Accès libre

Modification of PP Fabric with Polyols by the Plasma Composite Technique

À propos de cet article

Citez

Fig. 1

Structure diagram of polyols (sorbitol, maltitol, PEG) and crosslinkers (EGDE, TTMA)
Structure diagram of polyols (sorbitol, maltitol, PEG) and crosslinkers (EGDE, TTMA)

Fig. 2

Flow chart of plasma treatment and polyol modification
Flow chart of plasma treatment and polyol modification

Fig. 3

Infrared spectra of PP before and after O2 plasma
Infrared spectra of PP before and after O2 plasma

Fig. 4

Colouring photos of PP fabric before and after O2 plasma treatment: a-c) original PP fabric, d-f) plasma (O2)-PP fabric
Colouring photos of PP fabric before and after O2 plasma treatment: a-c) original PP fabric, d-f) plasma (O2)-PP fabric

Fig. 5

Influence of different factor levels on the grafting rate: a) the influence of temperature on the grafting rate (12h, 4% crosslinker), b) the influence of time on the grafting rate (EGDE: 80°C, 4% crosslinker. TTMA:50°C, 4% crosslinker.), and c) the influence of the amount of crosslinker (EGDE: 80°C, 16h. TTMA:50°C, 12h.)
Influence of different factor levels on the grafting rate: a) the influence of temperature on the grafting rate (12h, 4% crosslinker), b) the influence of time on the grafting rate (EGDE: 80°C, 4% crosslinker. TTMA:50°C, 4% crosslinker.), and c) the influence of the amount of crosslinker (EGDE: 80°C, 16h. TTMA:50°C, 12h.)

Fig. 6

SEM images of the three finishing stages of PP fabric: a) untreated PP, b) PP treated by oxygen plasma, and c) PP grafted with PEG
SEM images of the three finishing stages of PP fabric: a) untreated PP, b) PP treated by oxygen plasma, and c) PP grafted with PEG

Fig. 7

Loose fiber suspension picture with different finishing methods: a) untreated PP, b) PP treated by oxygen plasma, c) PP grafted with sorbitol, d) PP grafted with maltitol, and e) PP grafted with PEG.
Loose fiber suspension picture with different finishing methods: a) untreated PP, b) PP treated by oxygen plasma, c) PP grafted with sorbitol, d) PP grafted with maltitol, and e) PP grafted with PEG.

Fig. 8

Changes in moisture absorption and desorption of untreated PP and grafted PP
Changes in moisture absorption and desorption of untreated PP and grafted PP

Absorption intensity of the characteristic peak and colouring performance of PP fabric after plasma treatment

Factors 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Power (W) 50 100 150 200 250 300 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
Time (s) 90 90 90 90 90 90 120 150 180 210 240 180 180
Flow (sccm) 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 250 200
O-H (3340 cm−1) 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.20 0.14 0.26 0.32 0.42 0.28 0.22 0.23 0.15
C=O (1716 cm−1) 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.18 0.28 0.22 0.37 0.41 0.50 0.39 0.24 0.31 0.19
Dye uptake (%) 12 15 18 25 30 28 32 33 37 29 27 26 21
K/S value 0.24 0.37 0.51 0.68 0.65 0.72 0.84 0.89 1.03 0.88 0.77 0.63 0.49

Electrostatic pressure peak value and half-life period of PP fabric with different finishing methods

Samples Electrostatic pressure peak value [V] Half-life period [s]
Untreated 1102 >99
PP-EGDE-Sorbitol 507 25
PP-EGDE-Maltitol 485 22
PP-EGDE-PEG 463 17
PP-TTMA-Sorbitol 405 14
PP-TTMA-Maltitol 389 13
PP-TTMA-PEG 342 9s