Accès libre

Job satisfaction among Ethiopian nurses: a systematic review

À propos de cet article

Citez

Figure 1

Flowchart of the study selection and inclusion process.
Flowchart of the study selection and inclusion process.

Figure 2

Forest plot of the six studies that quantitatively assessed prevalence of nurses’ job satisfaction in Ethiopia, 2017.
Forest plot of the six studies that quantitatively assessed prevalence of nurses’ job satisfaction in Ethiopia, 2017.

Descriptive summary of six studies included in the meta-analysis of the prevalence of nurses’ job satisfaction in Ethiopia

Location of study area Study place Authors name Publication Year Response rate (%) Sample size Prevalence (95% CI)
Central part of Ethiopia West Shoa Zone hospitals Mulugeta et al.12 2015 100 166 30.70 (23.68,37.72)
East Gojam Zone hospitals Haile et al.14 2017 98.3 178 54.20 (46.88.61.52)
Addis Ababa Sinidu et al.16 2014 100 70 8.58 (2.02,15.14)
South-Eastern part of Ethiopia Sidama Zone hospitals Agezegn et al.13 2014 87 542 47.50 (41.21,53.29)
Harari region hospitals Ayele et al.15 2015 100 182 37.90 (30.85,44.95)
Jimma University Specialized Teaching Hospital Semachew et al.4 2017 92.7 316 58.13 (52.69,63.57)
Total nurses included in the study 1,151 39.53 (24.52,54.53)

Factors affecting nurses’ job satisfaction in each study of Ethiopia, 2017.

Study area, Author reference Key findings Comments
Sidama Zone public hospitals13 Nurses with service between 5 and 10 years (78% less likely to be satisfied (OR = 0.22 (95%CI: 0.06, 0.96))) As experience increases, job satisfaction might decrease
Leadership relation in the organization (OR = 23.30 (95%CI: 5.02, 108.22)) Positive predictor of job satisfaction
Work environment and group cohesion (OR = 26.63 (95% CI: 4.26, 16.20)) and 75% less likely to leave their work (OR = 0.25 (95%CI: 0.12, 0.51))
Recognition at work, employment opportunity, presence of training, autonomy, and promotion were also predictors of job satisfaction (P < 0.05) Over half of the nurses are satisfied with the leadership (57%), work environment (54.5%), and recognition at work (50.4%)
East Gojjam hospitals14 Promotion, salary, leadership (supervision), relationship with co-workers, work environment, communication, and rewards were found to be predictors (P < 0.05) A moderate level of satisfaction was observed in this study
Addis Ababa hospitals16 Predictor variables were:

relationship among staff (P < 0.001)

training opportunity (P < 0.04)

autonomy (50% of nurses were satisfied)

91.43% dissatisfied because of salary

Most nurses were not satisfied in this study and the reasons identified were bad working environment, poor salary, transport problem, administrative problems, and lack of training and benefits
Jimma University Specialized Teaching Hospital4 Mutual understanding at work, working environment, and professional commitment were positive predictors, whereas workload was a negative predictor (P < 0.05). Mutual understanding at work brings a sense of recognition and feeling of respect among nurses, which can lead to job satisfaction
Nurses were least satisfied with rewards and professional opportunities.
Leadership is not satisfying the nurses.
Salary was least satisfying (59.8%).
Education level was a negative predictor
eISSN:
2544-8994
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Medicine, Assistive Professions, Nursing