[
MALFITANO, Chiara; POLLICINO, Oreste. Two Courts, two Languages? The Taricco Saga Ends on a Worrying Note. Verfassungsblog, 5 June 2018. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/two-courts-two-languages-the-taricco-saga-ends-on-a-worrying-note/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BECK, Gunnar. The Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU. Hart Publishing, 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BOBEK, Michal. Why There is no Principle of ‘Procedural Autonomy’ of the Member States. In: MICKLITZ, Hans-Wolfgang; DE WITTE, Bruno (eds.). The European Court of Justice and Autonomy of the Member States, 2011, Intersentia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BONELLI, Mateo. The Taricco saga and the consolidation of judicial dialogue in the European Union: CJEU, C-105/14 Ivo Taricco and others, ECLI:EU:C:2015:555; and C-42/17 M.A.S., M.B., ECLI:EU:C:2017:936 Italian Constitutional Court, Order no. 24/2017. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2018, Vol. 25(3), pp. 357–373.10.1177/1023263X18773046
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DE BÚRCA, Gráinne. After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: The Court of Justice as a Human Rights Adjudicator? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2013, Vol. 20.10.1177/1023263X1302000202
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CLAES, Monica. Negotiating Constitutional Identity or Whose Identity Is It Anyway? In: CLAES, Monica; DE VISSER, Maartje; POPELIER, Patricia; VAN DE HEYNING, Catherine (eds). Constitutional Conversations in Europe – Actors, Topics and Procedures, Intersentia Publishing Ltd, 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CLOOTS, Elke. National Identity, Constitutional Identity and Sovereignty in the EU. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 2016, Vol. 45, Issue 2.10.5553/NJLP/.000049
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CONWAY, Gerard. The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice, Cambridge University Press, 2012.10.1017/CBO9780511735929
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CONWAY, Gerard. The Quality of Decision-Making at the Court of Justice of the European Union. In: BENCZE, Mátyás and YEIN, Ng Gar (eds.). How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning, Springer, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6_14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FARAGUNA, Pietro. A Living Constitutional Identity: The Contribution of Non-Judicial Actors. Jean Monnet Working Paper no 10/15, 2015.10.2139/ssrn.2688667
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FARAGUNA, Pietro. Taking Constitutional Identities away from the Court. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 2016, Vol. 41, No. 2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FARAGUNA, Pietro. Constitutional Identity in the EU— A Shield or a Sword? German Law Journal, 2017, Vol. 18, Issue 7, pp. 1618–1631.10.1017/S207183220002246X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GIUFRIDDA, Fabio. Taricco principles beyond Taricco: Some thoughts on three pending cases (Scialdone, Kolev and Menci). New Journal of European Criminal law, 2018, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp. 31–37.10.1177/2032284418761068
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HORSLEY, Thomas. The Court of Justice of the European Union as an Institutional Actor: Judicial Lawmaking and its Limits. Cambridge University Press, 2018.10.1017/9781316403792
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JAKAB, András; DYEVRE, Arthur; ITZCOVICH, Giulio. Comparative Constitutional Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, 201710.1017/9781316084281
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KRAJEWSKI, Michal. A Way Out for the ECJ in Taricco II: Constitutional Identity or a More Careful Proportionality Analysis? European Law Blog [online], 2017. Available at: https://europeanlawblog.eu/2017/11/23/a-way-out-for-the-ecj-in-taricco-ii-constitutional-identity-or-a-more-careful-proportionality-analysis/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KONSTADINIDES, Theodore. The Constitutionalisation of National Identity in EU Law and its Implications. 2013. [online]. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2318972.10.2139/ssrn.2318972
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LENAERTS, Koen. Court’s Outer and Inner Selves. In: ADAMS, Maurice, et al. Judging Europe’s Judges: The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LENAERTS, Koen; MASELIS, Ignace; GUTMAN, Kathleen. EU Proceudral Law. Oxford University Press, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MILLET, François-Xavier. L’Union européenne et l’identité constitutionelle des États membres. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2012, Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 498–505.10.1093/icon/mou037
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PENINGS, Frans. The Cross-Border Health Care Directive: More Free Movement for Citizens and More Coherent EU Law. European Journal of Social Security, 2011, Vol 13, Issue 4.10.1177/138826271101300403
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PELKMANS, Jacques. Mutual Recognition in Goods and Services: An Economic Perspective. European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes, 2003, Working Paper No. 16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PORTUESE, Aurelien. Principle of Proportionality as Principle of Economic Efficiency. European Law Journal, 2013, Vol. 19, No. 5.10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00611.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SARMIENTO, Daniel. Half Case at a Time: Dealing with Judicial Minimalism at the European Court of Justice. In: CLAES, Monica; DE VISSER, Maartje; POPELIER, Patricia; VAN DE HEYNING, Catherine (eds). Constitutional Conversations in Europe – Actors, Topics and Procedures, Intersentia Publishing Ltd, 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SANKARI, Suvi. European Court of Justice Legal Reasoning in Context. European Law publishing, 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SMITH, Tara. Reckless Caution: The Perils of Judicial Minimalism. New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2010, Vol. 5, No. 347.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SUNSTEIN, Cass Robert. Beyond Judicial Minimalism. Tulsa Law Review, 2008, Volume 43, Issue 3.10.2139/ssrn.1274200
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SUNSTEIN, Cass Robert. One case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Harvard University Press, 1999.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ŠADL, Urška. Case – Case-Law – Law: Ruiz Zambrano as an Illustration of How the Court of Justice of the European Union Constructs Its Legal Arguments. European Constitutional Law Review, 2013, Vol. 9, pp. 205–229.10.1017/S1574019612001125
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VON BOGDANDY, Armin; SCHILL, Stephan. Overcoming Absolute primacy: Respect for National Identity under the Lisbon Treaty. Common Market Law Review, 2011, Vol. 48, Issue 5.10.54648/COLA2011057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
YOUNG, Alison; DE BÚRCA, Gráinne. “Proportionality” In: VOGENAUER, Stefan. and WEATHERILL, Steven (eds.). General Principles of EU Law: European and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZUCCA, Lorenzo. A Secular Europe: Law and Religion in the European Constitutional Landscape. Oxford University Press, 2012.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592784.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
