[
ABRAMAVIČIUS, Armanas. Teisė į teisminę gynybą Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismo Jurisprudencijoje [The right to judicial defense in the Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania]. Jurisprudencija. 2009, 3 (117).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Act on the Remuneration of Lawyers [online]. Available at: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_rvg/englisch_rvg.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BILEVIČIŪTĖ, Eglė et al. Lietuvos Konstitucinė Teisė [Lithuanian Constitutional Law]. Registrų Centras, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DEKEL, Omer. Should the Acquitted Recover Damages? The Right of an Acquitted Defendant to Receive Compensation for the Injury He Has Suffered. Criminal Law Bulletin. 2011, 47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case Beinarovič and Others v. Lithuania, Application no. 70520/10, 21920/10 and 41876/11, European Court of Human Rights, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case Černius and Rinkevičius v. Lithuania, Application no. 73579/17 and 14620/18, European Court of Human Rights, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case Dragan Kovačević v. Croatia, Application no. 49281/15, European Court of Human Rights, 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case Golder v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 4451/70, European Court of Human Rights, 1975.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case Klauz v. Croatia, Application no. 28963/10, European Court of Human Rights, 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania, Application no. 76943/11, European Court of Human Rights, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case Mihajlović v. Croatia, Application no. 21752/02, European Court of Human Rights, 2005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case Musa Tarhan v. Turkey, Application no. 12055/17, European Court of Human Rights, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case Stella and Others v. Italy, Application no. 49169/09, 54908/09, 55156/09 et al., European Court of Human Rights, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case Zubac v. Croatia, Application no. 40160/12, European Court of Human Rights, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Case Zustović v. Croatia, Application no. 27903/15, European Court of Human Rights, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 18 December 2000, 2000/C 364/01. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Poland [online]. Available at: https://legislationline.org/sites/default/files/documents/f6/Polish%20CPC%201997_am%202003_en.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DAMINOVA, Nasiya et al. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as a factor affecting the ‘European consensus’ notion (the example of ‘due process’ rights). European Studies-the Review of European Law, Economics and Politics. 2017, 4.1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2010/64/EU on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings [2010] OJ L 280/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2012/13/EU on the right to information in criminal proceedings [2012] OJ L 142/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2013/48/EU on the right to access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty [2013] OJ L 294/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2016/343/EU on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings [2016] OJ L 65/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2016/800/EU on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings [2016] OJ L 132/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2016/1919/EU on legal aid for suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings and for requested persons in European arrest warrant proceedings [2016] OJ L 297/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950). European e-Justice Portal [online]. Available at: https://e-justice.europa.eu/37/EN/costs?GERMANY&member=1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ES-HAGHI, Seyyed Jafar, SHEIDAEIAN, Mahdi. Public interest in criminal procedure and its challenges: an attitude toward Iranian criminal law. J. Pol. & L. 2016, 9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Federal Code for Lawyers [online]. Available at: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_brao/englisch_brao.html#:~:text=(1)%20A%20lawyer%20is%20the,only%20by%20a%20federal%20law
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GACSI, Anett Erzsebet et al. Right to the (effective) defence in the (new) Hungarian Code of Criminal Proceedings. Curentul Juridic. 2018, 73.2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
German Code of Criminal Procedure [online]. Available at: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stpo/englisch_stpo.html#p3087
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GHEORGHIU, Elena et al. Respect for the right of defence in accordance with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Studii Juridice şi Administrative. 2022, 26.1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GRUODYTĖ, Edita, MILČIUVIENĖ, Saulė, PALIONIENĖ, Neringa. The Principle of Direct Effect in Criminal Law: Theory and Practice. European Studies – the Review of European Law, Economics and Politics. 2020, 7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GUTNYK, Vitalli. The right to defence in criminal proceedings: international law aspects. Teisė. 2022, 14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej et al. The variations of judicial enforcement of EU charter of fundamental rights vis-á-vis union institutions and bodies. European Studies-the Review of European Law, Economics and Politics. 2018, 5.1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej et al. Penetration of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union into the Constitutional Order of the Czech Republic–Basic Scenarios. European Studies-the Review of European Law, Economics and Politics. 2020, 7.1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal of 26 July 2006, SK 21/04
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEONAITĖ, Erika. Proporcingumo principas Europos žmogaus teisių teismo jurisprudencijoje (Daktaro disertacija) [Principle of Proportionality in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights (Doctoral dissertation)]. Vilniaus universitetas, 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo proceso kodeksas [Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Lithuania]. Official Gazette. 2002, No. 37-1341.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MICHELS, Johan David. Compensating acquitted defendants for detention before international criminal courts. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2010, 8.2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Order of the Supreme Court of Lithuania of 12 February 2010 in case No. 3K-3-75/2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Order of the Supreme Court of Lithuania of 2 December 2011 in case No. 3K-7-375/2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Order of the Supreme Court of Lithuania of 13November 2015 in case No. 3K-3-572-969/2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Order of the Supreme Court of Lithuania of 18 December 2015 in case No. E3K-3-670-378/2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Order of the Supreme Court of Lithuania of 1 July 2020 in case No. 3K-3-205-313/2020. Order of the Supreme Court of Lithuania of 27 April 2017 in case No. e3K-3-214-695/2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Order of the Supreme Court of Lithuania of 23 May 2023 in case No. 2K-165-489/2023 Order of the Supreme Court of Lithuania of 17 April 2023 in case No. 2K-92-976/2023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PAPRZYCKI, Lech Krzysztof et. al. Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz Lex, 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PECORINO, Philip A. An Introduction to Philosophy [online]. Available at: https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialsciences/ppecorino/intro_text/Chapter%2010%20Political%20Philosophy/Group_vs_Individual_Interest.htm
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PERCIVAL, Robert V., MILLER, Geoffrey P. The Role of Attorney Fee Shifting in Public Interest Litigation. Law and Contemporary Problems. 1984, 47.1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RAMOS, Vânia Costa. The Rights of the Defence According to the ECtHR: An Illustration in the Light of ATV Luxembourg and the Right to Legal Assistance. New Journal of European Criminal Law. 2016, 7.4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Regulation of the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Poland of 28 September 2002 [online]. Avaible at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20021631348
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Report on the activities of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Lithuania in 2022. [online]. Available at: http://www.prokuraturos.lt/data/public/uploads/2023/03/2022-m.-ataskaita-2023-03-01-nr.-17.9.-1974.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROOS, Daniel. Compensation for costs and legal fees after acquittal or conviction [online]. Available at: https://ecba.org/content/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=672:copenhagen-2014&catid=40&Itemid=1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruling of the Wroclaw Court of Appeal of 16 December 2011 in case No. II AKz 523/11. Ruling of Katowice Court of Appeal of 14 September 2011 in case No. II AKz 613/11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruling of the Supreme Court of Poland of 28 January 2016 in case No. I KZP 16/15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 13 March 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure [online]. Available at: https://www.government.se/contentassets/a1be9e99a5c64d1bb93a96ce5d517e9c/the-swedish-code-of-judicial-procedure-ds-1998_65.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ŠALČIUS, Marijus, BILIUS, Mindaugas. Baudžiamojo proceso pažeidimu padarytos žalos atlyginimo teisinis reguliavimas ir vertinimo teismų praktikoje problematika [Legal Regulation of Compensation for Damage Caused by Violation of the Criminal Process and the Problem of Assessment in Court Practice]. Teisės apžvalga. 2016, 2(14).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ŠALČIUS, Marijus. Baudžiamojo proceso veiksmų (sprendimų) teisėtumo vertinimas baudži-amajame ir civiliniame procesuose [Evaluation of the lawfulness of criminal proceedings (decisions) in criminal and civil proceedings]. Teisės apžvalga. 2020, 2(22), pp. 22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ŠALČIUS, Marijus. Neteisėtais baudžiamojo proceso veiksmais padarytos žalos atlyginimo problematika: mokslo daktaro disertacija [Problems of compensation of damages inflicted by unlawful actions in the course of the criminal proceedings: doctoral dissertation]. Vytautas Magnus University, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ŠIŠKOVÁ, Naděžda et al. New Challenges for the EU in the Field of Human Rights (Focusing on the Mechanism of the Charter). European Studies-the Review of European Law, Economics and Politics. 2014, 1.1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ŚWIECKI, Dariusz et. al. Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz. Warszawa, 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TULU, Diriba Adugna. Withdrawal of Criminal Charges for the Sake of Public Interest in Ethiopia: Exploring Legal Gaps and Way Forward. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2021, 9(4).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VĖLYVIS, Stasys, ABROMAVIČIENĖ, Gitana. Kai kurios teisės kreiptis į teismą bendrosios sąlygos [General conditions for certain rights of appeal]. Jurisprudencija. 2006, 2 (80).
]Search in Google Scholar
