This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Tramontana P, Amalfitano D, Amatucci N, et al. Automated functional testing of mobile applications: a systematic mapping study [J]. Software Quality Journal, 2019, 27(1):149–201.de TramontanaPAmalfitanoDAmatucciNAutomated functional testing of mobile applications: a systematic mapping study [J]. , 2019, 27(1):149–201.Search in Google Scholar
Kong P, Li L, Gao J, et al. Automated testing of android apps: A systematic literature review [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2018, 68(1): 45–66.KongPLiLGaoJAutomated testing of android apps: A systematic literature review [J]. , 2018, 68(1): 45–66.Search in Google Scholar
Cruz L, Abreu R, Lo D. To the attention of mobile software developers: guess what, test your app! [J]. Empirical Software Engineering, 2019, 24(4): 2438–2468.CruzLAbreuRLoD.To the attention of mobile software developers: guess what, test your app! [J]. , 2019, 24(4): 2438–2468.Search in Google Scholar
Wimalasooriya C, Licorish S A, da Costa D A, et al. A systematic mapping study addressing the reliability of mobile applications: The need to move beyond testing reliability [J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2022, 186: 111166.WimalasooriyaCLicorish SAda Costa DAA systematic mapping study addressing the reliability of mobile applications: The need to move beyond testing reliability [J]. , 2022, 186: 111166.Search in Google Scholar
Al-Subaihin A A, Sarro F, Black S, et al. App store effects on software engineering practices [J]. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2019, 47(2): 300–319.Al-Subaihin AASarroFBlackSApp store effects on software engineering practices [J]. , 2019, 47(2): 300–319.Search in Google Scholar
Luo C, Goncalves J, Velloso E, et al. A survey of context simulation for testing mobile context-aware applications [J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2020, 53(1):LuoCGoncalvesJVellosoEA survey of context simulation for testing mobile context-aware applications [J]. , 2020, 53(1):Search in Google Scholar
Amalfitano D, Amatucci N, Memon A M, et al. A general framework for comparing automatic testing techniques of Android mobile apps [J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2017, 125(c): 322–343.AmalfitanoDAmatucciNMemon AMA general framework for comparing automatic testing techniques of Android mobile apps [J]. , 2017, 125(c): 322–343.Search in Google Scholar
Linares-Vásquez M, Bernal-Cárdenas C, Moran K, et al. How do developers test android applications?[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). IEEE, 2017: 613–622.Linares-VásquezMBernal-CárdenasCMoranKHow do developers test android applications?[C]//. IEEE, 2017: 613–622.Search in Google Scholar
Li N, Offutt J. Test oracle strategies for model-based testing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2016, 43(4): 372–395.LiNOffuttJ.Test oracle strategies for model-based testing[J]. , 2016, 43(4): 372–395.Search in Google Scholar
Banerjee I. Advances in model-based testing of GUI-based software[M]//Advances in Computers. Elsevier, 2017, 105: 45–78.BanerjeeI.Advances in model-based testing of GUI-based software[M]//Advances in Computers. , 2017, 105: 45–78.Search in Google Scholar
Automator[EB/OL], https://developer.android.com/training/testing/ui-automator, 2020-3. Ngo C D, Pastore F, Briand L. Automated, cost-effective, and update-driven app testing [J], ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2022, 31(4):1–51.Automator[EB/OL], https://developer.android.com/training/testing/ui-automator, 2020-3.Ngo CDPastoreFBriandL.Automated, cost-effective, and update-driven app testing [J], , 2022, 31(4):1–51.Search in Google Scholar
Gu T, Sun C, Ma X, et al. Practical GUI testing of Android applications via model abstraction and refinement[C]//2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE, 2019: 269–280.GuTSunCMaXPractical GUI testing of Android applications via model abstraction and refinement[C]//. IEEE, 2019: 269–280.Search in Google Scholar
Ghorbani N, Jabbarvand R, Salehnamadi N, et al. DeltaDroid: Dynamic Delivery Testing in Android [J]. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2022.GhorbaniNJabbarvandRSalehnamadiNDeltaDroid: Dynamic Delivery Testing in Android [J]. , 2022.Search in Google Scholar
Hasan H, Ladani B T, Zamani B. MEGDroid: A model-driven event generation framework for dynamic android malware analysis [J]. Information and Software Technology, 2021, 135:106569.HasanHLadani BTZamaniB.MEGDroid: A model-driven event generation framework for dynamic android malware analysis [J]. , 2021, 135:106569.Search in Google Scholar
Pan M, Lu Y, Pei Y, et al. Effective testing of Android apps using extended IFML models [J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2020, 159:110433.PanMLuYPeiYEffective testing of Android apps using extended IFML models [J]. , 2020, 159:110433.Search in Google Scholar
Perera A, Aleti A, Böhme M, et al. Defect prediction guided search-based software testing[C]//2020 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE). IEEE, 2020:448–460.PereraAAletiABöhmeMDefect prediction guided search-based software testing[C]//. IEEE, 2020:448–460.Search in Google Scholar
Su T, Meng G, Chen Y, et al. Guided, stochastic model-based GUI testing of Android apps [C]//Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering. 2017:245–256.SuTMengGChenYGuided, stochastic model-based GUI testing of Android apps [C]//. 2017:245–256.Search in Google Scholar
Zhong B, Wu H, Li H, et al. A scientometric analysis and critical review of construction related ontology research [J]. Automation in Construction, 2019, 101:17–31.ZhongBWuHLiHA scientometric analysis and critical review of construction related ontology research [J]. , 2019, 101:17–31.Search in Google Scholar
Web Ontology Language (OWL)[EB/OL]. https://www.w3.org/OWL, 2012-12/2022-9.. https://www.w3.org/OWL, 2012-12/2022-9.Search in Google Scholar
Li Y, Yang Z, Guo Y, et al. Humanoid: a deep learning-based approach to automated black-box Android app testing [C]//2019 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE). IEEE, 2019:1070–1073.LiYYangZGuoYHumanoid: a deep learning-based approach to automated black-box Android app testing [C]//. IEEE, 2019:1070–1073.Search in Google Scholar
Wu X, Sahoo D, Hoi S C H. Recent advances in deep learning for object detection [J]. Neurocomputing, 2020, 396:39–64.WuXSahooDHoiS C H.Recent advances in deep learning for object detection [J]. , 2020, 396:39–64.Search in Google Scholar
Deka B, Huang Z, Franzen C, et al. Rico: A mobile app dataset for buildingDekaBHuangZFranzenCSearch in Google Scholar
Data-driven design applications [C]//Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 2017:845–854.Data-driven design applications [C]//. 2017:845–854.Search in Google Scholar
Ioffe S, Szegedy C. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift [C]//International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2015:448–456.IoffeSSzegedyC.Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift [C]//. PMLR, 2015:448–456.Search in Google Scholar