[Bartholomee, O., Grigulis, K., Colace, M. P., Arnoldi, C., Lavorel, S., 2018: Methodological uncertainties in estimating carbon storage in temperate forests and grasslands. Ecological Indicators, 1:331–342.10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.054]Search in Google Scholar
[Bateman, I., Lovett, A., 2000: Estimating and valuing the carbon sequestered in softwood and hardwood trees, timber products and forest soils in Wales. Journal of Environmental Management, 60:301–323.10.1006/jema.2000.0388]Search in Google Scholar
[Burke, T., Whyatt, D., Blackburn, A., Rowland, C., Abbatt, J., 2020: Large-scale tree planting in the UK: feasibility and implications, Lancaster: UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, 9 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Long, J. R., Jackson, B. G., Wilkinson, A., Pritchard, W. J., Oakley, S., Mason, K.E. et al., 2019: Relationships between plant traits, soil properties and carbon fluxes differ between monocultures and mixed communities in temperate grassland. Journal of Ecology, 107:1704–1719.10.1111/1365-2745.13160661775031341333]Search in Google Scholar
[Dunn, M., Sing, L., Clarke, T., Moseley, D., 2020: Attitudes Towards Landscape Benefits and Woodland Creation in Southern Scotland, Forest Research, 42 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elwin, A., Clark, J. M., Short, C., Badjana, M., Neumann, J., Elwin, A., 2020: LANDWISE NFM scenario workshop initial findings for the Loddon Catchment – Report of Loddon Catchment workshop, 11 October 2019, for workshop participants and the Loddon Catchment Partnership. Unpublished.]Search in Google Scholar
[England, J. R., Paul, K. L., Cunningham, S. C., Madhavan, D. B., Baker, T. G., Read, Z. et al., 2016: Previous land use and climate influence differences in soil organic carbon following reforestation of agricultural land with mixed-species plantings. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 227:61–72.10.1016/j.agee.2016.04.026]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans, M., 2013: 12.11 Peatland Geomorphology. In: Shroder, J. (eds.): Treatise on Geomorphology. Academic Press, p. 165–181.10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00327-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Garcia de Jalon, S., Graves, A., Palma, J. H. N., Williams, A., Upson, M., 2018: Modelling and valuing the environmental impacts of arable, forestry and agroforestry systems: a case study. Agroforestry Systems, 4:1059–1073.10.1007/s10457-017-0128-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Giannitsopoulos, M. L., Graves, A. R., Burgess, P. J., Crous-Duran, J., Moreno, G., Herzog, F. et al., 2020: Whole system valuation of arable, agroforestry and tree-only systems at three case study sites in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 23.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122283]Search in Google Scholar
[Gregg, R., Elias, J. L., Alonso, I., Crosher, I. E., Muto, P., Morecroft, M. D., 2021: Carbon storage and sequestration by habitat: a review of the evidence (second edition) – Natural England Research Report NERR094, York: Natural England, 58 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grunelberg, E., Ziche, D., Wellbrock, N., 2014: Organic Carbon Stocks and Sequestration Rates of Forest Soils in Germany. Global Change Biology, 8:2644–2662.10.1111/gcb.12558425752424616061]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, S., 2018: A novel agroecosystem: Beef production in abandoned farmland as a multifunctional alternative to rewilding. Agricultural Systems, 167:10–16.10.1016/j.agsy.2018.08.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamilton, W., Bosworth, G., Ruto, E., 2015: Entrepreneurial younger farmers and the “young farmer problem” in England. Agriculture and Forestry, 61:61–69.10.17707/AgricultForest.61.4.05]Search in Google Scholar
[Hardaker, A., 2018: Is forestry really more profitable than upland farming? A historic and present day farm level economic comparison of upland sheep farming and forestry in the UK. Land Use Policy, 71:98–120.10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.032]Search in Google Scholar
[Howley, P., Buckley, C., O’Donoghue, C., Ryan, M., 2015. Explaining the economic ‘irrationality’ of farmers’ land use behaviour: The role of productivist attitudes and non-pecuniary benefits. Ecological Economics, 109:186–193.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyland, J. J., Jones, D. L., Parkhill, K. A., Barnes, A. P., Williams, A. P., 2016: Farmers’ perceptions of climate change: identifying types. Agriculture and Human Values, 33:323–339.10.1007/s10460-015-9608-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaske, K., Garcia de Jalon, S., Williams, A., Graves, A., 2021: Assessing the Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Economic Profitability of Arable, Forestry, and Silvoarable Systems. Sustainability, 7:363710.3390/su13073637]Search in Google Scholar
[Lange, M., Eisenhauer, N., Sierra, C. A., Bessler, H., Engels, C., Griffiths, R. I. et al., 2015: Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage. Nature Communications, 6:1–8.10.1038/ncomms770725848862]Search in Google Scholar
[Lawerence, A., Dandy, N., Urquhart, J., 2010: Landowner attitudes to woodland creation and management in the UK, Farnham: Forest Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lawrence, A., Edwards, D., 2013: Prospects for new productive woodland in Scotland: Insights from stake-holders, Roslin: Forestry Commission, 75 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maguire, P., Donofrio, S., Merry, W., Myers, K., Weatherer, L., Wildish, J. et al., 2021: A Green Growth Spurt – State of Forest Carbon Finance 2021, Washington DC: Ecosystem Marketplace, 64 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Manzoor, S. A., Griffiths, G., Rose, D. C., Lukac, M., 2021: The Return of Wooded Landscapes in Wales: An Exploration of Possible Post-Brexit Futures. Land, 10: 59–64.10.3390/land10010059]Search in Google Scholar
[Matthews, K. B., Wardell-Johnson, D., Miller, D., Fitton, N., Jones, E., Bathgate, S. et al., 2020: Not seeing the carbon for the trees? Why area-based targets for establishing new woodlands can limit or underplay their climate change mitigation benefits. Land Use Policy, 97: 104690.10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104690]Search in Google Scholar
[Morison, J., Matthews, R., Miller, G., Perks, M., Randle, T., Vanguelova, E. et al., 2012: Understanding the carbon and greenhouse gas balance of forests in Britain - Forestry Commission Research Report, Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 149 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nijnik, M., Pajot, G., Moffat, A., Slee, B., 2013: An economic analysis of the establishment of forest plantations in the United Kingdom to mitigate climatic change. Forest Policy and Economics, 26:34–42.10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Neill, C., Lim, F., Edwards, D., Osborne, C., 2020: Forest regeneration on European sheep pasture is an economically viable climate change mitigation strategy. Environmental Research Letters, 15: 104090.10.1088/1748-9326/abaf87]Search in Google Scholar
[Ostle, N., Levy, P., Evans, C., Smith, P., 2009: UK land use and soil carbon sequestration. Land Use Policy, 26:274–283.10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Ovando, P., Begueria, S., Campos, P., 2019: Carbon sequestration or water yield? The effect of payments for ecosystem services on forest management decisions in Mediterranean forests. Water Resources and Economics, 28:100119.10.1016/j.wre.2018.04.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Patenaude, G., Briggs, B.D.J., Milne, R., Rowland, C.S., Dawson, T.P., Pryor, S.N., 2003: The carbon pool in a British Semi-Natural Woodland. Forestry, 76:109–119.10.1093/forestry/76.1.109]Search in Google Scholar
[Poulton, P., Pye, E., Hargreaves, P., Jenkinson, D., 2003: Accumulation of carbon and nitrogen by old arable land reverting to woodland. Global Change Biology, 9:942–955.10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00633.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Redman, G., 2020: John Nix Pocketbook. 51st ed. Melton Mowbray, The Andersons Centre, 303 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reid, C., Hornigold, K., McHenry, E., Nichols, C., Townsend, M., Lewthwaite, K. et al., 2021: State of the UK’s Woods and Trees, Woodland Trust, 245 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruskule, A., Nikodemus, O., Kasparinskis, R., Prižavoite, D., Bojāre, D., Brūmelis, G., 2016: Soil–vegetation interactions in abandoned farmland within the temperate region of Europe. New Forests, 47:587–605.10.1007/s11056-016-9532-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryan, M., O’Donoghue, C. & Hynes, S., 2018: Heterogeneous economic and behavioural drivers of the Farm afforestation decision. Journal of Forest Economics, 33:63–74.10.1016/j.jfe.2018.11.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Senapati, N., Chabbi, A., Gastal, F., Smith, P., Mascher, N., Loubet, B. et al., 2014: Net carbon storage measured in a mowed and grazed temperate sown grassland shows potential for carbon sequestration under grazed system. Carbon Management, 5:131–144.10.1080/17583004.2014.912863]Search in Google Scholar
[Sławski, M., Tarabuła, T., Sławska, M., 2020: Does the enrichment of post-arable soil with organic matter stimulate forest ecosystem restoration–A view from the perspective of three decades after the afforestation of farmland. Forest Ecology and Management, 478:118525.10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118525]Search in Google Scholar
[Sharps, K., Masante, D., Thomas, A., Jackson, B., Redhead, J., May, L. et al., 2017: Comparing strengths and weaknesses of three ecosystem services modelling tools in a diverse UK river catchment. Science of the Total Environment, 584–585:118–130.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.16028147292]Search in Google Scholar
[Tupek, B., Zanchi, G., Verkerk, P. J., Churkina, G., Viovy, N., Hughes, J. K. et al., 2010: A comparison of alternative modelling approaches to evaluate the European forest carbon fluxes. Forest Ecology and Management, 260:241–251.10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.045]Search in Google Scholar
[Upson, M., Burgess, P., Morison, J., 2016: Soil carbon changes after establishing woodland and agroforestry trees in a grazed pasture. Geoderma, 283:10–20.10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.07.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Vanguelova, E. I., Nisbet, T. R., Moffat, A. J., Broadmeadow, S., Sanders, T. G. M., Morison, J. I. L., 2013: A New Evaluation of Carbon Stocks in British Forest Soils. Soil Use and Management, 29:169–181.10.1111/sum.12025]Search in Google Scholar
[Vinogradovs, I., Nikodemus, O., Elferts, D., Brūmelis, G., 2018: Assessment of site-specific drivers of farmland abandonment in mosaic-type landscapes: A case study in Vidzeme, Latvia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 253:113–121.10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Vlek, P. L. G., Khamzina, A., Azadi, H., Bhaduri, A., Bharati, L., Braimoh, A. et al., 2017: Trade-Offs in Multi-Purpose Land Use under Land Degradation. Sustainability, 9:1–19.10.3390/su9122196]Search in Google Scholar
[Watkins, C., Williams, D., Lloyd, T., 1996: Constraints on farm woodland planting in England: a study of Nottinghamshire farmers. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 69:167–176.10.1093/forestry/69.2.167]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilkes, M. A., Bennett, J., Burbi, S., Charlesworth, S., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Rayns, F. et al., 2020: Making Way for Trees? Changes in Land-Use, Habitats and Protected Areas in Great Britain under “Global Tree Restoration Potential”. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12145845]Search in Google Scholar
[Willett, W., Rockstrom, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S. et al., 2019: Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet, 393:447–492.10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Wynne-Jones, S., 2013: Carbon blinkers and policy blindness: The difficulties of “Growing Our Woodland in Wales”. Land Use Policy, 32:250–260.10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.012]Search in Google Scholar
[CCC, 2020: Land use: Policies for a Net Zero UK, London: Committee on Climate Change.]Search in Google Scholar
[Climate Change Act 2008: (c.27). London: The Stationary Office. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/contents]Search in Google Scholar
[Coe, S., Finlay, J., 2020: The Agriculture Act 2020, London: House of Commons.]Search in Google Scholar
[DBEIS, 2021: 2019 UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Final Figures, London: Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy.]Search in Google Scholar
[DBEIS, 2021: Green Book supplementary guidance: valuation of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for appraisal - Data tables 1 to 19: supporting the toolkit and the guidance. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/valuation-of-energy-use-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions-for-appraisal]Search in Google Scholar
[DEFRA, 2018: Moving away from Direct Payments – Agriculture Bill: Analysis of the impacts of removing Direct Payments. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/740669/agri-bill-evidence-slide-pack-direct-payments.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[DEFRA, 2021: Consultation outcome: Analysis of responses summary. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/environmental-land-management-policy-discussion-document/outcome/analysis-of-responses-summary]Search in Google Scholar
[EftEC, 2015: Developing UK Natural Capital Accounts: Woodland Ecosystem Accounts, London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.]Search in Google Scholar
[Environment Agency, 2020: WFD River Waterbody Catchments Cycle 2. Available at: https://data.gov.uk/dataset/298258ee-c4a0-4505-a3b5-0e6585ecfdb2/wfd-river-waterbody-catchments-cycle-2]Search in Google Scholar
[HM Government, 2018: A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment, London: HM Government.]Search in Google Scholar
[HM Treasury, 2020: The Green Book - Central Government Guidance of Appraisal and Evaluation, London: HM Treasury.]Search in Google Scholar
[IPCC, 2006: Chapter 2: Generic Methodologies Applicable to Multiple Land-Use Categories. In: 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. Hayama, p. 2.27.]Search in Google Scholar
[IPCC, 2019: Chapter 4: Forest Land. In: 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, p. 4.19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Loddon Observatory, 2021: Loddon Catchment. Available at: https://loddonobservatory.org/loddoncatchment/]Search in Google Scholar
[Met Office, 2016: UK Regional climates – Southern England. Available at: https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/binaries/content/assets/metofficegovuk/pdf/weather/learn-about/uk-past-events/regional-climates/southern-england_-climate---met-office.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[MHCLG, 2020: Land Use in England, 2018, London: Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.]Search in Google Scholar
[Natural Capital Project, 2021: Carbon Storage and Sequestration. Available at: http://releases.natural-capitalproject.org/invest-userguide/latest/carbon-storage.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Natural England, 2020: Provisional Agricultural Land Classification (ALC). Available at: https://data.gov.uk/dataset/952421ec-da63-4569-817d-4d6399df40a1/provisional-agricultural-land-classification-alc]Search in Google Scholar
[Stanford University, 2021: Natural Capital Project – Carbon. Available at: https://naturalcapitalproject.stanford.edu/software/invest-models/carbon]Search in Google Scholar
[UKCEH, 2019: Digimap – Environment Data Download. Available at: https://digimap.edina.ac.uk/roam/download/environment]Search in Google Scholar
[UKCEH, 2020: The UKCEH Land Cover Maps for 2017, 2018 and 2019, UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.]Search in Google Scholar
[World Bank Group, 2020: Country – United Kingdom. Available at: https://climateknowledgeportal.world-bank.org/country/united-kingdom#]Search in Google Scholar