<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>This study examines the possibilities of sensor-instrumented training (SIT) in mid-distance running training sessions. Within this framework, variations of ground contact time (GCT) between straight and curved running, as well as GCT as a fatigue indicator, are explored. Seven experienced runners, with two elite female athletes, participated in two training protocols: 15 sets of 400 m with 1-minute rest and five sets of 300 m with 3-minute rest. GCT was calculated using two inertial measurement units (IMU) attached to the athletes’ feet. The running speed of all athletes was measured with wearable GPS devices. GCT showed variations between inner and outer feet, notably during curve running (300m: 2.56%; 400m: 2.35%). However, for the 300m runs, statistically insignificant GCT differences were more pronounced in straight runs (3.54%) than in curve runs (2.56%), contrasting with the typical assumption of higher differences in curve running. A fatigue-indicating pattern is visible in GCT, as well as speed curves. Other data of this study are consistent with prior research that has observed differences between the inner and outer foot during curve running, while our understanding of the development throughout the training session is enhanced. Using SIT can be a valuable tool for refining curve running technique. By incorporating novel sensing technology, the possibilities enhance our understanding of running kinematics and offer an excellent application of SIT in sports.</p>
</abstract>

This study examines the possibilities of sensor-instrumented training (SIT) in mid-distance running training sessions. Within this framework, variations of ground contact time (GCT) between straight and curved running, as well as GCT as a fatigue indicator, are explored. Seven experienced runners, with two elite female athletes, participated in two training protocols: 15 sets of 400 m with 1-minute rest and five sets of 300 m with 3-minute rest. GCT was calculated using two inertial measurement units (IMU) attached to the athletes’ feet. The running speed of all athletes was measured with wearable GPS devices. GCT showed variations between inner and outer feet, notably during curve running (300m: 2.56%; 400m: 2.35%). However, for the 300m runs, statistically insignificant GCT differences were more pronounced in straight runs (3.54%) than in curve runs (2.56%), contrasting with the typical assumption of higher differences in curve running. A fatigue-indicating pattern is visible in GCT, as well as speed curves. Other data of this study are consistent with prior research that has observed differences between the inner and outer foot during curve running, while our understanding of the development throughout the training session is enhanced. Using SIT can be a valuable tool for refining curve running technique. By incorporating novel sensing technology, the possibilities enhance our understanding of running kinematics and offer an excellent application of SIT in sports.

A Pilot Study in Sensor Instrumented Training (SIT) - Ground Contact Time for Monitoring Fatigue and Curve Running Technique

International Journal of Computer Science in Sport

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This study examines the possibilities of sensor-instrumented training (SIT) in mid-distance running training sessions. Within this framework, variations of...

A Pilot Study in Sensor Instrumented Training (SIT) - Ground Contact Time for Monitoring Fatigue and Curve Running Technique

Publié en ligne: 05 juin 2024

Pages: 80 - 92

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcss-2024-0005

Mots clés
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS, TRAINING CONTROL, SENSORS, CURVE RUNNING, GROUND CONTACT TIME

© 2024 P. Blauberger et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

A Pilot Study in Sensor Instrumented Training (SIT) - Ground Contact Time for Monitoring Fatigue and Curve Running Technique

Publié en ligne: 05 juin 2024

Pages: 80 - 92

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcss-2024-0005

Mots clésPERFORMANCE ANALYSIS, TRAINING CONTROL, SENSORS, CURVE RUNNING, GROUND CONTACT TIME

© 2024 P. Blauberger et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mots clés
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS, TRAINING CONTROL, SENSORS, CURVE RUNNING, GROUND CONTACT TIME