[BERGQVIST, Trine Osen. The winner does not take it all. Swedish Court of Appeal says co-operation between competing bidders is not restrictive by object. European Competition Law Review, 2019, no 4, p. 141]Search in Google Scholar
[ESTACHE, Antonio, IIMI, Atsushi. Procurement Efficiency for Infrastructure Development and Financial Needs Reassessed. [online]. Available at: <http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-9450-4662> Accessed 1 November 2019]Search in Google Scholar
[HERRERA ANCHUSTEGUI, Ignacio. Joint Bidding and Object Restrictions of Competition: The EFTA Court’s Take in the Taxi Case. European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, 2017, no 2, p. 17810.21552/core/2017/2/14]Search in Google Scholar
[GIANNINO. Michele. The Regional Administrative Court of Lazio confirms that bid-rigging is a competition restriction by object (Eco Trass). [online]. Available at: <https://www.concurrences.com/en/bulletin/news-issues/november-2015/The-Regional-Administrative-Court-77571> Accessed 1 November 2019]Search in Google Scholar
[KJAER-HANSEN, Erik., ALSING, Josephine. Danish Court: Consortium Agreement and Joint Bidding Permissible under Competition Law. Journal of Competition Law & Practice, 2019, no 4, p. 24110.1093/jeclap/lpz004]Search in Google Scholar
[MACMAHON BALDWIN, Sam. Danish Court Quashes Landmark Joint Bidding Decision – Legal and Economic Context Saves the Day. [online]. Available at: <http://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2018/08/29/danish-court-quashes-landmark-joint-bidding-decision-legal-economic-context-saves-day/> Accessed 1 November 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[MERLINO, Pietro. Italy Team Convinces Italian Authority to Close Investigation. [online]. Available at: <https://www.orrick.com/en/News/2019/01/Italy-Team-Convinces-Competition-Authority-to-Close-Investigation> Accessed 1 November 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[RICHARDS, Matt. Italy drops pharma bidding probe [online]. Available at: <https://globalcompetitionreview.com/article/1178862/italy-drops-pharma-bidding-probe> Accessed 1 November 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[RICHARDS, Matt. Temporary unions are not a per se cartel, Spanish court rules. [online]. Available at: <https://globalcompetitionreview.com/article/1174928/temporary-unions-are-not-a-per-se-cartel-spanish-court-rules> Accessed 1 November 2019]Search in Google Scholar
[RITTER, Cyril. Joint Tendering Under EU Competition Law [online]. Available at: <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2909572 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2909572> Accessed 1 November 2019]Search in Google Scholar
[SÁNCHEZ GRAELLS, Albert. Public Procurement and the EU Competition Rules. Second Edition. Oxford: Bloomsbury, 2015, 624 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[THOMAS, Christopher. Two Bids or not to Bid? An Exploration of the Legality of Joint Bidding and Subcontracting Under EU Competition Law. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2015, no 9, p. 63410.1093/jeclap/lpv016]Search in Google Scholar
[VOLPIN, Cristina. The ball is in your court: Evidential burden of proof and the proof-proximity principle in EU competition law. Common Market Law Review, 2014, no 4, p. 115910.54648/COLA2014089]Search in Google Scholar