Rationales for public policy intervention in the innovation process: systems of innovation approach, in: R.E. Smits, S. Kuhlmann, P. Shapira, (Eds), The theory and practice of innovation policy. An international research handbook, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton, MA (USA), pp. 95–114.ChaminadeC.EdquistC.2010Rationales for public policy intervention in the innovation process: systems of innovation approachin:SmitsR.E.KuhlmannS.ShapiraP.(Eds),The theory and practice of innovation policy. An international research handbookEdward ElgarCheltenham (UK) and Northampton, MA (USA)9511410.4337/9781849804424.00012Search in Google Scholar
Christensen, C.M., McDonald, R., Altman, E.J., Palmer, J.E. (2018), Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 55, Issue 7, pp. 1043–1078.ChristensenC.M.McDonaldR.AltmanE.J.PalmerJ.E.2018Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future ResearchJournal of Management Studies5571043107810.1111/joms.12349Search in Google Scholar
Clausen, T., Nås, S.O., Verspagen, B. (2007), Norwegian Innovation and Industrial Structure: Insiders and Outsiders?, Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20070610, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.ClausenT.NåsS.O.VerspagenB.2007Norwegian Innovation and Industrial Structure: Insiders and Outsiders?Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20070610,Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of OsloSearch in Google Scholar
Community Innovation Survey (CIS) (2008), The Harmonised Survey Questionnaire, retrieved from http://innovacion.ricyt.org/files/CIS%202006%202008.pdf [dostęp: 22nd June 2022].Community Innovation Survey (CIS)2008The Harmonised Survey Questionnaireretrieved from http://innovacion.ricyt.org/files/CIS%202006%202008.pdf [dostęp: 22nd June 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Crépon, B., Duguet, E., Mairesse, J. (1998), Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 115–158.CréponB.DuguetE.MairesseJ.1998Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm levelEconomics of Innovation and New Technology7211515810.3386/w6696Search in Google Scholar
Czarnitzki, D., Delanote, J. (2015), R&D policies for young SMEs: input and output effects, Small Business Economics, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 465–485.CzarnitzkiD.DelanoteJ.2015R&D policies for young SMEs: input and output effectsSmall Business Economics45346548510.1007/s11187-015-9661-1Search in Google Scholar
Czarnitzki, D., Hussinger, K. (2018), Input and output additionality of R&D subsidies, Applied Economics, Vol. 50, No. 12, p. 1341, doi: 10.1080/00036846.2017.1361010.CzarnitzkiD.HussingerK.2018Input and output additionality of R&D subsidiesApplied Economics5012134110.1080/00036846.2017.1361010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Czarnitzki, D., Licht, G. (2006), Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy: the case of Eastern Germany, Economics of Transition, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 101–131.CzarnitzkiD.LichtG.2006Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy: the case of Eastern GermanyEconomics of Transition14110113110.1111/j.1468-0351.2006.00236.xSearch in Google Scholar
Czarnitzki, D., Lopes-Bento, C. (2014), Innovation subsidies: does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany, Industry & Innovation, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 380–384.CzarnitzkiD.Lopes-BentoC.2014Innovation subsidies: does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from GermanyIndustry & Innovation21538038410.1080/13662716.2014.973246Search in Google Scholar
David, P.A., Hall, B.H., Toole, A.A. (2000), Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence, Research Policy, Vol. 29, pp. 497–529.DavidP.A.HallB.H.TooleA.A.2000Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidenceResearch Policy2949752910.3386/w7373Search in Google Scholar
Dimos, C., Fai, F., Tomlinson, P.R. (2021), The temporal effects of R&D subsidies on R&D, innovation and innovation behaviour : evidence from UK, Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol 2021, No. 1.DimosC.FaiF.TomlinsonP.R.2021The temporal effects of R&D subsidies on R&D, innovation and innovation behaviour : evidence from UKAcademy of Management Proceedings2021110.5465/AMBPP.2021.200Search in Google Scholar
Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., Shapira, P. (2013), Impacts of innovation policy: synthesis and conclusions. Compendium of Evidence on the Effectiveness of Innovation Policy Intervention Project, Manchester Institute of Innovation Research Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, retrieved from http://research.mbs.ac.uk/innovation/.EdlerJ.CunninghamP.GökA.ShapiraP.2013Impacts of innovation policy: synthesis and conclusionsCompendium of Evidence on the Effectiveness of Innovation Policy Intervention Project, Manchester Institute of Innovation Research Manchester Business School, University of Manchesterretrieved from http://research.mbs.ac.uk/innovation/.Search in Google Scholar
Edquist, Ch. (2019), Towards a holistic innovation policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council (NIC) be a role model? Research Policy, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 869–879. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.008.EdquistCh.2019Towards a holistic innovation policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council (NIC) be a role model?Research Policy48486987910.1016/j.respol.2018.10.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Edquist, C., Malerba, F., Metcalfe, S., Montobbio, F., Steinmueller, E. (2004), Sectoral systems: implication for European innovation policy, in: F. Malerba (Eds), Sectoral systems of innovation in Europe – Concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 427–461.EdquistC.MalerbaF.MetcalfeS.MontobbioF.SteinmuellerE.2004Sectoral systems: implication for European innovation policyin:MalerbaF.(Eds),Sectoral systems of innovation in Europe – Concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in EuropeCambridge University PressCambridge, UK42746110.1017/CBO9780511493270.013Search in Google Scholar
Edquist, Ch. (2011), Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: identification of systemic problems (or failures), Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 11, pp. 1–29.EdquistCh.2011Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: identification of systemic problems (or failures)Industrial and Corporate Change1112910.1093/icc/dtr060Search in Google Scholar
Edquist, Ch., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.M. (2020), Functional procurement for innovation, welfare and the environment: A mission-oriented approach, Papers in Innovation Studies Paper no. 2020/1, Lund University, CIRCLE – Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy, retrieved from http://wp.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/202001_edquist.pdfEdquistCh.Zabala-IturriagagoitiaJ.M.2020Functional procurement for innovation, welfare and the environment: A mission-oriented approachPapers in Innovation Studies Paper no. 2020/1,Lund University, CIRCLE – Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economyretrieved from http://wp.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/202001_edquist.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Efron, B. (1979), Bootstrap methods: another look at the Jackknife, The Annals of Statistics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1–26.EfronB.1979Bootstrap methods: another look at the JackknifeThe Annals of Statistics7112610.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_41Search in Google Scholar
Freitas, I.B, Castellacci, F., Fontana, R., Malerba, F., Vezzulli, A. (2017), Sectors and the additionality effects of R&D tax credits: a cross-country microeconometric analysis, Research Policy, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 57–72.FreitasI.BCastellacciF.FontanaR.MalerbaF.VezzulliA.2017Sectors and the additionality effects of R&D tax credits: a cross-country microeconometric analysisResearch Policy461577210.1016/j.respol.2016.10.002Search in Google Scholar
Garcia, A., Mohnen, P. (2010), Impact of government support on R&D and innovation, UNU-MERIT Working paper Series p. 2010-034, United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology, Maastricht.GarciaA.MohnenP.2010Impact of government support on R&D and innovationUNU-MERIT Working paper Series p. 2010-034,United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and TechnologyMaastrichtSearch in Google Scholar
Gaul, M., Machowski, A. (1987), Elementy analizy ścieżek, in: W: J. Brzeziński (red.), Wielozmiennowe modele statystyczne w badaniach psychologicznych. PWE, Warszawa.GaulM.MachowskiA.1987Elementy analizy ścieżekin: W:BrzezińskiJ.(red.),Wielozmiennowe modele statystyczne w badaniach psychologicznychPWEWarszawaSearch in Google Scholar
Geels, F.W. (2020), Transformative innovation and socio-technical transitions to address grand challenges, R&I Working papers Series 2020/02, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, doi: 10.2777/967325.GeelsF.W.2020Transformative innovation and socio-technical transitions to address grand challengesR&I Working papers Series 2020/02,Publications Office of the European UnionLuxembourg10.2777/967325Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Georghiou, L. (2002), Impact and additionality of innovation policy, in: P. Boekholt (Eds), Innovation policy and sustainable development: Can innovation incentives make a difference? Brussels: IWT-Studies Innovation Science Technology no 40, pp. 57–67.GeorghiouL.2002Impact and additionality of innovation policyin:BoekholtP.(Eds),Innovation policy and sustainable development: Can innovation incentives make a difference?BrusselsIWT-Studies Innovation Science Technology405767Search in Google Scholar
Georghiou, L. (2004), Evaluation of behavioural additionality, Concept Paper, in: L. Georghiou, B. Clarysse, G. Steurs, V. Bilsen, J. Larosse, (Eds), ‘Making the difference’. The evaluation of ‘behavioural additionality’ of R&D, IWT – Observatory no.48, Brussels.GeorghiouL.2004Evaluation of behavioural additionality, Concept Paperin:GeorghiouL.ClarysseB.SteursG.BilsenV.LarosseJ.(Eds),‘Making the difference’. The evaluation of ‘behavioural additionality’ of R&DIWT – Observatory no.48BrusselsSearch in Google Scholar
Gonzalez, X., Jaumandreu, J., Pazo, C. (2005), Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 930–949.GonzalezX.JaumandreuJ.PazoC.2005Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectivenessRAND Journal of Economics364930949Search in Google Scholar
Grabowski, W, Staszewska-Bystrova, A. (2020), The role of public support for innovativeness in SMEs across european countries and sectors of economic activity. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 10, p. 4143. doi: 10.3390/su12104143.GrabowskiWStaszewska-BystrovaA.2020The role of public support for innovativeness in SMEs across european countries and sectors of economic activitySustainability1210414310.3390/su12104143Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Grabowski, W., Pamukcu, T., Szczygielski, K., Tandogan, S. (2013), Does government support for private innovation matter? Firm-level evidence from Turkey and Poland. CASE Network Studies & Analysis, Warszawa, 458/20.GrabowskiW.PamukcuT.SzczygielskiK.TandoganS.2013Does government support for private innovation matter? Firm-level evidence from Turkey and PolandCASE Network Studies & AnalysisWarszawa458/20.Search in Google Scholar
Guerzoni, M., Raiteri, E. (2015), Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix, Research Policy, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 726–747.GuerzoniM.RaiteriE.2015Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mixResearch Policy44372674710.1016/j.respol.2014.10.009Search in Google Scholar
Gürbüz, K., Erdil, E. (2020), Prioritization and R&D support mechanisms: Turkish case, Journal of Knowledge Economy, doi: 10.1007/s13132-020-00648-y.GürbüzK.ErdilE.2020Prioritization and R&D support mechanisms: Turkish caseJournal of Knowledge Economy10.1007/s13132-020-00648-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Halpern, L. (2010), R&D subsidies and firm performance in Hungary, Micro-Dyn Working Paper, 38/10.HalpernL.2010R&D subsidies and firm performance in HungaryMicro-Dyn Working Paper, 38/10.Search in Google Scholar
Hegerty, S.W., Kowalski, A.M., Lewandowska, M.S. (2022), Complementarity of additionalities resulting from European Union funds: Perspective of the users of research infrastructures, Review of Policy Research, online access, doi: 10.1111/ropr.12480HegertyS.W.KowalskiA.M.LewandowskaM.S.2022Complementarity of additionalities resulting from European Union funds: Perspective of the users of research infrastructuresReview of Policy Researchonline access,10.1111/ropr.12480Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hicks, D.J., Coil, D.A., Stahmer, C.G., Eisen, J.A. (2019), Network analysis to evaluate the impact of research funding on research community consolidation, PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 6, p. e0218273, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218273.HicksD.J.CoilD.A.StahmerC.G.EisenJ.A.2019Network analysis to evaluate the impact of research funding on research community consolidationPLoS ONE146e021827310.1371/journal.pone.0218273Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hussinger, K. (2003), Crowding out or stimulus: The effect of public R&D subsidies on firm's R&D expenditure, Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), draft version, July.HussingerK.2003Crowding out or stimulus: The effect of public R&D subsidies on firm's R&D expenditureCentre for European Economic Research (ZEW), draft versionJulySearch in Google Scholar
Innovation Activities of Enterprises in 2008–2010. (2012), Central Statistical Office, Statistical Office in Szczecin, Warsaw.Innovation Activities of Enterprises in 2008–20102012Central Statistical Office, Statistical Office in SzczecinWarsawSearch in Google Scholar
IUS. (2014), Innovation Union Scoreboard 2014, European Union, Brussels, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d1cb48d3-4861-41fe-a26d-09850d32487b.IUS2014Innovation Union Scoreboard 2014European UnionBrusselshttps://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d1cb48d3-4861-41fe-a26d-09850d32487b.Search in Google Scholar
Jensen, M., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007), Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation, Research Policy, Vol. 36, pp. 680–693.JensenM.JohnsonB.LorenzE.LundvallB.-Å.2007Forms of knowledge and modes of innovationResearch Policy3668069310.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006Search in Google Scholar
Kang, K.N., Park, H. (2012), Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs, Technovation, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 68–78.KangK.N.ParkH.2012Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEsTechnovation321687810.1016/j.technovation.2011.08.004Search in Google Scholar
Kline, R.B. (2011), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Guilford Press, New York.KlineR.B.2011Principles and Practice of Structural Equation ModelingGuilford PressNew YorkSearch in Google Scholar
Konarski, R. (2009), Modele równań strukturalnych. Teoria i praktyka, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.KonarskiR.2009Modele równań strukturalnychTeoria i praktyka, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWNSearch in Google Scholar
Lewandowska, M.S., Kowalski, A.M. (2015), Współpraca polskich przedsiębiorstw w sferze innowacji a wsparcie z funduszy unijnych, Gospodarka Narodowa, Vol. 4, No. 278, pp. 69–89.LewandowskaM.S.KowalskiA.M.2015Współpraca polskich przedsiębiorstw w sferze innowacji a wsparcie z funduszy unijnychGospodarka Narodowa4278698910.33119/GN/100826Search in Google Scholar
Magro, E., Wilson, J.R. (2013), Complex innovation policy systems: towards an evaluation mix, Research Policy, Vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 1647–1656.MagroE.WilsonJ.R.2013Complex innovation policy systems: towards an evaluation mixResearch Policy4291647165610.1016/j.respol.2013.06.005Search in Google Scholar
Marino, M., Lhuillery, S., Parrotta, P., Sala, D. (2016), Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure, Research Policy, Vol. 45, No. 9, pp. 1715–1730.MarinoM.LhuilleryS.ParrottaP.SalaD.2016Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditureResearch Policy4591715173010.1016/j.respol.2016.04.009Search in Google Scholar
Marzucchi, A., Montresor, S. (2012), The multi-dimensional additionality of innovation policies. A multi-level application to Italy and Spain, preliminary version, retrieved from https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=montresor2-ita-spa-spru.pdf&site=25MarzucchiA.MontresorS.2012The multi-dimensional additionality of innovation policies. A multi-level application to Italy and Spainpreliminary version, retrieved from https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=montresor2-ita-spa-spru.pdf&site=25Search in Google Scholar
Mazzucato, M. (2018), Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 803–815. doi: 10.1093/icc/dty034MazzucatoM.2018Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunitiesIndustrial and Corporate Change27580381510.1093/icc/dty034Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Neicu, D., Teirlinck, P., Kelchtermans, S. (2016), Dipping in the policy mix: do R&D subsidies foster behavioral additionality effects of R&D tax credits?, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 218–239, doi: 10.1080/10438599.2015.1076192NeicuD.TeirlinckP.KelchtermansS.2016Dipping in the policy mix: do R&D subsidies foster behavioral additionality effects of R&D tax credits?Economics of Innovation and New Technology25321823910.1080/10438599.2015.1076192Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nilsen, Ø.-A., Raknerud, A., Iancu, D.-C. (2020), Public R&D support and firm performance: A multivariate dose-response analysis, Research Policy, Vol. 49, No. 7, pp. 1–16, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104067NilsenØ.-A.RaknerudA.IancuD.-C.2020Public R&D support and firm performance: A multivariate dose-response analysisResearch Policy49711610.1016/j.respol.2020.104067Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
OECD. (2006), Government R&D funding and company behaviour, Measuring behavioural additionality, Paris, OECD Publishing.OECD2006Government R&D funding and company behaviour, Measuring behavioural additionalityParisOECD PublishingSearch in Google Scholar
Orlic, E., Radicic, D., Balavac, M. (2019), R&D and innovation policy in the Western Balkans: are there additionality effects? Science and Public Policy, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scz036.OrlicE.RadicicD.BalavacM.2019R&D and innovation policy in the Western Balkans: are there additionality effects?Science and Public Policy46611910.1093/scipol/scz036Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pang, S., Dou, S., Li, H. (2020), Synergy effect of science and technology policies on innovation: Evidence from China. PLoS ONE, Vol. 15, No. 10, p. e0240515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240515.PangS.DouS.LiH.2020Synergy effect of science and technology policies on innovation: Evidence from ChinaPLoS ONE1510e024051510.1371/journal.pone.0240515Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Petrin, T. (2018), A literature review on the impact and effectiveness of government support for R&D and innovation, Working paper No. 05/2018, http://www.isigrowth.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/working_paper_2018_05.pdfPetrinT.2018A literature review on the impact and effectiveness of government support for R&D and innovationWorking paper No. 05/2018, http://www.isigrowth.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/working_paper_2018_05.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Radas, S., Anića I.-D., Tafro A., Wagner, V. (2015), The effects of public support schemes on small and medium enterprises, Technovation, Vol. 38, pp. 15–30.RadasS.AnićaI.-D.TafroA.WagnerV.2015The effects of public support schemes on small and medium enterprisesTechnovation38153010.1016/j.technovation.2014.08.002Search in Google Scholar
Radicic, D., Pugh, G. (2017), R&D programmes, policy mix, and the “European Paradox”: evidence from European SMEs, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 44, No.4, pp. 1–16.RadicicD.PughG.2017R&D programmes, policy mix, and the “European Paradox”: evidence from European SMEsScience and Public Policy44411610.1093/scipol/scw077Search in Google Scholar
Roper, S., Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2016), The legacy of public subsidies for innovation: input, output and behavioural additionality effects, ERC Research Paper 21, Warwick: Enterprise Research Centre.RoperS.Hewitt-DundasN.2016The legacy of public subsidies for innovation: input, output and behavioural additionality effectsERC Research Paper 21,WarwickEnterprise Research CentreSearch in Google Scholar
Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W. (1982), Industrial innovation and public policy: preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s. Pinter, London.RothwellR.ZegveldW.1982Industrial innovation and public policy: preparing for the 1980s and the 1990sPinterLondonSearch in Google Scholar
Schneider, C., Veugelers, R. (2010), On young highly innovative companies: Why they matter and how (not) to policy support them, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 969–1007.SchneiderC.VeugelersR.2010On young highly innovative companies: Why they matter and how (not) to policy support themIndustrial and Corporate Change194969100710.1093/icc/dtp052Search in Google Scholar
Schot, J., Steinmueller, W.E. (2018), Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change, Research Policy, Vol. 47, No. 9, pp. 1554–1567.SchotJ.SteinmuellerW.E.2018Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative changeResearch Policy4791554156710.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011Search in Google Scholar
Serrano-Velarde, N. (2008), Crowding-out at the top: the heterogeneous impact of R&D subsidies on firm investment, European University Institute, Department of Economics, November 24, 2008. Job Market Paper.Serrano-VelardeN.2008Crowding-out at the top: the heterogeneous impact of R&D subsidies on firm investmentEuropean University Institute, Department of EconomicsNovember242008Job Market Paper.Search in Google Scholar
Shin, K., Choy, M., Lee, C., Park, G. (2019), Government R&D subsidy and additionality of biotechnology firms: the case of the South Korean Biotechnology Industry, Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 6, p. 1583.ShinK.ChoyM.LeeC.ParkG.2019Government R&D subsidy and additionality of biotechnology firms: the case of the South Korean Biotechnology IndustrySustainability116158310.3390/su11061583Search in Google Scholar
Szczygielski, K., Grabowski, W., Pamukcu, M.T. (2017), Does government support for private innovation matter? Firm-level evidence from two catching-up countries, Research Policy, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 219–237.SzczygielskiK.GrabowskiW.PamukcuM.T.2017Does government support for private innovation matter? Firm-level evidence from two catching-up countriesResearch Policy46121923710.1016/j.respol.2016.10.009Search in Google Scholar
Uyarra, E., Zabala-Iturriagagoitiac, J.M., Flanagana, K., Magrod, E. (2020), Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation, Research Policy, Vol. 49, No. 1, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103844.UyarraE.Zabala-IturriagagoitiacJ.M.FlanaganaK.MagrodE.2020Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: rationales, roles, capabilities and implementationResearch Policy49110.1016/j.respol.2019.103844Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Van Beers, C., Zand, F. (2014), R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: an empirical analysis, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 292–312.Van BeersC.ZandF.2014R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: an empirical analysisJournal of Product Innovation Management31229231210.1111/jpim.12096Search in Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, G., Klomp, L. (2006), On the contribution of innovation to multi-factor productivity, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 15, No. 4/5, pp. 367–390.Van LeeuwenG.KlompL.2006On the contribution of innovation to multi-factor productivityEconomics of Innovation and New Technology154/536739010.1080/10438590500512927Search in Google Scholar
Wallsten, S.J. (2000), The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of the small business innovation research program, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 82–100.WallstenS.J.2000The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of the small business innovation research programRAND Journal of Economics3118210010.2307/2601030Search in Google Scholar
Wanzebock, I., Scherngell, T., Fischer, M.M. (2013), How do firm characteristics affect behavioural additionalities of public R&D subsidies? Evidence for the Austrian transport sector, Technovation, Vol. No. 33(2–3), pp. 66–77.WanzebockI.ScherngellT.FischerM.M.2013How do firm characteristics affect behavioural additionalities of public R&D subsidies?Evidence for the Austrian transport sector, Technovation332–36677Search in Google Scholar
Weresa, M.A., Poel, M., Cunningham, P., den Hertog, P. (2018), Mutual learning exercise on evaluation of business R&D grant schemes: behavioural change, mixed-method approaches and big data, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, doi:10.2777/79197.WeresaM.A.PoelM.CunninghamP.den HertogP.2018Mutual learning exercise on evaluation of business R&D grant schemes: behavioural change, mixed-method approaches and big dataEuropean Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation10.2777/79197Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Weresa, M.A. (2017), Research and development policy, innovation policy, and industrial policy: an interface, in: A. Ambroziak (Ed.), The New Industrial Policy of the European Union, Springer, pp. 187–204, SwitzerlandWeresaM.A.2017Research and development policy, innovation policy, and industrial policy: an interfacein:AmbroziakA.(Ed.),The New Industrial Policy of the European UnionSpringer187204Switzerland10.1007/978-3-319-39070-3_8Search in Google Scholar
Weresa, M.A., Lewandowska, M.S. (2014), Innovation system restructuring in Poland in the context of EU membership, in: M.A. Weresa (Ed.), Poland: Competitiveness Report 2014. A Decade in the European Union, Warsaw School of Economics Press, Warsaw.WeresaM.A.LewandowskaM.S.2014Innovation system restructuring in Poland in the context of EU membershipin:WeresaM.A.(Ed.),Poland: Competitiveness Report 2014. A Decade in the European UnionWarsaw School of Economics PressWarsawSearch in Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1934), The method of path coefficients, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 161–215. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177732676.WrightS.1934The method of path coefficientsAnnals of Mathematical Statistics5316121510.1214/aoms/1177732676Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1921), Correlation and causation, Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 20, pp. 557–585.WrightS.1921Correlation and causationJournal of Agricultural Research20557585Search in Google Scholar
Wubben, E.F.M., Batterink, M., Kolympiris, C., Kemp, R.G.M., Omta, O.S.W.F. (2015), Profiting from external knowledge: the impact of different external knowledge acquisition strategies on innovation performance, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 139–165.WubbenE.F.M.BatterinkM.KolympirisC.KempR.G.M.OmtaO.S.W.F.2015Profiting from external knowledge: the impact of different external knowledge acquisition strategies on innovation performanceInternational Journal of Technology Management69213916510.1504/IJTM.2015.071552Search in Google Scholar