[
Ashour, S., & Kleimann, B. (2024). Private higher education: a comparative study of Germany and the United Arab Emirates. Research Papers in Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2024.2318033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bağdatlı Kalkan, S., Turanlı, M., & Özden, Ü. H. (2017). Comparison of ranking results obtained by TOPSIS and VIKOR methods, using the same criteria as Times Higher Education World University ranking.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buckner, E. (2017). The Worldwide Growth of Private Higher Education: Cross-National Patterns of Higher Education Institution Foundings by Sector. Sociology of Education 90 (4): 296–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040717739613.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belenkuyu, C., & Karadag, E. (2024). Better than not starting? Research university project of Turkey. Studies in Higher Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2328829
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chakraborty, S. (2022). TOPSIS and Modified TOPSIS: A comparative analysis. Decision Analytics Journal, 2, 100021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Civera, A., Lehmann, E.E., Paleari, S., Stockinger, S.A.E. (2020). Higher Education Policy: Why Hope for Quality When Rewarding Quantity?. Research Policy 49 (8): 104083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104083.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feng, J., Yan, Y., Huang, M., Du, Y., Lu, Z., & Li, B. (2022). A study on the multi-attribute decision theory and methods. Procedia Computer Science, 214, 544-551.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fu, Y.C., Macasaet, B.T., Quetzal, A.S., Junedi, J. & Moradel-Vásquez, J.J. (2023, November). In pursuit of excellence: a historical investigation of scientific production in Indonesia’s higher education system, 1990–2020. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01128-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbons, S., Neumayer, E., & Perkins, R. (2015). Student satisfaction, league tables and university applications: Evidence from Britain. Economics of Education Review, 48, 148–164. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.07.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gonzales, L.D., Núñez, AM. (2021). The Ranking Regime and the Production of Knowledge: Implications for Academia. In: Welch, A., Li, J. (eds) Measuring Up in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7921-9_4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lai, Y. J., Liu, T. Y., & Hwang, C. L. (1994). Topsis for MODM. European journal of operational research, 76(3), 486–500.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moradi, N. (2022). Performance Evaluation of University Faculty by Combining BSC, AHP, and TOPSIS: from the Students’ Perspective. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v14i2.915
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Entity for Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Higher Education, (2023). Accreditation Outcomes for Institutions of Higher Education and Study Programmes in Serbia, 07/02/2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Qi, H., Wang, Y., & Liu, L. (2022, December). Quantitative Analysis of Higher Education Based on AHP-TOPSIS. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2381, No. 1, p. 012034). IOP Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pucciarelli, F., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Business Horizons, 59(3), 311–320. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Şahinbaş, K., & Keskin, A. (2022). Data analysis of the top universities in the ranking via the topsis model. Tarsus Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 130–143.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sanoff, A.P. (2007). The U.S. news college rankings: a view from the inside’, in College and University Ranking Systems: Global Perspectives and American Challenges, Institute for Higher Education Policy.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(11), 1073-1076.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, T. C., Thu Nguyen, T. T., & Phan, B. N. (2022). Analyzing higher education performance by entropy-TOPSIS method: A case study in Viet Nam private universities. Measurement and Control, 55(5–6), 385–410.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, N., Ren, Z., Zhang, Z., & Fu, J. (2022). Evaluation and prediction of higher education system based on AHP-TOPSIS and LSTM neural network. Applied Sciences, 12(10), 4987. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12104987
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, H. M., Ma, R. Q., Deng, M. X., & Liu, X. B. (2021). Research on evaluation and improvement policy of higher education development based on TOPSIS-synthetic control method. Complexity, 2021, 1–11.
]Search in Google Scholar
