Party Autonomy in the Procedure of Appointing Arbitrators

ASCHAUER, Christian. Die Besetzung von Schiedsgerichten zwischen Parteiautonomie und Rechtsstaatlichkeit. Austrian Law Journal, 2016, No. 1, pp. 102-108.Search in Google Scholar

BIGHAM, Tom. The Business of Judging. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 434 p.Search in Google Scholar

BORALESSA, Anoosha. The Limitations of Party Autonomy in ICSID Arbitration. American Review of International Arbitration, 2004, Vol. 15, No. 2, 58 p.Search in Google Scholar

BRUCE, Fiona. Case Comment: Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC v AES Ust- Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP [2013] UKSC 35 [online]. ukscblog.com, 30 July 2013 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://ukscblog.com/case-comment-ustkamenogorsk-hydropower-plant-jsc-v-aes-ust-kamenogorsk-hydropower-plant-llp-2013-uksc-35>.Search in Google Scholar

CARBONNEAU, Thomas E. The Exercise of Contract Freedom in Making of Arbitration Agreements. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2003, Vol. 36, pp. 1189-1232.Search in Google Scholar

COLLINS, Lawrence (ed.). Dicey, Morris and Collins on The Conflict of Laws, vol 2. 14th edition. London: Sweet&Maxwell, 2010. 1950 p.Search in Google Scholar

DONAHEY, M. Scott. The Independence and Neutrality of Arbitrators. Journal of International Arbitration, 1992, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 31-42.10.54648/JOIA1992033Search in Google Scholar

English Arbitration Act.Search in Google Scholar

GOTTWALD, Peter, HESS, Burkhard (eds.). Procedural Justice XIV, IAPL World Congress Heidelberg, 2011. Bielfeld: Gieseking-Verlag, 2014. 721 p.Search in Google Scholar

HOFFMANN, Leonard. Changing Perspectives on Civil Litigation. The Modern Law Review, 1993, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 297-306.10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb02674.xSearch in Google Scholar

HOUSE OF LORDS. Judgments - Magill v. Porter Magill v. Weeks [online]. publications. parliament.uk, 13 December 2001 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd011213/magill-1.htm>.Search in Google Scholar

HRNČIŘÍKOVÁ, Miluše, VALENTOVÁ, Lucia. Judiciální trendy v mimosoudním řešení přeshraničních sporů. (Judicial Trends in the Out-of-Court Settlements of Cross-border Disputes.) 1st edition. Prague: Leges, 2016. 176 p.Search in Google Scholar

CHATTERJEE, C. The Reality of The Party Autonomy Rule In International Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 2003, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 539 - 560.10.54648/JOIA2003046Search in Google Scholar

CHUKWUMERIJE, Okezie. Choice of Law in International Commercial Arbitration. Quorum Books, 1994. 218 p.Search in Google Scholar

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION. International Dispute Resolution Procedures (Including Mediation and Arbitration Rules): English [online]. icdr.org, 1 July 2016 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <https://www.icdr.org/icdr/faces/i_search/i_rule/i_rule_detail?doc=ADRSTAGE2025301&_afrLoop=163277989018227&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=1a4w45rk1n_161#%40%3F_afrWindowId%3D1a4w45rk1n_161%26_afrLoop%3D163277989018227%26doc%3DADRSTAGE2025301%26_afrWindowMode%3D0%26_adf.ctrlstate%3D1a4w45rk1n_221>.Search in Google Scholar

INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. Arbitration Rules [online]. iccwbo. org, 1 March 2017 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-of-arbitration/>.Search in Google Scholar

MUSTILL, Michael John. Comments and Conclusions. In Conservatory Provisional Measures in international Arbitration, 9. Joint Colloquim. ICC Publication, 1993, p. 118.Search in Google Scholar

ONYEMA, Emilia. Selection of Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration. International Arbitration Law Review, 2005, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 45-54.Search in Google Scholar

PARK, William. Arbitrators and Accuracy. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2010, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 25-53.10.1093/jnlids/idp004Search in Google Scholar

REDFERN, Alan, HUNTER, Martin. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, Student Version. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 727 p.Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Appeal from 13 December 2001, Magill v. Porter v. Weeks, [2001] UKLH 67.Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Appeal from 3 November 1999, Peh Teck Quee v Bayerische Landesbank Girozentrale, [2000] 1 SLR 148; [1999] SGCA 79.Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Appeal, Smith v Kvaerner Cementation Foundations Ltd, 2006, EWCA civ. 242.Search in Google Scholar

Decision Laker Airways Inc. V. FLS Aerospace Ltd, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the US Supreme Court from 6 March 1995, Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 514 U.S. 52 (1995).Search in Google Scholar

SOBICH, Phillip. Die Civil Procedure Rules 1999 - Zivilprozessrecht in England. Juristen Zeitung, 1999, pp. 775 - 780.Search in Google Scholar

The 1996 DAC Report on the English Arbitration Bill: The Last Part. Arbitration International, 1999, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 413-433.10.1093/arbitration/15.4.413Search in Google Scholar

THOMSON REUTERS PRACTICAL LAW. DAC Report on Arbitration Bill 1996 [online]. uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com, 1996 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-004-4914?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1>.Search in Google Scholar

TUFTE-KRISTENSEN, Johan. The Unilateral Appointment of Co-arbitrators. Arbitration International, 2016, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 483-503.10.1093/arbint/aiw024Search in Google Scholar

TWEEDDALE, Andrew, TWEEDDALE, Keren. Arbitration of Commercial Disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 1010 p.Search in Google Scholar

The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards concluded on June 10, 1958; order of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs No. 74/1959 Coll., the New York Arbitration Convention.Search in Google Scholar

UNCITRAL. UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules [online]. uncitral.org, 2017 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules-2013/UNCITRAL-Arbitration-Rules-2013-e.pdf>.Search in Google Scholar

UNCITRAL. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 [online]. uncitral.org, 1985 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/06-54671_Ebook.pdf>.Search in Google Scholar

UNCITRAL. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with amendments as adopted in 2006 [online]. uncitral.org, 2008 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at < http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/07-86998_Ebook.pdf>.Search in Google Scholar

VIENNA INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE. Wiener Regeln [online]. viac. eu, 1 June 2013 [cit. 1 July 2017]. Accessible at <http://www.viac.eu/de/schiedsverfahren/wiener-regeln>.Search in Google Scholar

WERNER, Jacques. Intellectual Property Disputes and Arbitration - A Comment on a Recent ICC Report. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 1998, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 841-886.10.1111/j.1747-1796.1998.tb00039.xSearch in Google Scholar