This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Azzopardi, E., Nash, R. 2013. A critical evaluation of importance–performance analysis. – Tourism Management, 35, 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.07.007.AzzopardiE.NashR.2013A critical evaluation of importance–performance analysis35222233https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.07.007.10.1016/j.tourman.2012.07.007Search in Google Scholar
Deng, J., McGill, D., Arbogast, D. 2017. Perceptions of challenges facing rural communities: An importance-performance analysis. – Tourism Analysis, 22, 219–236 https://doi.org/10.3727/108354217X14888192562401.DengJ.McGillD.ArbogastD.2017Perceptions of challenges facing rural communities: An importance-performance analysis22219236https://doi.org/10.3727/108354217X14888192562401.10.3727/108354217X14888192562401Search in Google Scholar
EPFU. 2019. Members of the Estonian Private Forest Union. (Eesti Erametsaliidu liikmed). [WWW document]. – URL https://erametsaliit.ee/liidust/liikmed/. [Accessed 11 February 2019]. (In Estonian)EPFU2019(Eesti Erametsaliidu liikmed). [WWW document]. – URL https://erametsaliit.ee/liidust/liikmed/. [Accessed 11 February 2019]. (In Estonian)Search in Google Scholar
Feliciano, D., Bouriaud, L., Brahic, E., Deuffic, P., Dobsinska, Z., Jarsky, V., Lawrence, A., Nybakk, E., Quiroga, S., Suarez, C., Ficko, A. 2017. Understanding private forest owners’ conceptualisation of forest management: Evidence from a survey in seven European countries. – Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.016.FelicianoD.BouriaudL.BrahicE.DeufficP.DobsinskaZ.JarskyV.LawrenceA.NybakkE.QuirogaS.SuarezC.FickoA.2017Understanding private forest owners’ conceptualisation of forest management: Evidence from a survey in seven European countries54162176https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.016.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.016Search in Google Scholar
Ficko, A., Boncina, A. 2015. Forest owner representation of forest management and perception of resource efficiency: a structural equation modeling study. – Ecology and Society, 20(1), 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07189-200136.FickoA.BoncinaA.2015Forest owner representation of forest management and perception of resource efficiency: a structural equation modeling study20136http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07189-200136.10.5751/ES-07189-200136Search in Google Scholar
Ficko, A., Lidestav, G., Ní Dhubháin, Á., Karppinen, H., Zivojinovic, I., Westin, K. 2019. European private forest owner typologies: A review of methods and use. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 21–31 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010.FickoA.LidestavG.Ní DhubháinÁ.KarppinenH.ZivojinovicI.WestinK.2019European private forest owner typologies: A review of methods and use992131https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010.10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010Search in Google Scholar
Forest policy. 1997. Approval of the Estonian forest policy. (Eesti metsapoliitika heakskiitmine). Riigi Teataja, RT I, 1997, 47, 768. (In Estonian).Forest policy1997(Eesti metsapoliitika heakskiitmine).Riigi Teataja, RT I199747768(In Estonian).Search in Google Scholar
Hujala, T., Tikkanen, J. 2008. Boosters of and barriers to smooth communication in family forest owners’ decision making. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23(5), 466–477. http://doi.org/10.1080/02827580802334209.HujalaT.TikkanenJ.2008Boosters of and barriers to smooth communication in family forest owners’ decision making235466477http://doi.org/10.1080/02827580802334209.10.1080/02827580802334209Search in Google Scholar
Janota, J.J., Broussard, S.R. 2008. Examining private forest policy preferences. – Forest Policy and Economics, 10(3), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2007.06.001.JanotaJ.J.BroussardS.R.2008Examining private forest policy preferences1038997https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2007.06.001.10.1016/j.forpol.2007.06.001Search in Google Scholar
Karppinen, H. 2012. New forest owners and owners-to-be: apples and oranges? – Small-scale Forestry, 11, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9165-z.KarppinenH.2012New forest owners and owners-to-be: apples and oranges?111526https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9165-z.10.1007/s11842-011-9165-zSearch in Google Scholar
Keskkonnaagentuur. 2017. Yearbook Forest 2016. (Aastaraamat Mets 2016). Tallinn, Keskkonnaagentuur. 293 pp. (In Estonian).Keskkonnaagentuur2017(Aastaraamat Mets 2016).TallinnKeskkonnaagentuur293(In Estonian).Search in Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Los Angeleses, SAGE. 441 pp.KrippendorffK.2004Los AngelesesSAGE441Search in Google Scholar
Krott, M. 2005. Forest Policy Analysis. Dordrecht, Springer-Verlag.KrottM.2005DordrechtSpringer-VerlagSearch in Google Scholar
Lai, I.K.W., Hitchcock, M. 2015. Importance–performance analysis in tourism: A framework for researchers. – Tourism Management, 48, 242–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.11.008.LaiI.K.W.HitchcockM.2015Importance–performance analysis in tourism: A framework for researchers48242267https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.11.008.10.1016/j.tourman.2014.11.008Search in Google Scholar
Martilla, J.A., James, J.C. 1977. Importance–performance analysis. – Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79.MartillaJ.A.JamesJ.C.1977Importance–performance analysis411777910.1177/002224297704100112Search in Google Scholar
Matilainen, A., Koch, M., Zivojinovic, I., Lähdesmäki, M., Lidestav, G., Karppinen, H., Didolot, F., Jarsky, V., Põllumäe, P., Colson, V., Hricova, Z., Glavonjic, P., Scriban, R.E. 2019. Perceptions of ownership among new forest owners – A qualitative study in European context. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.06.002.MatilainenA.KochM.ZivojinovicI.LähdesmäkiM.LidestavG.KarppinenH.DidolotF.JarskyV.PõllumäeP.ColsonV.HricovaZ.GlavonjicP.ScribanR.E.2019Perceptions of ownership among new forest owners – A qualitative study in European context994351https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.06.002.10.1016/j.forpol.2018.06.002Search in Google Scholar
Pivoriūnas, A., Lazdinis, M. 2004. Needs of private forest owners in the context of changing political systems: Lithuania as a case study. – Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 3(2): 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-004-0014-1.PivoriūnasA.LazdinisM.2004Needs of private forest owners in the context of changing political systems: Lithuania as a case study32191202https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-004-0014-1.10.1007/s11842-004-0014-1Search in Google Scholar
Private Forest Centre. 2018. Support system for private forest owner. (Tugisüsteem erametsaomanikule). [WWW document]. – URL http://www.eramets.ee/metsaomanike-koostoo-2/erametsanduse-tugisusteem/. [Accessed 19 August 2018]. (In Estonian).Private Forest Centre2018(Tugisüsteem erametsaomanikule). [WWW document]. – URL http://www.eramets.ee/metsaomanike-koostoo-2/erametsanduse-tugisusteem/. [Accessed 19 August 2018]. (In Estonian).Search in Google Scholar
Põllumäe, P., Korjus, H. 2017. Estonian private forestry: a review of research and developments. – Baltic Forestry, 23(3), 724–733.PõllumäeP.KorjusH.2017Estonian private forestry: a review of research and developments233724733Search in Google Scholar
Põllumäe, P., Korjus, H., Kaimre, P., Vahter, T. 2014. Motives and incentives for joining forest owner associations in Estonia. – Small-Scale Forestry, 13(1), 19–33. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-013-9237-3.PõllumäeP.KorjusH.KaimreP.VahterT.2014Motives and incentives for joining forest owner associations in Estonia1311933http://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-013-9237-3.10.1007/s11842-013-9237-3Search in Google Scholar
Quiroga, S., Suarez, C., Ficko, A., Feliciano, D., Bouriaud, L., Brahic, E., Deuffic, P., Dobsinska, Z., Jarsky, V., Lawrence, A., Nybakk, E. 2019. What influences European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies? – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.008.QuirogaS.SuarezC.FickoA.FelicianoD.BouriaudL.BrahicE.DeufficP.DobsinskaZ.JarskyV.LawrenceA.NybakkE.2019What influences European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies?99136144https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.008.10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.008Search in Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [WWW document]. – URL https://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 20 December 2019].R Core Team2018R Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna, Austria[WWW document]. – URL https://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 20 December 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Sarvašová, Z., Zivojinovic, I., Weiss, G., Dobšinská, Z., Drăgoi, M., Gál, J., Jarský, V., Mizaraite, D., Põllumäe, P., Šálka, J., Schiberna, E., Šišák, L., Wolfslehner, B., Zalite, Z., Zalitis, T. 2015. Forest owners associations in the Central and Eastern European region. – Small-scale Forestry, 14, 217–232. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9283-5.SarvašováZ.ZivojinovicI.WeissG.DobšinskáZ.DrăgoiM.GálJ.JarskýV.MizaraiteD.PõllumäeP.ŠálkaJ.SchibernaE.ŠišákL.WolfslehnerB.ZaliteZ.ZalitisT.2015Forest owners associations in the Central and Eastern European region14217232http://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9283-5.10.1007/s11842-014-9283-5Search in Google Scholar
Sarvašová, Z., Ali, T., Đorđević, I., Lukmine, D., Quiroga, S., Suárez, C., Hrib, M., Rondeux, J., Mantzanas, K.T., Franz, K. 2019. Natura 2000 payments for private forest owners in Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013 – a comparative view. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.019.SarvašováZ.AliT.ĐorđevićI.LukmineD.QuirogaS.SuárezC.HribM.RondeuxJ.MantzanasK.T.FranzK.2019Natura 2000 payments for private forest owners in Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013 – a comparative view99123135https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.019.10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.019Search in Google Scholar
Schaaf, K.A., Broussard, S.R. 2006. Private forest policy tools: A national survey exploring the American public’s perceptions and support. – Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 316–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.10.001.SchaafK.A.BroussardS.R.2006Private forest policy tools: A national survey exploring the American public’s perceptions and support9316334https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.10.001.10.1016/j.forpol.2005.10.001Search in Google Scholar
Serbruyns, I., Luyssaert, S. 2006. Acceptance of sticks, carrots and sermons as policy instruments for directing private forest management. – Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.012.SerbruynsI.LuyssaertS.2006Acceptance of sticks, carrots and sermons as policy instruments for directing private forest management9285296https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.012.10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.012Search in Google Scholar
Sever, I. 2015. Importance–performance analysis: A valid management tool? – Tourism Management, 48, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.022.SeverI.2015Importance–performance analysis: A valid management tool?484353https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.022.10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.022Search in Google Scholar
Snyder, S.A., Butler, B.J., Markowski-Lindsay, M. 2019. Small-area family forest ownerships in the USA. – Small-scale Forestry, 18, 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-018-9410-9.SnyderS.A.ButlerB.J.Markowski-LindsayM.2019Small-area family forest ownerships in the USA18127147https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-018-9410-9.10.1007/s11842-018-9410-9Search in Google Scholar
Sotirov, M., Sallnäs, O., Eriksson, L.O. 2019. Forest owner behavioral models, policy changes, and forest management. An agent-based framework for studying the provision of forest ecosystem goods and services at the landscape level. – Forest Policy and Economics, 103, 79–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.015.SotirovM.SallnäsO.ErikssonL.O.2019Forest owner behavioral models, policy changes, and forest management. An agent-based framework for studying the provision of forest ecosystem goods and services at the landscape level1037989http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.015.10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.015Search in Google Scholar
Tikkanen, J., Isokääntä, T., Pykäläinen, J., Leskinen, P. 2006. Applying cognitive mapping approach to explore the objective-structure of forest owners in a Northern Finnish case area. – Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 139–152. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.04.001.TikkanenJ.IsokääntäT.PykäläinenJ.LeskinenP.2006Applying cognitive mapping approach to explore the objective-structure of forest owners in a Northern Finnish case area9139152http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.04.001.10.1016/j.forpol.2005.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Toivonen, R., Järvinen, E., Lindroos, K., Rämö, A.-K., Ripatti, P. 2005. The challenge of information service development for private forest owners: The Estonia and Finland cases. – Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 4, 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-005-0028-3.ToivonenR.JärvinenE.LindroosK.RämöA.-K.RipattiP.2005The challenge of information service development for private forest owners: The Estonia and Finland cases4451469https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-005-0028-3.10.1007/s11842-005-0028-3Search in Google Scholar
Weiss, G., Lawrence, A., Lidestav, G., Feliciano, D., Hujala, T., Sarvašová, Z., Dobšinská, Z., Živojinović, I. 2019a. Research trends: Forest ownership in multiple perspectives. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 1–8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.006.WeissG.LawrenceA.LidestavG.FelicianoD.HujalaT.SarvašováZ.DobšinskáZ.ŽivojinovićI.2019aResearch trends: Forest ownership in multiple perspectives9918http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.006.10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.006Search in Google Scholar
Weiss, G., Lawrence, A., Hujala, T., Lidestav, G., Nichiforel, L., Nybakk, E., Quiroga, S., Sarvašová, Z., Suarez, C., Živojinović, I. 2019b. Forest ownership changes in Europe: State of knowledge and conceptual foundations. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 9–20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.003.WeissG.LawrenceA.HujalaT.LidestavG.NichiforelL.NybakkE.QuirogaS.SarvašováZ.SuarezC.ŽivojinovićI.2019bForest ownership changes in Europe: State of knowledge and conceptual foundations99920http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.003.10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.003Search in Google Scholar