[ASCHAUER, Christian. Die Besetzung von Schiedsgerichten zwischen Parteiautonomie und Rechtsstaatlichkeit. Austrian Law Journal, 2016, No. 1, pp. 102-108.]Search in Google Scholar
[BIGHAM, Tom. The Business of Judging. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 434 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[BORALESSA, Anoosha. The Limitations of Party Autonomy in ICSID Arbitration. American Review of International Arbitration, 2004, Vol. 15, No. 2, 58 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[BRUCE, Fiona. Case Comment: Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC v AES Ust- Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP [2013] UKSC 35 [online]. ukscblog.com, 30 July 2013 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://ukscblog.com/case-comment-ustkamenogorsk-hydropower-plant-jsc-v-aes-ust-kamenogorsk-hydropower-plant-llp-2013-uksc-35>.]Search in Google Scholar
[CARBONNEAU, Thomas E. The Exercise of Contract Freedom in Making of Arbitration Agreements. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2003, Vol. 36, pp. 1189-1232.]Search in Google Scholar
[COLLINS, Lawrence (ed.). Dicey, Morris and Collins on The Conflict of Laws, vol 2. 14th edition. London: Sweet&Maxwell, 2010. 1950 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[DONAHEY, M. Scott. The Independence and Neutrality of Arbitrators. Journal of International Arbitration, 1992, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 31-42.10.54648/JOIA1992033]Search in Google Scholar
[English Arbitration Act.]Search in Google Scholar
[GOTTWALD, Peter, HESS, Burkhard (eds.). Procedural Justice XIV, IAPL World Congress Heidelberg, 2011. Bielfeld: Gieseking-Verlag, 2014. 721 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[HOFFMANN, Leonard. Changing Perspectives on Civil Litigation. The Modern Law Review, 1993, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 297-306.10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb02674.x]Search in Google Scholar
[HOUSE OF LORDS. Judgments - Magill v. Porter Magill v. Weeks [online]. publications. parliament.uk, 13 December 2001 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd011213/magill-1.htm>.]Search in Google Scholar
[HRNČIŘÍKOVÁ, Miluše, VALENTOVÁ, Lucia. Judiciální trendy v mimosoudním řešení přeshraničních sporů. (Judicial Trends in the Out-of-Court Settlements of Cross-border Disputes.) 1st edition. Prague: Leges, 2016. 176 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHATTERJEE, C. The Reality of The Party Autonomy Rule In International Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 2003, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 539 - 560.10.54648/JOIA2003046]Search in Google Scholar
[CHUKWUMERIJE, Okezie. Choice of Law in International Commercial Arbitration. Quorum Books, 1994. 218 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION. International Dispute Resolution Procedures (Including Mediation and Arbitration Rules): English [online]. icdr.org, 1 July 2016 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <https://www.icdr.org/icdr/faces/i_search/i_rule/i_rule_detail?doc=ADRSTAGE2025301&_afrLoop=163277989018227&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=1a4w45rk1n_161#%40%3F_afrWindowId%3D1a4w45rk1n_161%26_afrLoop%3D163277989018227%26doc%3DADRSTAGE2025301%26_afrWindowMode%3D0%26_adf.ctrlstate%3D1a4w45rk1n_221>.]Search in Google Scholar
[INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. Arbitration Rules [online]. iccwbo. org, 1 March 2017 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-of-arbitration/>.]Search in Google Scholar
[MUSTILL, Michael John. Comments and Conclusions. In Conservatory Provisional Measures in international Arbitration, 9. Joint Colloquim. ICC Publication, 1993, p. 118.]Search in Google Scholar
[ONYEMA, Emilia. Selection of Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration. International Arbitration Law Review, 2005, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 45-54.]Search in Google Scholar
[PARK, William. Arbitrators and Accuracy. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2010, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 25-53.10.1093/jnlids/idp004]Search in Google Scholar
[REDFERN, Alan, HUNTER, Martin. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, Student Version. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 727 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Court of Appeal from 13 December 2001, Magill v. Porter v. Weeks, [2001] UKLH 67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Court of Appeal from 3 November 1999, Peh Teck Quee v Bayerische Landesbank Girozentrale, [2000] 1 SLR 148; [1999] SGCA 79.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Court of Appeal, Smith v Kvaerner Cementation Foundations Ltd, 2006, EWCA civ. 242.]Search in Google Scholar
[Decision Laker Airways Inc. V. FLS Aerospace Ltd, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the US Supreme Court from 6 March 1995, Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 514 U.S. 52 (1995).]Search in Google Scholar
[SOBICH, Phillip. Die Civil Procedure Rules 1999 - Zivilprozessrecht in England. Juristen Zeitung, 1999, pp. 775 - 780.]Search in Google Scholar
[The 1996 DAC Report on the English Arbitration Bill: The Last Part. Arbitration International, 1999, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 413-433.10.1093/arbitration/15.4.413]Search in Google Scholar
[THOMSON REUTERS PRACTICAL LAW. DAC Report on Arbitration Bill 1996 [online]. uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com, 1996 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-004-4914?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1>.]Search in Google Scholar
[TUFTE-KRISTENSEN, Johan. The Unilateral Appointment of Co-arbitrators. Arbitration International, 2016, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 483-503.10.1093/arbint/aiw024]Search in Google Scholar
[TWEEDDALE, Andrew, TWEEDDALE, Keren. Arbitration of Commercial Disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 1010 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards concluded on June 10, 1958; order of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs No. 74/1959 Coll., the New York Arbitration Convention.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNCITRAL. UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules [online]. uncitral.org, 2017 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules-2013/UNCITRAL-Arbitration-Rules-2013-e.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNCITRAL. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 [online]. uncitral.org, 1985 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/06-54671_Ebook.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNCITRAL. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with amendments as adopted in 2006 [online]. uncitral.org, 2008 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at < http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/07-86998_Ebook.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[VIENNA INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE. Wiener Regeln [online]. viac. eu, 1 June 2013 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://www.viac.eu/de/schiedsverfahren/wiener-regeln>.]Search in Google Scholar
[WERNER, Jacques. Intellectual Property Disputes and Arbitration - A Comment on a Recent ICC Report. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 1998, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 841-886.10.1111/j.1747-1796.1998.tb00039.x]Search in Google Scholar