[
Aggestam, F., Pülzl, H., 2020: Downloading Europe: A regional comparison in the uptake of the EU Forest Action Plan. Sustainability, 12:1–14.10.3390/su12103999
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andong, S., Ongolo, S., 2019: From global forest governance to domestic politics: The European forest policy reforms in Cameroon. Forest Policy and Economics, 111 p.10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., Hardin, R., 2008: Changing governance of the world´s forests. 320:1460–1462.10.1126/science.115536918556552
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arts, B., Buizer, M., 2009: Forests, discourses, institutions: A discoursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 11:340–347.10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arts, B., Giessen, L., Visseren-Hamakers, I., 2013: International Forest policy and Europe: Four pathways of mutual influence. What Science Can Tell Us, 2:37–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arts, B., Leroy, P., 2006: Institutional dynamics in environmental governance. Springer Netherlands, 294 p.10.1007/1-4020-5079-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arts, B., Leroy, P., van Tatenhove, J., 2006: Political modernisation and policy arrangements: a framework for understanding environmental policy change. Public Organization Review, 6:93–106.10.1007/s11115-006-0001-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arts, B., Appelstrand, M., Kleinschmit, D., Pülzl, H., Visseren-Hamakers, I. et al., 2010. Discourses, actors and instruments in international forest governance. Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of international forest governance, p. 57–72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bache, I., Flinders, M., 2004: Multi-level Governance. New York, Oxford University Press Inc., 237 p.10.1093/0199259259.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benčo, J., 2001: Metodológia vedeckého výskumu. Bratislava, IRIS, 194 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernstein, S., Cashore, B., 2012: Complex global governance and domestic policies: four pathways of influence. International Affairs, 3:585–604.10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01090.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Börzel, T. A., 2002: Pace-Setting, Foot-Dragging and Fence-Sitting, member states responses to Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40:193–214.10.1111/1468-5965.00351
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cinar, K., 2018: Convergence in public sector upsizing/downsizing: An analysis of post-communist countries and the EU. International journal of emerging and transition economies, 7:1–17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dryzek, J., 1997: The politics of the Earth: environmental discourses. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 270 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dimitrov, R. S., 2005: Hostage to norms: States, institutions and global forest politics. Global environmental politics, 5:1–22.10.1162/152638005774785499
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dimitrov, R. S., Sprinz, D. F., Diguisto, G. M., Kelle, A., 2007: International nonregimes: a research agenda. International studies review, 9:230–258.10.1111/j.1468-2486.2007.00672.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Edwards, P., Kleinschmit, D., 2013: Towards a European forest policy: Conflicting courses. Forest Policy and Economics, 33:87–93.10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Faggin, J. M., Behagel, J. H., 2017: Translating Sustainable Forest Management from the global to the domestic sphere: The case of Brazil. Forest Policy and Economics, 85:22–31.10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FAO 2020. The State of the World’s Forests 2020: Forests, biodiversity and people. Rome, FAO and UNEP, 188 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giessen, L., 2012: Reviewing empirical explanations of policy change: Options for its analysis and future fields of research. Allgemeine Forst Und Jagdzeitung, 182 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giessen, L., 2013: Reviewing the main characteristics of the international forest regime complex and partial explanations for its fragmentation. International Forestry Review, 15:60–70.10.1505/146554813805927192
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giessen, L., Buttoud, G., 2014: Defining and Assesssing Forest Governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 49:1–3.10.1016/j.forpol.2014.11.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giessen, L., Kleinschmit, D., Böcher, 2009: Between power and legitimacy- discourse and expertise in forest and environmental governance. Forest policy and economics, 11:452–453.10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glück, P., Angelsen, A., Appelstrand, M., Assemble-Mvondo, S., Auld, G. et al., 2010: Core components of the international forest regime complex. In Overcoming to challenges to integration: embracing complexity in forest policy design through multi-level governance. A global assessment report. IUFRO, Vienna, 28:37–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hajer, M., 1995: The politics of environemntal discourse, ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 332 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hajer, M., 2003: Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36:175–195.10.1023/A:1024834510939
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hall, P. A., 1996: Political Science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, p. 936–957.10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hall, P. A., 2006: Systematic process analysis: when and how to use it. European Management Review, p. 24–31.10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500050
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henry, L. A., Tysiachniouk, M., 2018: The uneven response to global environmental governance: Russia´s contentious politics of forest certification. Forest Policy and Economics, 90:97–105.10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogl, K., 1999: The Austrian domestic forest policy community in change? Impacts of the globalisation and Europeanisation of forest politics. Forest Policy and Economics, p. 3–13.10.1016/S1389-9341(99)00003-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Humphreys, D., 2003: Life protective or carcinogenic challenge?: Global forests governance under advanced capitalism. Global environmental politics 3:40–55.10.1162/152638003322068209
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Humphreys, D., 2009: Discourse as ideology: Neoliberalism and the limits of international forest policy. Forest policy and economics, 11:319–325.10.1016/j.forpol.2008.08.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Howlett, M., Rayner, J., Goehler, D., Heidbreder, E., Perron-Welch, F., Rukundo, O. et al., 2010: Overcoming to challenges to integration: embracing complexity in forest policy design through multi-level governance. A global assessment report. IUFRO, Vienna, 28:93–110.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kleinschmit, D., Böcher, M., Giessen, L., 2009: Discourse and expertise in forest and environmental governance. Forest policy and economics 11:309–312.10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konôpka, J. et al., 2010: Príručka vlastníka a obhospodarovateľa lesa. Zvolen, NLC, 212 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krasner, S. D., 1982: Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International organization 36:185–205.10.1017/S0020818300018920
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krott, M., Bader, A., Schusser, C., Devkota, R., Maryudi, A., Giessen, L., Aurenhammer, H., 2013: Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, p. 1–9.10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liefferink, D., 2006: The dynamics of policy arrangements: turning round the tetrahedron. In: Arts, B., Leroy, P. (eds) Institutional dynamics in environmental governance. Springer, Dodrecht, p. 45–68.10.1007/1-4020-5079-8_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Logmani, J., Krott, M., Lecyk, M. T., Giessen, L., 2017: Customizing elements of the International Forest Regime Complex in Poland? Non-implementation of a National Forest Programme and redefined transposition of NATURA 2000 in Bialowieza Forest. Forest Policy and Economics, 74:81–90.10.1016/j.forpol.2016.11.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marcos-Martinez, R., Bryan, B. A., Schwabe, K. A., Connor, J. D., Law, E. A., Nolan, M., Sánchez, J. J., 2019: Projected social costs of CO2 emissions from forest losses far exceed the sequestration benefits of forest gains under global change. Ecosystem Services, 37:1–10.10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100935
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maier, C., Lindner, T., Winkel, G., 2014: Stakeholders´ perceptions of participation in forest policy: A case study from Baden-Württemberg. Land Use Policy, 39:166–176.10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.02.018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meuser, M., Nagel, U., 1991: Experteninterviews – viel-– viel- vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht, Ein Beitrag qualitativen Methodensdiskussion, In: Garz, D., Kraimer, K. (ed.): Qualitativ-empirische Sozialforschung: Konzepte, Methoden, Analysen, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, p. 441–471.10.1007/978-3-322-97024-4_14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mwangi, E., Wardell, A., 2012: Multi-level governance of forest resources. International journal of the Commons, 6/2:79–103.10.18352/ijc.374
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paraskevopoulos, CH. J., Getimis, P., Rees, N., 2006: Adapting to EU Multi-Level Governance. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 301 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, M. S., 2015: Inter-Korean forest cooperation 1998–2012: A policy arrangement approach. Sustainability, 7:5241–5259.10.3390/su7055241
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, M. S., Lee, H., 2019: Accountability and reciprocal interests of bilateral forest cooperation under the global forest regime. Forest Policy and Economics, 101:32–44.10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pülzl, H., Hogl, K., 2013: Forest governance in Europe. What Science Can Tell Us, 2:11–17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pülzl, H., Mayer, P., 2015: Assessment of the achievements and added value of the Forest Europe Process. Technical report, 17 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rayner, J., Howlett, M., 2009: Introduction: Understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution. Policy and society, p. 99–109.10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rayner, J., Buck, A., Katila, P., 2010: Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. A global assessment report. IUFRO, Vienna, 28:172.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sabatier, P., 1988: An Advocacy Coalition Framework of policy change and the role of policy learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21:128–168.10.1007/BF00136406
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scharpf, F. W., 2000: Institutions in comparative policy research. Max Planck institute for the study of societies, p. 1–24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schneider, V., 2009: Governance and complexity. Oxford university press, p. 129–142.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schusser, C., Krott, M., Movuh, M. C. Y., Logmani, J., Devkota, R. R., Maryudi, A. et al., 2015: Powerful stakeholders as drivers of community forestry – Results of an international study. Forest policy and Economics, 58:92–101.10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schusser, C., Krott, M., Movuh, M., C., Y., Logmani, J., Devkota, R. R., Maryudi, A., Salla, M., 2016: Comparing Community Forestry Actors in Cameroon, Indonesia, Namibia, Nepal and Germany. Policy Economics, 68:81–87.10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singer, B., Giessen, L., 2017: Towards a donut regime? Domestic actors, climatization, and the hollowing-out of the international forests regime in Anthropocene. Forest Policy and Economics, 79:69–79.10.1016/j.forpol.2016.11.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smolík, J., 2014: Úvod do studia mezinárodních vztahů. Praha, Grada Publishing, 232 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sotirov, M., Arts, B., 2018: Integrated forest governance in Europe: An introduction to the special issue on forest policy integration and integrated forest management. Land use policy, 79:960–967.10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sotirov, M., Storch, S., 2018: Resilience through policy integration in Europe? Domestic forest policy changes as response to absorb pressure to integrate biodiversity conservation, bioenergy use and climate protection in France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. Land use policy, 79:977–989.10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sotirov, M., Pokorny, B., Kleinschmit, D., Kanowski, P., 2020: International Forest Governance and Policy: Institutional Architecture and Pathways of Influence in Global Sustainability. Sustainability, 12:1–25.10.3390/su12177010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Surubaru, N. C., 2017: Revisiting the role of domestic politics: politicisation and European Cohesion Policy performance in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics, 33:106–125.10.1080/21599165.2017.1279606
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šálka, J., 2006: Analýza verejnej politiky v lesníctve. Zvolen, Technická univerzita vo Zvolene, 63 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šálka, J., Dobšinská, Z., Sarvašová, Z., Štěrbová, M., Paluš, H., 2017: Lesnícka politika. Zvolen, Vydavateľstvo Technickej univerzity vo Zvolene, 275 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weber, N., 2012: Reflections on theories in forest policy: Testing, combining or building? Forest Policy and Economics, 16:102–108.10.1016/j.forpol.2011.02.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolfslehner, B., Lindner, M., Nabuurs, G. J., 2013: European forests: setting the context. What science can tell us, p. 19–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolfslehner, B., Pülzl, H., Kleisnchmit, D., Aggestam, F., Winkel, G., Candel, J. et al., 2020: European forest governance post-2020. From science to policy, 52 p.10.36333/fs10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wydra, D., 2013: The legal context of European forest policy-making. What science can tell us, p. 29–36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yin, R. K., 2009: Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
