Accès libre

Improving Learning in a Traditional, Large-Scale Science Module with a Simple And Efficient Learning Design

   | 03 mars 2015
À propos de cet article

Citez

1. Aarhus Universitet (2011). Den Faglige Udviklingsproces. Øvrige bilag. Universitetsledelsen den. 9. marts. Retrieved July 2, 2014 from http://medarbejdere.au.dk/fileadmin/res/fau/dok/fau_bilag_oevrige_bilag_090311.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

2. Blumenfeld, P.C.; Soloway, E.; Marx, R.W.; Krajcik, J.S.; Guzdial, M.; Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. In Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), (pp. 369-398).10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8Search in Google Scholar

3. Bonwell, C.C. and Eison, J.A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.Search in Google Scholar

4. Britain, S. (2004). A review of learning design: concept, specifications and tools. A report for the JISC E-learning Pedagogy Programme, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

5. Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. In The journal of the learning sciences, 2(2), (pp. 141-178).10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2Search in Google Scholar

6. Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0Search in Google Scholar

7. Conole, G. and Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? In Association for Learning Technology Journal, 12(2), (pp. 113-124).Search in Google Scholar

8. Conole, G.; Dyke, M.; Oliver, M. and Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. In Computers & Education, 43(1), (pp. 17-33).10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.018Search in Google Scholar

9. Conole, G. and Fill, K. (2005). A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities. In Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2005(1).10.5334/2005-8Search in Google Scholar

10. Conole, G. and Oliver, M. (2002). Embedding theory into learning technology practice with toolkits. In Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2002(1).10.5334/2002-8Search in Google Scholar

11. Correll, A. (2014). Godt studiemiljø kan stadig forbedres. Retrieved from http://newsroom.au.dk/nyheder/vis/artikel/godt-studiemiljoe-kan-stadig-forbedres/.Search in Google Scholar

12. Course Catalogue (2013). Calculus 2 (Q2) - Search Course. Retrieved March 04, 2014 from http://kursuskatalog.au.dk/en/coursecatalog/Course/show/41378/.Search in Google Scholar

13. Creswell, J.W. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Fourth Edition. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Search in Google Scholar

14. Cross, S. and Conole, G. (2009). Learn about learning design. Part of the OU Learn about series of guides. The Open University: Milton Keynes. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/OULDI/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Learn-aboutlearning- design_v7.doc.Search in Google Scholar

15. Daniel, J.; Kanwar, A. and Uvalić-Trumbić, S. (2009). Breaking higher education’s iron triangle: Access, cost, and quality. In Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 41(2), (pp. 30-35).Search in Google Scholar

16. The Danish Government (2012). Danmark i arbejde - udfordringer for dansk økonomi mod 2020. Retrieved from http://www.stm.dk/multimedia/danmark_i_arbejde_- _udfordringer_for_dansk__konomi_mod_2020_web.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

17. The Danish Ministry of Education (2014a). Andel af en årgang der forventes at få en uddannelse - Undervisningsministeriet. Retrieved from http://uvm.dk/Service/Statistik/Tvaergaaendestatistik/ Andel-af-en-aargang-der-forventes-at-faa-en-uddannelse.Search in Google Scholar

18. The Danish Ministry of Education (2014b). Metode bag fremskrivning af en ungdomsårgangs uddannelsesniveau samt deres tidsforbrug. Retrieved from http://uvm.dk/~/media/UVM/Filer/Stat/PDF14/140321%2014022014Metode%20bag%2 0profilmodellen_ny.ashx.Search in Google Scholar

19. Earle, R.S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. In Educational Technology, 42(1), (pp. 5-13).Search in Google Scholar

20. Garrison, D.R. and Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. In The internet and higher education, 7(2), (pp. 95-105).10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001Search in Google Scholar

21. Godsk, M. (2013). STREAM: a Flexible Model for Transforming Higher Science Education into Blended and Online Learning. In T. Bastiaens & G. Marks (eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2013, (pp. 722-728). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Search in Google Scholar

22. Godsk, M. (2014). Efficient Learning Design - Concept, Catalyst, and Cases. Ascilite 2014: Rhetoric and Reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology, Dunedin, New Zealand, 23-26 November.Search in Google Scholar

23. Hines, P.J.; Mervis, J.; McCartney, M.; Wible, B. (eds). (2013). Grand challenges in science education. Science, (p. 340).Search in Google Scholar

24. Jones, S.R. (1992). Was there a Hawthorne effect? In American Journal of Sociology.Search in Google Scholar

25. Mazur, E. and Hilborn, R.C. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. In Physics Today, 50(4), (pp. 68-69). 10.1063/1.881735Search in Google Scholar

26. Novak, G.M.; Patterson, E.T.; Gavrin, A.D.; Christian, W. (1999). Just-in-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

27. Price, L. and Kirkwood, A. (2011). Enhancing professional learning and teaching through technology: a synthesis of evidence-based practice among teachers in higher education. The Open University. Retrieved from http://www.lth.se/fileadmin/lth/genombrottet/DTR/PLATP_Main_Report_2011.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

28. Romiszowski, A.J. (2004). How’s the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation. In Educational Technology, 44(1), (pp. 5-27).Search in Google Scholar

29. Simkins, S.P. and Maier, M.H. (eds.) (2010). Just-in-Time Teaching: Across the Disciplines, and Across the Academy. Sterling: Stylus Publishing, LLC.Search in Google Scholar

30. Twigg, C. (2009). Improving Learning and Reducing Costs for Online Learning. In P.L. Rogers, G.A. Berg, J.V. Boettcher, C. Howard, L. Justice & K. Schenk (eds.), Encyclopedia of Distance Learning, (pp. 1148-1154), Second Edition. Hershey: IGI Global.Search in Google Scholar

31. Twigg, C. (2013). An overview of course redesign. The National Center for Academic Transformation. Retrieved from http://www.thencat.org/Articles/An Overview of Course Redesign.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

32. Weller, M. (2002). Delivering learning on the Net: The why, what & how of online education. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1027-5207
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
2 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Social Sciences, Education, Curriculum and Pedagogy, other