À propos de cet article
Publié en ligne: 16 août 2023
Pages: 46 - 53
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijanmc-2023-0055
Mots clés
© 2023 Jieyi Lv et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Ablation experiment
No | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
Yes | No | Yes | Yes | |
No | No | Yes | Yes | |
Yes | Yes | No | Yes | |
Yes | Yes | Yes | No | |
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Adaptation Algorithm on Unpaired Data
Paired synthetic data: Sp; |
Batch sizes for Su and Sp : x and y; |
Indicator function: Sm. |
1. Load the pretrained models P and u; |
2. while not convergent do |
3. Sample unlabeled data {xi} from SU; |
4. Sample labeled data {(xi, yi)} from SP; |
5. // Update the primal mode |
6. Update P by minimizing the objective: |
7.
|
8. // Update the dual model |
9. Update D by minimizing the objective: |
10.
|
11. END |
Comparison of algorithms for different data sets
32.40/0.9589 | 31.32/0.9521 | 32.87/0.9563 | |
33.36/0.9460 | 33.78/0.9366 | 33.57/0.9423 | |
33.57/0.9432 | 33.99/0.9419 | 33.66/0.9410 | |
34.12/0.9439 | 34.26/0.9412 | 34.23/0.9356 | |
34.26/0.9356 | 34.89/0.9256 | 34.56/0.9246 | |
34.12/0.9326 | 34.56/0.9247 | 34.57/0.9232 |