[
Agamben, G. (2019). Creation and anarchy. The Work of Art and the Religion of Capitalism. Stanford University Press, California.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Airoldi, M. (2024). Machine Habitus. Sociologia degli algoritmi. Luiss University Press, Roma.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bailey D, Almusharraf N, ed (2021). Investigating the Effect of Chatbot-to-User Questions and Directives on Student Participation. 2021 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics (CAIDA).[PMCID: PMC8712626]. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIDA51941.2021.9425208
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benjamin, W. (2022; first version 1939). The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility. Translated by Kolio Koev. Sofia: Critique and Humanism.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boden, M. A. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Born, G., & Haworth, C. (2018). From Microsound to Vaporwave: Internet-Mediated Musics, Online Methods, and Genre. Music and Letters, 98(4), 601-647.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourdieu, P. (2003, ed or. 1972). Per una teoria della pratica. In P. Bourdieu, Per una teoria della pratica, con tre studi di etnologia cabila (pp. 175-316). Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruner, J. S. (1962). On Knowing. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Capron Puozzo, I. (2016). Créativité et apprentissage: un mariage prometteur. Pedagogia PIU didattica. Teorie e pratiche educative, 2(1), 1–12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, N., Roberts, I., & Watumull, J. (2023). The false promise of ChatGPT. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/opinion/noam-chomsky-chatgpt-ai.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corapi, P. (2002). Il linguaggio dell’arte in E.H. Gombrich. ITINERA – Rivista di Filosofia e di Teoria delle Arti e della Letteratura, Dipartimento di Filosofia dell’Università degli Studi di Milano. Online: http://filosofia.dipafilo.unimi.it/itinera/mat/saggi/corapip_gombrich.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258-267.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Collins Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dai, Y., Chai. C-S., Lin, P-Y., Jong MS-Y, Guo Y, Qin J.(2020). Promoting Students’ Well-Being by Developing Their Readiness for the Artificial Intelligence Age. Sustainability. Vol. 12(16):6597. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166597
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deng X, Yu Z. A (2023). Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Effect of Chatbot Technology Use in Sustainable Education. Sustainability. Vol. 15(4):2940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042940
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eco, U. (1984). Semiotica e filosofia del linguaggio. Torino: Einaudi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eco, U. (1990). I limiti dell’interpretazione. Milano: Bompiani.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elgammal, A. & Liu, B. & Elhoseiny, M. & Mazzone, M. (2017). CAN: Creative Adversarial Networks, Generating “Art” by Learning About Styles and Deviating from Style Norms.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Floridi, L. (2022). Etica dell’intelligenza artificiale: Sviluppi, opportunità, sfide. Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69-81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glăveanu, V. P., & Lebuda, I. (2019). Re/searching the social in creativity: Methods, studies, and reflections. Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gombrich, E. H. (1950). The story of art. London: Phaidon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haraway, D. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hertzmann, A. (2018). Can computers create art? Arts, 7(2), 18. Basel: MDPI.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jesi, F. (1973). Mito. Milano: ISEDI.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kraus, K. (1912). Pro domo et mundo. Albert Langen, Munich, Germany.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1-12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, I., Ali, S., Zhang, H., DiPaola, D., & Breazeal, C. (2021). Developing middle school students’ AI literacy. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 191-197).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marcus, G. (2018). Deep learning: A critical appraisal. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.00631.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mednick S. A. (1962). The associative basis of creativity. Psychological Review, 69:20-232.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Natale, S. & Ballatore, A. (2020). Imagining the thinking machine: Technological myths and the rise of artificial intelligence. Convergence, 26(1), 3-18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD (2023), “Putting AI to the test: How does the performance of GPT and 15-year-old students in PISA compare?”, OECD Education Spotlights, No. 6, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/2c297e0b-en.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pasolini, P. P. (1975). Scritti corsari. Garzanti.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., & Chen, M. (2022). Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with CLIP latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogers, C. R. (1954). Towards a theory of creativity. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 11, 249–260.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seaver, N. (2017). Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society, 4(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T.I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity, 1, 3-15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1995). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition-Verbal Tests, Forms A and B-Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNESCO (2021). Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. Paris: UNESCO.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vygotskii L.S. (1986) Psychology of Creativity, Moscow (in russian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weber, M. (1919, ed it. 1997). Wissenschaft als Beruf, München 1919, ed. it. La scienza come professione, Milano, Rusconi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhu, J., Shen, Y., Zhao, D., & Zhou, B. (2020). In-domain GAN inversion for real image editing. In European Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 592-608). Cham: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
