Research on the effects of family care degree on stigma and psychosocial adaptation among the patients with Parkinson’s disease

Sociodemographic variables	Number of people (n)	Constituent ratio (%)
Medical care payment mode
Self-paying	31	12.6
Chronic disease insurance	139	56.5
Other insurance	76	30.9
Sex
Male	127	51.6
Female	119	48.4
Age (years)
<60	55	22.3
60–69	92	37.4
70–79	79	32.1
≥80	20	8.1
Education
Junior high school or below	119	48.4
High school or technical secondary school	69	28.0
Junior college	46	18.7
Undergraduate or above	12	4.9
Marital status
Single	6	2.4
Married	200	81.3
Widowed/divorced/separated	40	16.3
Living status
Living alone	13	5.3
Living with his/her spouse	201	81.7
Living with other members	32	13.0
Personal monthly income (yuan)
<3000	115	46.7
3000–5000	94	38.2
>5000	37	15.0
Time of illness (years)
<1	25	10.2
<3	93	37.8
3–5	59	24.0
>5	69	28.0

Groups	n	Total score of stigma	Internalized stigma	Enacted stigma
Family function was good	132	51.87 ± 10.54	30.84 ± 6.80	21.03 ± 4.77
Family dysfunction	114	59.11 ± 10.70	35.44 ± 6.92	23.67 ± 4.80
t		−5.329	−5.243	−4.311
P		<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

Groups	n	Total score of psychosocial adaptation	Anxiety	Self-esteem, attitude	Self-attitude toward life	Self-acceptance	Self-efficacy	Social support
Family function was good	132	90.28 ± 13.50	18.97 ± 3.68	11.09 ± 1.71	16.54 ± 2.42	10.52 ± 2.47	13.18 ± 1.93	19.97 ± 4.03
Family dysfunction	114	77.30 ± 13.70	16.11 ± 3.42	9.07 ± 1.96	13.65 ± 3.00	9.16 ± 2.35	11.51 ± 2.07	17.81 ± 3.53
t		7.468	6.291	8.619	8.255	4.422	6.562	4.446
P		<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

Research on the effects of family care degree on stigma and psychosocial adaptation among the patients with Parkinson’s disease†