[
BESSELINK, Leonard F. M. A Composite European Constitution/Een Samengestelde Europese Constitutie. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BESSELINK, Leonard F. M. The Member States, the National Constitutions and the Scope of the Charter. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2001, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 68–80.10.1177/1023263X0100800105
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VAN BOCKEL, Bas. The Ne Bis In Idem Principle in EU Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
C-486/14 Kossowski, 29 June 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
C-129/14 PPU Spasic, 27 May 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
C-617/10 Akerberg Fransson, 26 February 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
C-298/07 Bourquain, 11 December 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Joined Cases C-187/01 and C-385/01 Gözütok and Brügge, 11 February 2003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
C-4/73 Nold vs. Commission of the European Communities, 14 May 1974.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
C-11/70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft, 17 December 1970.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
C-29/69 Stauder vs. City of Ulm, 12 November 1969.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CHALMERS, Damian, DAVIES, Gareth, MONTI, Giorgio. European Union Law: Text and Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.10.1017/9781108654173
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Commission of the European Communities. 2015. Green Paper on Conflicts of Jurisdiction and the Principle of ne bis in idem in Criminal Proceedings, Brussels, 23.12.2005 COM (2005) 696 final.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Commission Memorandum. 1979. Accession of the European Communities to the European Convention on Human Rights, Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 2/79.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Commission Memorandum. 1976. The Protection of Fundamental Rights as Community Law is Created and Developed, Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 5/76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DOUGLAS-SCOTT, Sionaidh. Constitutional Law of the European Union. Essex: Pearson, 2002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ECKES, Christina, KONSTADINIDES, Theodore. Crime within the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: a European Public Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.10.1017/CBO9780511751219
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GROUSSOT, Xavier, AROLD LORENZ, Nina-Louisa, PETURSSON, Gunnar Thor. The Paradox of Human Rights Protection in Europe: Two Courts, One Goal? In ARNARDOTTIR, Oddny Mjoll, BUYSE, Antoine (eds.) Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU and National Legal Orders. London: Routledge, 2016.10.4324/9781315651125-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LASAGNI, Giulia, MIRANDOLA, Sofia. The European ne bis in idem at the Crossroads of Administrative and Criminal Law. Eucrim, 2019, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 126–135.10.30709/eucrim-2019-009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LELIEUR, Juliette. “Transnationalising” Ne Bis In Idem: How the Rule of Ne Bis In Idem Reveals the Principle of Personal Legal Certainty. Utrecht Law Review, 2013, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 198–210.10.18352/ulr.250
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LUCHTMAN, Michiel. The ECJ’s Recent Case Law on Ne Bis in Idem: Implications for Law Enforcement in a Shared Legal Order. Common Market Law Review, 2018, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1717–1750.10.54648/COLA2018143
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MITSILEGAS, Valsamis, GIUFFRIDA, Fabio. Ne Bis in Idem. In SICURELLA, Rosaria, MITSILEGAS, Valsamis, PARIZOT, Raphaele, LUCIFORA, Annalisa (eds.) General Principles for a Common Criminal Law Framework in the EU: A Guide for Legal Practitioners. Milano: Giuffre Editore, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MITSILEGAS, Valsamis. EU Criminal Law after Lisbon: Rights, Trust and the Transformation of Justice in Europe. Oxford – Portland: Hart Publishing, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MUNIVRANA VAJDA, Maja. The Trust is not Blind – Reviewing the Idea of Mutual Trust in the EU in the Context of Conflicts of Jurisdiction and Ne Bis in Idem Principle. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series, 2018, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 323–337.10.25234/eclic/7115
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PEERS, Steve, PRECHAL Sacha. Article 52 – Scope and Interpretation of Rights and Principles. In PEERS, Steve, HERVEY, Tamara, KENNER, Jeff, WARD, Angela (eds.) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: a Commentary. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014.10.5771/9783845259055
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PERNICE, Ingolf. The Treaty of Lisbon and Fundamental Rights. In GRILLER, Stefan, ZILLER, Jacques (eds.) The Lisbon Treaty: EU Constitutionalism without a Constitutional Treaty? Wien – New York: Springer, 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REDING, Viviane. On Substantive Criminal Law of the European Union. In KLIP, Andre (ed.) Substantive Criminal Law of the European Union. Antwepren – Apeldoorn – Portland: Maklu Publishers, 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROSANO, Alessandro. Ne Bis Interpretatio In Idem? The Two Faces of the Ne Bis In Idem Principle in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice. German Law Journal, 2017, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–58.10.1017/S2071832200021866
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SIMONATO, Michele. Ne bis in idem in the EU: Two Important Questions for the CJEU (Opinion of the AG in C-486/14 Kussowski). [online]. Available: <https://european-lawblog.eu/2016/01/12/ne-bis-in-idem-in-the-eu-two-important-questions-for-thecjeu-opinion-of-ag-in-c-48614-kussowski/> Accessed 25.03.2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TUORI, Kaarlo. European Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.10.1017/CBO9781316091883
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VERVAELE, John. Schengen and Charter-related ne bis in idem protection in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: M and Zoran Spasic. Common Market Law Review, 2015, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1339–1360.10.54648/COLA2015106
]Search in Google Scholar
