<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>This paper, which covers the period of the 2004 Annan Plan and its rejection to date, places the Cyprus Problem in an International Relations theoretic framework. It searches for a “foreign policy outcome,” essentially a decision by the leaders of the Greek-Cypriot and Turkish-Cypriot communities, to politically reunite these two communities under the auspices of the UN. The paper provides a synthesis of the neo-liberal and the neoclassical realist paradigms, aiming to better interpret the existing experience and to shed light on the prospect of a future solution to the problem. The strategic environment for the Republic of Cyprus (RoC) and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) is ‘permissive’ because the message sent by the international system for reunification does not require the use of hard power. The leaders of the two communities play a key role, although the strategic political culture in small states such as the TRNC is not developed and state-society relations are underdeveloped. Also, the civil society at large can play a role in influencing the leaders' images regarding the reunification opportunity.</p>
</abstract>

This paper, which covers the period of the 2004 Annan Plan and its rejection to date, places the Cyprus Problem in an International Relations theoretic framework. It searches for a “foreign policy outcome,” essentially a decision by the leaders of the Greek-Cypriot and Turkish-Cypriot communities, to politically reunite these two communities under the auspices of the UN. The paper provides a synthesis of the neo-liberal and the neoclassical realist paradigms, aiming to better interpret the existing experience and to shed light on the prospect of a future solution to the problem. The strategic environment for the Republic of Cyprus (RoC) and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) is ‘permissive’ because the message sent by the international system for reunification does not require the use of hard power. The leaders of the two communities play a key role, although the strategic political culture in small states such as the TRNC is not developed and state-society relations are underdeveloped. Also, the civil society at large can play a role in influencing the leaders' images regarding the reunification opportunity.

A theoretical approach to the Cyprus Problem: Neoclassical Realism with Neoliberalism

Post-Doctoral Researcher - Political Science Department

Geopolitical, Social Security and Freedom Journal

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

This paper, which covers the period of the 2004 Annan Plan and its rejection to date, places the Cyprus Problem in an International Relations theoretic...

A theoretical approach to the Cyprus Problem: Neoclassical Realism with Neoliberalism

Publié en ligne: 26 oct. 2021

Pages: 50 - 59

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/gssfj-2021-0005

Mots clés
Cyprus, International Relations theories, Neo-classical Realism, Neoliberalism, Peace and Conflict Studies

© 2021 Nikos Lekakis, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

A theoretical approach to the Cyprus Problem: Neoclassical Realism with Neoliberalism

Publié en ligne: 26 oct. 2021

Pages: 50 - 59

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/gssfj-2021-0005

Mots clésCyprus, International Relations theories, Neo-classical Realism, Neoliberalism, Peace and Conflict Studies

© 2021 Nikos Lekakis, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Mots clés
Cyprus, International Relations theories, Neo-classical Realism, Neoliberalism, Peace and Conflict Studies