<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The International Criminal Court is a very controversial institution. It is extensively criticised by both its critics and its supporters. This article examines what steps have been taken to reform the Court. It considers issues such as the need for better communications and messaging by the Court. The paper takes up how and why the Court needs to engage better and in more far-reaching ways with a host of role players that affect the terrain in which the Court operates. It is argued that more reform is needed in how the Court is lead, how it operates, and who the judges and staff are. It is argued that greater diversity is needed at the Court. Also taken up are how the reach of the Court can be increased beyond only prosecutions, how the Court can assist states to prosecute more cases themselves, and how the Court can become more victim centred. A core theme is how state cooperation can be enhanced. A range of suggestions are made so as to enhance the role of the Court in the years to come.</p>
</abstract>

The International Criminal Court is a very controversial institution. It is extensively criticised by both its critics and its supporters. This article examines what steps have been taken to reform the Court. It considers issues such as the need for better communications and messaging by the Court. The paper takes up how and why the Court needs to engage better and in more far-reaching ways with a host of role players that affect the terrain in which the Court operates. It is argued that more reform is needed in how the Court is lead, how it operates, and who the judges and staff are. It is argued that greater diversity is needed at the Court. Also taken up are how the reach of the Court can be increased beyond only prosecutions, how the Court can assist states to prosecute more cases themselves, and how the Court can become more victim centred. A core theme is how state cooperation can be enhanced. A range of suggestions are made so as to enhance the role of the Court in the years to come.

Reforming the International Criminal Court (ICC): Progress, Perils and Pitfalls Post the ICC Review Process

Professor, NOVA University of Lisbon Law School

Research Fellow, Department of Criminology

International and Comparative Law Review

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

The International Criminal Court is a very controversial institution. It is extensively criticised by both its critics and its supporters. This article...

Reforming the International Criminal Court (ICC): Progress, Perils and Pitfalls Post the ICC Review Process

Publié en ligne: 19 août 2021

Pages: 7 - 42

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0001

Mots clés
International Criminal Court, International Criminal Justice, Criticisms, Reforms, Human Rights Violations, Impunity, Deterrence, ICC Review Process, Crime of Aggression, United Nations Security Council

© 2021 Jeremy Julian Sarkin, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Reforming the International Criminal Court (ICC): Progress, Perils and Pitfalls Post the ICC Review Process

Publié en ligne: 19 août 2021

Pages: 7 - 42

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0001

Mots clésInternational Criminal Court, International Criminal Justice, Criticisms, Reforms, Human Rights Violations, Impunity, Deterrence, ICC Review Process, Crime of Aggression, United Nations Security Council

© 2021 Jeremy Julian Sarkin, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Mots clés
International Criminal Court, International Criminal Justice, Criticisms, Reforms, Human Rights Violations, Impunity, Deterrence, ICC Review Process, Crime of Aggression, United Nations Security Council