Analysis of Faecal pH in Piglets from Birth to Weaning

1. Baumhak, M. J., Michima, L. E. S., Andrioli, B. M., Brandi, R. A., Weigel, R. A., Belli, M. N. C. B., Siqueira, R. F., 2021: Buffering capacity and faecal pH in healthy horses submitted to experimental enteral nutrition. Semin. Cienc. Agrar., 42, 6, 3793–3802. DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6Supl2 p3793.10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6Supl2 Search in Google Scholar

2. Berg, M., Hoskin, S. O., Rogers, Ch. W., Grinberg, A., 2013: Faecal pH and microbial populations in thoroughbred horses during transition from pasture to concentrate feeding. J. Equine Vet., 33, 4, 215–222. DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.06.004.10.1016/j.jevs.2012.06.004 Search in Google Scholar

3. Bergeland, M. E., Henry, S. C., 1982: Infectious diarrhoeas of young pigs. Vet. Clin. North Am. Large Anim. Pract., 4, 2, 389–399. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-9846(17)30113-1.10.1016/S0196-9846(17)30113-171326976761948 Search in Google Scholar

4. Chiang, C. C., Croom, J., Chuang, S. T., Chiou, P. W. S., Yu, B., 2008: Development of a dynamic system simulating pig gastric digestion. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 21, 10, 1522–1528. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2008.70640.10.5713/ajas.2008.70640 Search in Google Scholar

5. Coffey, M. T., Seerley, R. W., Mabry, J. W., 1982: The effect of source of supplemental dietary energy on sows’ milk yield, milk composition and litter performance. J. Anim. Sci., 55, 1388–1394.10.2527/jas1982.5561388x7161211 Search in Google Scholar

6. Diem, K., Lentner, C., 1970: Faeces. In Scientific Tables, 7th edn., Basle, Switzerland, CIBA-GEIGY Ltd., 657–660. Search in Google Scholar

7. Fukuda, S., Toh, H., Hase, K., Oshima, K., Nakanishi, Y., Yoshimura, K., et al., 2011: Bifidobacteria can protect from enteropathogenic infection through production of acetate. Nature, 469, 543–547.10.1038/nature0964621270894 Search in Google Scholar

8. Hydock, K. L., Nissley, S. G., Staniar, W. B., 2014: A standard protocol for faecal pH measurement in the horse. Prof. Anim. Sci., 30, 6, 643–648. DOI: 10.15232/pas. 2014-01346. Search in Google Scholar

9. Kasırga, E., 2019: The importance of stool tests in diagnosis and follow-up of gastrointestinal disorders in children. Turk. Pediatri. Ars., 25, 54, 3, 141–148. DOI: 10.14744/TurkPedia triArs.2018.00483. Search in Google Scholar

10. Kent, J. C., Arthur, P. G., Hartmann, P. E., 1998: Citrate, calcium, phosphate and magnesium in sows’ milk at initiation of lactation. J. Dairy Res., 65, 55–68.10.1017/S0022029997002574 Search in Google Scholar

11. Kim, Y. Y., Kil, D. Y., Oh, H. K., Han, I. K., 2005: Acidifier as an alternative material to antibiotics in animal feed. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 18, 1048–1060.10.5713/ajas.2005.1048 Search in Google Scholar

12. Maes, D., Chantziaras, I., Vallaey, E., Demeyere, K., Meyer, E., Janssens, G. P. J., 2021: Faecal pH throughout the reproductive cycle of sows in commercial pig herds. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl.), 105, 4, 687‒692. DOI: 10.1111/jpn.13370.10.1111/jpn.1337032306451 Search in Google Scholar

13. McCormack, U., Curião, T., Wilkinson, T., Metzler-Zebeli, B., Reyer, H., Ryan, T., Lawlor, P., 2018: Faecal microbiota transplantation in gestating sows and neonatal offspring alters lifetime intestinal microbiota and growth in offspring. mSystems, 3, 3, e00134-17. DOI: 10.1128/mSystems. 00134-17. Search in Google Scholar

14. Niederwerder, M., Jaing, C., Thissen, J., Cino-Ozuna, A., McLoughlin, K., Rowland, R., 2016: Microbiome associations in pigs with the best and worst clinical outcomes following co-infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2). Vet. Microbiol., 188, 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic. 2016.03.008. Search in Google Scholar

15. Nuntapaitoon, M., Juthamanee, P., Theil, P. K., Tummaruk, P., 2020: Impact of sow parity on yield and composition of colostrum and milk in Danish Landrace × Yorkshire cross-bred sows. Prev. Vet. Med., 181, 105085.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.10508532653489 Search in Google Scholar

16. Nuntapaitoon, M., 2022: Colostrum and milk in sow. In Milk Protein ‒ New Research Approaches. IntechOpen. DOI: 10. 5772/intechopen.102890.10.5772/intechopen.102890 Search in Google Scholar

17. Osuka, A., Shimizu, K., Ogura, H., Tasaki, O., Hamasaki, T., Asahara, T., et al., 2012: Prognostic impact of faecal pH in critically ill patients. Crit. Care, 10, 16, 4, R119, DOI: 10. 1186/cc11413.10.1186/cc11413358069622776285 Search in Google Scholar

18. Quesnel, H., Farmer, C., Devillers, N., 2012: Colostrum intake: Influence on piglet performance and factors of variation. Livest. Sci., 46, 105–114.10.1016/j.livsci.2012.03.010 Search in Google Scholar

19. Quesnel, H., Farmer, C., Theil, P. K., 2015: Colostrum and milk production. In The Gestating and Lactating Sow. Wage-ningen Academic Publishers, The Netherland, 173–192.10.3920/978-90-8686-803-2_8 Search in Google Scholar

20. Sciascia, Q. L., Daş G., Metges, C. C., 2016: Review. The pig as a model for humans: Effects of nutritional factors on intestinal function and health, J. Anim. Sci., 94, Suppl. 3, 441–452, DOI: 10.2527/jas.2015-978810.2527/jas.2015-9788 Search in Google Scholar

21. Snoeck, V., Cox, E., Verdonck, F., Joensuu, J. J., Godde-eris, B. M., 2004: Influence of porcine intestinal pH and gastric digestion on antigenicity of F4 fimbriae for oral immunisation. Vet. Microbiol., 14, 98, 1, 45–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.vet mic.2003.10.020. Search in Google Scholar

22. Tortora, G. J., Anagnostakos, N. P., 1987: Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, 5th edn., Harper and Row Publishers., New York, 624 pp. Search in Google Scholar

23. Wen, X., Wang, L., Zheng, C., Yang, X., Ma, X., Wu, Y., Jiang, Z., 2018: Faecal scores and microbial metabolites in weaned piglets fed different protein sources and levels. Anim. Nutr., 4, 31–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.10.00610.1016/j.aninu.2017.10.006611236030167481 Search in Google Scholar

24. Whitehouse, C., Pagan, J. D., Coleman, R. J., 2013: Responses in faecal pH from low to high starch intakes in healthy horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci., 33, 5, 358–359.10.1016/j.jevs.2013.03.090 Search in Google Scholar

25. Yue, S., Li, Z., Hu, F., et al., 2020: Curing piglets from diarrhoea and preparation of a healthy microbiome with Bacillus treatment for industrial animal breeding. Sci. Rep., 10, 19476. DOI: /10.1038/s41598-020-75207-1.10.1038/s41598-020-75207-1765645633173074 Search in Google Scholar

• Synchronization of Ovulation and Timed Insemination in Lactating Dairy Cattle
• Effects of In Ovo Injection of Inorganic Salts of Zinc and Copper on Performance and Serum Biochemical Indices of Two Strains of Broiler Chickens
• Amylolytic and Cellulolytic Activities, the Digestibility of Dry Matter of Broiler Chickens After Feed Intake of Humic Substances
• Hindlimb Skeletal Morphology of the Helmeted Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagridis)
• Detection of Antibiotic Residues and Mycotoxins in Milk Using Competitive Immunochromatographic Tests
• Testing of the Efficacy of Bee Probiotic Lactobacilli Under In Vivo Conditions
• Multilocus Sequence Typing as a Useful Tool for the Study of the Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Cryptosporidium Spp.
• Molecular, Morphological and Clinical Characteristics of Spontaneous Canine Colorectal Cancer – A Review
• Efficacy of Different Methods of General Anaesthesia in Pigs and their Influence on Haematological Parameters
• Lyme Borreliosis in Dogs: Background, Epidemiology, Diagnostics, Treatment and Prevention